International insights about a holistic model of teaching competence for a digital era: the digital teacher framework reviewed

References

• Albion, P. R., and J. Tondeur. 2018. “Section Introduction: Professional Learning and Development of Teachers.” Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. edited by J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, and K.-W. Lai, 1–3. Springer, Cham: Springer International Handbooks of Education. 12th of March 2020. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_99-2
   Google Scholar
• Attwell, G. 2019. ‘Personal Learning Environments’. In Literacias Cívicas e Críticas: Refletir e Praticar, edited by Maria Jose Brites, Ines Amaral, and Marisa Torres da Silva. Braga, Portugal: CECS - Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade. Universidade do Minho. https://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/bitstream/10198/19887/3/MRP-ED_F_NF_I.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. 2016. “Following Policy: Networks, Network Ethnography and Education Policy Mobilities.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (5): 549–566. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1122232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaquisto, L. 2008. “Coding Frame.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited byL. M. Given, Edición1, 88–89. Los Angeles, Californa: SAGE Publications, .
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., K. Takayama, M. Kettle, and S. Heimans. 2020. “Teacher Education between Principle, Politics, and Practice: A Statement from the New Editors of the Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 48 (5): 455–459. Routledge. doi10.1080/1359866X.2020.1818485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., and M. Tedder. 2007. “Agency and Learning in the Lifecourse: Towards an Ecological Perspective.” Studies in the Education of Adults 39 (2): 132–149. doi:10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545.
   Google Scholar
• Bolivar, A. 2001. “Los Centros Educativos Como Organizaciones Que Aprenden: Una Mirada Crítica.” Contexto Educativo-Revista Digital De Educación Y Nuevas Tecnologias 3: 18.
   Google Scholar
• Caena, F. 2014. “Teacher Competence Frameworks in Europe: Policy-as-Discourse and Policy-as-Practice.” European Journal of Education 49 (3): 311–331. doi:10.1111/ejed.12088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caena, F., and C. Redecker. 2019. “Aligning Teacher Competence Frameworks to 21st Century Challenges: The Case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu).” European Journal of Education 54 (3): 356–369. doi:10.1111/ejed.12345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, L. 2016. “The Power of Teacher Agency: Why We Must Transform Professional Learning so that It Really Supports Educator Learning.” Journal of Staff Development 37 (2): 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, L., and Adell J., eds. 2013. Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje: Claves Para El Ecosistema Educativo En Red. Alicante: Marfil.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, L., Esteve-Mon, F. and J. Adell. 2018. ‘¿Por Qué Es Necesario Repensar La Competencia Docente Para El Mundo Digital?’ RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia 56. doi:10.6018/red/56/6.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 1999. “The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later.” Educational Researcher 28 (7): 15–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X028007015.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2017. Research Methods in Education. Edición. 8 ed. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coll, C., and A. Engel. 2014. “Introduction: Personal Learning Environments in the Context of Formal Education/Introducción: Los Entornos Personales De Aprendizaje En Contextos De Educación Formal.” Cultura Y Educación 26 (4): 617–630. doi:10.1080/11356405.2014.985947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, Califorinia: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, N. M. 1992. “Organizational Learning: A Review of the Literature with Implications for HRD Professionals.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 3 (1): 29–49. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920030105.
   Google Scholar
• Drexler, W. 2010. “The Networked Student Model for Construction of Personal Learning Environments: Balancing Teacher Control and Student Autonomy.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26 (3): 3. doi:10.14742/ajet.1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. 2007. “An Identity Crisis? Using Concepts of “Identity”, “Agency” and “Structure” in the Education of Adults.” Studies in the Education of Adults 39 (2): 121–131. doi:10.1080/02660830.2007.11661544.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. Bristol: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emejulu, A., and M. Callum. 2019. “Towards a Radical Digital Citizenship in Digital Education.” Critical Studies in Education 60 (1): 131–147. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1234494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., and A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2013. “Removing Obstacles to the Pedagogical Changes Required by Jonassen’s Vision of Authentic Technology-Enabled Learning.” Computers & Education 64 (May): 175–182. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escudero, J. M. 2005. “Un Maestro Para Nuestro Tiempo: Entre La Memoria Y El Futuro Que Nos Desafía.” Enseñanza 23: 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Esteve-Mon, F., F. Castañeda and J. Adell. 2018. ‘Un Modelo Holístico de Competencia Docente Para El Mundo Digital’. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado32 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Eteläpelto, A., K. Vähäsantanen, P. Hökkä, and S. Paloniemi. 2013. “What Is Agency? Conceptualizing Professional Agency at Work.” Educational Research Review 10 (December): 45–65. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facer, K. 2011. Learning Futures: Education, Technology and Social Change. Edición:. 1 ed. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2017. Agency and Citizenship in a Technological Society. Spaces for the Future: A Companion to Philosophy of Technology, edited by, J. C. Pitt and A. Shew.1. 98–107.Edición:.New York:Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. 2011. “Theoretical Considerations for Understanding Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK).” Computers & Education 57 (3): 1953–1960. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INTEF. 2017. Marco Común de Competencia Digital Docente. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. 25th of May, 2019. http://blog.educalab.es/intef/2016/12/22/marco-comun-de-competencia-digital-docente-2017-intef.
   Google Scholar
• ISTE. 2017. ISTE Standards for Educators. USA: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jääskelä, P., A.-M. Poikkeus, K. Vasalampi, U. M. Valleala, and H. Rasku-Puttonen. 2017. “Assessing Agency of University Students: Validation of the AUS Scale.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2061–2079. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1130693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, C. 2010. “Innovation Thourgh Technology.” In 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn, edited by J. A. Bellanca and R. Brandt, 243–274. Bloomington, In Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, C., and Luckin, R. 2010. ‘Technology to Support Parental Engagement in Elementary Education: Lessons Learned from the UK’. Computers & Education, Learning in Digital Worlds: Selected Contributions from the CAL 09 Conference, 54 (3): 749–58. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.010.
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., and K. Kumpulainen. 2011. “Acting as Accountable Authors: Creating Interactional Spaces for Agency Work in Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (5): 812–819. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manso, J., L. S.-T. Vicente, M. A. Tonna, and J. Madalinska-Michalat. 2018. “Competency Frameworks for Teachers: A Contribution from the European Education Policy.” Foundation for the Development of the Education System. In Teacher Education Policy and Practice: International Perspectives and Inspiration. 80–101. 16th of June 2020. http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/181444
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., and M. J. Koehler. 2006. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.” Teachers College Record 108 (6): 1017. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottareale, D. 2015. “La familia y la escuela.” In La orientación y la tutoría escolar con familias: Teoría y práctica, edited by José Luis Parejo and José María Pinto, 27–42. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, M. 2014. “Conceptions of Professional Competence.” In International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-Based Learning, edited by S. Billett, C. Harteis, and H. Gruber, 107–137. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_5.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and K. M. T. Collins. 2007. “A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research.” The Qualitative Report 12 (2): 281–316.
   Google Scholar
• Pantić, N. 2015. “A Model for Study of Teacher Agency for Social Justice.” Teachers and Teaching 21 (6): 759–778. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña-López, I., and J. Moravec. 2013. “Heavy Switchers in Translearning: From Formal Teaching to Ubiquitous Learning.” On the Horizon 21 (2): 127–137. doi:10.1108/10748121311323021.
   Google Scholar
• Plomp, T., and N. Nieveen, eds. 2013. Educational Design Research. Enschede, the Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO). 16th of June 2020. http://downloads.slo.nl/Documenten/educational-design-research-part-a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pötzsch, H. 2019. “Critical Digital Literacy: Technology in Education beyond Issues of User Competence and Labour-Market Qualifications.” TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 17 (2): 221–240. doi:10.31269/triplec.v17i2.1093.
   Google Scholar
• Prestridge, Sarah and Carlos de Aldama. 2016. A classification framework for exploring technology-enabled practice–FrameTEP. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(7), 901–921. doi:10.1177/0735633116636767
   Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S. 2017. ‘Examining the Shaping of Teachers’ Pedagogical Orientation for the Use of Technology’. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 26 (4). Routledge: 367–381. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2016.1258369.
   Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S. 2019. ‘Categorising Teachers’ Use of Social Media for Their Professional Learning: A Self-Generating Professional Learning Paradigm’. Computers & Education 129 (February): 143–158. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., G. Biesta, S. Philippou, and S. Robinson. 2015. “The Teacher and the Curriculum: Exploring Teacher Agency”.In The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment: Two Volume Set, edited byD. Wyse, L. Hayward, and J. Pandya, 187–201. SAGE Publications .London.
   Google Scholar
• Raffaghelli, J. E., and B. Stewart. 2020. “Centering Complexity in “Educators” Data Literacy’ to Support Future Practices in Faculty Development: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Teaching in Higher Education 25 (4): 435–455. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1696301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redecker, C. 2017. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu, Edited by Y. Punie. Luxembourg: Publications Offce of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ruitenberg, C. W. 2015. “‘Toward a Curatorial Turn in Education.” In Art’s Teachings, Teaching’s Art: Philosophical, Critical and Educational Musings, edited by T. Lewis and M. Laverty, 229–242. Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7191-7_16
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers Third Edition. Edición:. Third ed. Los Angeles; London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004.
   Google Scholar
• Starkey, L. 2020. “A Review of Research Exploring Teacher Preparation for the Digital Age.” Cambridge Journal of Education 50 (1): 37–56. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., J. van Braak, P. A. Ertmer, and A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2016. “Understanding the Relationship between Teachers Pedagogical Beliefs and Technology Use in Education: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.” Educational Technology Research and Development 1–21. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trust, T. and S. Prestridge. 2021. The Interplay of Five Elements of Influence on Educators’ PLN Actions,Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103–195. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103195.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2011. UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M. 2011. The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Academic Practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. 2015. “Political Computational Thinking: Policy Networks, Digital Governance and Learning to Code.” Critical Policy Studies 10 (1): 39–58. doi:10.1080/19460171.2015.1052003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabalza, M. A., and M. A. Zabalza. 2011. “La Formación Del Profesorado De Educación Infantil”. Participación Educativa, No 16: 103–113.
   Google Scholar