Class participation as a pedagogical tool in social work education

References

• Askeland, G. A., & Fook, J. (2009). Critical reflection in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 287–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, J. C., & Peterson, D. (1998). Grading classroom participation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Brett, C., Forrester, B. C., & Fujita, N. (2009). Online learning journals as an instructional and self-assessment tool for epistemological growth. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(1). Retrieved from https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/cjlt/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26406/19588
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, S. (2013). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking. New York, NY: Broadway Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, P. E., Graham-Day, K. J., Ressa, V. A., Peters, M. T., & Konrad, M. (2014). Beyond involvement: Promoting student ownership of learning in classrooms. Interventions in School and Clinic, 50(2), 105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoph, J., & Nystrand, M. (2001). Taking risks, negotiating relationships: One teacher’s transition towards a dialogic classroom (CELA Research Rep. 14003). Albany: The National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement, State University of New York, University at Albany. Retrieved from http://www.albany.edu/cela/reports/christophrisks14003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. (2012, June). Your body language shapes who you are [Video]. TED Talks: Ideas worth spreading. Podcast retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/amy_cuddy_your_body_language_shapes_who_you_are.html
   Google Scholar
• Dancer, D., & Kamvounias, P. (2005). Student involvement in assessment: A project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 445–454.
   Google Scholar
• Desiraju, R., & Gopinath, C. (2001). Encouraging participation in case discussions: A comparison of the MICA and the Harvard case methods. Journal of Management Education, 25(4), 394–408.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., Thummaphan, P., Lan, M., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2015). Caution, student experience may vary: Social identities a student’s experience in peer discussions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fritschner, L. M. (2000). Inside the undergraduate college classroom: Faculty and students differ on the meaning of student participation. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 342–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmele, P., & Himmele, W. (2011). Total participation techniques: Making every student an active learner. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, C. (1994). Of dinosaurs and sacred cows: The grading of classroom participation. Journal of Management Education, 18(2), 227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Girgin, K. Z., & Stevens, D. D. (2005). Bridging in-class participation with innovative instruction: Use and implications in a Turkish university classroom. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, 93–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2005). Critical thinking in clinical practice: Improving the quality of judgements and decisions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gopinath, C. (1999). Alternatives to instructor assessment of class participation. Journal of Education for Business, 75(1), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hartnett, D. F. (2009). Transformative education in the Jesuit tradition. Chicago, IL: Loyola University Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, J. E., & Sailors, J. J. (2011). Peer assessment of class participation: Applying peer nomination to overcome rating inflation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 605–618. doi:10.1080/02602931003632365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, C. A., & Ruth, B. J. (2002). Multicultural content and class participation: Do students self-censor? Journal of Social Work Education, 38(2), 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., & Davis, C. A. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 550–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. C., & Chase, C. I. (1992). Developing and using tests effectively: A guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. C. (2008). The ‘why’ of class participation: A question worth asking. College Teaching, 56(1), 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. (1990). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47, 12–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keesing-Styles, L. (2003). The relationship between critical pedagogy and assessment in teacher education. Radical Pedagogy, 5(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy ( Rev. and updated ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge Adult Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lay, K., & McGuire, L. (2010). Building a lens for critical reflection and reflexivity in social work education. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 29(5), 539–550.
   Google Scholar
• Larrison, T. E., & Korr, W. S. (2013). Does social work have a signature pedagogy. Journal of Social Work Education, 49(2), 194–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, M. D. N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Self-reflection and academic performance: Is there a relationship? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 529–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyman, F. (1987). Think-pair-share: An expanding teaching technique. MAA-CIE Cooperative News, 1(1), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• MacKnight, C. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly, 23(4), 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Manikar, A. V. (2008). A student-empowered system for measuring and weighing participation in class discussions. Journal of Management Education, 32(1), 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Manzer, J. P., & Rassuli, A. (2005). Teach us to learn: Multivariate analysis of perception of success in team learning. Journal of Education for Business, 81(1), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mello, J. A. (2010). The good, the bad and the controversial: The practicalities and pitfalls of the grading of class participation. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(1), 77–97.
   Google Scholar
• Melvin, K. B. (2000). Rating class participation: The prof/peer method. In M. R. Hebl, C. L. Brewer, & L. T. Benjamin Jr. (Eds.), Handbook for teaching introductory psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57–59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mishna, F., & Bogo, M. (2007). Reflective practice in contemporary social work classrooms. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(3), 529–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, K. J. (2013). Class participation: Promoting in-class student engagement (report). Education, 133, 340–345.
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, M. B., & Pathak, S. (2008). Classroom assessments what do students perceive as fair. Journal of Education for Business, 83(6), 360–368.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, A. (2010). An exploratory study of opinions on clickers and class participation from students of human behavior in the social environment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20, 721–731.
   Google Scholar
• Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. J. (2009). Simply effective cognitive behavior therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Kappan Professional Journal (online). Retrieved from http://beta.edtechpolicy.org/CourseInfo/edhd485/AssessmentCrisis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stowell, J. R., & Nelson, J. M. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching for Psychology, 34, 253–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H. K. (2008). Qualitatively different ways of experiencing student self-assessment. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(1), 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, H. (2014). Student Involvement in Assessment of their learning. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert (Eds.), Designing assessment for quality learning (pp. 39–54). Springer: Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, A. (2011). In-class reflective group discussion as a strategy for the development of students as evolving professionals. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Vandrick, S. (2000, March 14–18). Language, culture, class, gender, and class participation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of teachers of English to speakers of other languages, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED473086
   Google Scholar
• Walser, T. M. (2009). An action research study of student self-assessment in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 34, 299–306.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., & Lahman, M. (2011). Online discussion, student engagement, and critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education, 7, 143–162.
   Google Scholar