Timing the time of concentration: shedding light on a paradox

References

• Antoniadi, S., 2016. Investigation of the river basin’s response time variability. Postgraduate thesis. Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, National Technical University of Athens full text and extended English abstract are Available from: http://www.itia.ntua.gr/1639/.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, G., Ball, J.E., and Smith, T.A., 1991. Fractal concept used in time-of-concentration estimates. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 117 (5), 635–641. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1991)117:5(635)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askew, A.J., 1970. Derivation of formulae for variable lag time. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 225–242. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90251-9
   Google Scholar
• Corps of Engineers, 1954. Airfield drainage investigation. Washington, DC: U.S. Army, Los Angeles District for the Office of the Chief of Engineers, Airfield Branch Engineering Division, Military Construction, Data Report.
   Google Scholar
• Cronshey, R., 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, W.E., et al., 1993. Analysis of erosion thresholds, channel networks and landscape morphology using a digital terrain model. The Journal of Geology, 101, 259–278. doi:10.1086/648220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstratiadis, A., et al., 2014. Flood design recipes vs. reality: can predictions for ungauged basins be trusted? Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14 (6), 1417–1428. doi:10.5194/nhess-14-1417-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gericke, O.J. and Smithers, J.C., 2014. Review of methods used to estimate catchment response time for the purpose of peak discharge estimation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59 (11), 1935–1971. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.866712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giandotti, M., 1934. Previsione delle piene e delle magre dei corsi d’acqua, Memorie e Studi Idrografici. Roma: Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., et al., 2010. Flow time estimation with spatially variable hillslope velocity in ungauged basins. Advances in Water Resources, 33 (10), 1216–1223. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., et al., 2012. Time of concentration: a paradox in modern hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (2), 217–228. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.644244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan, C.T., Barfield, B.J., and Hayes, J.C., 1994. Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Izzard, C.F. and Hicks, W.I., 1946. Hydraulics of runoff from developed surfaces. In: 26th Annual Meetings of the Highway Research Board, 5–8 December, Washington, DC, 129–150.
   Google Scholar
• Kadoya, M. and Fukushima, A., 1977. Concentration time of flood runoff in smaller river basins. In: H.J. Morel-Seytoux, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 3rd International Hydrology Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Hydrology, 27–29 July, Fort Collins, CO. Fort Collins: Water Resources Publication, Colorado State University, 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kirpich, Z.P., 1940. Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds. Civil Engineering, 10 (6), 362.
   Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen, T.R., et al., 2016. Evidence and implications of nonlinear flood response in a small mountainous watershed. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 21 (8), 04016024. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, L.B. and Maddock Jr, T., 1953. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some geomorphologic implications. US Geological Survey Professional Papers, 252, 56.
   Google Scholar
• Loukas, A. and Quick, M.C., 1996. Physically-based estimation of lag time for forested mountainous watersheds. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 41 (1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/02626669609491475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, D.R., et al., 1996. Unit hydrograph derived from a spatially distributed velocity field. Hydrological Processes, 10, 831–844. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199606)10:6<831::AID-HYP374>3.0.CO;2-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCuen, R.H., 1989. Hydrologic analysis and design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McCuen, R.H., 2009. Uncertainty analyses of watershed time parameters. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14 (5), 490–498. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, J.P., et al., 2006. Channel head locations with respect to geomorphologic thresholds derived from a digital elevation model: a case study in northern Thailand. Forest Ecology and Management, 224 (1–2), 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyersohn, W.D., 2016. Runoff prediction for dam safety evaluations based on variable time of concentration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 21 (10), 04016031. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.R. and Dietrich, W.E., 1988. Where do channels begin? Nature, 336, 232–234. doi:10.1038/336232a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.R. and Foufoula-Georgiou, E., 1993. Channel network source representation using digital elevation models. Water Resources Research, 29 (12), 3925–3934. doi:10.1029/93WR02463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgali, J.R. and Linsley, R.K., 1965. Computer simulation of overland flow. Journal of Hydraulics Division ASCE, 91 (HY3), 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• NRCS (National Research Conservation Service), 2010. Time of concentration. In: National engineering handbook, Part 630 hydrology, chapter 15. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Papadakis, K.N. and Kazan, M.N., 1987. Time of concentration in small rural watersheds. In: Proceedings of the ASCE Engineering Hydrology Symposium. Williamsburg, VA: ASCE, 633–638.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovic, S.B. and Moglen, G.E., 2008. Discretization issues in travel time calculation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13 (2), 71–79. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:2(71)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, A.R. and Delleur, J.W., 1974. Instantaneous unit hydrographs, peak discharges and time lags in urban basins. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 19 (2), 185–198. doi:10.1080/02626667409493898
   Google Scholar
• Saghafian, B., Julien, P.Y., and Rajaie, H., 2002. Runoff hydrograph simulation based on time variable isochrone technique. Journal of Hydrology, 261 (1–4), 193–203. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00007-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P., 1976. Derivation of time of concentration. Journal of Hydrology, 30 (1–2), 147–165. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(76)90095-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarboton, D.G., Bras, R.L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 1991. On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes, 5, 81–100. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, T.S., 2005. Assessment of time of concentration formulas for overland flow. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 131 (4), 383–387. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:4(383)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B., et al., 2000. The relationship between runoff rate and lag time and the effects of surface treatments at the plot scale. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 45 (5), 709–726. doi:10.1080/02626660009492372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar