Estimating uncertainty of streamflow measurements with moving-boat acoustic Doppler current profilers

References

• Boldt, J.A. and Oberg, K., 2015. Validation of streamflow measurements made with M9 and RiverRay acoustic Doppler current profilers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943–7900.0001087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J.L. and Herrick, L.E., 1982. Mississippi river test: volume 1: final report. DCP4400/300, prepared for the US Geological Survey by AMETEK/Straza Division, El Cajon, California, under contract no. 14-08-0001-19003.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, T., Kiang, J., and Mason Jr., R., 2013. Estimating discharge measurement uncertainty using the interpolated variance estimator. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139 (5), 502–510. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (Environment Canada), 2004. Procedures for the review and approval of ADCP discharge measurements. 1st ed. Ottawa, Canada: Environment Canada.
   Google Scholar
• García, C., et al., 2012. Variance of discharge estimates sampled using acoustic Doppler current profilers from moving platforms. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138 (8), 684–694. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Castro, J.A., Buzard, J., and Mohamed, A., 2016. RiverFlowUA—a package to estimate total uncertainty in ADCP discharge measurements by FOTSE—with an application in hydrometry. In: G. Constantinescu, M. Garcia, and D. Hanes, eds. River Flow 2016 (Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, 12–15 July 2016, St. Louis, MO. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 715–723.
   Google Scholar
• González-Castro, J.A. and Muste, M., 2007. Framework for estimating uncertainty of ADCP measurements from a moving boat by standardized uncertainty analysis. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133 (12), 1390–1410. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1390)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H., 2006. Analysis of random error in ADCP discharge measurement, Part I: a model for predicting random uncertainty. China Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 37 (5), 619–624. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., 2008. Estimating precision of moving boat ADCP discharge measurement. In: Proceedings (DVD) of 14th Australian hydrographers association conference: water initiatives 2008 and beyond. Northcote: Australia Hydrographers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., 2012. Uncertainty model for in situ quality control of stationary ADCP open channel discharge measurement. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138 (1), 4–12. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H., 2013. Closure to “Uncertainty model for in situ quality control of stationary ADCP open-channel discharge measurement” by Hening Huang. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139 (1), 104–106. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H., 2014. Uncertainty-based measurement quality control. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 19 (2), 65–73. doi:10.1007/s00769-013-1032-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H., 2015. Statistical quality control of streamflow measurements with moving-boat acoustic Doppler current profilers. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 53 (6), 820–827. doi:10.1080/00221686.2015.1074947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H., 2016. Estimation of Type A uncertainty of moving-boat ADCP streamflow measurements. In: I.G. Constantinescu, M. Garcia, and D. Hanes, eds. River Flow 2016 (Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, 12–15 July 2016, St. Louis, MO. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 696–701.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 5168, 2005. Measurement of fluid flow – procedures for the evaluation of uncertainties. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 748, 2007. Hydrometry – measurement of liquid flow in open channels using current meters or floats. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM), 2008. Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM 1995 with minor corrections). Geneva, Switzerland. Available from: http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Law, A.M. and Kelton, W.D., 1991. Simulation modeling and analysis, 2nd ensemble discharge. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S.A., et al., 2017. Monte Carlo approach for uncertainty analysis of acoustic Doppler current profiler discharge measurement by moving boat. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 143 (3), 04016088. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, D.S., 2013. Extrap: software to assist the selection of extrapolation methods for moving-boat ADCP streamflow measurements. Computers & Geosciences, 54, 211–218. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, D.S., 2016a. QRev: software for computation and quality assurance of acoustic Doppler current profiler moving-boat streamflow measurements – users manual, Version 2.8. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey Report Series 2016–1052.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, D.S., 2016b. Consistent and efficient processing of ADCP streamflow measurements. In: G. Constantinescu, M. Garcia, and D. Hanes, eds. River Flow 2016, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, 12–15 July 2016, St. Louis, MO. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 655–663.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, D.S. and Wagner, C.R., 2007. Correcting acoustic Doppler current profiler discharge measurements biased by sediment transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133 (12), 1329–1336. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1329)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, D.S., et al., 2013. Measuring discharge with acoustic Doppler current profilers from a moving boat. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 3-A22, Version 2.0.
   Google Scholar
• MWR (Ministry of Water Resources, People’s Republic of China), 2006. Guidance for streamflow measurements using acoustic Doppler current profiler. Beijing, China, SL337-2006.
   Google Scholar
• Oberg, K.A. and Mueller, D.S., 2007. Validation of streamflow measurements made with acoustic Doppler current profilers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133 (12), 1421–1432. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1421)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, C.D. and Rainville, F., 2006. Case study of precision of GPS differential correction strategies: influence on aDcp velocity and discharge estimates. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 132 (3), 225–234. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:3(225)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, M.R., 2001. Discharge measurements using a broad-band acoustic Doppler current profiler. Reston, VA, USA, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 01–1.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrab, L., et al., 2012. Role of turbulence fluctuations on uncertainties of acoustic Doppler current profiler discharge measurements. Water Resources Research, 48 (6), W06507. doi:10.1029/2011WR011185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TRDI (Teledyne RD Instruments), 2009. WinRiver II user’s guide. California: Poway.
   Google Scholar
• TRDI (Teledyne RD Instruments), 2015. Q-view user’s guide. California: Poway.
   Google Scholar
• USGS (US Geological Survey), 2002. Policy and technical guidance on discharge measurements using acoustic Doppler current profilers. US Geological Survey, Office of Surface Water Technical Memorandum 2002.02 Available from: http://hydroacoustics.usgs.gov/memos/OSW2002-02.pdf [Accessed 13 August 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Wadsworth Jr., H.M., 1989. Summarization and interpretation of data. In: M. Harrison and H.M. Wadsworth Jr., eds. Handbook of statistical methods for engineers and scientists, ensemble discharges. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C.R. and Mueller, D.S., 2011. Comparison of bottom-track to global positioning system referenced discharges measured using an acoustic Doppler current profiler. Journal of Hydrology, 401 (3–4), 250–258. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willsman, A., 2006. A case study of low flow measurement in a small channel using StreamPro with a customer-made traveler system. In: National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, ed. Customer’s success story. New Zealand: National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research.
   Google Scholar