A revisit of NRCS-CN inspired models coupled with RS and GIS for runoff estimation

References

• Adler, R.F., et al., 1993. Estimation of monthly rainfall over Japan and surrounding waters from a combination of low-orbit microwave and geosynchronous IR data. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 32, 335–356. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1993)0322.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Ajmal, M., et al., 2015a. Investigation of SCS-CN and its inspired modified models for runoff estimation in South Korean watersheds. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 9 (4), 592–603. doi:10.1016/j.jher.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajmal, M., et al., 2015b. Evolution of a parsimonious rainfall–runoff model using soil moisture proxies. Journal of Hydrology, 530, 623–633. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajmal, M., et al., 2016b. Runoff estimation using the NRCS slope-adjusted curve number in mountainous watersheds. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 141, 04014058. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajmal, M., Khan, T.K., and Kim, T.-W., 2016a. A CN-based ensembled hydrological model for enhanced watershed runoff prediction. Water, 8, 20. doi:10.3390/w8010020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhondi, S., 2001. An investigation of curve number model in flood estimation using Geographical Information System. Thesis (MSc). Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostou, E.N., 2004. Overview of overland satellite rainfall estimation for hydro-meteorological applications. Surveys in Geophysics, 25 (5–6), 511–537. doi:10.1007/s10712-004-5724-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R.G., 1954. The use of relative infiltration indices in computing runoff. In: V.P. Singh, ed. Rainfall–runoff relationship. Littleton, CO: Water Resources Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J.G., et al., 1990. SWRRB-A basin scale simulation model for soil and water resources management. College Station, TX: A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, G., Miller, A.C., and Lakatos, D.F., 1977. Infiltration formula based on SCS curve numbers. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division ASCE, 103 (4), 419–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artan, G., et al., 2007. Users’ manual for the geospatial stream flow model (GeoSFM). Reston, VA: US Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2007–1440.
   Google Scholar
• Ashenafi, Y. and Hailu, D., 2014. Assessment of the use of remotely sensed rainfall products for runoff simulation in the Upper Blue Nile basin of Ethiopia. Journal of EEA, 31, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ashish, P., et al., 2003. Estimation of run-off for agricultural watershed using SCS curve number and Geographical Information System. Available from: http://www.gisdevelopment.net.
   Google Scholar
• Aubert, D., Loumagne, C., and Oudin, L., 2003. Sequential assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow data in a conceptual rainfall runoff model. Journal of Hydrology, 280, 145–161. Available from http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/water/quality/common/techpaper/don1.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awadallah, A.G., et al., 2016. Reliability assessment of water structures subject to data scarcity using the SCS-CN model. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (4), 696–710. doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1027709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu, P.S. and Mishra, S.K., 2012. An improved SCS-CN inspired model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 17 (11), 1164–1172. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltas, E.A., Dervos, N.A., and Mimikou, M.A., 2007. Determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1825–1829. doi:10.5194/hess-11-1825-2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M.S., et al., 2016. Beyond the SCS-CN method: A theoretical framework for spatially lumped rainfall–runoff response. Water Resources Research, 52, 4608–4627. doi:10.1002/2015WR018439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, H.E., et al., 2009. Improving curve number based storm runoff estimates using soil moisture proxies. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2 (4), 250–259. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2031227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrangi, A., et al., 2011. Hydrologic evaluation of satellite precipitation products over a mid-size basin. Journal of Hydrology, 397, 225–237. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhanumurty, V., et al., 2003. Application of remote sensing and GIS in water resources development. Water and Energy International, 60 (2), 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, N.R., Wesley, P.J., and Devulapalli, R.S., 1992. Hydrologic parameter estimation using geographic information systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 118, 492–512. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1992)118:5(492)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhunya, P.K., et al., 2009. A simple conceptual model of sediment yield. Water Resources Management, 24 (8), 1697–1716. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9520-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitew, M.M. and Gebremichael, M., 2011. Evaluation of satellite rainfall products through hydrologic simulation in a fully distributed hydrologic model. Water Resources Research, 47 (6), W06526. doi:10.1029/2010WR009917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, B.J., et al., 1981. Estimation of soil moisture with API algorithms and microwave emission. Water Resources Bulletin, 17, 767–774. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1981.tb01296.x
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J.V., 1997. Determination of watershed curve number using derived distributions. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 123 (1), 28–36. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:1(28)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosznay, M., 1989. Generalization of SCS curve number method. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 115 (1), 139–144. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1989)115:1(139)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2009b. Assimilation of observed soil moisture data in storm rainfall–runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 14 (2), 153–165. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:2(153)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2010. Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14, 1881–1893. doi:10.5194/hess-14-1881-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2013. Detecting threshold hydrological response through satellite soil moisture data. Die Bodenkultur, 64, 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., Melone, F., and Moramarco, T., 2008. On the estimation of antecedent wetness conditions in rainfall–runoff modelling. Hydrological Processes, 22, 629–642. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., Melone, F., and Moramarco, T., 2009a. Antecedent wetness conditions based on ERS scatterometer data in support to rainfall–runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 364, 73–87. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooner, W.G., et al., 1987. Remote sensing technologies and spatial data applications relevant to HEC programs and mission. Davis, CA: USACE, Final report, contract no. DACWO5-87-C-0012, US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Camici, S., et al., 2011. Design soil moisture estimation by comparing continuous and storm-based rainfall–runoff modelling. Water Resources Research, 47, W05527. doi:10.1029/2010WR009298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsel, R., et al., 1997. PRZM 3.1 user’s manual, national exposure research lab, office of research and development. Athens, GA: US Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, V., Gomez-Plaza, A., and Martınez-Mena, M., 2003. The role of antecedent soil water content in the runoff response of semiarid catchments: a simulation approach. Journal of Hydrology, 284 (1–4), 114–130. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00264-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Unit for Soil Conservation (Hydrology and Sedimentation), 1972. Handbook of hydrology. India: Soil Conservation Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, A.K., 1993. Strategies for watershed management planning using remote sensing techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 21 (2), 87–97. doi:10.1007/BF02996346
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, C., et al., 2001. Runoff curve number estimation for a basin using remote sensing and GIS. Asian Pacific Remote Sensing and GIS Journal, 14, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, A., Mishra, S.K., and Pandey, A., 2013. Experimental verification of effect of slope on runoff and curve numbers. Journal of Indian Water Resources Society, 33 (1), 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.L., 1982. Infiltration formulas by curve number procedure. Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE, 108 (7), 823–829.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-Y., Engel, B.A., and Chung, H.W., 2002. Daily streamflow modelling and assessment based on the curve-number technique. Hydrological Processes, 16 (16), 3131–3150. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., and Mays, L.W., eds., 1988. Applied hydrology. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Collischonn, B., Collischonn, W., and Tucci, C.E.M., 2008. Daily hydrological modeling in the Amazon basin using TRMM rainfall estimates. Journal of Hydrology, 360 (1–4), 207–216. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coustau, M., et al., 2012. Flood modelling with a distributed event-based parsimonious rainfall–runoff model: case of the karstic Lez river catchment. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 1119–1133. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-1119-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, W.T. and Ryu, D., 2009. A new data assimilation approach for improving runoff prediction using remotely-sensed soil moisture retrievals. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 1–16. doi:10.5194/hess-13-1-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, S., Crawford, T.W., and Lecce, S.A., 2007. A comparison of TRMM to other basin-scale estimates of rainfall during the 1999 Hurricane Floyd flood. Natural Hazards, 43, 187–198. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-9093-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVantier, B.A. and Feldman, A.D., 1993. Review of GIS applications in hydrologic modeling. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, 119, 246–261. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:2(246)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhawale, A.W., 2013. Runoff estimation for Darewadi watershed using RS and GIS. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 1 (6), 46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Durbude, D.G., Jain, M.K., and Mishra, S.K., 2011. Long-term hydrologic simulation using SCS-CN based improved soil moisture accounting procedure. Hydrological Processes, 25 (4), 561–579. doi:10.1002/hyp.7789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert, E., Janowiak, J.E., and Kidd, C., 2007. Comparison of near-real-time precipitation estimates from satellite observations and numerical models. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 88, 1–18. doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-1-47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimian, M., et al., 2012. Runoff estimation in step slope watershed with standard and slope-adjusted Curve Number Methods. Polish Journal Environmental Studies, 21 (5), 1191–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstratiadis, A., et al., 2014. Flood design recipes vs. reality: can predictions for ungauged basins be trusted? Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences, 14, 1417–1428. doi:10.5194/nhess-14-1417-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhakeem, M. and Papanicolaou, A., 2009. Estimation of the runoff curve number via direct rainfall simulator measurements in the state of Iowa, USA. Water Resources Management, 23 (12), 2455–2473. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9390-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eli, R.N. and Lamont, S.J., 2010. Curve numbers and urban runoff modelling – application limitations. In: S. Struck and K. Lichten, eds.. Low impact development 2010: redefining water in the city (Proceedings of the 2010 International Low Impact Development Conference, San Francisco, CA, April 11-14, 2010). ASCE, 405–418. doi:10.1061/9780784410998
   Google Scholar
• Fan, F.L., et al., 2013. Estimating composite curve number using an improved SCS-CN method with remotely sensed variables in Guangzhou, China. Remote Sensing, 5, 1425–1438. doi:10.3390/rs5031425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foerster, J. and Milne-Home, W.A., 1995. Application of AGNPS to model nutrient generation rates under different farming management practices at the Gunnedah Research Centre catchment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 35, 961–967. doi:10.1071/EA9950961
   Google Scholar
• Fry, L., et al., 2013. Identifying stream gage networks for maximizing the effectiveness of regional water balance modeling. Water Resources Research, 49 (5), 2689–2700. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabellani, S., et al., 2008. General calibration methodology for a combined Horton-SCS infiltration scheme in flash flood modelling. Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences, 8, 1317–1327. doi:10.5194/nhess-8-1317-2008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajbhiye, S. and Mishra, S.K., 2012. Application of NRSC-SCS curve number model in runoff estimation using RS and GIS. In: IEEE International conference on advances in engineering, science and management (ICAESM 2012). IEEE, 346–352. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6216286/ [Accessed 20 May 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Gamage, S.H.P.W., Hewa, G.A., and Beecham, S., 2015. Modelling hydrological losses for varying rainfall and moisture conditions in South Australian catchments. Journal of Hydrology. Regional Studies, 4, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Garen, D. and Moore, D.S., 2005. Curve number hydrology in water quality modeling: uses, abuses, and future directions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41 (2), 377–388. doi:10.1111/jawr.2005.41.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, V., et al., 2013. Assessment of the effect of slope on runoff potential of a watershed using NRCS-CN method. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology, 3, 141–159. doi:10.1504/IJHST.2013.057626
   Google Scholar
• Gassman, P.W., et al., 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transaction of the American Society of Agriculture Engineering, 50 (4), 1211–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geetha, K., et al., 2007. Modifications to SCS-CN method for long term hydrologic simulation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 133 (5), 475–486. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:5(475)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, B.L., 1979. Discussion of Runoff curve number with varying site moisture” by Hawkins, R. H. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE, 105 (IR4), 441–442.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A., Temimi, M., and Khanbilvardi, R., 2015. Adjustment to the curve number (NRCS-CN) to account for the vegetation effect on hydrological processes. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60 (4), 591–605. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.898119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrich, D.C., et al., 1994. Runoff simulation sensitivity to remotely sensed initial soil water content. Water Resources Research, 30, 1393–1405. doi:10.1029/93WR03083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourley, D.C., et al., 2010. Impacts of polarimetric radar observations on hydrologic simulation. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 11, 781–796. doi:10.1175/2010JHM1218.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, W. H., and Ampt, G., 1911, Studies on soil physics, 1. The flow of air and water through soils. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 4, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., and Romano, N., 2013. Green-Ampt Curve-Number mixed procedure as an empirical tool for rainfall–runoff modelling in small and ungauged basins. Hydrological Processes, 27 (8), 1253–1264. doi:10.1002/hyp.9303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., and Serinaldi, F., 2012a. A continuous simulation model for design-hydrograph estimation in small and ungauged watersheds. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57, 1035–1051. doi:10.1080/02626667.2012.702214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., and Serinaldi, F., 2012b. Design hydrograph estimation in small and ungauged watersheds: continuous simulation method versus event-based approach. Hydrological Processes, 26, 3124–3134. doi:10.1002/hyp.v26.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohmann, C.H., 2004. Morphometric analysis in geographic information systems: applications of free software GRASS and R. Computers & Geosciences, 30, 1055–1067. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2004.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, M., Harbor, J., and Engel, B., 1998. Composite vs. Distributed curve numbers: effects on estimates of storm runoff depths. Journal of the American Water resources Association, 34, 1015–1023. doi:10.1111/jawr.1998.34.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumbo, B., et al., 2002. Coupling of digital elevation model and rainfall–runoff model in storm drainage network design. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27 (11–22), 755–764. doi:10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00063-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundalia, M. and Dholakia, M., 2014. Impact of monthly curve number on daily runoff estimation for Ozat catchment in India. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 4, 144–155. doi:10.4236/ojmh.2014.44014
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, P.K. and Panigrahy, S., 2008. Predicting the spatio-temporal variation of run-off generation in India using remotely sensed input and Soil Conservation Service curve number model. Current Science, 95 (11), 1580–1587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbor, J.M., 1994. A practical method for estimating the impact of land use change on surface runoff, groundwater recharge, and wetland hydrology. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60 (1), 95–108. doi:10.1080/01944369408975555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. and Hossain, F., 2008. Investigating the optimal configuration of conceptual hydrologic models for satellite-rainfall–based flood prediction. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 5 (3), 532–536. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2008.922551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., 1978. Runoff curve number with varying site moisture. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 104 (4), 389–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., 1984. A comparison of predicted and observed runoff curve numbers. In: Proceeding of ASCE, Irrigation and Drainage Division, special conference. Flagstaff AZ: ASCE, 702–709.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., et al., 1985. Runoff probability storm depth and curve numbers. Journal of irrigation and drainage division. Asce, 111 (4), 330–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., 1993. Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 119 (2), 334–345. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:2(334)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., et al., 2009. Curve number hydrology: state of the practice. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 106. ISBN 978-0-7844-1044-2.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., Hjelmfelt Jr., A.T., and Zevenbergen, A.W., 1985. Runoff probability, storm depth and curve numbers. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 111 (4), 330–340. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:4(330)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H. and Ward, T.J., 1998. Site and cover effects on event runoff, Jornada experimental range, New Mexico. Rangeland management and water resources. In: Proceedings from American Water Resources Association (AWRA). Reno, NV, 361–370.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Guzmán, R. and Ruiz-Luna, A., 2013. SARA – an enhanced curve number-based tool for estimating direct runoff. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 15, 881–887. doi:10.2166/hydro.2013.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmfelt Jr., A.T., 1980. Empirical investigation of curve number technique. Journal of Hydraulics and Engineering Division, ASCE, 106 (HY9), 1471–1476.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmfelt Jr., A.T., 1991. Investigation of curve number procedure. Journal of hydraulic Engineering, 117 (6), 725–737. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:6(725)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmfelt, A.T., et al., 2001. Curve numbers, recent developments. In: XXIX IAHR Congress Proceedings, Beijing, China. IAHR: International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmfelt Jr., A.T., Kramer, K.A., and Burwell, R.E., 1982. Curve numbers as random variables. In: Proceedings of the international Symposium of Rainfall–Runoff Modeling. Littleton, CO: Water Resource Publications, 365–373.
   Google Scholar
• Hlaing, K.T., Haruyama, S., and Aye, M.M., 2008. Using GIS-based distributed soil loss modeling and morphometric analysis to prioritize watershed for soil conservation in Bago river basin of lower Myanmar. Frontiers of Earth Science in China, 2, 465–478. doi:10.1007/s11707-008-0048-3
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., et al., 2006. Uncertainty quantification of satellite precipitation estimation and Monte Carlo assessment of the error propagation into hydrologic response. Water Resources Research, 42, W08421. doi:10.1029/2005WR004398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., et al., 2007. A first approach to global runoff simulation using satellite rainfall estimation. Water Resources Research, 43 (8), W080502. doi:10.1029/2006WR005739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, F. and Lettenmaier, D.P., 2006. Flood prediction in the future: recognizing hydrologic issues in anticipation of the global precipitation measurement mission. Water Resources Research, 42, W11301. doi:10.1029/2006WR005202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M., et al., 2006. A modification to the Soil Conservation Service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess plateau of China. Hydrological Processes, 20 (3), 579–589. doi:10.1002/hyp.5925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, W.C., et al., 1976. Environmental resources management studies in the Kissimmee River basin. Gainsville, FL: Department of Environmental Engineering and Science, University of Florida, Report ENV-05–76-3.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, G.J., et al., 2007. The TRMM multi-satellite precipitation analysis: quasi global, multiyear, combined sensor precipitation estimates at fine scale. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8 (1), 38–55. doi:10.1175/JHM560.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishidaira, H., et al., 2008. Estimating the evolution of vegetation cover and its hydrological impact in the Mekong River basin in the 21st century. Hydrological Processes, 22, 1395–1405. doi:10.1002/hyp.6948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J.H. and Srinivasan, R., 2005. Effects of curve number modification on runoff estimation using WSR-88D rainfall data in Texas watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 60 (5), 274–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J.M., et al., 2004. SMEX02: field scale variability, time stability and similarity of soil moisture. Remote Sensing of Environment, 92, 436–446. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, M.K., et al., 2006. Enhanced runoff curve number model incorporating storm duration and a non-linear Ia-S relation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 11 (6), 631–635. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(631)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, M.K., Durbude, D.G., and Mishra, S.K., 2012. Improved CN-based long-term hydrologic simulation model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 17, 1204–1220. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakeman, A. J., and Hornberger, G. M., 1993. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model? Water Resources Research, 29(8), 2637-2649.
   Google Scholar
• Jasrotia, A.S., Dhiman, S.D., and Aggarwal, S.P., 2002. Rainfall–runoff and soil erosion modeling using remote sensing and GIS technique – A case study of Tons watershed. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 30 (3), 167–180. doi:10.1007/BF02990649
   Google Scholar
• Javed, A., Khanday, M.Y., and Ahmed, R., 2009. Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37, 261–274. doi:10.1007/s12524-009-0016-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jena, S.K., et al., 2012. RS and Geographical Information System–based evaluation of distributed and composite curve number techniques. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17 (11), 1278–1286. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, R.K., Mishra, S.K., and Pandey, A., 2014. Experimental verification of effect of slope, soil, and AMC of a fallow land on runoff curve number. Journal of Indian Water Resources Society, 34 (2), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao, P., et al., 2015. Improved SCS-CN method based on storage and depletion of antecedent daily precipitation. Water Resources Management, 29 (13), 4753–4765. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-1088-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobard, I. and Desbois, M., 1994. Satellite estimation of the tropical precipitation using the METEOSAT and SSM/I data. Atmospheric Research, 34 (1–4), 285–298. doi:10.1016/0169-8095(94)90097-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joycee, C.S.D. and Santhi, M.H., 2015. Assessment of surface runoff from sub basin of Kodayar using NRCS-CN model with GIS. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8 (13). doi:10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i13/60403
   Google Scholar
• Kabiri, R., Chan, A., and Bai, R., 2013. Comparison of SCS and Green-Ampt methods in surface runoff-flooding simulation for Klang watershed in Malaysia. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 3 (3), 102–114. doi:10.4236/ojmh.2013.33014
   Google Scholar
• Kadam, A.K., et al., 2012. Identifying potential rainwater harvesting sites of a semi-arid, basaltic region of western India, using SCS-CN method. Water Resources Management, 26 (9), 2537–2554. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0031-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalma, J.D., McVicar, T.R., and McCabe, M., 2008. Estimating land surface evaporation: a review of methods using remotely sensed surface temperature data. Surveys in Geophysics, 29 (4–5), 421–469. doi:10.1007/s10712-008-9037-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamuju, N., 2015. Rainfall–runoff estimation and comparative analysis using advanced geospatial digital hydrological modelling tools, ArcCN-runoff and ArcSWAT. SSRG International Journal of Geo Informatics and Geological Science, 2 (4), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kannan, N., et al., 2007. Development of a continuous soil moisture accounting procedure for curve number methodology and its behavior with different evapotranspiration methods. Hydrological Processes, 22, 2114–2121. doi:10.1002/hyp.6811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, N., Santhi, C., and Arnold, J.G., 2008. Development of an automated procedure for estimation of the spatial variation of runoff in large river basins. Journal of Hydrology, 359, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, P. and Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., 2015. Spatial evapotranspiration, rainfall and land use data in water accounting – part 1: review of the accuracy of the remote sensing data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19, 507–532. doi:10.5194/hess-19-507-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kherde, R.V.K. and Sawant, P.H., 2013. Integrating geographical information systems (GIS) with hydrological modeling-applicability and limitations. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5 (4), 3374–3381.
   Google Scholar
• Kibbler, D.F., 1982. Recommended hydrologic procedures for computing urban runoff from small developing watersheds in Pennsylvania. University Park, PA: Institute for Research on Land and Water Resources, The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, C. and Levizzani, V., 2011. Status of satellite precipitation retrievals. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 1109–1116. doi:10.5194/hess-15-1109-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N.W. and Lee, J., 2008. Temporally weighted average curve number method for daily runoff simulation. Hydrological Processes, 22 (25), 4936–4948. doi:10.1002/hyp.v22:25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, G.W. and Pietroniro, A., 1996. Remote sensing applications in hydrological modelling. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 41 (4), 563–591. doi:10.1080/02626669609491526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knisel, W.G., 1980 CREAMS: a field-scale model for chemical, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, USDA Conservation Research Report. No. 26.
   Google Scholar
• Korkalainen, T.H.J., Lauren, A.M., and Kokkonen, T.S., 2007. A GIS based analysis of catchment properties within a drumlin field. Boreal Environment Research, 12, 489–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krysanova, V., Wechsung, F., and Arnold, J.G., 2000. SWIM user manual. Potsdam, Germany: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, D.N. and Reshmidev, T.V., 2013. Remote sensing applications in water resources. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 93 (2), 163–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal, M., Mishra, S.K., and Pandey, A., 2015. Physical verification of the effect of land features and antecedent moisture on runoff curve number. Catena, 133, 318–327. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2015.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, D. G., and Hawkins, R. H., 2001. Discussion of long-term hydrologic impact of urbanization: a tale of two models. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE. 127, 13–19. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, R.A., Knisel, W.G., and Still, D.A., 1987. GLEAMS: groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Transactions of the ASAE, 30 (5), 1403–1418. doi:10.13031/2013.30578
   Google Scholar
• Lim, K.J., et al., 2006. Effects of initial abstraction and urbanization on estimated runoff using CN technology. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42, 629–643. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04481.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C., Greenwald, D., and Banin, A., 2003. Temperature dependence of infiltration rate during large scale water recharge into soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67, 487–493. doi:10.2136/sssaj2003.4870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, S.W., et al., 2004. Using a topographic index to distribute variable source area runoff predicted with the SCS curve-number equation. Hydrological Processes, 18, 2757–2771. doi:10.1002/hyp.v18:15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, D.R., 1996. GIS and hydrological modeling - an assessment of progress. In: Paper presented at The Third International Conference on GIS and Environmental Modeling, Santa Fe, NM. Available from: maidment/GISHydro/meetings/santafe/santafe.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, M. and Rosso, R., 1989. Using GIS to assess spatial variability of SCS curve number at the basin scale. Wallingford, UK:International Association of Hydrological Sciences, New direction for surface water modeling, IAHS Publ. No. 181, 435–444.
   Google Scholar
• Massari, C., et al., 2014. Using globally available soil moisture indicators for flood modelling in Mediterranean catchments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 839–853. doi:10.5194/hess-18-839-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massari, C., et al., 2015. The use of H-SAF soil moisture products for operational hydrology: flood modelling over Italy. Hydrology, 2, 2–22. doi:10.3390/hydrology2010002
   Google Scholar
• McCuen, R.H., 1989. Hydrologic analysis and design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McCuen, R.H., 2002. Approach to confidence interval estimation for curve numbers. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 7 (1), 43–48. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:1(43)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, A.C., 2010. Does soil data resolution matter? State soil geographic database versus soil survey geographic database in rainfall–runoff modeling across Wisconsin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 65 (3), 190–199. doi:10.2489/jswc.65.3.190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, P., Frömelt, A., and Kinzelbach, W., 2011. Hydrological real-time modelling in the Zambezi river basin using satellite-based soil moisture and rainfall data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15 (3), 999–1008. doi:10.5194/hess-15-999-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menziani, M., et al., 2001. TDR soil moisture measurements at the Lago Maggiore MAP target area: preliminary results. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 26 (5–6), 431–436. doi:10.1016/S1464-1909(01)00031-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, W.S., Letcher, R.A., and Jakeman, A.J., 2003. A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environmental modelling & Software, 18, 761–799. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00078-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B. and Plate, E.J., 1997. An analysis of the effects of spatial variability of soil and soil moisture on runoff. Water Resources Research, 33 (12), 2909–2922. doi:10.1029/97WR02204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Vazken, A., and Charles, P., 2005. Soil Conservation Service curve number method: how to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure? Water Resources Research, 41 (2), W02011. doi:10.1029/2004WR003191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milewski, A., et al., 2009. A remote sensing solution for estimating runoff and recharge in arid environments. Journal of Hydrology, 373 (1–2), 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A., et al., 2009. Study of intense rainfall events over India using Kalpana-IR and TRMM-precipitation radar observations. Current Science, 97, 689–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 1998. An SCS-CN-based long-term daily flow simulation model a hilly catchment. In: Proc. of international symposium on hydrology of ungauged streams in hilly regions for small hydro power development. New Delhi, India: AHEC, 59–81.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2005. Long-term hydrologic simulation using storage and source area concepts. Hydrological Processes, 19 (14), 2845–2861. doi:10.1002/hyp.5735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2006a. An improved Ia–S relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology. Water Resources Management, 20, 643–660. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-9000-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2006b. SCS-CN based modeling of sediment yield. Journal of Hydrology, 324, 301–322. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2008a. Comparison of AMC-dependent CN-conversion formulae. Water Resources Management, 22, 1409–1420. doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9233-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2008b. A rain duration and modified AMC dependent SCS-CN procedure for long duration rainfall– runoff events. Water Resources Management, 22 (7), 861–876. doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9196-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2014a. Experimental verification of the effect of slope and landuse on SCS runoff curve number. Water Resources Management, 28 (11), 3407–3416. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0582-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2014b. Relationship between runoff curve number and PET. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19 (2), 355–365. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., Babu, P.S., and Singh, V.P., 2007. SCS-CN method revisited. In: V.P. Singh, ed. Advances in hydraulics and hydrology. Colorado: Water Resources Publication (WRP), 36 p.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., Jain, M.K., and Singh, V.P., 2004. Evaluation of the SCS-CN-based model incorporating antecedent moisture. Water Resources Management, 18 (6), 567–589. doi:10.1007/s11269-004-8765-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P., 1999. Another look at SCS-CN method. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 4 (3), 257–264. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(257)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P., 2002a. SCS-CN method: part-I: derivation of SCS-CN based models. Acta Geophysica Polonica, 50 (3), 457–477.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P., 2003a. Derivation of SCS-CN parameter S from linear Fokker-Planck equation. Acta Geophysica Polonica, 51 (2), 180–202.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P., 2003b. Soil Conservation Service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P., 2004a. Long-term hydrological simulation based on the Soil Conservation Service curve number. Hydrological Processes, 18 (7), 1291–1313. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P., 2004b. Validity and extension of the SCS-CN method for computing infiltration and rainfall–excess rates. Hydrological Processes, 18 (17), 3323–3345. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P., 2006. A relook at NEH-4 curve number data and antecedent moisture condition criteria. Hydrological Processes, 20 (13), 2755–2768. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P., 2002b. SCS-CN based hydrologic simulation package. In: V.P. Singh and D.K. Frevert, eds. Mathematical models in small watershed hydrology. Littleton, CO: Water Resources Publications, 391–464.
   Google Scholar
• Mockus, V., 1949. Estimation of total (peak rates of) surface runoff for individual storms. Exhibit A of Appendix B, Interim Survey Rep. Washington, DC: Grand (Neosho) River Watershed, USDA.
   Google Scholar
• Moglen, G.E., 2000. Effect of orientation of spatially distributed curve number in runoff calculations. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 36 (6), 1391–1400. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb05734.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, G.W., 1955. How much of the rain enters the soil?, Yearbook of agriculture 1955: water. Washington, DC: USDA.
   Google Scholar
• Nagarajan, N. and Poongothai, S., 2012. Spatial mapping of runoff from a watershed using SCS-CN method with remote sensing and GIS. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17 (11), 1268–1277. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narain, S., et al., 2015. SCS-CN-based simulation of pollutants removal. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 5 (2), 168.
   Google Scholar
• Narayana, V.V.D., 1993. Soil and water conservation research in India. New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2001. National engineering handbook Section 4: hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, T., Verma, M.K., and Hema Bindu, S., 2012. SCS curve number method in Narmada basin. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 3 (1), 219–228.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, T.R. and Jaiswal, R.K., 2003. Rainfall–runoff modeling using satellite data and GIS for Bebas River in Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Institution of Engineers, 84, 47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Neitsch, S.L., et al., 2002. Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT): theoretical documentation, version 2000. College Station, TX: Texas Water Resources Institute, TWRI Report TR-191.
   Google Scholar
• Njoku, E.G., et al., 2003. Soil moisture retrieval from AMSR-E. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41 (2), 215–229. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2002.808243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani, V., Singh, V.P., and Delafrouz, H., 2009. Three geomorphological rainfall–runoff models based on the linear reservoir concept. Catena, 76, 206–214. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2008.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha, C., 2012. Simulating turbidity removal at a river bank filtration site in India using SCS-CN approach. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 17 (11), 1240–1244. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, J. S., et al., 2003. Cover-runoff equations to improve simulation of runoff in pasture growth models. Australian Journal Of Soil Research, 41, doi:10.1071/SR03047-0004-9573/03/0801467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, A., et al., 2003. Estimation of runoff for agricultural watershed using SCS curve number and Geographic Information System. Available from: htpp://www.GISdevelopment.net.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, A. and Sahu, A.K., 2002. Generation of curve number using remote sensing and geographic information system. In: Water resources, Map India Conference. Available from: http://[email protected]/.
   Google Scholar
• Pandit, A. and Gopalakrishnan, G., 1996. Estimation of annual storm runoff coefficients by continuous simulation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 122 (4), 211–220. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1996)122:4(211)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankaj, A. and Kumar, P., 2009. GIS-based morphometric analysis of five major sub-watersheds of Song River, Dehradun District, Uttarakhand with special reference to landslide incidences. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37, 157–166. doi:10.1007/s12524-009-0007-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, J.P., et al., 2008. Evaluation of modified CN methods for watershed runoff estimation using a GIS-based interface. Biomass Engineering, 100, 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, G. and Krajewski, W.F., 1996. Satellite estimation of precipitation over land. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 41, 433–451. doi:10.1080/02626669609491519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfister, L., et al., 2003. Predicting peak discharge through empirical relationships between rainfall, groundwater level and basin humidity in the Alzette River basin Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 51 (3), 210–220.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, A. and Woodward, D.E., 2002. The origin and derivation of Ia/S in the runoff curve number system. Available from: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1044210.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ponce, V.M., 1989. Engineering hydrology: principles and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ponce, V.M. and Hawkins, R.H., 1996. Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 1 (1), 11–19. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, S., et al., 2009. Combined use of microwave and IR data for the study of Indian monsoon rainfall. In: ISPRS archives XXXVIII-8/W3 workshop proceedings: impact of climate change on agriculture. Ahmedabad, India, 227–230.
   Google Scholar
• Ragan, R.M. and Jackson, T.M., 1980. Runoff synthesis using Landsat and SCS model. Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE, 106 (5), 667–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallison, R.E., 1980. Origin and evaluation of the SCS runoff equation. In: Proceeding of symposium Watershed Management. Idaho: ASCE, 912–924.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, D., Bandyopadhyay, A., and Kusuma, K.N., 2009. SCS-CN and GIS based approach for identifying potential water harvesting sites in the Kali watershed, Mahi river basin, India. Journal of Earth System Sciences, 118 (4), 355–368. doi:10.1007/s12040-009-0034-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasastri, K.S. and Seth, S.M., 1985. Rainfall–runoff relationships. Roorkee, UP: National Institute of Hydrology, Rep. RN – 20.
   Google Scholar
• Randusová, B., et al., 2015. Comparison of CN estimation approaches. International Journal of Engineering Research and Science, 1 (7), 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rietz, P.D. and Hawkins, R.H., 2000. Effects of landuse on runoff curve number. In: Watershed management 2000, ASCE, Proceedings of the Watershed Management Symposium. Fort Collins, CO, CD ROM, 11 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J.C., Zimba, P.V., and Everitt, J.H., 2003. Remote sensing techniques to assess water quality. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69, 695–704. doi:10.14358/PERS.69.6.695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. and Crane, S.B., 1997. Temporal variations in near surface soil moisture at two contrasting sites in the Wye catchment and their control on storm streamflow generation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 1 (3), 453–461. doi:10.5194/hess-1-453-1997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, P., et al., 2007. Curve number values for oliveorchards under different soil management. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 71 (6), 1758–1769.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, W.D., Harlan, J.C., and Blanchard, B.J., 1982. Case study: estimating antecedent precipitation index from Head Capacity Mapping Mission day thermal infrared data. IAHS Bulletin, 27 (4), 415–426.
   Google Scholar
• Sagintayev, Z., et al., 2011. A remote sensing contribution to hydrologic modeling in arid and inaccessible watersheds, Pishin Lora basin, Pakistan. Hydrological Processes, 26, 85–99. doi:10.1002/hyp.8114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu, R.K., et al., 2007. An advanced soil moisture accounting procedure for SCS curve number method. Hydrological Processes, 21 (21), 2827–2881. doi:10.1002/hyp.6503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu, R.K., Mishra, S.K., and Eldho, T.I., 2010. An improved AMC-coupled runoff curve number model. Hydrological Processes, 24 (20), 2834–2839. doi:10.1002/hyp.v24:20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu, R.K., Mishra, S.K., and Eldho, T.I., 2012a. Improved storm duration and antecedent moisture condition coupled SCS-CN concept-based model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 17 (11), 1173–1179. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu, R.K., Mishra, S.K., and Eldho, T.I., 2012b. Performance evaluation of modified versions of SCS curve number method for two watersheds of Maharashtra, India. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 18 (1), 27–36. doi:10.1080/09715010.2012.662425
   Google Scholar
• Sandholt, I., et al., 2003. Integration of earth observation data in distributed hydrological models: the Senegal River basin. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29 (6), 701–710. doi:10.5589/m03-045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savvidou, E., et al., 2016. A curve number approach to formulate hydrological response units within distributed hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1–34. doi:10.5194/hess-2016-627
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, L.E. and McCuen, R.H., 2005. Statistical guidelines for curve number generation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 131 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:3(282)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, P.R., et al., 1994. The hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) model: engineering documentation for version 3. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-94/168b.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, G.A., 1988. Remote sensing in hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 100 (1–3), 239–265. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(88)90187-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, G.A., 1996. Remote sensing applications to hydrology: runoff. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 41, 453–475. doi:10.1080/02626669609491520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCS, 1956, 1964, 1971, 1972, 1985, 1993, 2004. National engineering handbook section 4: hydrology, chapter 4. Soil Conservation Service. Washington, DC: USDA.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, M.J., Halvorson, A.D., and Pierce, F.J., 1991. Nitrate leaching and economic analysis package (NLEAP): model description and application. In: R.F. Follett, et al., eds. Managing nitrogen for groundwater quality and farm profitability. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, 285–322.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, K.D. and Singh, S., 1992. Runoff estimation using Landsat Thematic Mapper data and the SCS model. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 37 (1), 39–52. doi:10.1080/02626669209492560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, T., et al., 2001. Hydrologic response of a watershed to landuse changes: A remote sensing and GIS approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22 (11), 2095–2108. doi:10.1080/01431160117359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpley, A.N. and Williams, J.R., 1990. EPIC—erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, USDA Technical Bulletin No. 1768.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L.K., 1949. Streamflow from rainfall by the unit graph method. Engineering News Record, 108, 501–505.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L.K., 1942. Hydrograph of runoff. In: O.E. Meinzer, ed. Physics of the earth, vol. 9, hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Z.-H., et al., 2009. Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfall–runoff event analysis in the Three Gorges area, China. Catena, 77, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2008.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirmohammadi, A., et al., 1997. Evaluation of curve number procedures to predict runoff in GLEAMS. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 33, 1069–1076. doi:10.1111/jawr.1997.33.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, R.K., Mishra, S.K., and Pandey, A., 2013. Curve number affected by slope of experimental plot having maize crop. Journal of Indian Water Resources Society, 33 (2), 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sindhu, D., Shivakumar, B.L., and Ravikumar, A.S., 2013. Estimation of surface runoff In Nallur Amanikere watershed using SCS-CN method. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2 (13), 404–409. doi:10.15623/ijret.2013.0213076
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P., Gupta, A., and Singh, M., 2014. Hydrological inferences from watershed analysis for water resource management using remote sensing and GIS techniques. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 17, 111–121. doi:10.1016/j.ejrs.2014.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P.K., et al., 2008. A sediment graph model based on SCS-CN method. Journal of Hydrology, 349, 244–255. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P.K., et al., 2010. An updated hydrological review on recent advancements in soil conservation service curve-number technique. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 1 (2), 118–134. doi:10.2166/wcc.2010.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P.K., et al., 2013. SCS-CN based quantification of potential of rooftop catchments and computation of ASRC for rainwater harvesting. Water Resources Management, 27, 2001–2012. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0267-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P.K., et al., 2015. Development of a modified SMA based MSCS-CN model for runoff estimation. Water Resources Management, 29 (11), 4111–4127. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-1048-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P., 1992. Elementary hydrology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Skaugen, T., Peerebom, I.O., and Nilsson, A., 2015. Use of a parsimonious rainfall–runoff model for prediction hydrological response in ungauged basins. Hydrological Processes, 29, 1999–2013. doi:10.1002/hyp.10315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R.E., 1978. A proposed infiltration model for use in simulation of field-scale watershed hydrology. In: Presented at U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Res. Serv. Nonpoint Pollution Modeling Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R.E., 1997. Discussion of runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? by Ponce, V.M., and Hawkins, R.H. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2 (3), 145–148. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1997)2:3(145)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R.E. and Williams, J.R., 1980. Simulation of surface water hydrology. In: W.G. Knisel, eds. CREAMS: a field scale model for chemicals. Conservation Research Report No.26. Washington, DC: USDA, 643.
   Google Scholar
• Sobhani, G., 1975. A review of selected small watershed design methods for possible adoption to Iranian conditions. MS Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Sorooshian, S., et al., 2000. Evaluation of PERSIANN system satellite-based estimates of tropical rainfall. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81, 2035–2046. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2000)0812.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulis, K.X., et al., 2009. Investigation of the direct runoff generation mechanism for the analysis of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 605–615. doi:10.5194/hess-13-605-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulis, K.X. and Valiantzas, J.D., 2012. SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall–runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds -the two-CN system approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 1001–1015. doi:10.5194/hess-16-1001-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulis, K.X. and Valiantzas, J.D., 2013. Identification of the SCS-CN parameter spatial distribution using rainfall–runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds. Water resources Management, 27, 1737–1749. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0082-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, E.P., et al., 1980. Curve numbers from watershed data. In: Symposium on “Watershed Management”. New York, NY: Boios, ID: ASCE, 938–950.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R. and Engel, B.A., 1994. A spatial decision support system for assessing agricultural nonpoint source pollution. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 30 (3), 441–452. doi:10.1111/jawr.1994.30.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Steefel, C.I. and Van Cappellen, P., 1998. Reactive transport modeling of natural systems. Journal of Hydrology, 209, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhuis, T.S., et al., 1995. SCS runoff equation revisited for variable-source runoff areas. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 121 (3), 234–238. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1995)121:3(234)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Still, D.A. and Shih, S.F., 1984. Using Landsat data to estimate runoff. ASAE Summer Meeting. Paper no. 80-2018. St. Joseph, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Still, D.A. and Shih, S.F., 1985. Using Landsat to classify land use for assessing the basin-wide runoff index. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 21 (6), 931–940. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1985.tb00188.x
   Google Scholar
• Still, D.A. and Shih, S.F., 1991. Satellite data and geographic information system in runoff curve number prediction. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Computer Application in Water Resources, Taipei, Taiwan, 1014–1021.
   Google Scholar
• Stuebe, M.M. and Johnston, D.M., 1990. Runoff volume estimation using GIS technique. Water Resources Bulletin, 26 (4), 611–620. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1990.tb01398.x
   Google Scholar
• Su, F.G., Hong, Y., and Lettenmaier, D.P., 2008. Evaluation of TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA) and its utility in hydrologic prediction in the La Plata Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 9 (4), 622–640. doi:10.1175/2007JHM944.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh., Babu, P., and Mishra, S. K., 2012. Improved SCS-CN inspired model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17 (11), 1164-1172. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000435
   Google Scholar
• Svoboda, A., 1991. Changes in flood regime by use of the modified curve number method. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 36 (5), 461–470. doi:10.1080/02626669109492531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauer, W. and Humborg, G., 1992. Runoff irrigation in the Sahel zone: remote sensing and GIS for determining potential sites. Technical Centre for Agriculture and Rural Co-operation. Netherlands: GIS publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tedela, N.H., et al., 2012. Runoff curve number for 10 small forested watersheds in the mountains of the Eastern United States. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17, 1188–1198. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejaswini, N.B., Shetty, A., and Hegde, V.S., 2011. Land use scenario analysis and prediction of runoff using SCS‐CN method: A case study from the Gudgudi tank, Haveri District, Karnataka, India. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 4 (5), 845–853.
   Google Scholar
• Temimi, M., et al., 2010. A combination of remote sensing data and topographic attributes for the spatial and temporal monitoring of soil wetness. Journal of Hydrology, 388 (1–2), 28–40. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakuriah, G. and Ranjan, S., 2014. Estimation of surface runoff using NRCS curve number procedure in Buriganga Watershed, Assam, India – A geospatial approach. International Research Journal of Earth Sciences, 2 (5), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tischler, M., et al., 2007. A GIS framework for surface-layer soil moisture estimation combining satellite radar measurements and land surface modeling with soil physical property estimation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 891–898. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, K.N., et al., 1997. Watershed parameters extraction using GIS and remote sensing for Hydrologic modelling. Journal of Asian-Pacific Remote Sensing and GIS, 10 (1), 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, M., et al., 2001. A combined satellite infrared and passive microwave technique for estimation of small-scale rainfall. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 18, 742–755. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2001)0582.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topno, A., Singh, A.K., and Vaishya, R.C., 2015. SCS-CN Runoff estimation for Vindhyachal region using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Advanced Remote Sensing and GIS, 4 (1), 1214–1223. doi:10.23953/cloud.ijarsg.108
   Google Scholar
• Tramblay, Y., et al., 2010. Assessment of initial soil moisture conditions for event-based rainfall–runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 380 (3–4), 305–317. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tramblay, Y., et al., 2012. Estimation of antecedent wetness conditions for flood modelling in northern Morocco. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 4375–4386. doi:10.5194/hess-16-4375-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi, M.P., et al., 2002. Runoff modelling of a small watershed using satellite data and GIS. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 30 (1–2), 39–52. doi:10.1007/BF02989975
   Google Scholar
• Tyagi, J.V., et al., 2008. SCS-CN based time distributed sediment yield model. Journal of Hydrology, 352 (3–4), 388–403. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA, 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Technical Release 55 (TR-55).
   Google Scholar
• Van Mullem, J., et al., 2002. Runoff curve number method: beyond the handbook. In: Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 1–10. Available from: https://acwi.gov/hydrology/mtsconfwkshops/conf_proceedings/second_fihmc_nevada.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Mullem, J.A., 1991. Runoff and peak discharges using Green-Ampt infiltration model. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 117 (3), 354–370. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:3(354)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, G.A. and Anderson, J.R., 1994. A new rain retrieval technique that combines geosynchronous IR and MW polar orbit data for hourly rainfall estimates. Case study: Kwajalein and TOGA-COARE. In: American Meteorological Society, ed. Proceeding of the 7th conference on satellite meteorology and oceanography. AMS, 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., Lemoine, G., and Rott, H., 1999. A method for estimating soil moisture from ERS scatterometer and soil data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70, 191–207. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00036-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, M.T. and Stephen, B.S., 2005. Discussion of: “Curve number hydrology in water quality modeling: uses, abuses, and future directions” by David C. Garen and Daniel S. Moore. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 41 (6), 1491–1492. doi:10.1111/jawr.2005.41.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S.G., et al., 2011. Estimation of surface soil moisture and roughness from multi-angular ASAR imagery in the Watershed Allied Telemetry Experimental Research (WATER). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15 (5), 1415–1426. doi:10.5194/hess-15-1415-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., et al., 2012a. Climate WNA – high-resolution spatial climate data for western North America. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 51, 16–29. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-11-043.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2008. Simulation of an agricultural watershed using an improved curve number method in SWAT. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 51 (4), 1323–1339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2010. Simulated wetland conservationrestoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1511–1525. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Liu, T., and Yang, W., 2012b. Development of a robust runoff-prediction model by fusing the rational equation and a modified SCS-CN method. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57, 1118–1140. doi:10.1080/02626667.2012.701305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, M., et al., 2003. How does rainfall become runoff? A combined tracer and runoff transfer function approach. Water Resources Research, 39 (11), 1315. doi:10.1029/2003WR002331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D., 1988. Grid-based application of runoff curve numbers. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, 114 (6), 601–612. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1988)114:6(601)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wight, J.R. and Skiles, J.W., 1987. SPUR: simulation of production and utilization of rangelands. Documentation and users guide. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture -Agricultural Research Service, 372.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. R., Arnold, J. G., and Srinivasan, R., 2000. The APEX model. Temple, TX: Texas A&M Blackland Research Center, BRC Report No. 00–06.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.R., et al., 2012. Evolution of the SCS runoff curve number method and its application to continuous runoff simulation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(11),1221–1229.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.R. and Izaurralde, R.C., 2005. The APEX model. Temple, TX: Texas A&M Blackland Research Center, BRC Report no. 2005-2.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.R. and LaSeur, V., 1976. Water yield model using SCS curve numbers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 102 (9), 1241–1253.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, D.E., et al., 2002. Curve number method: origins, applications and limitations. Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 1–10. Available from: http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/water/quality/common/techpapers/curve.html.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, D.E., et al., 2003. Runoff curve number method: examination of the initial abstraction ratio. In: Paul Bizier and Paul DeBarry, eds.World Water & Environ. Resources Congress 2003 and related symposia, 23–26 June 2003. Philadelphia, PA: EWRI, ASCE, 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, D.E., et al., 2010. Discussion of “modifications to SCS-CN method for long-term hydrologic simulation” by K. Geetha, S. K. Mishra, T. I. Eldho, A. K. Rastogi, and R. P. Pandey. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 136 (6), 444–446. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000231
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, D.E. and Gbuerek, W.J., 1992. Progress report ARS/SCS curve number work group. In: Proceedings ASCE, Water Forum, 92. New York: ASCE, 378–382.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, X., et al., 2013. Statistical and hydrological evaluation of TRMM-based multi-satellite precipitation analysis over the Wangchu basin of Bhutan: are the latest satellite precipitation products 3B42V7 ready for use in ungauged basins? Journal of Hydrology, 499, 91–99. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, K., et al., 2010. Evaluation of a satellite based global flood monitoring system. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31, 3763–3782. doi:10.1080/01431161.2010.483489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, K.K., et al., 2005. Intercomparison of rain gauge, radar and satellite-based precipitation estimates with emphasis on hydrologic forecasting. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 6 (4), 497–517. doi:10.1175/JHM431.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong, B., et al., 2010. Hydrologic evaluation of multi satellite precipitation analysis standard precipitation products in basins beyond its inclined latitude band: A case study in Laohahe basin, China. Water Resources Research, 46 (7), W07542. doi:10.1029/2009WR008965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, R.A., et al., 1989. AGNPS: a nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 44 (2), 168–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B., 1998. Theoretical justification of SCS method for runoff estimation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 124 (6), 306–310. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1998)124:6(306)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., et al., 2001. Modified SCS curve number method for predicting sub surface drainage flow. Transactions of the ASCE, 44 (6), 1673–1682.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., et al., 2014. Initial abstraction and curve numbersfor semiarid watersheds in south eastern Arizona. Hydrological Processes, 28, 774–783. doi:10.1002/hyp.9592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zende, A.M. and Atal, K.R., 2015. Identification of rainwater harvesting structure for Yerala river using remote sensing and GIS. In: E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress. The Hague, The Netherlands: IAHR.
   Google Scholar
• Zende, A.M., Nagarajan, R., and Atal, K.R., 2014. Analysis of surface runoff from Yerala River Basin using SCS-CN and GIS. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 4 (3), 508–516.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, X. and Huang, M.-L., 2004. ArcCN-runoff: an ArcGIS tool for generating curve number and runoff maps. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19 (10), 875–879. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Haan, C.T., and Nofziger, D.L., 1990. Hydrologic modeling with GIS: an overview. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 6 (4), 453–458. doi:10.13031/2013.26413
   Google Scholar