Integration of theory and practice in social work education. Analysis of Finnish social work students’ field reports

References

• Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 1–14). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aro, M. (2013). Kielen oppijasta kielen osaajaksi [From language learning to language use]. In T. Keisanen, E. Kärkkäinen, M. Rauniomaa, P. Siitonen, & M. Siromaa Eds., Osallistumisen multimodaaliset diskurssit [Multimodal discourses of participation] (pp. 11–28). Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistyksen julkaisuja n: o71. AFinLAn vuosikirja 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Arpiainen, R.-L., Lackéus, M., Täks, M., & Tynjälä, P. (2013). The sources and dynamics of emotions in entrepreneurship education learning process. Trames: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 17(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2013.4.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldschun, A. (2018). The occupational well-being of child protection social workers: Theoretical conceptualization and empirical investigations among Finnish statutory social workers [Doctoral dissertation, University of Eastern Finland].Publications of the University of Eastern Finland, Dissertations in Social Sciences and Business Studies No178. https://epublications.uef.fi/pub/urn_isbn_978-952-61-2829-0/urn_isbn_978-952-61-2829-0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barber, J. P. (2012). Integration of learning: A grounde.d theory analysis of college students’ learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 590–617. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212437854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay, U., & Macfarlane, S. (2011). Teaching critical reflection: A tool for transformative learning in social work? Social Work Education, 30(7), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.516429
   Google Scholar
• Bellinger, A. (2010). Studying the landscape: Practice learning for social work reconsidered. Social Work Education, 29(6), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470903508743
   Google Scholar
• Boitel, C. R., & Fromm, L. R. (2014). Defining signature pedagogy in social work education: Learning theory and learning contract. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2014.947161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A., McLean, M., & Walker, M. (2009). Self, others and society: A case study of university integrative learning. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 929–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902773818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleak, H., Roulston, A., & Vreugdenhil, A. (2016). The inside story: A survey of social work students’ supervision and learning opportunities on placement. British Journal of Social Work, 46(7), 2033–2050. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleak, H., & Smith, D. (2012). Student satisfaction with models of field placement supervision. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2011.572981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filppa, V., Kemppainen, T., & Rossi, E. (2012). Sosiaalityön käytännön opetus: Odotuksia, kokemuksia ja orastavaa osaamista [Social work field education: Expectations, experiences and nascent skills].In N. Tuohino, A. Pohjola, & M. Suonio (Eds.), Sosiaalityön käytännön opetus liikkeessä [Social work practice education in the move] (pp. 227–244). Sosnet.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. (2002). Theorizing from practice: Towards an inclusive approach for social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 1(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/147332500200100106
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., Rogers, C. A., & Williamson, E. (2018). Effects of an integrative field seminar for MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 54(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2017.1307149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, J. (2011). Social work as a research-based profession: Opportunities, prerequisites and restrictions. Sociology Study, 1(7), 473–483.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, N., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Knowledge typologies for professional learning: Educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice. Educational Technology Research & Development, 65(6), 1583–1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9536-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Introduction to membership categorisation analysis. In R. Fitzgerald & W. Housley (Eds.), Advances in membership categorisation analysis. Sage. http://methods.sagepub.com.ezproxy.uef.fi:2048/book/advances-in-membership-categorisation-analysis
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T., Hutchings, P., & Gale, R. (2005). Integrative learning for liberal education. Review, 7(4), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• International Association of Schools of Social Work (IASSW) (2019, March 18). Global standards of for the education and training of the social work profession. Retrieved August 1, 2019, from https://www.iassw-aiets.org/global-standards-for-social-work-education-and-training/
   Google Scholar
• Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and moral order. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson, E., & Svensson, K. (2005). Theory in social work: Some reflections on understanding and explaining interventions. European Journal of Social Work, 8(4), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450500314442
   Google Scholar
• Jokinen, A. (2017). Tavoiteltavat sosiaalityöntekijän ominaisuudet ja vuorovaikutusasetelmat asiakkaan kohtaamisessa opiskelijoiden tulkitsemana [Desirable features of a social worker and interaction settings in meeting a client interpreted by students]. Janus, 25(3), 191–207.
   Google Scholar
• Juhila, K., Jokinen, A., & Suoninen, E. (2012). Kategoria-analyysin teesit [Theses of category analysis]. In A. Jokinen, K. Juhila, & E. Suoninen (Eds.), Kategoriat, kulttuuri & moraali [Categories, culture & moral] (pp. 45–87). Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Juhila, K. (2012a). Ongelmat, niiden selittäminen ja kategoriat [Prolems, explaining them and categories]. In A. Jokinen, K. Juhila, & E. Suoninen (Eds.), Kategoriat, kulttuuri & moraali [Categories, culture & moral] (pp. 131–173). Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Juhila, K. (2012b). Poikkeavan kategorian jäsenyyden tuottaminen ja vastustaminen [Construction and resistance of a membership in an abnormal category]. In A. Jokinen, K. Juhila, & E. Suoninen (Eds.), Kategoriat, kulttuuri & moraali [Categories, culture & moral] (pp. 175–225). Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Kanno, H., & Koeske, G. F. (2010). MSW students’ satisfaction with their field placements: The role of preparedness and quality of supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2010.200800066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähteinen, S., Raitakari, S., Hänninen, K., Kaittila, A., Kekoni, T., Krok, S., & Skaffari, P. (2017). Social work education in Finland: Courses for competency. National University Network for Social Work (Sosnet). https://www.sosnet.fi/loader.aspx?id=43aacd5d-7a96-44b7-8dcb-62dcd7ea6d65
   Google Scholar
• Lay, K., & McGuire, L. (2010). Building a lense for critical reflection and reflexivity in social work education. Social Work Education, 29(5), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470903159125
   Google Scholar
• Mönkkönen, K., Kekoni, T., Jaakola, A.-M., Pehkonen, A., & Profiam Social Services Staff. (2019). Kohti monitoimijaista kehittämistä [Towards multiagency development]. In K. Mönkkönen, T. Kekoni, & A. Pehkonen (Eds.), Moniammatillinen yhteistyö [Multiprofessional co-operation] (pp. 112–148). Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Nevgi, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2009). Oppimisen teoriat [Theories of learning]. In S. Lindblom-Ylänne & A. Nevgi (Eds.), Yliopisto-opettajan käsikirja [University teacher’s handbook] (pp. 194–236). WSOY.
   Google Scholar
• Niehaus, E., Holder, C., Rivera, M., Garcia, C. E., Woodman, T. C., & Dierberger, J. (2017). Exploring integrative learning in service-based alternative breaks. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(6), 922–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1313086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, N. (2001). Knowledge bases and knowledge biases in social work. Journal of Social Work, 1(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/146801730100100202
   Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen, V., & Hirsto, L. (2017). University lecturers’ experiences of and reflections on the development of their pedagogical competency. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(6), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1188148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piippo, S., Hämäläinen, J., Savolainen, A., Suonio, M., & Väisänen, R. (2013). Better integration of education and practice? Promoting research-based social work. Journal of Practice Teaching & Learning, 12(2), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1921/6002120204
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–165). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumbertz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sosiolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 329–345). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1989). Lecture six: The M.I.R. membership categorization device. Human Studies, 12(3/4), 271–281. doi: 10.1007/BF00142771
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D., Cleak, H., & Vreugdenhill, A. (2015). “What are they really doing?” An exploration of student learning activities in field placement. Australian Social Work, 68(4), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2014.960433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suonio, M., & Pohjola, A. (2012). Mihin suuntaan tutkimusperustainen käytännönopetus muuttuu [In which direction research-based practice teaching is going to change]? In N. Tuohino, A. Pohjola, & M. Suonio (Eds.), Sosiaalityön käytännön opetus liikkeessä [Social work practice education in the move] (pp. 245–250). Sosnet.
   Google Scholar
• Tuohino, N., Pohjola, A., & Suonio, M. (2012). Sosiaalityön käytännönopetus kohti tutkimusperustaista työelämäsuhteissa oppimista [Social work practice teaching towards research-based learning in working life relations]. In N. Tuohino, A. Pohjola, & M. Suonio (Eds.), Sosiaalityön käytännön opetus liikkeessä [Social work practice education in the move] (pp. 8–18). Sosnet.
   Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 130–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P., Häkkinen, P., & Hämäläinen, R. (2014). TEL@work: Toward integration of theory and practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 990–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P., Heikkinen, H. L., & Kiviniemi, U. (2011). Integratiivinen pedagogiikka opetusharjoittelussa opettajan autonomisuuden tukena [Integrative pedagogy in teaching practical training in promoting teacher autonomy]. Kasvatus, 42(4), 302–315. http://electra.helsinki.fi.ezproxy.uef.fi:2048/se/k/0022-927-x/42/4/integrat.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P., Virtanen, A., Klemola, U., Kostiainen, E., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2016). Developing social competence and other generic skills in teacher education: Applying the model of integrative pedagogy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1171314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. R. (1978). Categorization, authorization and blame-negotiation in conversation. Sociology, 12(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200106
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, J., Raskin, M., & Bogo, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2010.200900043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar