How the performance of hydrological models relates to credibility of projections under climate change

References

• Abbaspour, K.C., et al., 2007. Modelling of hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333, 413–430. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aich, V., et al., 2014. Comparing impacts of climate change on streamflow in four large African river basins. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18 (4), 1305–1321. doi:10.5194/hess-18-1305-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, J.C.M., et al., 2017. Process refinements improve a hydrological model concept applied to the Niger River basin. Hydrological Processes, 31 (25), 4540–4554. doi:10.1002/hyp.11376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andréassian, V., et al., 2004. Impact of spatial aggregation of inputs and parameters on the efficiency of rainfall-runoff models: A theoretical study using chimera watersheds. Water Resources Research, 40 (5), W05209. doi:10.1029/2003WR002854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archfield, S.A., et al., 2015. Accelerating advances in continental domain hydrologic modelling. Water Resources Research, 51 (12), 10078–10091. doi:10.1002/2015WR017498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arheimer, B., Dahné, J., and Donnelly, C., 2012. Climate change impact on riverine nutrient load and land-based remedial measures of the Baltic Sea Action Plan. Ambio, 41 (6), 600–612. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0323-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arheimer, B. and Lindström, G., 2015. Climate impact on floods: changes in high flows in Sweden in the past and the future (1911–2100). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19, 771–784. doi:10.5194/hess-19-771-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnell, N.W. and Gosling, S.N., 2016. The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Climatic Change, 134 (3), 387–401. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1084-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J.G., Allen, P.M., and Bernhardt, G., 1993. A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology, 142, 47–69. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, H.E., et al., 2016. Global-scale regionalization of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resources Research, 52 (5), 3599–3622. doi:10.1002/2015WR018247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, H.E., et al., 2017. Global evaluation of runoff from ten state-of-the-art hydrological models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21, 2881–2903. doi:10.5194/hess-21-2881-2017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström, S., 1976. Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments. Norrköping: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, SMHI RHO 7.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström, S., et al., 2001. Climate change impacts on runoff in Sweden – assessments by global climate models, dynamical downscaling and hydrological modelling. Climate Research, 16, 101–112. doi:10.3354/cr016101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. and Alcock, R.E., 2012. Modelling everything everywhere: a new approach to decision-making for water management under uncertainty. Freshwater Biology, 57 (Suppl. 1), 124–132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02592.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. and Binley, A., 1992. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes, 6 (3), 279–298. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J., 2006. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology, 320 (1), 18–36. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J., 2009. Environmental modelling – an uncertain future? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J., 2011. I believe in climate change but how precautionary do we need to be in planning for the future? Hydrological Processes (HPToday), 25, 1517–1520. doi:10.1002/hyp.7939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J., 2012. Causal models as multiple working hypotheses about environmental processes. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, Académie des Sciences, Paris, 344, 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.crte.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J., 2016. EGU Leonardo lecture: facets of hydrology – epistemic error, non-stationarity, likelihood, hypothesis testing, and communication. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (9), 1652–1665. doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1031761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J. and Binley, A.M., 2014. GLUE, 20 years on. Hydrological Processes, 28 (24), 5897–5918. doi:10.1002/hyp.10082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J. and Kirby, M.J., 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24 (1), 43–69. doi:10.1080/02626667909491834
   Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J. and Smith, P.J., 2015. Concepts of information content and likelihood in parameter calibration for hydrological simulation models. ASCE Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J. and Westerberg, I., 2011. On red herrings and real herrings: disinformation and information in hydrological inference. Hydrological Processes (Hptoday), 25, 1676–1680. doi:10.1002/hyp.7963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biemans, H., et al., 2009. Effects of precipitation uncertainty on discharge calculations for main river basins. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 10, 1011–1025. doi:10.1175/2008JHM1067.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierkens, M.F.P., 2015. Global hydrology 2015: state, trends, and directions. Water Resources Research, 51 (7), 4923–4947. doi:10.1002/2015WR017173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierkens, M.F.P., et al., 2015. Hyper-resolution global hydrological modelling: what is next? “Everywhere and locally relevant.”. Hydrological Processes, 29, 310–320. doi:10.1002/hyp.10391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazkova, S. and Beven, K., 2009. A limits of acceptability approach to model evaluation and uncertainty estimation in flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation: skalka catchment, Czech Republic. Water Resources Research, 45, W00B16. doi:10.1029/2007WR006726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blöschl, G. and Montanari, A., 2010. Climate change impacts – throwing the dice? Hydrological Processes, 24, 374–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsuk, M., et al., 2001. Stakeholder values and scientific modeling in the Neuse river watershed. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 355–373. doi:10.1023/A:1011231801266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo, J., et al., 2012. Coupled hydrologic-hydraulic modeling of the Upper Paraguay River Basin. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17 (5), 635–646. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D., Beven, K., and Naden, P., 2000. Flood frequency estimation under climate change (with uncertainty). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 4 (3), 393–405. doi:10.5194/hess-4-393-2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiew, F.H.S., et al., 2014. Observed hydrologic non-stationarity in far south-eastern Australia: implications for modelling and prediction. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28 (1), 3–15. doi:10.1007/s00477-013-0755-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, H.T. and Beven, K.J., 2007. Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in distributed rainfall-runoff modelling within GLUE framework. Journal of Hydrology, 332 (3–4), 316–336. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J.H., et al., 2010. Weight assignment in regional climate models. Climate Research, 44, 179–194. doi:10.3354/cr00916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M.P., et al., 2016. Characterizing uncertainty of the hydrologic impacts of climate change. Current Climate Change Report, 2, 55. doi:10.1007/s40641-016-0034-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coron, L., et al., 2012. Crash testing hydrological models in contrasted climate conditions: an experiment on 216 Australian catchments. Water Resources Research, 48, W05552. doi:10.1029/2011WR011721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coron, L., et al., 2011. Pathologies of hydrological models used in changing climatic conditions: a review. In: S.W. Franks, et al., eds. Hydro-climatology: variability and change. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Scoiences, IAHS Publ. 344, 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dankers, R., et al., 2014. First look at changes in flood hazard in the inter-sectoral impact model intercomparison project ensemble. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 3257–3261. doi:10.1073/pnas.1302078110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre, G., et al., 2011. Future hydrology and climate in the River Nile basin: a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56 (2), 199–211. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.557378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döll, P., Kaspar, F., and Lehner, B., 2003. A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. Journal of Hydrology, 270 (1–2), 105–134. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00283-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, C., et al., 2017. Impacts of climate change on European hydrology at 1.5, 2 and 3 degrees mean global warming above preindustrial level. Climatic Change, 143, 13. doi:10.1007/s10584-017-1971-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, C., Andersson, J.C.M., and Arheimer, B., 2016. Using flow signatures and catchment similarities to evaluate a multi-basin model (E-HYPE) across Europe. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (2), 255–273. doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1027710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, Q.Y., Gupta, V.K., and Sorooshian, S., 1993. Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 76 (3), 501. doi:10.1007/BF00939380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehret, U., et al., 2012. Should we apply bias correction to global and regional climate model data? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 3391–3404. doi:10.5194/hess-16-3391-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euser, T., et al., 2013. A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 1893–1912. doi:10.5194/hess-17-1893-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, K.J.A., et al., 2016. Simulating runoff under changing climatic conditions: revisiting an apparent deficiency of conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research, 52, 1820–1846. doi:10.1002/2015WR018068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gain, A.K., et al., 2011. Impact of climate change on the stream flow of lower Brahmaputra: trends in high and low flows based on discharge-weighted ensemble modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 8, 365–390. doi:10.5194/hessd-8-365-2011
   Google Scholar
• Gelfan, A., et al., 2015. Testing the robustness of the physically-based ECOMAG model with respect to changing conditions. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60 (7–8), 1266–1285. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.935780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfan, A., et al., 2017. Climate change impact on the water regime of two great Arctic rivers: modeling and uncertainty issues. Climatic Change, 141 (3), 499–515. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1710-5
   Google Scholar
• Gerten, D., et al., 2004. Terrestrial vegetation and water balance: hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model. Journal of Hydrology, 286, 249–270. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S., et al., 2017. A comparison of changes in river runoff from multiple global and catchment-scale hydrological models under global warming scenarios of 1°C, 2°C and 3°C. Climatic Change, 141 (3), 577–595. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1773-3
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, S.N. and Arnell, N.W., 2011. Simulating current global river runoff with a global hydrological model: model revisions, validation, and sensitivity analysis. Hydrological Processes, 25, 1129–1145. doi:10.1002/hyp.7727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greuell, W., et al., 2015. Evaluation of five hydrological models across Europe and their suitability for making projections under climate change. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 12, 10289–10330. doi:10.5194/hessd-12-10289-2015
   Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson, L., et al., 2012a. Comparing large-scale hydrological model simulations to observed runoff percentiles in Europe. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13 (2), 604–620. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-11-083.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson, L., et al., 2012b. Evaluation of nine large‐scale hydrological models with respect to the seasonal runoff climatology in Europe. Water Resources Research, 48 (11). doi:10.1029/2011WR010911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddeland, I., et al., 2011. Multimodel estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: setup and first results. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 35 (12), 869–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddeland, I., et al., 2014. Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change. Pnas, 111 (9), 3251–3256. doi:10.1073/pnas.1222475110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S. and Dümenil Gates, L., 2001. Validation of the hydrological cycle of ECMWF and NCEP reanalyses using the MPI hydrological discharge model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106 (D2), 1503–1510. doi:10.1029/2000JD900568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanasaki, N., et al., 2008. An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources – part 2: applications and assessments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12, 1027–1037. doi:10.5194/hess-12-1027-2008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattermann, F.F., et al., 2014. Modelling flood damages under climate change conditions – a case study for Germany. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14 (12), 3151–3168. doi:10.5194/nhess-14-3151-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattermann, F.F., et al., 2017. Cross-scale intercomparison of climate change impacts simulated by regional and global hydrological models in eleven large scale river basins. Climatic Change, 141 (3), 561–576. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1829-4
   Google Scholar
• Hattermann, F.F., Huang, S., and Koch, H., 2015. Climate change impacts on hydrology and water resources. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 24 (2), 201–211. doi:10.1127/metz/2014/0575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel, S., et al., 2013. A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISIMIP approach. Earth System Dynamics Discussions, 4, 49–92. doi: 10.5194/esdd-4-49
   Google Scholar
• Hinshelwood, C., 1966/67. The qualitative and the quantitative. Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, 109, 10918–10926.
   Google Scholar
• Hinshelwood, C.N., 1971. The qualitative and the quantitative. In: Yu.I. Soloviev and N.I. Rodnoy, eds. Philosophical problems of modern chemistry. Moscow: Progress, 21–32 [in Russian].
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S., et al., 2010. Simulation of spatiotemporal dynamics of water fluxes in Germany under climate change. Hydrological Processes, 24, 3289–3306. doi:10.1002/hyp.7753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., et al., 2013b. Projections of impact of climate change on river flood conditions in Germany by combining three different RCMs with a regional hydrological model. Climatic Change, 116, 663. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0586-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., et al., 2017. Evaluation of an ensemble of regional hydrological models in 12 large-scale river basins worldwide. Climatic Change, 141 (3), 381–397. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1841-8
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S., Krysanova, V., and Hatterman, F.F., 2013a. Projection of low flow conditions in Germany under climate change by combining three RCMs and a regional hydrological mode. Acta Geophysica, 61 (1), 151–193. doi:10.2478/s11600-012-0065-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundecha, Y., et al., 2016. A regional parameter estimation scheme for a pan-European multi-basin model. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 6, 90–111. doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.04.002
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri, and L.A. Meyer, eds. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Kaspersen, P.S., et al., 2012. Methodological framework, analytical tool and database for the assessment of climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability in Denmark. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark, DTU Management Engineering Report Series, Report no. 11.2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffeldt, A., et al., 2013. Disinformative data in large-scale hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17 (7), 2845–2857. doi:10.5194/hess-17-2845-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffeldt, A., et al., 2016. Technical review of large-scale hydrological models for implementation in operational flood forecasting schemes on continental level. Environmental Modelling and Software, 75, 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, D.I., et al., 2013. A comprehensive benchmarking system for evaluating global vegetation models. Biogeosciences, 10, 3313–3340. doi:10.5194/bg-10-3313-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellström, K., et al., 2010. Daily and monthly temperature and precipitation statistics as performance indicators for regional climate models. Climate Research, 44, 135–150. doi:10.3354/cr00932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemeš, V., 1986. Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 31 (1), 13–24. doi:10.1080/02626668609491024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koirala, S., et al., 2014. Global-scale land surface hydrologic modeling with the representation of water table dynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 119, 75–89. doi:10.1002/2013JD020398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krysanova, V., et al., 2017. Intercomparison of regional-scale hydrological models and climate change impacts projected for 12 large river basins worldwide – a synthesis. Environmental Research Letters, 12, 105002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa8359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krysanova, V. and Hattermann, F., 2017. Intercomparison of climate change impacts in 12 large river basins: overview of methods and summary of results. Climatic Change, 141 (3), 363–379. doi:10.1007/s10584-017-1919-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krysanova, V., Kundzewicz, Z.W., and Piniewski, M., 2016. Assessment of climate change impacts on water resources. Chapter 148. In: V. Singh, ed. Handbook of applied hydrology. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kundzewicz, Z.W., et al., 2017. Differences in flood hazard projections in Europe – their causes and consequences for decision making. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/02626667.2016.1241398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundzewicz, Z.W., et al., 2018. Uncertainty in climate change impacts on water resources. Environmental Science and Policy, 79, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström, G., et al., 2010. Development and testing of the HYPE (Hydrological Predictions for the Environment) water quality model for different spatial scales. Hydrology Research, 41 (3–4), 295. doi:10.2166/nh.2010.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.L., et al., 2009. Towards a limits of acceptability approach to the calibration of hydrological models: extending observation error. Journal of Hydrology, 367 (1–2), 93–103. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Y.Q., et al., 2012. A framework for benchmarking land models. Biogeosciences, 9, 3857–3874. doi:10.5194/bg-9-3857-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, R., Parajka, J., and Blöschl, G., 2011. Time stability of catchment model parameters: implications for climate impact analyses. Water Resources Research, 47, W02531. doi:10.1029/2010WR009505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriasi, D.N., et al., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50 (3), 885–900. doi:10.13031/2013.23153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motovilov, Y.G., et al., 2013. Assessing runoff sensitivity to climate change in the Arctic basin: empirical and modelling approaches. In: A. Gelfan, eds. Cold and mountain region hydrological systems under climate change: towards improved projections. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences, IAHS Publ. 360, 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Müller Schmied, H., et al., 2014. Sensitivity of simulated global-scale freshwater fluxes and storages to input data, hydrological model structure, human water use and calibration. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 3511–3538. doi:10.5194/hess-18-3511-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijssen, B.N., et al., 2001. Predicting the discharge of global rivers. Journal of Climate, 14 (15), 3307–3323. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<3307:PTDOGR>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nóbrega, M.T., et al., 2011. Uncertainty in climate change impacts on water resources in the Rio Grande Basin, Brazil. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 585–595. doi:10.5194/hess-15-585-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., et al., 2016. Hydrological climate change impact assessment at small and large scales: key messages from recent progress in Sweden. Climate, 4, 39. doi:10.3390/cli4030039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva, R.C.D., et al., 2013. Largescale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling of the Amazon River basin. Water Resources Research, 49, 1226–1243. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechlivanidis, I. and Arheimer, B., 2015. Large-scale hydrological modelling by using modified PUB recommendations: the India-HYPE case. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19, 4559–4579. doi:10.5194/hess-19-4559-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piniewski, M., et al., 2016. Hydrological modelling of the Vistula and Odra basins using SWAT. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62 (8), 1266–1289. doi:10.1080/02626667.2017.1321842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudhomme, C., et al., 2010. Scenario-neutral approach to climate change impact studies: application to flood risk. Journal of Hydrology, 390 (3–4), 198–209. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudhomme, C., et al., 2011. How well do large-scale models reproduce regional hydrological extremes in Europe? Journal of Hydrometeorology, 12 (6), 1181–1204. doi:10.1175/2011JHM1387.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudhomme, C., et al., 2014. Hydrological droughts in the 21st century, hotspots and uncertainties from a global multimodel ensemble experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 3262–3267. doi:10.1073/pnas.1222473110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, J.C., et al., 2013a. A framework for testing the ability of models to project climate change and its impacts. Climatic Change, 122 (1–2), 271–282. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0990-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, J.C., et al., 2013b. The role of uncertainty in climate change adaptation strategies – a Danish water management example. Mitigation and Adaptatkion Strategies for Global Change, 18, 337–359. doi:10.1007/s11027-012-9366-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, J.C., Storm, B., and Clausen, T., 2010. Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE): review and perspectives after 30 years development in distributed physically-based hydrological modelling. Hydrology Research, 41 (5), 355–377. doi:10.2166/nh.2010.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, A. and Muñoz-Carpena, R., 2013. Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. Journal of Hydrology, 480, 33–45. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roudier, P., et al., 2016. Projections of future floods and hydrological droughts in Europe under a +2°C global warming. Climatic Change, 135 (2), 341–355. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1570-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schewe, J., et al., 2014. Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change, 2014. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 3245–3250. doi:10.1073/pnas.1222460110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, J., 1997. Estimation of parameter uncertainty in the HBV model. Nordic Hydrology, 28 (4/5), 247–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood, A. and Smakhtin, V., 2015. Global hydrological models: a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60 (4), 549–565. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.950580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauch, M., et al., 2017. Adjustment of global precipitation data for enhanced hydrologic modelling of tropical Andean watersheds. Climatic Change, 141 (3), 547–560. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1706-1
   Google Scholar
• Strömqvist, J., et al., 2012. Water and nutrient predictions in ungauged basins – set-up and evaluation of a model at the national scale. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (2), 229–247. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.637497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, K.E., Stouffer, R.J., and Meehl, G.A., 2012. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93, 485–498. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirel, G., Andréassian, V., and Perrin, C., 2015. On the need to test hydrological models under changing conditions. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60 (7–8), 1165–1173. doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1050027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuppad, P., et al., 2011. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrologic/water quality model: extended capability and wider adoption. Transactions of the ASABE, 54 (5), 1677–1684. doi:10.13031/2013.39856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beek, L.P.H., Wada, Y., and Bierkens, M.F.P., 2011. Global monthly water stress: 1. Water balance and water availability. Water Resources Research, 47 (7), W07517. doi:10.1029/2010WR009791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vautard, R., et al., 2014. The European climate under a 2°C global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 9 (3), 034006. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, T., et al., 2015. Multi-model climate impact assessment and intercomparison for three large-scale river basins on three continents. Earth System Dynamics, 6, 17–43. doi:10.5194/esd-6-17-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, T., et al., 2017. Evaluation of sources of uncertainty in projected hydrological changes under climate change in 12 large-scale river basins. Climatic Change, 141 (3), 419–433. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1794-y
   Google Scholar
• Viney, N.R., et al., 2009. The usefulness of bias constraints in model calibration for regionalisation to ungauged catchments. In: R.S. Anderssen, R.D. Braddock, and L.T.H. Newham, eds. 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress [online], July 2009, Cairns, Australia. Cairns: Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand and International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 3421–3427. Available from: http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim09/F12/kragt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vörösmarty, C.H.J., et al., 2000. Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 289.5477, 284–288. doi:10.1126/science.289.5477.284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrugt, J.A., et al., 2003. Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 39 (8). doi:10.1029/2002WR001746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weedon, G.P., et al., 2011. Creation of the WATCH forcing data and its use to assess global and regional reference crop evaporation over land during the twentieth century. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 12, 823–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widén-Nilsson, E., Halldin, S., and Xu, C., 2007. Global water-balance modelling with WASMOD-M: parameter estimation and regionalisation. Journal of Hydrology, 340.1 (2007), 105–118. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T., et al., 2014. Climate change and probabilistic scenario of streamflow extremes in an alpine region. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 119, 8535–8551. doi:10.1002/2014JD021824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., et al., 2016. Evaluating regional and global hydrological models against streamflow and evapotranspiration measurements. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 17, 995–1010. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-15-0107.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar