Discussion of “Assessment and review of the hydraulics of storage flood routing 70 years after the presentation of the Muskingum method”Footnote*

*Koussis A. D. (2009) Assessment and review of the hydraulics of storage flood routing 70 years after the presentation of the Muskingum method. Hydrol. Sci. J. 54(1), 43–61.

REFERENCES

• Apollov , B. A. , Kalinin , G. P. and Komarov , V. D. 1964 . Hydrological Forecasting , Jerusalem : Israel Program for Scientific Translations . Translated from Russian
   Google Scholar
• Brakensiek , D. L. 1963 . Estimating coefficients for storage flood routing . J. Geophys. Res. AGU , 68 ( 24 ) : 6471 – 6474 .
   Google Scholar
• Chow , V. T. 1959 . Open Channel Hydraulics , New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Cunge , J. A. 1969 . On the subject of a flood propagation method (Muskingum method) . J. Hydraul. Res. IAHR , 7 ( 2 ) : 205 – 230 .
   Google Scholar
• Hayami , S. 1951 . On the propagation of flood waves . Bull. Disaster Prev. Res. Inst. , 1 ( 1 ) : 1 – 16 . Kyoto Univ., Japan
   Google Scholar
• Heatherman , W. J. 2004 . “ Muskingum–Cunge revisited ” . In World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2004 , Edited by: Sehlke , G. , Hayes , D. F. and Stevens , D. K. Salt Lake City, UT : ASCE . In2 June–1 July 2004
   Google Scholar
• Koussis , A. D. 1978 . Theoretical estimation of flood routing parameters . J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE , 104 ( HY1 ) : 109 – 115 .
   Google Scholar
• Koussis , A. D. 2009 . Assessment and review of the hydraulics of storage flood routing 70 years after the presentation of the Muskingum method . Hydrol. Sci. J. , 54 ( 1 ) : 43 – 61 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy , G. T. 1938 . “ The unit hydrograph and flood routing ” . In Conference of North Atlantic Division , New London, CT : US Army Corps of Engineers .
   Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. 1989 . Unification of Muskingum difference schemes . J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE , 115 ( 4 ) : 536 – 543 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. 1992a . Multilinear Muskingum flood routing method . J. Hydrol. , 133 ( 3-4 ) : 259 – 272 .
   Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. 1992b . The cause of negative initial outflow with the Muskingum method . Hydrol. Sci. J. , 37 ( 4 ) : 391 – 401 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. 1994a . Hydrodynamic derivation of a variable parameter Muskingum method: 1. Theory and solution procedure . Hydrol. Sci. J. , 39 ( 5 ) : 431 – 442 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. 1994b . Hydrodynamic derivation of a variable parameter Muskingum method: 2. Verification . Hydrol. Sci. J. , 39 ( 5 ) : 443 – 458 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. Removing some anomalies of the Muskingum method . Proceedings of International Conference on Water and Environment . 15–18 December 2003 , Bhopal.
   Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. , O'Connell , P. E. and Ranga Raju , K. G. 2001 . Field applications of a variable-parameter Muskingum method . J. Hydrol. Engng , 6 ( 3 ) : 196 – 207 .
   Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. and Ranga Raju , K. G. 1998a . Variable-parameter stage-hydrograph routing method I: Theory . J. Hydrol. Engng ASCE , 3 ( 2 ) : 109 – 114 .
   Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. and Ranga Raju , K. G. 1998b . Variable-parameter stage-hydrograph routing method II: Evaluation . J. Hydrol. Engng ASCE , 3 ( 2 ) : 115 – 121 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. and Ranga Raju , K. G. 1999 . Approximate convection diffusion equations . J. Hydrol. Engng ASCE , 4 ( 2 ) : 161 – 164 .
   Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. and Ranga Raju , K. G. 2007 . Variable parameter Muskingum routing considering downstream effects . J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE , 133 ( 11 ) : 1249 – 1260 .
   Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. and Sahoo , B. 2007 . Applicability criteria of the variable parameter Muskingum stage and discharge routing methods . Water Resour. Res. , 43 ( 5 ) : 1 – 20 . W05409, doi:10.1029/2006WR004909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. and Sahoo , B. 2008 . Volume conservation controversy of the variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge method . J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE , 134 ( 4 ) : 475 – 485 .
   Google Scholar
• Perumal , M. , Moramarco , T. , Sahoo , B. and Barbetta , S. 2007 . A methodology for discharge estimation and rating curve development at ungaged river sites . Water Resour. Res. , 43 ( 2 ) : 1 – 22 . W02412, doi:10.1029/2005WR004609
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price , R. K. 1985 . “ Flood routing ” . In Developments in Hydraulic Engineering , Edited by: Novak , P. 129 – 173 . London : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers . Chapter 4
   Google Scholar
• Price , R. K. 2010 . Volume conservative, non-linear flood routing . J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE , in press
   Google Scholar
• Puls , L. G. 1928 . “ Construction of flood routing curves ” . In House document 185, US 70th Congress, First Session Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Singh , V. P. and Scarlatos , P. D. 1987 . Analysis of nonlinear Muskingum flood routing . J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE , 113 ( 1 ) : 61 – 79 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szilagyi , J. 1992 . Why can the weighting parameter of the Muskingum channel routing method be negative? . J. Hydrol. , 138 ( 1-2 ) : 145 – 151 .
   Google Scholar
• Todini , E. 2007 . A mass conservative and water storage consistent variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge approach . Hydrol. Earth System Sci. , 11 : 1645 – 1659 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USACE . 2008 . Hydrologic Modeling System, HEC-HMS v3.2 User's Manual , Army Corps of Engineering Center .
   Google Scholar
• Weinmann , P. E. and Laurenson , E. M. 1979 . Approximate flood routing methods: a review . J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE , 105 ( 12 ) : 1521 – 1526 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar