A multivariate design framework for river confluences

References

• Bender, J., Wahl, T., and Jensen, J., 2014. Multivariate design in the presence of non-stationarity. Journal of Hydrology, 514, 123–130. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BfG (Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde), 2009. Flusshydrologische Software (River hydrologic software) – User Manual, version 2.1.3, Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde (German Federal Institute of Hydrology).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., et al., 2012. Flood coincidence risk analysis using multivariate copula functions. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17 (6), 742–755. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, S., Heffernan, J., and Tawn, J., 1999. Dependence measures for extreme value analyses. Extremes, 2 (4), 339–365. doi:10.1023/A:1009963131610
   Google Scholar
• De Michele, C. and Salvadori, G., 2003. A generalized Pareto intensity-duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2-copulas. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108 (D2), 4067. doi:10.1029/2002JD002534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favre, A.-C., et al., 2004. Multivariate hydrological frequency analysis using copulas. Water Resources Research, 40, W01101. doi:10.1029/2003WR002456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genest, C., Rémillard, B., and Beaudoin, D., 2009. Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: a review and a power study. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gräler, B., et al., 2013. Multivariate return periods in hydrology: a critical and practical review focusing on synthetic design hydrograph estimation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 1281–1296. doi:10.5194/hess-17-1281-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S. and Serinaldi, F., 2006. Design hyetograph analysis with 3-copula function. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (2), 223–238. doi:10.1623/hysj.51.2.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gringorten, I.I., 1963. A plotting rule for extreme probability paper. Journal of Geophysical Research, 68 (3), 813–814. doi:10.1029/JZ068i003p00813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer, C., Mandlburger, G., and Habersack, H., 2009. Hydraulically related hydro-morphological units: description based on a new conceptual mesohabitat evaluation model (MEM) using lidar data as geometric input. River Research and Applications, 25, 29–47. doi:10.1002/rra.1083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, S. and Govindaraju, R.S., 2010. A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. Journal of Hydrology, 380 (1–2), 121–134. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar, S. and Simonovic, S.P., 2008. Bivariate flood frequency analysis: part 1 - Determination of marginals by parametric and nonparametric techniques. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 1, 190–200. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2008.00022.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar, S. and Simonovic, S.P., 2009. Bivariate flood frequency analysis. Part 2: a copula-based approach with mixed marginal distributions. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2 (1), 32–44. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, M.G., 1955. Rank correlation methods. London: Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, H.B., 1945. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13, 245–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, C.D. and Calise, S.J., 1987. Bivariate analysis of concurrent flooding. In: V.P. Singh, ed. Hydrologic frequency modeling: proceedings of the international symposium on flood frequency and risk analysis, 14–17 May 1986 Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Dordrecht: Reidel, 615–632.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2010. Estimating Joint Probabilities of Design Coincident Flows at Stream Confluences. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 15–36. Washington, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nelsen, R.B., 2006. An introduction to copulas. Lecture notes in statistics. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nujic, M., 1999. Praktischer Einsatz eines hochgenauen Verfahrens für die Berechnung von tiefengemittelten Strömungen. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Wasserwesen der Universität der Bundeswehr München, Nr. 64.
   Google Scholar
• Pironneau, P., 1989. Finite element methods for fluids. Paris: Masson.
   Google Scholar
• Raynal, J.A. and Salas, J.D., 1987. A probabilistic model for flooding downstream of the junction of two rivers. In: V.P. Singh, ed. Hydrologic frequency modeling: proceedings of the international symposium on flood frequency and risk analysis, 14–17 May 1986 Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Dordrecht: Reidel, 595–601.
   Google Scholar
• Salvadori, G. and De Michele, C., 2004. Frequency analysis via copulas: theoretical aspects and applications to hydrological events. Water Resources Research, 40, W12511. doi:10.1029/2004WR003133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serinaldi, F., 2014. Dismissing return periods! Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0916-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, C., Kundzewicz, W.Z., and Maurer, T., 2005. Trend detection in river flow series: 2. Flood and low-flow index series. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50 (5), 811–824. doi:10.1623/hysj.2005.50.5.811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl, T., Mudersbach, C., and Jensen, J., 2012. Assessing the hydrodynamic boundary conditions for risk analyses in coastal areas: a multivariate statistical approach based on Copula functions. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 495–510. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-495-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Chang, N.-B., and Yeh, G.-T., 2009. Copula-based flood frequency (COFF) analysis at the confluences of river systems. Hydrological Processes, 23, 1471–1486. doi:10.1002/hyp.7273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. and Singh, V.P., 2006. Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula method. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11 (2), 150–164. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:2(150)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar