REFERENCES

• Abbaspour, K.C., et al., 2007. Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333 (2–4), 413–430. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahart, R.J., et al., 2012. Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting. Progress in Physical Geography, 36 (4), 480–513. doi:10.1177/0309133312444943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altunkaynak, A., 2007. Forecasting surface water level fluctuations of lake van by artificial neural networks. Water Resources Management, 21 (2), 399–408. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9022-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E.A., 1976. A point energy and mass balance of a snow cover. NOAA Technical Report NWS-19, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J.G., Allen, P.M., and Bernhardt, G., 1993. A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology, 142, 47–69. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J.G., et al., 1998. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34 (1), 73–89. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. and Adams, B.J., 2006. Integration of artificial neural networks with conceptual models in rainfall-runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 318 (1–4), 232–249. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, L.H.C. and Wong, T.S.W., 2010. Improving event-based rainfall–runoff modelling using a combined artificial neural network–kinematic wave approach. Journal of Hydrology, 390 (1–2), 9–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corzo, G.A., et al., 2009. Combining semi-distributed process-based and data-driven models in flow simulation: a case study of the Meuse river basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 1619–1634. doi:10.5194/hess-13-1619-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulibaly, P., 2010. Reservoir computing approach to Great Lakes water level forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 381, 76–88. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunge, J.A., 1969. On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Musklngum method). Journal of Hydraulic Research, 7 (2), 205–230. doi:10.1080/00221686909500264
   Google Scholar
• Ehsanzadeh, E., et al., 2012. On the behaviour of dynamic contributing areas and flood frequency curves in North American Prairie watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 414–415, 364–373. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshorbagy, A., Simonovic, S.P., and Panu, U.S., 2000. Performance evaluation of artificial neural networks for runoff prediction. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5 (4), 424–427. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:4(424)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshorbagy, A.A., et al., 2010. Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modelling techniques in hydrology—Part 1: concepts and methodology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14, 1931–1941. doi:10.5194/hess-14-1931-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment Canada, 2009. Canadian climate normals 1971-2000 [online]. Available from: http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html. [Accessed: 10 December 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Fang, X., et al., 2008. Drought impacts on Canadian prairie wetland snow hydrology. Hydrological Processes, 22 (15), 2858–2873. doi:10.1002/hyp.7074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassman, P.W., et al., 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the ASABE, 50 (4), 1211–1250. doi:10.13031/2013.23637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, D.M. and Landine, P.G., 1988. An energy-budget snowmelt model for the Canadian Prairies. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 25, 1292–1303. doi:10.1139/e88-124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, W.H. and Ampt, G.A., 1911. Studies on soil physics, 1. The flow of air and water through soils. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4, 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Guez, A., Protopopsecu, V., and Barhen, J., 1988. On the stability, storage capacity, and design of nonlinear continuous neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18 (1), 80–87. doi:10.1109/21.87056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, G.L., Hargreaves, G.H., and Riley, J.P., 1985. Agricultural benefits for Senegal River Basin. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 111 (2), 113–124. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:2(113)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., and White, H., 1989. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2 (5), 359–366. doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izadifar, Z. and Elshorbagy, A., 2010. Prediction of hourly actual evapotranspiration using neural networks, genetic programming, and statistical models. Hydrological Processes, 24, 3413–3425. doi:10.1002/hyp.7771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A. and Srinivasulu, S., 2006. Integrated approach to model decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial neural network and conceptual techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 317 (3–4), 291–306. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kişi, Ö., 2006. Evapotranspiration estimation using feed-forward neural networks. Nordic Hydrology, 37 (3), 247–260. doi:10.2166/nh.2006.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmen, D., et al., 2008. From impacts to adaptation: Canada in a changing climate 2007. Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, K., 1944. A method for the solution of certain problems in least squares. The Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 2, 164–168.
   Google Scholar
• Lévesque, É., et al., 2008. Evaluation of streamflow simulation by SWAT model for two small watersheds under snowmelt and rainfall. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (5), 961–976. doi:10.1623/hysj.53.5.961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.B., Yang, W., and Wang, X., 2008. Development of a SWAT extension module to simulate riparian wetland hydrologic processes at a watershed scale. Hydrological Processes, 22 (16), 2901–2915. doi:10.1002/hyp.6874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, D.J.C., 1992. A practical Bayesian framework for backpropagation networks. Neural Computation, 4, 448–472. doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, H.R. and Dandy, G.C., 2000. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 15 (1), 101–124. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00007-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt, D., 1963. An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11 (2), 431–441. doi:10.1137/0111030
   Google Scholar
• Monteith, J.L., 1965. Evaporation and the environment. In the state and movement of water in living organisms. 19th Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology. Cambridge University Press, London, UK, p. 205–234.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M.D., 1991. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics, 33, 161–174. do i:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemi, A.-R., Hosseini, S.M., and Akbarzadeh-T, M.-R., 2006. Soft computing-based nonlinear fusion algorithms for describing non-Darcy flow in porous media. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 44 (2), 269–282. doi:10.1080/00221686.2006.9521681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemi, A.R., et al., 2008. On the quality of multi-objective calibration results in conceptual rainfall-runoff models. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Flood Risk Management: Research into Practice, FloodRisk 2008, 30 September –2 October, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Neitsch, S.L., et al., 2011. Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) user’s manual: version 2009. Temple, TX: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, I., Mimikou, M., and Kapetanaki, M., 2007. Estimation of nitrogen and phosphorus losses to surface water and groundwater through the implementation of the SWAT model for Norwegian soils. Journal Soils Sediments, 7 (4), 223–231. doi:10.1065/jss2007.04.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, R.W., Spence, C., and Pomeroy, J.W., 2011. Connectivity and runoff dynamics in heterogeneous basins. Hydrological Processes, 25, 3061–3075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration, 2008. Prairie farm rehabilitation administration (PFRA) watershed project–- areas of non-contributing drainage. Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, C.H.B. and Taylor, R.J., 1972. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review, 100, 81–92. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:OTAOSH>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryke, A., Mostaghim, S., and Nazemi, A., 2007. Heatmap visualization of population based multi objective algorithms. In: S. Obayashi, et al. eds. Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization. Berlin: Springer, 361–375. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70928-2_29
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J.T., 1972. A model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resources Research, 8, 1204–1213. doi:10.1029/WR008i005p01204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saskatchewan Watershed Authority, 2005. Background report: Assiniboine River watershed. Regina: Assiniboine Watershed. Technical committee, 123.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D.A., 2010. The influence of contributing area on the hydrology of the prairie pothole region of North America. Thesis (PhD). Department of Geography, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, J.A., et al., 1991. Soil Landscapes of Canada—Procedures Manual and User’s Handbook—1991. LRRC Contribution Number 88-29, Land Resource Research Centre, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa. 74.
   Google Scholar
• Shook, K.R., et al., 2011. Memory effects of depressional storage in Northern Prairie hydrology. Hydrological Processes, 25 (25), 3890–3898. doi:10.1002/hyp.8381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, R.R., Dibike, Y.B., and Prowse, T.D., 2012. Modeling climate change impacts on hydrology and nutrient loading in the Upper Assiniboine Catchment. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48 (1), 74–89. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00592.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomatine, D.P. and Xue, Y., 2004. M5 model trees and neural networks: application to flood forecasting in the upper reach of the Huai River in China. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 9 (6), 491–501. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:6(491)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sophocleous, M.A., et al., 1999. Integrated numerical modelling for basin-wide water management: the case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in south-central Kansas. Journal of Hydrology, 214, 179–196. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00289-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, C., 2007. On the relation between dynamic storage and runoff: a discussion on thresholds, efficiency, and function. Water Resources Research, 43 (12), 1944–7973. doi:10.1029/2006WR005645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, C., 2010. A paradigm shift in hydrology: storage thresholds across scales influence catchment runoff generation. Geography Compass, 4, 819–833. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00341.x
   Google Scholar
• Spence, C., et al., 2010. Storage dynamics and streamflow in a catchment with a variable contributing area. Hydrological Processes, 24, 2209–2221. doi:10.1002/hyp.7492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P., McNair, J.N., and Johnson, T.E., 2006. Comparison of process-based and artificial neural network approaches for streamflow modelling in an agricultural watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA), 42 (3), 545–563. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04475.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebizadeh, M., et al., 2010. Uncertainty analysis in sediment load modelling using ANN and SWAT model. Water Resources Management, 24, 1747–1761. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9522-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1972. National engineering handbook section 4 hydrology. Chapters 4–10. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Kamp, G., Hayashi, M., and Gallen, D., 2003. Comparing the hydrology of grassed and cultivated catchments in the semi-arid Canadian prairies. Hydrological Processes, 17, 559–575. doi:10.1002/hyp.1157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Griensven, A. and Meixner, T., 2007. A global and efficient multi-objective autocalibration and uncertainty estimation method for water quality catchment models. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 9 (4), 277–291. doi:10.2166/hydro.2007.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, T., Howard, S.W., and Hoshin, V.G., 2004. Rainfall-runoff modelling in gauged and ungauged catchments. England: Imperial College Print.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, L., et al., 2011. Reconstructing sixty year (1950-2009) daily soil moisture over the Canadian Prairies using the variable infiltration capacity model. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 36 (1), 83–102. doi:10.4296/cwrj3601083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J.R., 1969. Flood routing with variable travel time or variable storage coefficients. Transactions of the ASAE, 12 (1), 100–103. doi:10.13031/2013.38772
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G.P., 2003. Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing, 50, 159–175. doi:10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00702-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Srinivasan, R., and Hao, F., 2007. Predicting hydrologic response to climate change in the Luohe river basin using the SWAT model. American Social Agricultural Biologic Engineering, 50 (3), 901–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar