REFERENCES

• Abdulla, F.A. and Eshtawi, T., 2007. Application of automated geospatial watershed assessment (AGWA) tool to evaluate the sediment yield in a semi-arid region: case study, Kufranja Basin—Jordan. Journal of Civil Engineering, 1 (3), 234–244.
   Google Scholar
• Aksoy, H. and Kavvas, M.L., 2005. A review of hillslope and watershed scale erosion and sediment transport models. Catena, 64, 247–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, K., et al., 2006. Soil-erosion modelling along badland hillslopes in a dryland environment of NE Spain. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 8, 02874.
   Google Scholar
• Arekhi, S., 2007. Estimating erosion and sediment yield using KW-GIUH and MUSLE models in GIS environment. In: 3rd Watershed and soil and water resources management of Iran. Kerman: Shahid Bahonar University, 711–716. 10–12 January 2008. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Asokan, K., 1981. Runoff and sediment yield from Bino subwatershed of Ramganga Catchment. Thesis (M-Tech), Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar.
   Google Scholar
• Banasik, K., 1985. Applicability of the Universal Soil Loss Equation for predicting sediment yield from small watershed in Poland. In: International symposium on erosion, debris flow and disaster prevention. Tsukuba: The Erosion Control Engineering Society of Japan, 85–88, 3–5 September.
   Google Scholar
• Banasik, K., et al., 1988. Estimation of deforestation effect on flood flow and sediment yield from a small Carpathian watershed. In: International Symposium Interpraevent. Tagungspublikation, Band 1. Austria: Seite, 175–184, 1988–Graz.
   Google Scholar
• Banasik, K. and Walling, D.E., 1996. Predicting sedimentgraphs for a small agricultural catchment. Nordic Hydrology, 27, 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• Basson, G., 2005. Erosion and sediment dynamics from catchment to coast a southern perspective. Thesis (MSc), University of Stellenbosch, South Africa Water Research Commission. 38 p.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, D.B., et al., 1980. ANSWERS: a model for watershed planning. Transactions of the ASAE, 23, 938–944.
   Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski, J., 2003. Estimating watershed runoff and sediment yield using a GIS interface to Curve Number and MUSLE models. Soil Geology, Resource Note 66, 2 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cambazoglu, M.K. and Gogos, M., 2004. Sediment yields of basins in the Western Black Sea region of Turkey. Turk Journal of Engineering Environmental Science, 28, 355–367.
   Google Scholar
• Cardei, P., 2010. The dimensional analysis of the USLE-MUSLE soil erosion model. Proceedings of Romanian Academy, 12 (3), 249–253.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, A., et al., 2007. Environmental impact study of a pumped storage project on hillytract of Purulia—a remote sensing GIS analysis [online]. ACRS 2008. 9 pp. Available from: http://www.a-a-r-s.org/acrs/proceeding/ACRS2008/Papers/TS%209.1.pdf [Accessed 10–14 November 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M., 2006. Forest hydrology, an introduction to water and forest. 2nd ed. Ames: Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, E. and Mackay, D.S., 2004. Effects of distribution-based parameter aggregation on a spatially distributed agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. Journal of Hydrology, 295, 211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, A.J., 1981. The effectiveness of a sediment and erosion control ordinance. Thesis (MSc), Columbia University, Richland County, South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Das, G., 1982. Runoff and sediment yield from Upper Ramganga Catchment. PhD Dissertation, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar.
   Google Scholar
• DeCoursey, D.G. and Snyder, W.M., 1969. Computer-oriented method of optimizing hydrologic model parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 9, 34–56.
   Google Scholar
• Epifanio, C.R., et al., 1991. Hydrologic impacts of oak harvesting and evaluation of the modified universal soil loss equation. In: R.B. Standiford, ed. Proceedings of the symposium on Oak Woodlands and Hardwood rangeland management, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report PSW-126, 221–224.
   Google Scholar
• Erskine, W.D., et al., 2002. Land use effects on sediment yields and soil loss rates in small basins of Triassic sandstone near Sydney, NSW, Australia. Catena, 49, 271–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmali, A. and Abedini, M., 2009. Estimation of soil erosion rates using emprical models for determining their efficiency and accuracy comparing in Pole-Almasi catchment, Ardabil. In: 4th watershed and soil and water reources management of Iran. Kerman: Shahid Bahonar University, 657–660, 2–3 December 2009. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Fontes, J.C., et al., 2004. Runoff and erosion in volcanic soils of Azores: simulation with OPUS. Catena, 56, 199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, G.R., Meyer, L.D., and Onstad, C.A., 1977. A runoff erosiovity factor and variable slope length exponents for soil loss estimates. Transaction of the ASAE, 20, 683–687.
   Google Scholar
• Golson, K.F., et al., 2000. Evaluating modified rainfall erosivity factors in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. In: Geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 24–28 July. Honolulu: IGARSS 2000, 5, 2017–2020.
   Google Scholar
• Haan, C.T., et al., 1994. Designhydrology and sedimentology for small catchments. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 588 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S.S. and Ghorbani, M., 2005. Economic of soil erosion. Mashhad: Mashhad University. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Hrissanthou, V., 2005. Estimate of sediment yield in a basin without sediment data. Catena, 64, 333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, W.L., et al., 1987. Use of the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation for average annual sediment yield estimates on small rangeland drainage basins. IAHS Publication, 159, 413–422.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, F., 2007. Estimating and modeling soil loss and sediment yield in the Maracas-St. Joseph River catchment with empirical models (RUSLE and MUSLE) and a physically based model (Erosion 3D). Thesis (MSc), Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, McGill University, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Kandrika, S. and Dwivedi, R.S., 2003. Assessment of the impact of mining on agricultural land using erosion–deposition model and space borne multispectral data. Journal of Spatial Hydrolology, 3, 6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kandrika, S. and Venkataratnam, L., 2005. A spatially distributed event based model to predict sediment yield. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 5, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Khajehie, A., et al., 2002. Study of application capabilities of MUSLE model for storm-wise and annual sediment yield prediction in Shahrchai watershed. Arak: Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Centre/Jihad-e-Agriculture Organization of Markazi Province/Natural Resources and Livestock Research Centre of Markazi Province, 436–446, 22–24 January. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Khaledi Darvishan, A.V., et al., 2009. Comparison of efficacy and calibration of MUSLE-E and MUSLE-S models in storm-wise sediment estimation. In: The 5th national conference on watershed management. Gorgan, Iran, 22–23 April 2009. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Kinnell, P.I.A., 2001. The USLE-M and modeling erosion within catchments. In: D.E. Slott, R.H. Mohtar, and G.C. Steinardt, eds. Selected papers from the 10th international soil conservation organization meeting, 24–29 May 1999. Purdue University and the US Department of Agriculture-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, 924–928.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnell, P.I.A., 2005. Why the universal soil loss equation and the revised version of it do not predict event erosion well. Hydrological Processes, 19, 851–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnell, P.I.A., 2010. Event soil loss, runoff and the universal soil loss equation family of models. Journal of Hydrology, 385, 345–397.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnell, P.I.A. and Riss, L.M., 1998. USLE-M: empirical modeling rainfall erosion through runoff and sediment concentration. American Soil Science Society Journal, 62, 1662–1672.
   Google Scholar
• Laflen, J.M. and Moldenhauer, W.C., 2003. The USLE story. Special Publication No 1. Beijing: WASWC.
   Google Scholar
• Lpez-Tarazn, J.A., et al., 2012. The sediment budget of a highly dynamic mesoscale catchment: the River Isbena. Geomorphology, 138 (1), 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, N., 2006. Mathematical modelling of water soil erosion and sediment yield in large catchments. Thesis (MSc), University of Stellenbosch. 188 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Madeyski, M. and Banasik, K., 1989. Applicability of the modified universal soil loss equation in small Carpathian watersheds. Catena Supplement, 14, 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudzadeh, A., et al., 2002. Sediment yields and soil loss rates from native forest, pasture and cultivated land in the Bathurst area, New South Wales. Australian Forestry Journal, 65 (2), 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• McConkey, B.G., et al., 1997. Sediment yield and seasonal soil erodibility for semiarid cropland in Western Canada. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 77 (1), 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P. and Ravibabu, R., 2009. Simulation of storm sediment yield from an agricultural watershed using MUSLE, remote sensing and geographic information systems. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 8 (3), 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2006. SCS-CN-based modeling of sediment yield. Journal of Hydrology, 324, 301–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicks, A.D., et al., 1994. Estimating soil erosion with models having different technologies. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on International Erosion Control Association, 15–18 February, Reno, NV, 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Noor, H., et al., 2010. Application of MUSLE for the prediction of phosphorus losses. Water Science and Technology, 62 (4), 809–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotny, V. and Olem, H., 1994. Water quality: prevention, identification, and management of diffuse pollution. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, A., Chowdary, V.M., and Mal, B.C., 2009. Sediment yield modelling of an agricultural watershed using MUSLE, remote sensing and GIS. Paddy and Water Environment, 7, 105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porabdullah, M., 2005. Comparison of RUSLE and SWAT models in estimation of watershed erosion. Thesis (MSc), University of Sanati Sharif, Environmental Engineering. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, L.J., et al., 2012. SWAT-based runoff and sediment simulation in a small watershed, the loessial hilly-gullied region of China: capabilities and challenges. International Journal of Sediment Research, 27 (2), 226–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaiifard, M., et al., 2002. Study of MUSLE model application in storm-wise sediment prediction in Afcheh subwatershed. Arak: Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Centre/Jihad-e-Agriculture Organization of Markazi Province/Natural Resources and Livestock Research Centre of Markazi Province, 534–542, 22–24 January. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Rostamian, R., et al., 2008. Application of SWAT2000 model in sediment and runoff estimation in Beheshtabad watershed of North Karun subwatershed. Journal of Scinece and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Water and Soil Science, 12 (46b), 517–531. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, S.H.R., 2004. Comparison of some methods to estimate rainfall erosivity. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Industries, 19 (1), 45–52. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, S.H.R., et al., 2004. Efficacy of annual soil erosion models for storm-wise sediment prediction, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Engineers, 13 (1&2), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, S.H.R., et al., 2007a. Conformity of MUSLE estimates and erosion plot data for storm-wise sediment yield estimation. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 18 (1), 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, S.H.R., et al., 2007b. Is MUSLE apt to small steeply reforested watershed? Journal of Forest Research, 12, 270–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, S.H.R., et al., 2008. Comparison of sediment delivery ratio estimation methods in Chehelgazi watershed of Gheshlagh Dam. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Industries, 22 (1), 141–150. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, S.H.R. and Mahdavi, M., 2004. Applicability of SEDIMOT II model in flood and sediment yield estimation. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 6, 147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, S.H.R. and Singh, J.K., 2010. Derivation of flood hydrographs for ungauged upstream subwatersheds using a main outlet hydrograph. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15 (12), 1059–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J.R. and Canino, G., 1997. Erosion and sediment transport in a proposed regional sanitary landfill. In: AIDIS; Colegio de Ingenieros y Agrimensores de Puerto Rico. Preservación del Ambiente y el Control de la Contaminación: Eslabones Indispensables para el Futuro de las Américas [online], June. San Juan: AIDIS, 1–8. Available from: http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsaidis/puertorico/lviii.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sarkhosh, A., et al., 2004. Comparison and evaluation of MUSLE and MPSIAC models for sediment yield prediction in Darakeh watershed in Northern Tehran. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Industries, 34 (3), 733–747. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Z.Y., et al., 2009. A comparison of WEPP and SWAT for modeling soil erosion of the Zhangjiachong Watershed in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Agricultural Water Management, 96, 1435–1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S.J., et al., 1984. Prediction of sediment yield from southern plains grasslands with the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation. Journal of Range Management, 37 (4), 295–297.
   Google Scholar
• Varvani, J., et al., 2006. Assessment of the experimental models performance in watersheds sediment in time to single flood and provide modification coefficients. Journal of Natural Resources, 60 (4), 1125–1239. (In Persian.)
   Google Scholar
• Wambua, R.M., et al., 2009. Classification of catchment risk areas using spatially distributed event-based soil erosion: a case of Upper Njoro River catchment, Kenya. Journal of Design and Nature, 3 (4), 281–295.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.R., 1975. Sediment-yield prediction with Universal Equation using runoff energy factor, present and prospective technology for predicting sediment yield and sources. ARS-S-40. Brooksville, FL: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 244–252.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.R., 1977. Sediment delivery ratios determined with sediment and runoff models. In: Erosion and solid matter transport in inland water. Proceedings of Paris Symposium, July 1977, IAHS Publication, 122. Wallingford: IAHS Press, 168–179.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.R. and Berndt, H.D., 1977. Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers [online], 20 (6), 1100–1104. Available from: http://itia.ntua.gr/hsj/redbooks/122/iahs_122_0168.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wischmeier, W.H. and Smith, D.D., 1965. Predicting rainfall erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains [online]. Agricultural Handbook 282. Brooksville, FL: US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, 47 p. Available from: http://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/CAT79706928/PDF
   Google Scholar
• Wischmeier, W.H. and Smith, D.D., 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning [online]. Agriculture Handbook 537. Brooksville, FL: Science and Education Administration, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, 58 p. Available from: http://topsoil.nserl.purdue.edu/usle/AH_537.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C.S., et al., 2012. Simulation of soil and water loss in the Upper Huaihe River Basin using the Xinanjiang Model. Proceedings of Engineering, 28, 501–505.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., et al., 2009. Integration of Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) into a GIS framework to assess soil erosion risk. Journal of Land Degradation and Development, 20, 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar