REFERENCES

• Abrisqueta, J.M., et al., 2006. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of disturbed and undisturbed loam soil. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 4 (1), 91–96. doi:10.5424/sjar/2006041-179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alyamani, M.S. and Sen, Z., 1993. Determination of hydraulic conductivity from complete grain-size distribution curves. Ground Water, 31, 551–555. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb00587.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appoloni, C.R., et al., 1990. Determinação da condutividade e difusividade hidráulica dos solos terra roxa estruturada e latossolo roxo através da infiltração vertical [Determination of hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity of structured red earth and red leptosol through vertical infiltration]. Semina, 11 (4), 145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Baloochestani, F., 2008. Estimation of hydraulic properties of the shallow aquifer system for selected basins in the Blue Ridge and the Piedmont physiographic provinces of the southeastern U.S. using streamflow recession and baseflow data [online]. Geosciences Dissertations, Paper 2. Available from: http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/geosciences_diss/2 [Accessed 13 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Bear, J., 1972. Dynamics of fluids in porous media. New York: American Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, W., 1964. Zur Bestimmung der Wasserdurchlässigkeit von Kiesen und Sanden aus der Kornverteilungskurve. WWT- Wasserwirtschaft Wassertechnik, 14, 165–168.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, N. and Perrier, E., 2010. Multiscale percolation properties of a fractal pore network. Geoderma, 160, 105–110. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma, J., 1982. Measuring the hydraulic conductivity of soil horizons with continuous macropores. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46, 438–441. doi:10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600020047x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J.J., 2005. Hydrogeological methods. In: Y. Rubin and S. Hubbard, eds. Hydrogeophysics. Dordrecht: Springer, 23–58.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, P.C., 1937. Fluid flow through granular beds. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, 15, 150–166.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, P.C., 1956. Flow of gases through porous media. London: Butterworth Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-C., 1998. Estimating the hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity in unsaturated porous media by fractal capillary model. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 21 (4), 449–458. doi:10.1080/02533839.1998.9670407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauser, C., 1992. Permeability of crystalline rocks. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 73 (21), 233–238. doi:10.1029/91EO00190.
   Google Scholar
• Das, B.B. and Kondraivendhan, B., 2012. Implication of pore size distribution parameters on compressive strength, permeability and hydraulic diffusivity of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 28, 382–386. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marsily, G., 1986. Quantitative hydrogeology: groundwater hydrology for engineers. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delépine, N., et al., 2004. Characterization of fluid transport properties of the Hot Dry Rock reservoir Soultz-2000 using induced microseismicity. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 1, 77–83. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/1/1/010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, M.L., et al., 2006. In situ measurement of the hydraulic diffusivity of the active Chelungpu Fault, Taiwan. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L16317. doi:10.1029/2006GL026889.
   Google Scholar
• ESRI, 2010. ArcMap (version 10). Redlands, CA: ESRI. Available from: http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis
   Google Scholar
• Fallico, C., 2014. Reconsideration at field scale of the relationship between hydraulic conductivity and porosity: the case of a sandy aquifer in South Italy. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 15. doi:10.1155/2014/537387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, U.H., et al., 2001. Hydraulic and mechanical properties of glacial sediments beneath Unteraargletscher, Switzerland: implications for glacier basal motion. Hydrological Processes, 15, 3525–3540. doi:10.1002/hyp.349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flach, G.P., et al., 2000. Electromagnetic Borehole Flowmeter (EBF) testing at the Southwest Plume Test Pad (U). Savannah River Site, Aiken: Westinghouse Savannah River Company (Rep. WSRC-TR–2000–00347).
   Google Scholar
• Frechen, M., Horváth, E., and Gábris, G., 1997. Geochronology of middle and upper Pleistocene loess sections in Hungary. Quaternary Research, 48, 291–312. doi:10.1006/qres.1997.1929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, T.J., et al., 1992. Application of three aquifer test methods for estimating hydraulic properties within the 100-N area. Richland, Washington: Pacific Northwest Laboratory (Report US Department of Energy, Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830).
   Google Scholar
• Giménez, D., Rawls, W.J., and Lauren, J.G., 1999. Scaling Properties of saturated hydraulic conductivity in soil. Geoderma, 88, 205–220. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00105-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H., Jiao, J.J., and Li, H., 2010. Groundwater response to tidal fluctuation in a two-zone aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, 381, 364–371. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, K., et al., 2007. Estimation of layered aquifer diffusivity and river resistance using flood wave response model. Journal of Hydrology, 337 (3–4), 284–293. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazen, A., 1893. Some physical properties of sand and gravels, with special reference to their use in filtration. Twenty Fourth Annual Report of the State Board of Health of Massachusetts, 541–556.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R.C., 1983. Basic ground-water hydrology. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2220.
   Google Scholar
• Illman, W.A., 2005. Type curve analyses of pneumatic single-hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff: direct evidence for a porosity scale effect. Water Resources Research, 41, W04018. doi:10.1029/2004WR003703.
   Google Scholar
• Illman, W.A., 2006. Strong field evidence of directional permeability scale effect in fractured rock. Journal of Hydrology, 319 (1–4), 227–236. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jámbor, Á.,1997. AKözép-Dunántúlfiatal kainozoos rétegtanának és fejl}odéstörténetének néhány kérdése. Annual Report of the Geological Institute of Hungary 1996 (2), 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Martínez, J., et al., 2013. Temporal and spatial scaling of hydraulic response to recharge in fractured aquifers: insights from a frequency domain analysis. Water Resources Research, 49, 3007–3023. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaubisch, M. and Fischer, M., 1985. Zur Berechnung des Filtrationskoeffizienten in Tagebaukippen. Teil 3: Ermittlung des Filtrationskoeffizienten für schluffige Feinsande aus Mischbodenkippen durch Korngrößenanalysen. Neue Bergbautechnik, 15, 142–143.
   Google Scholar
• Knudby, C. and Carrera, J., 2006. On the use of apparent hydraulic diffusivity as an indicator of connectivity. Journal of Hydrology, 329, 377–389. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács, J., et al., 2011. Plio-Pleistocene red clay deposits in the Pannonian basin: a review. Quaternary International, 240 (1–2), 35–43. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2010.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahn, J., 2004. Transport modelling with CTRAN/W: an engineering methodology. Calgary: GEO-SLOPT International.
   Google Scholar
• Leahy, P.P., 1976. Hydraulic characteristics of the Piney Point aquifer and overlying confining bed near Dover. Dover, DE: Geological Survey, Report of investigations 26.
   Google Scholar
• Le Borgne, T., et al., 2006. Assessment of preferential flow path connectivity and hydraulic properties at single borehole and cross-borehole scales in a fractured aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, 328, 347–359. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, V.C., 1984. Estimation of in-situ hydraulic diffusivity of rock masses. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 122, 545–559. doi:10.1007/BF00874616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Landa, L. and Carrera, J., 2005. An analysis of hydraulic conductivity scale effects in granite (Full-scale Engineered Barrier Experiment (FEBEX), Grimsel, Switzerland. Water Resources Research, 41, W03006.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.A. and Johnson, A.I., 1967. Summary of hydrologic and physical properties of rock and soil materials, as analyzed by the hydrologic laboratory of the U.S. Geological Survey (1948–60). US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1839-D.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, T., 1997. Assessing the paradigm shift: deformable glacier beds. Quaternary Science Reviews, 16, 995–1016. doi:10.1016/S0277-3791(97)00030-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemecz, E., et al., 2000. The origin of the silt size quartz grains and minerals in loess. Quaternary International, 68–71, 199–208. doi:10.1016/S1040-6182(00)00044-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, S.P., 1990. Universal scaling of hydraulic conductivities and dispersivities in geologic media. Water Resources Research, 26, 1749–1758. doi:10.1029/WR026i008p01749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, S.P. and Witherspoon, P.A., 1972. Field determination of the hydraulic properties of leaky multiple aquifer systems. Water Resources Research, 8 (5), 1284–1298. doi:10.1029/WR008i005p01284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odong, J., 2007. Evaluation of empirical formulae for determination of hydraulic conductivity based on grain-size analysis. Journal of American Science, 3 (3), 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Onder, H., 1994. Determination of aquifer parameters of finite confined aquifers from constant drawdown nonsteady type-curves. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 39 (3), 269–280. doi:10.1080/02626669409492743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco, F.A.L., 2013. Hydraulic diffusivity and macrodispersivity calculations embedded in a geographic information system. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58 (4), 930–944. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.784847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco, F.A.L. and Alencoão, A.M.P., 2006. Role of fractures in weathering of solid rocks: narrowing the gap between laboratory and field weathering rates. Journal of Hydrology, 316 (1–4), 248–265. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco, F.A.L. and Szocs, T., 2006. Dedolomitization reactions” driven by anthropogenic activity on loessy sediments, SW Hungary. Applied Geochemistry, 21, 614–631. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco, F.A.L. and Van der Weijden, C.H., 2012. Weathering of plagioclase across variable flow and solute transport regimes. Journal of Hydrology, 420–421, 46–58. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pécsi, M., 1987. The loess-paleosol and related subaereal sequence in Hungary. Geojournal, 15 (2), 151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhana, B., Nageshb, M., and Bhattacharjee, B., 2005. Prediction of the hydraulic diffusivity from pore size distribution of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 1724–1733. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovey, C.W. and Cherkauer, D.S., 1995. Scale dependency of hydraulic conductivity measurements. Ground Water, 33, 769–780. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00023.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad, H. and Teutsch, G., 1994. Effects of the investigation scale on pumping test results in heterogeneous porous aquifers. Journal of Hydrology, 159, 61–77. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(94)90249-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze-Makuch, D. and Cherkauer, D.S., 1997. Method developed for extrapolating scale behavior. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 78, 3. doi:10.1029/97EO00005.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze-Makuch, D. and Cherkauer, D.S., 1998. Variations in hydraulic conductivity with scale of measurement during aquifer tests in heterogeneous, porous, carbonate rocks. Hydrogeology Journal, 6, 204–215. doi:10.1007/s100400050145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze-Makuch, D., et al., 1999. Scale dependency of hydraulic conductivity in heterogeneous media. Ground Water, 37, 904–919. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb01190.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seelheim, F., 1880. Methoden zur Bestimmung der Durchlässigkeit des Bodens. Fresen. Zeitschrift für Analytische Chemie, 19, 387–418. doi:10.1007/BF01341054.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, R.G., 1989. Correlations of permeability and grain sizes. Ground Water, 27, 633–638. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1989.tb00476.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, D. and Lin, G., 2004. Application of spectral analysis to determine hydraulic diffusivity of a sandy aquifer(Pingtung County, Taiwan). Hydrological Processes, 18 (9), 1655–1669. doi:10.1002/hyp.1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smalley, I.J. and Leach, J.A., 1978. The origin and distribution of the loess in the Danube basin and associated regions of East-Central Europe—A review. Sedimentary Geology, 21, 1–26. doi:10.1016/0037-0738(78)90031-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwani, P., 1976. Earthquakes associated with the Clark Hill reservoir, South Carolina—A case of induced seismicity. Engineering Geology, 10, 239–253. doi:10.1016/0013-7952(76)90024-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwani, P., 1997. On the nature of reservoir-induced seismicity. Pure Applied Geophysics, 150, 473–492. doi:10.1007/s000240050089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwani, P., Cobb, J.S., and Schaeffer, M.F., 1999. In situ measurements of hydraulic properties of a shear zone in northwestern South Carolina. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104 (B7), 14993–15003. doi:10.1029/1999JB900059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.J. and Alley, W.M., 2001. Ground-water-level monitoring and the importance of long-term water-level data. Denver, CO: US Geological Survey Circular 1217.
   Google Scholar
• Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R.B., 1964. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Trefry, M.G. and Johnston, C.D., 1998. Pumping test analysis for a tidally forced aquifer. Ground Water, 36 (3), 427–433. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02813.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kamp, G., 2001. Methods for determining the in situ hydraulic conductivity of shallow aquitards – an overview. Hydrogeology Journal, 9 (1), 5–16. doi:10.1007/s100400000118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesselinov, V.V., Neuman, S.P., and Illman, W.A., 2001. Threedimensional numerical inversion of pneumatic cross-hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff: 2. Equivalent parameters, high-resolution stochastic imaging and scale effects. Water Resources Research, 37, 3019–3041. doi:10.1029/2000WR000135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vienken, T. and Dietrich, P., 2011. Field evaluation of methods for determining hydraulic conductivity from grain size data. Journal of Hydrology, 400, 58–71. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuković, M. and Soro, A., 1992. Determination of hydraulic conductivity of porous media from grain-size composition. Littleton, CO: Water Resources Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wibberley, C.A.J., 2002. Hydraulic diffusivity of fault gouge zones and implications for thermal pressurization during seismic slip. Earth Planets Space, 54, 1153–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar