Real-time assimilation of streamflow observations into a hydrological routing model: effects of model structures and updating methods

References

• Abaza, M., et al., 2014. Sequential streamflow assimilation for short-term hydrological ensemble forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 2692–2706. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, M., Garneau, C., and Anctil, F., 2015. Comparison of sequential and variational streamflow assimilation techniques for short-term hydrological forecasting. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20 (2). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.L., 2001. An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. Monthly Weather Review, 129, 2884–2903. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2884:AEAKFF>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreadis, K.M., et al., 2007. Prospects for river discharge and depth estimation through assimilation of swath-altimetry into a raster-based hydrodynamics model. Geophysical Research Letters, 34 (10). doi:10.1029/2007GL029721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreadis, K.M. and Lettenmaier, D.P., 2006. Assimilating remotely sensed snow observations into a macroscale hydrology model. Advances in Water Resources, 29 (6), 872–886. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreadis, K.M. and Schumann, G.J.-P., 2014. Estimating the impact of satellite observations on the predictability of large-scale hydraulic models. Advances in Water Resources, 73, 44–54. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbetta, S., et al., 2011. Case study: improving real-time stage forecasting Muskingum model by incorporating the rating curve model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16 (6), 540–557. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, B., Ringen, S., and Sallas, J., 2014. City of Dallas Floodway System (DFS) case study: 100-year levee remediation. In: Rocky Mountain Geo-Conference 2014. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 59–68. doi:10.1061/9780784413807.004
   Google Scholar
• Barthelemy, S., et al., 2017. Ensemble-based data assimilation for operational flood forecasting - On the merits of state estimation for 1-D hydrodynamic forecasting through the example of the “Adour maritime” river. Journal of Hydrology, 552, 210–224. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K., 2016. Facets of uncertainty: epistemic uncertainty, non-stationarity, likelihood, hypothesis testing, and communication. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61, 1652–1665. doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1031761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancamaria, S., et al., 2011. Assimilation of virtual wide swath altimetry to improve Arctic river modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 373–381. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boku, L. and Xuewei, Q., 1987. Some problems with the Muskingum method. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 32, 485–496. doi:10.1080/02626668709491207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2010. Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14, 1881–1893. doi:10.5194/hess-14-1881-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocca, L., et al., 2012. Assimilation of surface- and root-zone ASCAT soil moisture products into rainfall-runoff modeling. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50 (7 PART1), 2542–2555. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2011.2177468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brochero, D., Anctil, F., and Gagné, C., 2011. Simplifying a hydrological ensemble prediction system with a backward greedy selection of members – part 1: optimization criteria. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 3307–3325. doi:10.5194/hess-15-3307-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J., 2012. Evaluating raw ensembles with the continuous ranked probability score. Quarterly Journal of Royal Meteorological Society, 138, 1611–1617. doi: 10.1002/qj.1891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M.P., et al., 2008. Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model. Advances in Water Resources, 31, 1309–1324. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley, R., 1991. Atmospheric data analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Atmospheric and Space Science Series.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., et al., 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 182–197. doi:10.1109/4235.996017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeChant, C.M. and Moradkhani, H., 2012. Examining the effectiveness and robustness of data assimilation methods for calibration and quantification of uncertainty in hydrologic forecasting. Water Resources Research, 48, W04518. doi:10.1029/2011WR011011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, D.P., 1995. On-line estimation of error covariance parameters for atmospheric data assimilation. Monthly Weather Review, 123(4), 1128–1145. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<128:oleoec>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, R.A. and Vaughan, J.W., 2015. Asymmetrical response to flood hazards in south central Texas. Papers in Applied Geography, 1, 404–412. doi:10.1080/23754931.2015.1095792
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, G., 2003. The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dynamics, 53, 343–367. doi:10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, G., 2009. Data assimilation: the ensemble Kalman filter. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, K.J. and Hogue, T.S., 2011. Evaluating uncertainty estimates in hydrologic models: borrowing measures from the forecast verification community. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 3367–3382. doi:10.5194/hess-15-3367-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Pintado, J., et al., 2013. Scheduling satellite-based SAR acquisition for sequential assimilation of water level observations into flood modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 495, 252–266. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakakos, A.P., Georgakakos, K.P., and Baltas, E.A., 1990. A state-space model for hydrologic river routing. Water Resources Research, 26, 827–838. doi:10.1029/WR026i005p00827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giustarini, L., et al., 2011. Assimilating SAR-derived water level data into a hydraulic model: a case study. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 2349–2365. doi:10.5194/hess-15-2349-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gochis, D.J., Yu, W., and Yates, D.N., 2015. The WRF-Hydro model technical description and user’s guide, version 3.0. NCAR Technical Document; p. 123. [accessed 2018 Jan 2]. http://www.ral.ucar.edu/projects/wrf_hydro/.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, O.B., et al., 2015. Application of a hybrid optimization method in Muskingum parameter estimation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 141, 4015026. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajian-Tilaki, K., 2013. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine, 4 (2), 627–635.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jean-Baptiste, N., et al., 2011. Data assimilation for real-time estimation of hydraulic states and unmeasured perturbations in a 1D hydrodynamic model. In: eds, B. Amaziane and D. Barrera. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, MAMERN 2009: 3rd International Conference on Approximation Methods and Numerical Modeling in Environment and Natural Resources. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Vol. 81, 2201–2214. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2010.12.021
   Google Scholar
• Kalman, R.E., 1960. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82, 35–45. doi:10.1115/1.3662552
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., et al., 2013a. Estimating the 2011 largest flood discharge at the Kumano River using the 2d dynamic wave model and particle filters. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Series B1 (Hydraulic Engineering), 69 (4), 163–168. doi:10.2208/jscejhe.69.I_163
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., et al., 2013b. Simultaneous estimation of inflow and channel roughness using 2D hydraulic model and particle filters. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 6, 112–123. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitanidis, P.K., and Bras, R. L., 1980. Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 1. analysis of uncertainty. Water Resources Research, 16 (6), 1025–1033. doi:10.1029/WR016i006p01025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahoz, W.A., and Schneider, P., 2014. Data assimilation: making sense of Earth Observation. Frontiers In Environmental Science. 2. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2014.00016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, H., et al., 2011. Variational assimilation of streamflow into three-parameter Muskingum routing model for improved operational river flow forecasting. In: The EGU General Assembly. Munich: EGU.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al., 2008. Ensemble data assimilation for channel flow routing to improve operational hydrologic forecasting. In: The AGU Fall Meeting. Washington, DC: AGU.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al., 2012. Advancing data assimilation in operational hydrologic forecasting: progresses, challenges, and emerging opportunities. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 3863–3887. doi:10.5194/hess-16-3863-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. and Gupta, H.V., 2007. Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: toward an integrated data assimilation framework. Water Resources Research, 43, 1–18. doi:10.1029/2006WR005756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, H., et al., 2003. Data assimilation in the MIKE 11 Flood Forecasting system using Kalman filtering. In: G. Blöschl, ed. Water Resources Systems— hydrological Risk, Management and Development (Proceedings of symposium IlS02b held during IUGG2003 al Sapporo. July 2003). Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences, IAHS Publ. no. 281, 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, H. and Skotner, C., 2005. Adaptive state updating in real-time river flow forecasting - A combined filtering and error forecasting procedure. Journal of Hydrology, 308, 302–312. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matgen, P., et al., 2010. Towards the sequential assimilation of SAR-derived water stages into hydraulic models using the Particle Filter: proof of concept. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14, 1773–1785. doi:10.5194/hess-14-1773-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maybeck, P.S., 1982. Stochastic models, estimation, and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, M., 2017. Improving flood prediction assimilating uncertain crowdsourced data into hydrological and hydraulic models. Thesis (PhD). UNESCO-IHE PhD Thesis Series, CRC Press, Leiden, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, G.T., 1938. The unit hydrograph and flood routing. Unp ublished manuscript presented at a conference of the North Atlantic Division. US Army, Corps of Engineers, 24 June 1938.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, D., 1995. Recent developments in hydrologic data assimilation. Reviews of Geophysics, 33, 977–984. doi:10.1029/95RG00740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, D., 2002. An integrated approach to hydrologic data assimilation: interpolation, smoothing, and filtering. Advances in Water Resources, 25, 1275–1286. doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00055-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradkhani, H., et al., 2005a. Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: sequential data assimilation using the particle filter. Water Resources Research, 41, W05012. doi:10.1029/2004WR003604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradkhani, H., et al., 2005b. Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter. Advances in Water Resources, 28 (2), 135–147. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradkhani, H., DeChant, C.M., and Sorooshian, S., 2012. Evolution of ensemble data assimilation for uncertainty quantification using the particle filter-Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Water Resources Research, 48, W12520. doi:10.1029/2012WR012144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, A.H. and Winkler, R.L., 1987. A general framework for forecast verification. Monthly Weather Review, 115, 1330–1338. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<1330:AGFFFV>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10, 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• Neal, J., et al., 2009. A data assimilation approach to discharge estimation from space. Hydrological Processes, 23, 3641–3649. doi:10.1002/hyp.7518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, J.C., Atkinson, P.M., and Hutton, C.W., 2007. Flood inundation model updating using an ensemble Kalman filter and spatially distributed measurements. Journal of Hydrology, 336, 401–415. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, J.C., Atkinson, P.M., and Hutton, C.W., 2012. Adaptive space–time sampling with wireless sensor nodes for flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 414–415, 136–147. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh, S.J., et al., 2013. Ensemble Kalman filtering and particle filtering in a lag-time window for short-term streamflow forecasting with a distributed hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrologic. Engineering, 18, 1684–1696. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, T., 1985. A direct three-parameter Muskingum procedure incorporating lateral inflow. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 30, 479–496. doi:10.1080/02626668509491013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.K. and Xu, L., 2013. Data assimilation for atmospheric, oceanic and hydrologic applications. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, V.R.N. and De Lannoy, G.J.M., 2006. Improvement of modeled soil wetness conditions and turbulent fluxes through the assimilation of observed discharge. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 7 (3), 458–477. doi:10.1175/JHM490.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, V.R.N. and De Lannoy, G.J.M., 2009. Ensemble-based assimilation of discharge into rainfall-runoff models: A comparison of approaches to mapping observational information to state space. Water Resources Research, 45 (8), W08428. doi:10.1029/2008WR007590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J.D., 2008. Geomorphic controls and transition zones in the lower Sabine River. Hydrological Processes, 22, 2424–2437. doi:10.1002/hyp.6835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press, W.H., et al., 1992. Numerical recipes in FORTRAN. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puente, C.E. and Bras, R.L., 1987. Application of nonlinear filtering in the real time forecasting of river flows. Water Resources Research, 23, 675–682. doi:10.1029/WR023i004p00675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakovec, O., et al., 2012. State updating of a distributed hydrological model with ensemble Kalman filtering: effects of updating frequency and observation network density on forecast accuracy. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 3435–3449. doi:10.5194/hess-16-3435-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakovec, O., et al., 2015. Operational aspects of asynchronous filtering for flood forecasting. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19, 2911–2924. doi:10.5194/hess-19-2911-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakovec, O., et al., 2016. Improving the realism of hydrologic model functioning through multivariate parameter estimation. Water Resources Research, 52, 7779–7792. doi:10.1002/2016WR019430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, J.C., 1997. Validation and intercomparison of different updating procedures for real-time forecasting. Nordic Hydrology, 28, 65–84. doi:10.2166/nh.1997.005
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, R., McLaughlin, D.B., and Entekhabi, D., 2002. Hydrologic data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter. American Meteorological Society, 130, 103–114. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<0103:HDAWTE>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, R.H., Crow, W.T., and Keppenne, C.L., 2008. An adaptive ensemble Kalman filter for soil moisture data assimilation. Water Resources Research, 44, W03423. doi:10.1029/2007WR006357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, S., et al., 2011. Correction of upstream flow and hydraulic state with data assimilation in the context of flood forecasting. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 3555–3575. doi:10.5194/hess-15-3555-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, D.S., 2001. Measures of skill and value of ensemble prediction systems, their interrelationship and the effect of ensemble size. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 127, 2473–2489. doi:10.1002/qj.49712757715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakov, P., Evensen, G., and Bertino, L., 2010. Asynchronous data assimilation with the EnKF. Tellus A, 62, 24–29. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0870.2009.00417.x
   Google Scholar
• Samani, H.M.V. and Jebelifard, S., 2003. Design of circular urban storm sewer systems using multilinear Muskingum flow routing method. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129, 832–838. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:11(832)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumann, G.J.-P., et al., 2016. Unlocking the full potential of Earth observation during the 2015 Texas flood disaster. Water Resources Research, 52, 3288–3293. doi:10.1002/2015WR018428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, D.-J., Koren, V., and Reed, S., 2003. Improving a priori estimates of hydraulic parameters in a distributed routing model via variational assimilation of long-term streamflow data. IAHS Publications Series (Red Books), 282, 138–414.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L., et al., 2016. Review of the Kalman-type hydrological data assimilation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (13), 2348–2366. doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1127376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todini, E., 2007. A mass conservative and water storage consistent variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1645–1659. doi:10.5194/hess-11-1645-2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trambauer, P., et al., 2015. Hydrological drought forecasting and skill assessment for the Limpopo River basin, southern Africa. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19, 1695–1711. doi:10.5194/hess-19-1695-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS (US Geological Survey), 2016. USGS discharge data for Riverside [WWW Document]. Available from: https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/sw [Accessed 2 January 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Verlaan, M., 1998. Efficient Kalman filtering algorithms for hydrodynamic models. Thesis (PhD). Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J.P. and Houser, P.R., 2005. Hydrologic data assimilation. In: J. Tiefenbacher, eds. Approaches to managing disaster – assessing Hazards, emergencies and disaster impacts. London: InTechOpen, 233–234. doi:10.5772/1112
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J.P., Willgoose, G.R., and Kalma, J.D., 2001. One-dimensional soil moisture profile retrieval by assimilation of near-surface observations: a comparison of retrieval algorithms. Advances in Water Resources, 24 (6), 631–650. doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00043-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerts, A.H. and El Serafy, G.Y.H., 2006. Particle filtering and ensemble Kalman filtering for state updating with hydrological conceptual rainfall–runoff models. Water Resources Research, 42, 1–17. doi:10.1029/2005WR004093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigel, A.P., Liniger, M.A., and Appenzeller, C., 2007. The discrete brier and ranked probability skill scores. Monthly Weather Review, 135, 118–124. doi:10.1175/MWR3280.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMO (World Meteorological Organization), 1992. Simulated real-time intercomparison of hydrological models. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization, WMO Operational Hydrology Report.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, D.-M., Qiu, L., and Chen, S.-Y., 2012. Estimation of nonlinear Muskingum model parameter using differential evolution. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17, 348–353. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, X., et al., 2016. Parameter identification of nonlinear Muskingum model with backtracking search algorithm. Water Resources Management, 30, 2767–2783. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1321-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar