New fuzzy neural network–Markov model and application in mid- to long-term runoff forecast

References

• Adamowski, J., et al., 2012. Comparison of multivariate adaptive regression splines with coupled wavelet transform artificial neural networks for runoff forecasting in Himalayan micro-watersheds with limited data. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 14, 731. doi:10.2166/hydro.2011.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamowski, J. and Sun, K., 2010. Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of non-perennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 390 (1–2), 85–91. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anctil, F. and Tape, D.G., 2004. An exploration of artificial neural network rainfall-runoff forecasting combined with wavelet decomposition. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 3 (S1), S121–S128. doi:10.1139/s03-071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., et al., 2001. A review of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks. Clinical Applications of Artificial Neural Networks, 256–297. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543494.012
   Google Scholar
• Aqil, M., et al., 2007. A comparative study of artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy in continuous modeling of the daily and hourly behaviour of runoff. Journal of Hydrology, 337 (1–2), 22–34. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behzad, M., et al., 2009. Generalization performance of support vector machines and neural networks in runoff modeling. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (4), 7624–7629. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolch, G., et al., 2006. Queueing networks and Markov chains: modeling and performance evaluation with computer science applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Chang, L.-C., and Huang, H.-L., 2002. Real-time recurrent learning neural network for stream flow forecasting. Hydrological Processes, 16 (13), 2577–2588. doi:10.1002/hyp.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deka, P. and Chandramouli, V., 2003. A fuzzy neural network model for deriving the river stage-discharge relationship. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48 (2), 197–209. doi:10.1623/hysj.48.2.197.44697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibike, Y.B. and Solomatine, D.P., 2001. River flow forecasting using artificial neural networks. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 26 (1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/S1464-1909(01)85005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshorbagy, A., Simonovic, S.P., and Panu, U.S., 2000. Performance evaluation of artificial neural networks for runoff prediction. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5 (4), 424–427. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:4(424)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, L.R., 2009. Assessing the effect of climate change on mean annual runoff. Journal of Hydrology, 379 (3–4), 351–359. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X., et al., 2010. Study on prediction model of the chaotic runoff time series using fuzzy support vector machines and a case study. Shuili Fadian Xuebao (Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering), 29 (3), 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hlynka, M., 2007. Queueing networks and markov chains (modeling and performance evaluation with computer science applications). Technometrics, 49 (1), 104–105. doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s457
   Google Scholar
• Hong, W.-C. and Pai, P.-F., 2007. Potential assessment of the support vector regression technique in rainfall forecasting. Water Resources Management, 21 (2), 495–513. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9026-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X.J., et al., 2012. Index of multiple factors and expected height of fully mechanized water flowing fractured zone. Journal of China Coal Society, 4, 016.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A., 2009. Markov Analysis with Non-constant Hazard Rates. Thesis (Master). California State University.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, A. and Kumar, A.M., 2007. Hybrid neural network models for hydrologic time series forecasting. Applied Software Computing, 7 (2), 585–592. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jothityangkoon, C., Sivapalan, M., and Viney, N.R., 2000. Tests of a space-time model of daily rainfall in southwestern Australia based on nonhomogeneous random cascades. Water Resources Research, 36 (1), 267–284. doi:10.1029/1999WR900253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasabov, N.K. and Song, Q., 2002. DENFIS: dynamic evolving neural-fuzzy inference system and its application for time-series prediction. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 10 (2), 144–154. doi:10.1109/91.995117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O., 2010. Wavelet regression model for short-term stream flow forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 389 (3–4), 344–353. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O., 2011. Wavelet regression model as an alternative to neural networks for river stage forecasting. Water Resources Management, 25 (2), 579–600. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9715-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kişi, Ö., 2009. Wavelet regression model as an alternative to neural networks for monthly stream flow forecasting. Hydrological Processes, 23 (25), 3583–3597. doi:10.1002/hyp.7461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottegoda, N.T., Natale, L., and Raiteri, E., 2000. Statistical modeling of daily stream flows using rainfall input and curve number technique. Journal of Hydrology, 234 (3–4), 170–186. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00252-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, H.K. and Cai, Y., 1994. A fuzzy neural network and its application to pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2 (3), 185–193. doi:10.1109/91.298447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., et al., 2010. Analysis of parameter uncertainty in semi-distributed hydrological models using bootstrap method: A case study of SWAT model applied to Yingluoxia watershed in northwest China. Journal of Hydrology, 385 (1–4), 76–83. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.-Y., Cheng, C.-T., and Chau, K.-W., 2006. Using support vector machines for long-term discharge prediction. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (4), 599–612. doi:10.1623/hysj.51.4.599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, H.R., et al., 2010. Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: current status and future directions. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25 (8), 891–909. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, L., Nott, D., and Sharma, A., 2004. A comparative study of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resources Research, 40, 2. doi:10.1029/2003WR002378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosavi, V., et al., 2013. A wavelet-ANFIS hybrid model for groundwater level forecasting for different prediction periods. Water Resources Management, 27 (5), 1301–1321. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0239-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak, P.C., et al., 2004. A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series. Journal of Hydrology, 291 (1–2), 52–66. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., et al., 2013. Using self-organizing maps and wavelet transforms for space-time pre-processing of satellite precipitation and runoff data in neural network based rainfall-runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 476, 228–243. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachet, F., Roy, P., and Barbieri, G., 2011. Finite-length Markov processes with constraints. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 635–642.
   Google Scholar
• Partal, T. and Kişi, Ö., 2007. Wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for precipitation forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 342 (1–2), 199–212. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rong, H.-J., et al., 2006. Sequential adaptive fuzzy inference system (SAFIS) for nonlinear system identification and prediction. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157 (9), 1260–1275. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2005.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamseldin, A.Y., O’Connor, K.M., and Liang, G.C., 1997. Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology, 197 (1–4), 203–229. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03259-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, B., 2009. Short-term load forecast based on modified particle swarm optimizer and back propagation neural network model. Journal of Computer Applications, 29 (4), 1036–1039. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1087.2009.01036
   Google Scholar
• Shi, B., 2010a. Short-term load forecasting based on modified particle swarm optimizer and fuzzy neural network model. System Engineering-Theory & Practice, 30 (1), 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, B., 2010b. Long-term runoff forecast method based on dynamic adjustment particle swarm optimizer algorithm and Holt-Winters linear seasonal model. Transactions of the CSAE, 26 (7), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Shiri, J. and Kisi, O., 2010. Short-term and long-term stream flow forecasting using a wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model. Journal of Hydrology, 394 (3–4), 486–493. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-H. and Hung, K.-N., 2013. Intelligent adaptive law for missile guidance using fuzzy neural networks. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 15 (2), 182–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Liang, H., and Liu, G., 2005. Mid and long term hydrology forecast model and its application. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2, 008.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, S., Song, J., and Khan, N.I., 2012. Simulating and predicting river discharge time series using a wavelet-neural network hybrid modelling approach. Hydrological Processes, 26 (2), 281–296. doi:10.1002/hyp.8227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, S., et al., 2013. A wavelet-neural network hybrid modelling approach for estimating and predicting river monthly flows. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58 (2), 374–389. doi:10.1080/02626667.2012.754102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.L., Chau, K.W., and Li, Y.S., 2008. River stage prediction based on a distributed support vector regression. Journal of Hydrology, 358 (1–2), 96–111. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, L., Shamseldin, A.Y., and O’connor, K.M., 2001. A non-linear combination of the forecasts of rainfall-runoff models by the first-order Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system. Journal of Hydrology, 245 (1–4), 196–217. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00349-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J.-S., Yu, S.-P., and Liu, G.-M., 2013. Multi-step-ahead predictor design for effective long-term forecast of hydrological signals using a novel wavelet-NN hybrid model. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences Discussions, 10, 9239–9269. doi:10.5194/hessd-10-9239-2013
   Google Scholar