On guard against bureaucracy: depictions of the social work bureaucrat in syllabi texts

References

• Abrams, L. S., & Moio, J. A. (2013). Critical race theory and the cultural competence dilemma in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, G. B., & Balfour, D. L. (1998). Unmasking administrative evil. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ai, A. L., Moultine, K., Picciano, J. F., Nagda, B. R., & Thurman, L. H. (2004). Integrating spirituality into the social work curriculum. A student-initiated program evaluation. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(1–2), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v24n01_07
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem. A report on the banality of evil. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Askeland, G. A., & Molven, O. (2010). Dokument i klientarbeid*. Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P. (2012). Empowerment i helse- og sosialfaglig arbeid. Floskel, styringsverktøy eller frigjøringsstrategi?*. Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2012). Ethics and values in social work. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Barter, K. (2003). Social work identity and purpose: Real or imagined? In W. Shera (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on anti-oppressive practice(pp. 203–222). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B., Ellingsen, I., Levin, I., & Kleppe, L. C. (2019). Hva er sosialt arbeid?*. In I. Ellingsen, I. Levin, B. Berg, & L. C. Kleppe (Eds.), Sosialt arbeid. En grunnbok. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (1998). The quest for responsibility. Accountability and citizenship in complex organisations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burdon, P. D. (2015). Hannah arendt: On judgment and responsibility. Griffith Law Review, 24(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2015.1058215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell, M. (2010). Hannah arendt’s world: Bureaucracy, documentation, and banal evil. Archivaria, 70(fall 2010), 1–25. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13293
   Google Scholar
• Du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy. Weber - organizations - ethics. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eide, S. B., & Oltedal, S. (2019). Verdiers betydning for vår forståelse og vår handling*. In I. Ellingsen, I. Levin, B. Berg, & L. C. Kleppe (Eds.), Sosialt arbeid. En grunnbok (pp. 80–96). Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Eide, S. B., & Skorstad, B. (2013). Etikk - til refleksjon og handling i sosialt arbeid*. Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsen, I. T., & Skjefstad, N. S. (2019). Anerkjennelse, myndiggjøring og brukermedvirkning*. In I. Ellingsen, I. Levin, B. Berg, & L. C. Kleppe (Eds.), Sosialt arbeid. En grunnbok (pp. 97–111). Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Engelstad, F., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2018). Introduction: Bureaucracy in transition. In F. Engelstad & H. Byrkjeflot (Eds.), Bureaucracy and society in transition. Emerald House.
   Google Scholar
• Fellesorganisasjonen. (2015). Yrkesetisk grunnlagsdokument for barnevernpedagoger, sosionomer og velferdsvitere*. Fellesorganisasjonen. https://www.fo.no/getfile.php/1311735-1548957631/Dokumenter/Din%20profesjon/Brosjyrer/Yrkesetisk%20grunnlagsdokument.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finch, W. (1976). Social workers versus bureaucracy. Social Work, 21(5), 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/21.5.370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummer, B. (1985). Committing the truth. Administration in Social Work, 9(4), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v09n04_08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummer, B. (1987). Are administrators social workers? Administration in Social Work, 11(2), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v11n02_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrits, G. S. (2019). Street-level bureaucracy research and professionalism. In P. Hupe (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy(pp. 193–208). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, L. M. (2013). Curriculum building in international social work: Toward preparing professionals for the global age. Journal of Social Work Education, 24(3), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1988.10671256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heap, K. (2005). Gruppemetode for sosial- og helsearbeidere*. Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Herberg, E. B., & Jóhannesdóttir, H. (2007). Kunnskap og læring i praksis: Fra student til profesjonell sosialarbeider*. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, G. S. (2010). Samfunnsarbeid. Mobilisering og deltagelse i sosialfaglig arbeid*. Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, G. S., & Oltedal, S. (2017). Praksisteorier i sosialt arbeid*. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• IFSW. (2012). Effective and ethical working environments for social work. Responsibility of employers of social workers. International Federation of Social Workers. https://www.ifsw.org/effective-and-ethical-working-environments-for-social-work-the-responsibilities-of-employers-of-social-workers–2/
   Google Scholar
• IFSW. (2018). Global Social Work Statement of Ethical Principles. International Federation of Social Workers.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, M. D. (2014). Hierarchy. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 406–420). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. (1996). Anti-intellectualism and the peculiarities of British social work education. In N. Parton (Ed.), Social theory, social change and social work(pp. 190–210). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. (2012). Transforming the curriculum: Social work education and ecological consciousness. In M. Gray, J. Coates, & T. Hetherington (Eds.), Environmental social work (pp. 213–230). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology. Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, P. R., & Capaiuolo, A. (1987). Rebuilding the relationship between social work and public administration. Administration in Social Work, 11(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v11n01_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killén, K. (2017). Profesjonell utvikling og faglig veiledning - et fellesfaglig perspektiv*. Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Kjørstad, M. (2005). Between professional ethics and bureaucratic rationality: The challenging ethical position of social workers who are faced with implementing a workfare policy. European Journal of Social Work, 8(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450500314459
   Google Scholar
• Kleppe, L. C., Heggen, K. M., & Engebretsen, E. (2015). Dual ideals and single responsibilities - a critical analysis of social workers’ responsibility for the ideal promoting justice at the individual and the societal level. Nordic Social Work Research, 5(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2014.891534
   Google Scholar
• Kojan, B. H., & Storhaug, A. S. (2019). Erfaringsbasert kunnskap og refleksiv praksis*. In I. Ellingsen, I. Levin, B. Berg, & L. C. Kleppe (Eds.), Sosialt arbeid. En grunnbok (pp. 184–195). Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Kopels, S., & Gustavsson, N. S. (1996). Infusing legal issues into the social work curriculum. Journal of Social Work Education, 32(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1996.10672289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzman, P. (1978). Rules and regulations in large-scale organizations. Administration in Social Work, 1(4), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v01n04_07
   Google Scholar
• Lev-Wessel, R. (2003). Expectations of costs and rewards: Students versus practicing social workers. International Social Work, 46(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728030463006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Luban, D., Strudler, A., & Wasserman, D. (1992). Moral responsibility in the age of bureaucracy. Michigan Law Review, 90(8), 2348–2392. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macarov, D. (1977). Management in the social work curriculum. Administration in Social Work, 1(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v01n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Mackelprang, R., Ray, J., & Hernandez-Peck, M. (1996). Social work education and sexual orientation: Faculty, student, and curriculum issues. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 5(4), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1300/J041v05n04_02
   Google Scholar
• Marston, G., & McDonald, C. (2012). Getting beyond ‘heroic agency’ in conceptualising social workers as policy actors in the twenty-first century. British Journal of Social Work, 42(6), 1022–1038. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Toole, L. J. O. (2006). Bureaucracy in a democratic state. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18(4), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.2307/2570634
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1975). Obedience to authority. An experimental view. Harper Colophon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., & Ream, R. (2015). Summarizing the lessons: Shaping a blueprint. In D. Mitchell & R. Ream (Eds.), Professional responsibility. The fundamental issue in education and health care reform(pp. 329–337). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nesoff, I. (2007). The importance of revitalizing management education for social workers. Social Work, 52(2), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/52.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicotera, N., & Kang, H. K. (2009). Beyond diversity courses: Strategies for integrating critical consciousness across social work curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 29(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841230802240738
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. (2007). From “pure” to “hybrid” professionalism. Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration & Society, 39(6), 761–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707304434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oterholm, I. (2019). Skjønnsutøvelse i velferdsorganisasjoner*. In I. Ellingsen, I. Levin, B. Berg, & L. C. Kleppe (Eds.), Sosialt arbeid. En grunnbok (pp. 171–183). Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Pak, C.-M., Cheung, J. C.-S., & Tsui, M.-S. (2017). Looking for social work values and ethics in the textbooks of social services administration over the Past 50 Years (1965–2014). Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1231151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston-Shoot, M. (2010). On administrative evil-doing within social work policy and services: Law, ethics and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450903471229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruger, R. (1973). The good bureuacrat. Social Work, 18(4), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/18.4.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, A. (2005). Discourse analysis in social work: From apology to question. Critical Social Work, 6 (1), 1–7. https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/5654/4621
   Google Scholar
• Rugkåsa, M., Ylvisaker, S., & Eide, K. (2017). Barnevern i et minoritetsperspektiv*. Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, L. (2003). Kunsten å hjelpe individer og familier*. Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Schupmann, B. A. (2014). Thoughlessness and resentment: Determinism and moral responsibility in the case of Adolf Eichmann. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 40(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453713518323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, E. (2015). Organizational awareness: A missing generalist social work competency. Social Work, 60(1), 93–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swu055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skau, G. M. (2017). Gode fagfolk vokser*. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Solbrekke, T. D., & Englund, T. (2011). Bringing professional responsibility back in. Studies in Higher Education, 36(7), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.482205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømfors, G., & Edland-Gryt, M. (2013). Jeg visste ikke at jeg kunne så mye. Praksisrefleksjoner på arbeidsplassen*. Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. J., Larkin, H., & Rosen, A. L. (2006). An analysis of social work textbooks for aging content: How well do social work foundation texts prepare students for our aging society? Journal of Social Work Education, 42(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2006.042110001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardhaugh, J., & Wilding, P. (1993). Towards an explanation of the corruption of care. Critical Social Policy, 13(37), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101839301303701
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, H. (1971). The professional social worker in bureaucracy. Social Work, 16(1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/16.1.89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978a). Bureaucracy. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and Society II (pp. University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978b). Parliament and government in a reconstructed Germany. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and Society II. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whatcott, W. (1974). Bureaucratic focus and service delivery. Social Work, 19(4),432–437. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23712763
   Google Scholar
• Wormer, K. V. (2006). The case for restorative justice. A crucial adjunct to the social work curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 26(3–4), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v26n03_04
   Google Scholar
• Zacka, B. (2017). Zacka, Bernardo. When the state meets the street. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar