Hydrological simulation of the Betwa River basin (India) using the SWAT model

References

• Ahlawat, R., 2010. Space–time variation in rainfall and runoff: upper Betwa. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 71, 675–681.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J.G., et al., 1998. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment part I: model development. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34 (1), 73–81. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J.G. and Allen, P.M., 1996. Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 176 (1–4), 57‐77. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02782-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J.G., Allen, P.M., and Bernhardt, G., 1993. A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology, 142, 47–69. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, D.B., Monke, E.J., and Huggins, L.F., 1977. ANSWERS: a model for watershed planning. Purdue Agricultural Experimental Station Paper No. 7038. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Betwa River Board, 1979. Rajghat dam project report. Vol. I and II. Jhansi: Betwa River Board.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, W., et al., 2006. Multi-variable and multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability. Hydrological Processes, 20, 1057–1073. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census of India, 2011. Population count, growth rate and density. http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/data_files/mp/04population.pdf%2050%20No23.4.pdf [ Accessed 28 April 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Chaube, U.C., 1988. Model study of water use and water balance in Betwa basin. Journal of Institute Engineers, India, Civil Engineering Division, 69, 169–173.
   Google Scholar
• Chaube, U.C., et al., 2011. Synthesis of flow series of tributaries in upper Betwa basin. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1 (7), 1459–1475.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S.M., et al., 1995. GIS-based water quality model calibration in the Delaware river Basin. ASAE Microfiche No. 952404. St Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., 1959. Open-channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, T.W. and Shirmohammadi, A., 2004. Evaluation of the SWAT model’s hydrology component in the piedmont physiographic region of Maryland. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 47 (4), 1057–1073. doi:10.13031/2013.16579
   Google Scholar
• Donigian, A.S. Jr. and Rao, P.S.C., 1990. Selections, application, and validation of environmental model. In: D.G. Decoursey, ed. Water quality modeling of agricultural nonpoint sources, Part 2 (Proceedings of an International Symposium 19–23 June 1988 Logan, UT. US Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, USDA-ARS Report no. ARS-81, 577–604.
   Google Scholar
• El-Sadek, A., et al., 2011. Alternative climate data sources for distributed hydrological modelling on a daily time step. Hydrological Processes, 25 (10), 1542–1557. doi:10.1002/hyp.v25.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., et al., 2010. Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT modelling with consideration of parameter uncertainty. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15 (12), 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P.O., 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4 (2), 135–143. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattermann, F.F., et al., 2005. Runoff simulations on the macroscale with the ecohydrological model SWIM in the Elbe catchment - validation and uncertainty analysis. Hydrological Processes, 19, 693–714. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, P., Boyle, D.P., and Base, F., 2005. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in Geosciences, 5, 89–97. doi:10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005
   Google Scholar
• Laflen, J.M., Flanagan, D.C., and Engel, B.A., 2004. Soil erosion and sediment yield prediction accuracy using WEPP. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 40 (2), 289–297. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, L.J., 1983. Transmission losses. In: National engineering handbook hydrology, Section 4.
   Google Scholar
• Legates, D.R. and McCabe, G.J., 1999. Evaluating the use of goodness-of-fit measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research, 35 (1), 233–241. doi:10.1029/1998WR900018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewarne, M., 2009. Setting up hydrological model for the Verlorenvlei catchment. Thesis (PhD). Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., et al., 2009. Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis of SWAT model in upper reaches of the Heihe river basin. Hydrological Processes, 23, 2744–2753. doi:10.1002/hyp.v23:19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D., 1991. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics, 33 (2), 161–174. doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murty, P.S., Pandey, A., and Suryavanshi, S., 2014. Application of semi-distributed hydrological model for basin level water balance of the Ken basin of Central India. Hydrological Processes, 28 (13), 4119–4129. doi:10.1002/hyp.v28.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part 1 - a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• National Water Policy, 2012. Draft recommended by national water board, Ministry of Water Resources. http://mowr.gov.in/writereaddata/linkimages/DraftNWP2012_English9353289094.pdf [ Accessed 20 September 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, R.P., King, G.A., and Koerper, G., 1992. Toward a rule based biome model. Landscape Ecology, 7, 27–43. doi:10.1007/BF02573955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neitsch, S.L., et al., 2004. Soil and water assessment tool input/output file documentation. College Station, TX: Texas Water Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, J.P. and Seixas, J., 2011. Modelling the impact of climate change on water balance and agriculture and forestry productivity in southern Portugal using SWAT. CAB International, Soil Hydrology, Land Use and Agriculture. doi:10.1079/9781845937973.0366
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, A., et al., 2008. Runoff and sediment yield modeling from a small agricultural watershed in India using the WEPP model. Journal of Hydrology, 348, 305–319. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J.R. and Hamlett, J.M., 1998. Hydrological calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34 (3), 531–544. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb00952.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, W.D., Srinivasan, R., and Arnold, J.G., 1995. Alternative river management using a linked GIS‑hydrology model. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineering, 38 (3), 783–790. doi:10.13031/2013.27892
   Google Scholar
• Rouhani, H., et al., 2007. Parameter estimation in semi-distributed hydrological catchment modeling using a multi-criteria objective function. Hydrological Processes, 21, 2998–3008. doi:10.1002/hyp.6527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, R.K., Tripathi, M.P., and Das, S.N., 2004. Hydrological modeling of a small watershed using satellite data and GIS technique. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 32 (2), 145–157. doi:10.1007/BF03030871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J., Knapp, H.V., and Demissie, M., 2004. Hydrologic modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT. Champaign, IL: Illinois State Water Survey. ISWS CR 2004-08. www.sws.uiuc.edu/pubdoc/CR/ISWSCR2004-08.pdf [ Accessed 10 March 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Smedema, L.K. and Rycroft, D.W., 1983. Land drainage: planning and design of agricultural drainage systems. London: Batsford.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R., et al., 1993. Hydrologic modeling of Texas Gulf basin using GIS. In: Proceedings of 2nd International GIS and Environmental Modeling, Breckinridge, CO. 213–217.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R., et al., 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment, Part II: model application. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34 (1), 91–101. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05962.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R. and Arnold, J.G., 1994. Integration of a basin scale water quality model with GIS. Water Resource Bulletin, 30 (3), 453–462. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1994.tb03304.x
   Google Scholar
• Suryavanshi, S., 2012. Long term prediction of hydro-meteorological variables in Betwa basin. Unpublished thesis (PhD), Department of Water Resources Development and Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India.
   Google Scholar
• Suryavanshi, S., et al., 2014. Long term historic changes in climatic variables of Betwa basin, India. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 117 (3–4), 403–418. doi:10.1007/s00704-013-1013-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thampi, S.G., Raneesh, K.Y., and Surya, T.V., 2010. Influence of scale on SWAT model calibration for streamflow in a river basin in the humid tropics. Water Resources Management, 24, 4567–4578. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9676-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi, M.P., Panda, R.K., and Raghuwanshi, N.S., 1999a. Estimation of sediment yield from a small watershed using SWAT model. In: Proceedings of the civil and environmental engineering conference on ‘New Frontiers and Challenges’, 8–12 November 1999 Bangkok, Thailand. Asian Institute of Technology, 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, M.P., Panda, R.K., and Raghuwanshi, N.S., 1999b. Runoff estimation from a small watershed using SWAT model. In: Proceedings of the international conference on ‘Water, Environment, Ecology, Socio-Economics and Health Engineering, Seoul, Korea, 18–21 October 1999, 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Van Liew, M.W., et al., 2007. Suitability of SWAT for the conservation effects assessment project: a comparison on USDA-ARS experimental watersheds. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12 (2), 173–189. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:2(173)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez-Amabile, G. and Engel, B.A., 2008. Fitting of time series models to forecast streamflow and groundwater using simulated data from SWAT. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13 (7), 554–562. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:7(554)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmot, C.J., 1981. On the validation of models. Physical Geography, 2, 184–194.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R.A., Onstad, C.A., and Bosch, D.D., 1995. AGNPS: an agricultural nonpoint source model. In: V.P. Singh, ed. Computer models of watershed hydrology. Littleton, CO: Water Resources Publications.
   Google Scholar