In-service training programmes for mathematics teachers nested in transnational policy discourses

References

• Andrews, Paul. 2013. “What Does PISA Performance Tell Us about Mathematics Teaching Quality? Case Studies from Finland and Flanders.” In PISA, Power, and Policy: The Emergence of Global Educational Governance, edited by H.-D. Meyer and A. Benavot, 99–115. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Basil. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bill 2012/13:64. Increased Instructional Time in Mathematics. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Budget Bill 2003/04:1. Appendix 16. The Budget Bill for 2004. Education and Academic Research. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Budget Bill 2005/06:1. Appendix 16. The Budget Bill for 2006. Education and Academic Research. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Budget Bill 2010/11:1. Appendix 16. The Budget Bill for 2011. Education and Academic Research. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Budget Bill 2011/12:1. Appendix 16. The Budget Bill for 2012. Education and Academic Research. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo, José, and Nuria Climent. 2011. “The Development of Teachers’ Expertise through Their Analysis of Good Practice in the Mathematics Classroom.” ZDM Mathematics Education 43: 915–926.10.1007/s11858-011-0363-0
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough. 2002. Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Course plan 2008-03-26. Mathematics Teaching as a Development Project. Falun: University of Dalarna.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. Improving the Quality of Teacher Education. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. COM (2007) 392 Final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Improving Competences for the 21st Century: An Agenda for European Cooperation on Schools. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM. 2008. 425. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Communication from the Commission. COM (2010) 2020 final. Brussels: European Commission
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012a. Rethinking Education: Investing in Skills for Better Socio-economic Outcomes. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2012) 669 Final. Strasbourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012b. Supporting the Teaching Professions for Better Learning Outcomes. Commission Staff Working Document. Communication from the Commission. Strasbourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Communities. 2007. Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. European Reference Framework. Luxembourg: European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2011. Mathematics Education in Europe: Common Challenges and National Policies. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2012. Developing Key Competences at School in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities for Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman.10.4324/9780203809068
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, Simon. 2014. “Mathematics Teaching Development: Learning from Developmental Research in Norway.” ZDM Mathematics Education 46: 305–316.10.1007/s11858-013-0567-6
   Google Scholar
• Government Decision U2011/5531/S. Uppdrag till StatensskolverkattsvaraförLärarlyftet II [Assignment to the National Agency of Education to be Responsible for the “Training for Teachers” programme II]. 2011-10-06. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Government Decision U2011/4343/S. Uppdragattsvaraförutbildning [Assignment to be Responsible for Education]. 2012-03-29. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Government Decision U1999/3992/S. Uppdrag till Göteborgs universitet om utvecklingsarbete rörande undervisningen I matematik [Assignment to the University of Gothenburg Concerning Development Efforts in Mathematics Teaching]. Government Decision. Appendix no. 8. 1999-11-18. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Government Decision U2006/564/G. Uppdrag till Myndigheten för skolutveckling att genomföra utvecklingsinsatser för att höja kvaliteten i matematikundervisningen [Assignment to the National Agency for School Development to Implement Development Initiatives for the Enhancement of Quality in Mathematics Education]. 2006-02-02. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Government Decision U2007/3168/S. Uppdrag till Statens skolverk att svara för fortbildning av lärare [Assignment to the National Agency of Education of the Responsibility of the In-service Training for Teachers]. 2007-04-19. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Government Decision U2008/5625/S. Uppdrag till Statens skolverk angående statsbidrag för att stärka arbetet med basfärdigheterna läsa, skriva och räkna [Assignment to the National Agency of Education Regarding Government Grant for the Strengthening of the Work on Basic Skills in Reading, Writing and Arithmetic]. 2008-09-04. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Government Decision U2009/914/G. Uppdrag till Statens skolverk att genomföra utvecklingsinsatser inom matematik, naturvetenskap och teknik [Assignment to the National Agency of Education to Implement Development Initiatives in Mathematics, Science and Technology]. 2009-02-19. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Government Decision U2011/2229/G. Uppdrag till Statens skolverk att stärka undervisningen i matematik, naturvetenskap och teknik [Assignment to the National Agency of Education for Strengthening the Teaching in Mathematics, Science and Technology]. 2011-03-31. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Min-Hsiung. 2009. “Beyond Horse Race Comparisons of National Performance Averages: Math Performance Variation within and between Classrooms in 38 Countries.” Educational Research and Evaluation 15 (4): 327–342.10.1080/13803610903087003
   Google Scholar
• Jablonka, Eva. 2003. “Mathematical Literacy.” In Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education Vol. 1, 77–104, edited by A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, and F. K. S. Leung. Dordrecht: Kluwer International Handbooks of Education, No. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Moursed, Mona, Chinezi Chijioke, and Michael Barber. 2010. How the World’s Most Improved School Systems Keep Getting Better. Washington, DC: McKinsey & mpany.
   Google Scholar
• Musset, Pauline. 2010. Initial Teacher Education and Continuing Training Policies in a Comparative Perspective. OECD Education Working Papers No. 48. Paris: OECD.10.1787/5kmbphh7s47h-en
   Google Scholar
• NAE. 2015. Personnel Statistics by Subject. The NAE website. Accessed February 13, 2015. Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for Education. http://siris.skolverket.se
   Google Scholar
• NCM. 2001. Högtidförmatematik [Time for Mathematics]. Gothenburg: National Centre for Mathematics Education, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris: Organisation for Enomic -operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2009. PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris: Organisation for Enomic -operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. PISA 2012 Mathematics Framework. Paris: Organisation for Enomic -operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Official Reports 2004:97. Att lyfta matematiken – intresse, lärande, kompetens [Raising Mathematics – Interest, Learning, Skills]. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Kristie J. R., Laura M. Desimone, and Thomas M. Smith. 2011. “Teacher Participation in Content-focused Professional Development & the Role of State Policy.” Teachers College Record 113 (11): 2586–2630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presidency Conclusions. 2000. Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000. Lisbon: European Council.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, Matthias. 2014. “KOSINUS: An Approach to Long-term Development of Mathematics Education.” Journal of Mathematics Education 7 (2): 140–160.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, Pasi. 2011. “The Fourth Way of Finland.” Journal of Educational Change 12: 173–185.10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y
   Google Scholar
• Simola, Hannu. 2005. “The Finnish Miracle of PISA: Historical and Sociological Remarks on Teaching and Teacher Education.” Comparative Education 41 (4): 455–470.10.1080/03050060500317810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøberg, Svein. 2015. “PISA and Global Educational Governance – A Critique of the Project, Its Uses and Implications.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 11 (1): 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, Gita. 2010. “The Politics and Economics of Comparison.” Comparative Education Review 54 (3): 323–342.10.1086/652801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Parliament Education Committee 2011/12:UbU1. Appendix 16. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Valli, Linda, Robert G. Croninger, and Daria Buese. 2012. “Studying High-quality Teaching in a Highly Charged Policy Environment.” Teachers College Record 114 (040305): 1–33.
   Google Scholar