Sensitivity and fuzzy uncertainty analyses in the determination of SCS-CN parameters from rainfall–runoff data

References

• Ajmal, M., et al., 2015. Investigation of SCS-CN and its inspired modified models for runoff estimation in South Korean watersheds. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jher.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE/EWRI Curve Number Hydrology Task Committee, 2009. Curve number hydrology: state of the practice. R.H. Hawkins, T.J. Ward, D.E. Woodward, and J.A. Van Mullem, eds. Reston, VA: The American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Baltas, E.A., Dervos, N.A., and Mimikou, M.A., 2007a. Research on the initial abstraction – storage ratio and its effect on hydrograph simulation at a watershed in Greece. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 4, 2169–2204. doi:10.5194/hessd-4-2169-2007
   Google Scholar
• Baltas, E.A., Dervos, N.A., and Mimikou, M.A., 2007b. Technical note: determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1825–1829. doi:10.5194/hess-11-1825-2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banasik, K., Krajewski, A., and Sikorska, A., 2014. Curve number estimation for a small urban catchment from recorded rainfall-runoff events. Archives of Environmental Protection, 40 (3), 75–86. doi:10.2478/aep-2014-0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondelid, T.R., McCuen, R.H., and Jackson, T.J., 1982. Sensitivity of SCS models to curve number variation. Water Resources Bulletin AWRA, 18 (1), 111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Boughton, W.C., 1989. A review of the USDA SCS curve number method. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 27 (3), 511–523. doi:10.1071/SR9890511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, S. and Norton, L.D., 2000. Calibration and validation of a non-point source pollution model. Agricultural Water Management, 45, 17–39. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00074-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundalia, M. and Dholakia, M., 2014. Impact of monthly curve number on daily runoff estimation for Ozat catchment in India. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 2014 (4), 144–155. doi:10.4236/ojmh.2014.44014
   Google Scholar
• Hamby, D.M., 1994. A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 32, 135–154. doi:10.1007/BF00547132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., 1975. The importance of accurate curve numbers in the estimation of storm runoff. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 11 (5), 887–890. doi:10.1111/jawr.1975.11.issue-5
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., 1983. Discussion of Antecedent moisture condition probabilities. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 109 (2), 298–299. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1983)109:2(298)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., 1993. Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 119, 334–345. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:2(334)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., et al., 2002. Runoff curve number method: Examination of the initial abstraction ratio. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, 27 June–1 July 2002, Las Vegas.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., et al., 2009. Curve cumber hydrology – state of practice. In: The ASCE/EWRI Curve Number Hydrology Task Committee. Reston, VA: Hydrology Task Committee, American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.H., et al., 2010. Continuing evolution of rainfall–runoff and the curve number precedent. In: 2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference, 27 June–1 July 2010, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmfelt, A.T., 1991. Investigation of curve number procedure. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117, 725–737. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:6(725)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S.M. and Mahjouri, N., 2014. Developing a fuzzy neural network-based support vector regression (FNN-SVR) for regionalizing nitrate concentration in groundwater. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, 3685–3699. doi:10.1007/s10661-014-3650-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S.M., Mahjouri, N., and Riahi, S., 2016. Development of a Direct Geomorphologic IUH Model for Daily Runoff Estimation in Ungauged Watersheds. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 21 (6), 05016008 (1–17). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.R., 1998. An investigation of curve number applicability to watersheds in excess of 25000 hectares. Journal of Environmental Hydrology, 6, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kohnová, S., et al., 2015. On the possibilities of watershed parameterization for extreme flow estimation in ungauged basins. In: M. Rogger, eds. Changes in flood risk and perception in catchments and cities. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences, IAHS Publ. 370, 171–175.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y.Y. and Shao, M.A., 2006. Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Arid Environments, 64 (1), 77–96. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCuen, R.H., 2003. Modeling hydrologic change: statistical methods. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, A CRC Press Company.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Andréassian, V., and Perrin, C., 2005. Soil Conservation Service Curve Number method: How to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure? Water Resources Research, 41, W02011. doi:10.1029/2004WR003191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S., et al., 2003. A modified SCS-CN method: characterization and testing. Water Resources Management, 17, 37–68. doi:10.1023/A:1023099005944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2005. Field applicability of the SCS-CN-based mishra? Singh general model and its variants. Water Resources Management, 19, 37–62. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-1076-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., Jain, M.K., and Singh, V.P., 2004. Evaluation of the SCS-CN-based model incorporating antecedent moisture. Journal of Water Resources Management, 18, 567–589. doi:10.1007/s11269-004-8765-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K., et al., 2006. An improved IaS relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology. Journal of Water Resources Management, 20 (5), 643–660. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-9000-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P., 2003. Soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliff, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service), 1997. Part 630 – hydrology, national engineering handbook. Washington, DC: NRCS.
   Google Scholar
• Ponce, V.M., 1989. Engineering hydrology – principles and practices. San Diego: San Diego State University.
   Google Scholar
• Ponce, V.M. and Hawkins, R.H., 1996. Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity? Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1 (1), 11–19. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, A. and Muñoz-Carpena, R., 2013. Performance evaluation of hydrological models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. Journal of Hydrology, 480, 33–45. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runkler, T.A., 1996. Extended defuzzification methods and their properties. IEEE Transactions, 1, 694–700.
   Google Scholar
• Sahu, R.K., Mishra, S.K., and Eldho, T.I., 2010. An improved AMC-coupled runoff curve number model. Hydrological Processes, 24 (20), 2834–2839. doi:10.1002/hyp.v24:20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakouri-Ganjavi, H. and Nadimi, R., 2009. A novel fuzzy linear regression model based on a non-equality possibility index and optimum uncertainty. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 9 (2), 590–598. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2008.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Z.-H., et al., 2009. Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfall–runoff event analysis in the three gorges area, China. Catena, 77, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2008.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulis, K.X. and Valiantzas, J.D., 2012. SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds – the two-CN system approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 1001–1015. doi:10.5194/hess-16-1001-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulis, K.X., et al., 2009. Investigation of the direct runoff generation mechanism for the analysis of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 605–615. doi:10.5194/hess-13-605-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, H., Uejima, S., and Asai, K., 1982. Linear regression analysis with fuzzy model. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 12 (6), 903–907. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1982.4308925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedela, N.H., et al., 2012. Runoff curve numbers for 10 small forested watersheds in the mountains of the eastern United States. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17, 1188–1198. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP, 1997. World atlas of desertification. 2nd ed. New York and London: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. and Arnold, 182.
   Google Scholar
• USDA SCS (USDA–Soil Conservation Service), 1985. National engineering handbook. Section 4. Hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA-SCS.
   Google Scholar
• Viji, R., Prasanna, P.R., and Ilangovan, R., 2015. Modified SCS-CN and Green-Ampt methods in surface runoff modelling for the Kundahpallam Watershed, Nilgiris, Western Ghats, India. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 677–684. doi:10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.087
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.Q., Zhang, X.C., and Huang, C.Q., 2009. Spatial variability of soil total nitrogen and soil total phosphorus under different land uses in a small watershed on the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma, 150 (1–2), 141–149. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, D.E., et al., 2003. Runoff curve number method: examination of the initial abstraction ratio. World Water and Environ. Resour. In: Congress 2003 and related symposia, EWRI, ASCE, 23–26 June 2003, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, D.E., et al., 2004. Runoff curve number method: Examination of the initial abstraction ratio. In: Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress and Related Symposis. ASCE Publications: Philadelphia, PA. doi:10.1061/40685(2003)308
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, B., et al., 2009. Spatial variation of soil nutrients and bulk density in rehabilitated slope land on northeast of Loess Plateau. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 23 (3), 92–96. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Yen, K.K., Ghoshray, S., and Roig, G., 1999. A linear regression model using triangular fuzzy number coefficients. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 106, 167–177. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00269-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., et al., 2014. Initial abstraction and curve numbers for semiarid watersheds in Southeastern Arizona. Hydrological Processes, 28, 774–783. doi:10.1002/hyp.v28.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahraie, B. and Hosseini, S.M., 2009. Development of reservoir operation policies considering variable agricultural water demands. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4980–4987. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar