615
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Using Artefacts in Narrative Pedagogies: a case from beginning teachers’ peer group meetings

, , , &
Pages 35-49 | Received 17 Apr 2020, Accepted 22 Dec 2020, Published online: 18 Feb 2021

References

  • Avalos, B. 2011. “Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education over Ten Years.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (1): 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007.
  • Avalos, B. 2016. “Learning from Research on Beginning Teachers.” In International Handbook of Teacher Education, edited by J. Loughran and M. L. Hamilton, 487–522. Singapore:Springer.
  • Ballet, K., and G. Kelchtermans. 2008. “Workload and Willingness to Change: Disentangling the Experience of Intensification.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 40 (1): 47–67. doi:10.1080/00220270701516463
  • Bamberg, M., and A. Georgakopoulou. 2008. “Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis.” Text and Talk 28 (3): 377–396. doi:10.1515/TEXT.2008.018.
  • Bell, M. E., and S. E. Bell. 2012. “What to Do with All This ‘Stuff’? – Memory, Family and Material Objects.” Storytelling, Self and Society 8 (2): 63–84. doi:10.2307/41949178
  • Benjaminsen, N., and E. Sorensen. 2011. “Circulation of Authorizations in the Classroom: A Socio-Material Process.” Science as Culture 20 (4): 433–453. doi:10.1080/09505431.2011.605922
  • Burkitt, I. 1999. Bodies of Thought. Embodiment, Identity and Modernity. London: Sage.
  • Carter, K. 1993. “The Place of Story in the Study of Teaching and Teacher Education.” Educational Researcher 22 (1): 5–12. 18. doi10.3102/0013189X022001005.
  • Casey, K. 1995–1996. “The New Narrative Research in Education.” Review of Research in Education 21 (1): 211–253. doi:10.3102/0091732X021001211.
  • Clandinin, D. J. 2013. Engaging in Narrative Inquiry. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
  • Clandinin, D. J., and F. M. Connelly. 1996. “Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Landscapes Teacher Stories—Stories of Teachers—School Stories—Stories of School.” Educational Researcher 19 (5): 2–14.
  • Clandinin, D. J., and F. M. Connelly. 2000. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Conle, C. 1996. “Resonance in Pre-service Teacher Inquiry.” American Educational Research Journal 33 (2): 297–325. doi:10.3102/00028312033002297.
  • Craig, C. J., J. You, and S. Oh. 2017. “Pedagogy through the Pearl Metaphor: Teaching as a Process of Ongoing Refinement.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 49 (6): 757–781. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1066866
  • De Fina, A., and A. Georgakopoulou. 2012. Analyzing Narrative. Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Devos, A. 2010. “New Teachers, Mentoring, and the Discursive Formation of Professional Identity.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (5): 1219–1223. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.001.
  • Elbaz-Luwisch, F. 2005. Teachers’ Voices: Storytelling and Possibility. Greenwich CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Elbaz-Luwisch, F. 2010. “Writing and Professional Learning: The Uses of Autobiography in Graduate Studies in Education.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 16 (3): 307–327. doi:10.1080/13540601003634404.
  • Ericson, L., and S. Pinnegar. 2017. “Consequences of Personal Teaching Metaphors for Teacher Identity and Practice.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 23 (1): 106–122. doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1203774.
  • Estola, E., H. L. T. Heikkinen, and L. Syrjälä. 2014. “Narrative Pedagogies for Peer Groups.” In International Teacher Education: Promising Pedagogies (Part A), edited by C. J. Craig and L. Orland-Barak 155–172. Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1479-36872014000002201.
  • Estola, E., S.-L. Kaunisto, U. Keski-Filppula, L. Syrjälä, and M. Uitto. 2007. Lupa Puhua. Kertomisen Voima Arjessa Ja Työssä. [The promise to speak. The power of storytelling in everyday life and work]. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. 2001. “Helping Novices Learn to Teach: Lessons from an Exemplary Support Teacher.” Journal of Teacher Education 52 (1): 17–30. doi:10.1177/0022487101052001003.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. 2012. Teachers as Learners. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
  • Fenwick, T., R. Edwards, and P. Sawchuk. 2011. Emerging Approaches to Educational Research. Tracing the Sociomaterial. London-New York: Routledge.
  • Fox, R. K., L. S. Muccio, C. S. White, and J. Tian. 2015. “Investigating Advanced Professional Learning of Early Career and Experienced Teacher through Program Portfolios.” European Journal of Teacher Education 38 (2): 154–179. doi:10.1080/02619768.2015.1022647.
  • Goodson, I. F., and S. R. Gill. 2011. Narrative Pedagogy. Life History and Learning. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Hadar, L. L., and D. L. Brody. 2013. “The Interaction between Group Processes and Personal Professional Trajectories in a Professional Development Community for Teacher Educators.” Journal of Teacher Education 64 (2): 145–161. doi:10.1177/0022487112466898
  • Hanne, M., and A. Kaal, eds. 2019. Narrative and Metaphor in Education. Look Both Ways. London: Routledge.
  • Harju, V., and H. Niemi. 2018. “Teachers’ Changing Work and Support Needs from the Perspectives of School Leaders and Newly Qualified Teachers in the Finnish Context.” European Journal of Teacher Education 41 (5): 670–687. doi:10.1080/02619768.2018.1529754.
  • Heikkinen, H. L. T., H. Jokinen, and P. Tynjälä, eds. 2012. Peer-group Mentoring for Teacher Development. Oxford: Routledge.
  • Howe, E., and M. Arimoto. 2014. “Narrative Teacher Education Pedagogies from across the Pacific.” In International Teacher Education: Promising Pedagogies (Part A), edited by C. J. Craig and L. Orland-Barak. 213–232. Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1479-368720140000022014.
  • Huber, J., V. Caine, M. Huber, and P. Steeves. 2013. “Narrative Inquiry as Pedagogy in Education: The Extraordinary Potential of Living, Telling, Retelling, and Reliving Stories of Experience.” Review of Research in Education 37 (1): 212–242. doi:10.3102/0091732X12458885.
  • Hultman, K., and H. Lenz Taguchi. 2010. “Challenging Anthropocentric Analysis of Visual Data: A Relational Materialist Methodological Approach to Educational Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23 (5): 525–542. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.500628.
  • Ingersoll, R. M., and M. Strong. 2011. “The Impact of Induction and Mentoring Programs for Beginning Teachers: A Critical Review of the Research.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 201–233. doi:10.3102/0034654311403323
  • Juutinen, J., and E. Viljamaa. 2016. “A Narrative Inquiry about Values in a Finnish Preschool: The Case of Traffic Lights.” International Journal of Early Childhood 48 (2): 193–207. doi:10.1007/s13158-016-0165-1.
  • Kelchtermans, G. 2009. “Who I Am in How I Teach Is the Message: Self-Understanding, Vulnerability and Reflection.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 15 (2): 257–272. doi:10.1080/13540600902875332
  • Kelchtermans, G. 2014. “Narrative-Biographical Pedagogies in Teacher Education.” In International Teacher Education: Promising Pedagogies (Part A), edited by C. J. Craig and L. Orland-Barak. 273–291. Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1479-368720140000022017.
  • Kelchtermans, G., and K. Ballet. 2002. “The Micropolitics of Teacher Induction. A Narrative-Biographical Study on Teacher Socialisation.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (1): 105–120. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00053-1.
  • Kemmis, S., H. L. T. Heikkinen, J. Aspfors, G. Fransson, and C. Edwards-Groves. 2014. “Mentoring as Contested Practice: Support, Supervision and Collaborative Self Development.” Teaching and Teacher Education 43: 154–164. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.001.
  • Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lehtonen, M. 2014. Maa-ilma: Materialistisen Kulttuuriteorian Lähtökohtia [Starting Points for Materialistic Cultural Theory]. Tampere: Vastapaino.
  • März, V., G. Kelchtermans, and K. Vermeir. 2017. “Artifacts as Authoritative Actors in Educational Reform: Routines, Institutional Pressures, and Legitimacy in Student Data Systems.” Journal of Educational Change 18 (4): 439–464. doi:10.1007/s10833-017-9309-9.
  • Pillen, M., D. Beijaard, and P. Den Brok. 2013. “Tensions in Beginning Teachers’ Professional Identity Development, Accompanying Feelings and Coping Strategies.” European Journal of Teacher Education 36 (3): 240–260. doi:10.1080/02619768.2012.696192.
  • Riessman, C. K. 2008. Narrative Methods for Human Sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Rodgers, C., and M. Raider-Roth. 2006. “Presence in Teaching.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 12 (3): 265–287. doi:10.1080/13450600500467548.
  • Ropo, E., and M. Huttunen. 2013. Puheenvuoroja Narratiivisuudesta Opetuksessa Ja Oppimisessa [Accounts about Narrativity in Teaching and Learning]. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
  • Schön, A. 1979. “Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy.” Metaphor and Thought edited by A. Ortony 254–283. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • Spector-Mersel, G. 2010. “Narrative Research: Time for a Paradigm.” Narrative Inquiry 20 (1): 204–224. doi:10.1075/ni.20.1.10spe.
  • Strangeways, A., and L.-H. Papatraianou. 2016. “Case-based Learning for Classroom Ready Teachers: Addressing the Theory Practice Disjunction through Narrative Pedagogy.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 41: 9. doi:10.14221/ajte.2016v41n9.7.
  • Tammets, K., K. Pata, and E. Eisenschmidt. 2019. “Novice Teachers Learning and Knowledge Building during the Induction Programme.” European Journal of Teacher Education 42 (1): 36–51. doi:10.1080/02619768.2018.1523389.
  • Thomas, L., and C. Beauchamp. 2011. “Understanding New Teachers’ Professional Identities Through Metaphor.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (4): 762–769. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.007.
  • Uitto, M., S.-L. Kaunisto, G. Kelchtermans, and E. Estola. 2016. “Peer Group as a Meeting Place: Reconstructions of Teachers’ Self-Understanding and the Presence of Vulnerability.” International Journal of Educational Research 75: 7–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.10.004.
  • Vermeir, K., and G. Kelchtermans. 2020. “Innovative Practice as Interpretative Negotiation. A Case-Study on the Kamishibai in Kindergarten.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 26 (3–4): 248–263. doi:10.1080/13540602.2020.1820978.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.