References
- Adams, R. (2008). Empowerment, participation and social work. (4th ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Aldridge, J. (2016). Participatory research: Working with vulnerable groups in research and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
- Brown, K., & Young, N. (2008). Building capacity for service user and carer involvement in social work education. Social Work Education, 27(1), 84–96.
- Chambon, A., Irving, A., & Epstein, L. (eds.). (1999). Reading Foucault for social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
- European Social Work Research Association (ESWRA). (2017). Service user involvement. Retrieved from: http://www.eswra.org/users_sig.html
- European Typology of Homelessness and housing exclusion (ETHOS). (2018). FEANTSA. Retrieved from: https://www.feantsa.org/download/en-16822651433655843804.pdf
- Fook, J. (2002). Social work. Critical theory and practice. London: SAGE.
- Frišaufová, M., & Geregová, M. (2018). „Šok i osvěžení“: Participace expertů – uživatelů služeb ve výuce sociální práce na vysoké škole. Sociální práce/Sociálna Práca, 18, 84–100.
- Gojová, A. (2014). Participativní akční výzkum. In D. Baum & A. Gojová (Eds.), Výzkumné metody v sociální práci (pp. 203–218). Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita.
- Hart, R. A. (1992). Children's participation: from tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF.
- Healy, K. (2000). Social work practices: Contemporary perspectives on change. London: SAGE.
- Humphreys, C. (2005). Service user involvement in social work education: A case example. Social Work Education, 24, 797–803.
- Kemshall, H., & Littlechild, R. (2000). User involvement and participation in social care: Research informing practice. London: Jessica Kingsley publishers.
- McLaughlin, H. (2009). What’s in a name: ‘Client’, ‘Patient’, ‘Customer’, ‘Consumer’, ‘Expert by Experience’, ‘Service user’–What’s next? The British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1101–1117.
- McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
- Molyneux, J., & Irvine, J. (2004). Service user and carer involvement in social work training: A long and winding road? Social Work Education, 23, 293–308.
- Morgan, D. (2001). Ohniskové skupiny jako metoda kvalitativního výzkumu. Boskovice: Albert.
- Padgett, D. (2017). Qualitative methods in social work research. Los Angeles: Sage.
- Payne, M. (2005). Modern social work theory. Houndmills, Balsingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Robinson, K., & Webber, M. (2013). Models and effectiveness of service user and carer involvement in social work education: A literature review. The British Journal of Social Work, 43, 925–944.
- Rossiter, A. (2000). The postmodern feminist condition. New conditions for social work. In B. Fawcett (Ed.), Practice and research in social work: Postmodern feminist perspectives (pp. 24–38). London, UK: Routledge.
- Sen, R., McClelland, N., & Jowett, B. (2016). Belonging to the library: Humanising the space for social work education. Social Work Education, 35, 892–904.
- Videmšek, P. (2017). Expert by experience research as grounding for social work education. Social Work Education, 36, 172–187.
- Warren, J. (2007). Service user and carer participation in social work. Exeter: Learning Matters.
- Webber, M., & Robinson, K. (2012). The meaningful involvement of service users and carers in advanced-level post-qualifying social work education: A qualitative study. The British Journal of Social Work, 42, 1256–1274.