REFERENCES

• Aguilar, F.J., et al., 2010. Modelling vertical error in LiDAR-derived digital elevation models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65 (1), 103–110. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, R., Breune, I., and Guillou, M., 2007. Avaloirs et puisards (Inlet and Drainage Wells). [online]. Available from: http://www.agrireseau.qc.ca/references/6/Fiches_MAPAQ-AAC_Erosion/AvaloirsPuisards_EN_web.pdf [Accessed 1 Feburary 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Burrough, P.A., 1986. Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüksalih, G., et al., 2012. DEM Generation with WorldView-2 Images. In: XXII ISPRS congress, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, 25 August–1 September, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Callow, J.N., Van Niel, K.P., and Boggs, G.S., 2007. How does modifying a DEM to reflect known hydrology affect subsequent terrain analysis? Journal of Hydrology, 332 (1–2), 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAPSA, 2011. Portrait préliminaire des nouvelles zones de gestion intégrée de l’eau par bassin versant de la CAPSA : les bassins versants des rivières La Chevrotière et Belle-Isle. St-Raymmond, Québec: Organisme des bassins versants des rivières Sainte-Anne, Portneuf, La Chevrotière et Belle-Isle.
   Google Scholar
• Chaplot, V., et al., 2006. Accuracy of interpolation techniques for the derivation of digital elevation models in relation to landform types and data density. Geomorphology, 77 (1–2), 126–141. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrier, R. and Li, Y.K., 2012. Assessing resolution and source effects of digital elevation models on automated floodplain delineation: a case study from the Camp Creek Watershed, Missouri. Applied Geography, 34, 38–46. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaubey, I., et al., 2005. Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrological Processes, 19 (3), 621–628. doi:10.1002/hyp.5607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVenecia, K., Walker, S., and Zhang, B.C., 2007. New approaches to generating and processing high resolution elevation data with imagery. Photogrammetric Week, 17 (5), 1442–1448.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, S., Kellenberger, T., and Itten, K., 2005. Accuracy assessment of automatically derived digital elevation models from aster data in mountainous terrain. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26 (9), 1943–1957. doi:10.1080/0143116042000298306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hage, M., et al., 2012. Evaluation of elevation, slope and stream network quality of SPOT DEMs. In: XXII ISPRS congress. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, 25 August–1 September, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Endreny, T.A. and Wood, E.F., 2001. Representing elevation uncertainty in runoff modelling and flowpath mapping. Hydrological Processes, 15 (12), 2223–2236. doi:10.1002/hyp.266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erskine, R.H., et al., 2007. Digital elevation accuracy and grid cell size: effects on estimated terrain attributes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71 (4), 1371–1380. doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, Y.F., Thomasson, J.A., and Sui, R.X., 2011. Remote sensing of soil properties in precision agriculture: a review. Frontiers of Earth Science, 5 (3), 229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Q.H., et al., 2010. Effects of topographic variability and lidar sampling density on several DEM interpolation methods. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 76 (6), 701–712. doi:10.14358/PERS.76.6.701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellweger, F., 1997. AGREE - DEM Surface Reconditioning System. [online]. Available from: http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/maidment/gishydro/ferdi/research/agree/agree.html [Accessed 14 December 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Hobi, M.L. and Ginzler, C., 2012. Accuracy assessment of digital surface models based on WorldView-2 and ADS80 stereo remote sensing data. Sensors, 12 (12), 6347–6368. doi:10.3390/s120506347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höhle, J. and Höhle, M., 2009. Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64 (4), 398–406. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinzadeh, S.R., 2011. Assessing the quality of ASTER DEMs for hydrological applications. In: 2011 international conference on environment science and engineering, 6 August 2010. Singapore: IPCBEE.
   Google Scholar
• Huaxing, L.U., Tang, G., 2008. Modelling terrain complexity. In: Z. Qiming, B. G. Lees, and T. Guo-an, eds. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography: advances in digital terrain analysis, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77800-4_9.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, K., 2003. DEM generation from satellite data. In: Goossens, ed. Remote sensing in transition. Rotterdam: Millpress Science Publishers, 273–276.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, S.K. and Domingue, J.O., 1988. Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54 (11), 1593–1600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenward, T., et al., 2000. Effects of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrologic predictions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 74 (3), 432–444. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00136-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P., et al., 2012. Evaluation of ASTER GDEM Ver2 using GPS measurements and SRTM Ver4.1 in China. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, I-4, 181–186. doi:10.5194/isprsannals-I-4-181-2012.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Gold, C., and Zhu, Q., 2005. Digital terrain modeling principles and methodology. New York: CRC Press, 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X.H., et al., 2012. Approximation theory applied to DEM vertical accuracy assessment. Transactions in GIS, 16 (3), 397–410. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01343.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longley, P., 2005. Geographical information systems and science. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, J.G., et al., 2003. Remote sensing and GIS for site-specific farming. In: J.G. Lyon, ed. GIS for water resources and watershed management, London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Maidment, D.R., 2003. Arc hydro : GIS for water resources. 3rd print., June 2003. ed. Redlands, Calif: ESRI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchel, G. and MacNabb, K., 2010. High resolution stereo satellite elevation mapping accuracy assessment. In: ASPRS 2010 annual conference, 30 April. San Diego, CA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, I.D., Grayson, R.B., and Ladson, A.R., 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological Processes, 5 (1), 3–30. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, S., et al., 2013. Evaluation of topographic index in relation to terrain roughness and DEM grid spacing. Journal of Earth System Science, 122 (3), 869–886. doi:10.1007/s12040-013-0292-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, F., et al., 2008. Hydrogeomorphic properties of simulated drainage patterns using digital elevation models: the flat area issue. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (6), 1176–1193. doi:10.1623/hysj.53.6.1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NDEP. 2004. Guidelines for digital elevation data–Version 1 [online], 93 p. Available from: http://www.ndep.gov/NDEP_Elevation_Guidelines_Ver1_10May2004.pdf [Accessed 7 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Nigel, R. and Rughooputh, S., 2010a. Mapping of monthly soil erosion risk of mainland Mauritius and its aggregation with delineated basins. Geomorphology, 114 (3), 101–114. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigel, R. and Rughooputh, S.D.D.V., 2010b. Soil erosion risk mapping with new datasets: an improved identification and prioritisation of high erosion risk areas. CATENA, 82 (3), 191–205. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2010.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigel, R. and Rughooputh, S.D.D.V., 2013. Application of a RUSLE-based soil erosion modelling on Mauritius Island. Soil Research, 50 (8), 645–651. doi:10.1071/SR12175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinartz, P., et al., 2010. Benchmarking and quality analysis of DEM generated from high and very high resolution optical stereo satellite data. ISPRS Symp. Commission I, Int. Archives Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII. Convergence in Geomatics, CGC, ISPRS.
   Google Scholar
• Rezak, S., Laborde, J.P., and Errih, M., 2012. Validation d’un modèle numérique de terrain adapté à la modélisation hydrologique régionale sur l’Algérie du Nord. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (5), 928–941. doi:10.1080/02626667.2012.685742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, M., et al., 2013. Evaluation of a surface hydrological connectivity index in agricultural catchments. Environmental Modelling & Software, 47, 7–15. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toutin, T. and Cheng, P., 2002. Comparison of automated digital elevation model extraction results using along-track ASTER and across-track SPOT stereo images. Optical Engineering, 41 (9), 2102–2106. doi:10.1117/1.1496111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaaja, M., et al., 2011. Mapping topography changes and elevation accuracies using a mobile laser scanner. Remote Sensing, 3 (12), 587–600. doi:10.3390/rs3030587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Velde, Y., et al., 2010. Field-scale measurements for separation of catchment discharge into flow route contributions. Vadose Zone Journal, 9 (1), 25–35. doi:10.2136/vzj2008.0141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaze, J., Teng, J., and Spencer, G., 2010. Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on topographic indices. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25 (10), 1086–1098. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, S.P., 2007. Uncertainties associated with digital elevation models for hydrologic applications: a review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1481–1500. doi:10.5194/hess-11-1481-2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.P., 2012. Digital terrain modeling. Geomorphology, 137 (1), 107–121. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, S., 2000. Assessing the quality for hydrological applications of digital elevation models derived from contours. Hydrological Processes, 14 (11–12), 1909–1929. doi:10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12<1909::AID-HYP45>3.0.CO;2-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolock, D.M. and Price, C.V., 1994. Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on atTopography-based watershed model. Water Resources Research, 30 (11), 3041–3052. doi:10.1029/94WR01971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Li, J., and Huang, G.H., 2008. A study on DEM-derived primary topographic attributes for hydrologic applications: sensitivity to elevation data resolution. Applied Geography, 28 (3), 210–223. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, L.-L., Liu, H.-B., and Zhao, X.-G., 2010. Impact of digital elevation model resolution on stream network parameters. In: Environmental Science and Information Application Technology (ESIAT), 2010 international conference, vol. 3, 17–18 July, Wuhan. IEEE, 455–458.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.Y., et al., 1999. Comparison of slope estimates from low resolution DEMs: scaling issues and a fractal method for their solution. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 24 (9), 763–779. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199908)24:9<763::AID-ESP9>3.0.CO;2-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2010. Hydrologic information extraction based on arc hydro tool and DEM. In: Challenges in environmental science and computer engineering (CESCE), 2010 international conference, vol. 1, March 6–7, Wuhan. IEEE, 503–506.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W.H. and Montgomery, D.R., 1994. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations. Water Resources Research, 30 (4), 1019–1028. doi:10.1029/93WR03553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q.M. and Liu, X.J., 2004. Error analysis on grid-based slope and aspect algorithms. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70 (8), 957–962. doi:10.14358/PERS.70.8.957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar