Evolution of river-routing schemes in macro-scale models and their potential for watershed management

References

• Archfield, S.A., et al. 2015. Accelerating advances in continental domain hydrologic modeling. Water Resources Research, 51 (12), 10078–10091. doi:10.1002/2015WR017498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnell, N.W., 1995. River runoff data for the validation of climate simulation models. In: H.R. Oliver and S.A. Oliver, eds. The role of water and the hydrological cycle in global change. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 349–371.
   Google Scholar
• Arora, V.K. and George, J.B., 1999. A variable velocity flow routing algorithm for GCMs. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104 (D24), 30965–30979. doi:10.1029/1999JD900905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, V.A., et al., 2007. Development of a high resolution grid-based river flow model for use with regional climate model output. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11 (1), 532–549. doi:10.5194/hess-11-53two-2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancamaria, S., et al., 2011. Assimilation of virtual wide swath altimetry to improve Arctic river modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115 (2), 373–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancamaria, S., Lettenmaier, D.P., and Pavelsky, T.M., 2016. The SWOT mission and its capabilities for land hydrology. Surveys in Geophysics, 37 (2), 307–337. doi:10.1007/s10712-015-9346-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branstetter, M.L., 2001. Development of a parallel river transport algorithm and applications to climate studies PhD Dissertation. University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University, 2015. Gridded population of the world, version 4 (GPWv4): population density, beta release. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). doi:10.7927/H46T0JKB
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M.P., et al., 2015. Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in earth system models. Water Resources Research, 1–28. doi:10.1002/2015WR017096.Received
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, C.H., et al., 2011. River network routing on the NHDPlus dataset. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 12 (5), 913–934. doi:10.1175/2011JHM1345.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decharme, B., et al. 2010. Global evaluation of the ISBA-TRIP continental hydrological system. Part II: uncertainties in river routing simulation related to flow velocity and groundwater storage. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 11 (3), 601–617. doi:10.1175/2010JHM1212.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decharme, B., et al., 2012. Global off-line evaluation of the ISBA-TRIP flood model. Climate Dynamics, 38 (7–8), 1389–1412. doi:10.1007/s0038two-011-1054-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döll, P., Kaspar, F., and Lehner, B., 2003. A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. Journal of Hydrology, 270 (1), 105–134. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00283-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, M., et al., 2008. Estimation of bathymetric depth and slope from data assimilation of swath altimetry into a hydrodynamic model. Geophysical Research Letters, 35 (20). doi:10.1029/2008GL034150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekete, B.M., et al., 2010. Millennium ecosystem assessment scenario drivers (1970–2050): climate and hydrological alterations. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 24, 4. doi:10.1029/2009GB003593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getirana, A.C.V., et al., 2012. The hydrological modeling and analysis platform (HyMAP): evaluation in the Amazon basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13(6), 1641–1665. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-1221.1
   Google Scholar
• Getirana, A.C.V., Boone, A., and Peugeot, C., 2014. Evaluating LSM-based water budgets over a west african basin assisted with a river routing scheme. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 15 (6), 2331–2346. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-14-0012.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, C.J. and Smith, L.C., 2014. Toward global mapping of river discharge using satellite images and at-many-stations hydraulic geometry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111 (13), 4788–4791. doi:10.1073/pnas.1317606111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, L., et al., 2009. Large-scale runoff routing with an aggregated network-response function. Journal of Hydrology, 368 (1), 237–250. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, J. and Lambert, R., 2013. Free flow: reaching water security through cooperation. Paris: UNESCO. Available from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002228/222893e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grill, G., et al., 2015. An index-based framework for assessing patterns and trends in river fragmentation and flow regulation by global dams at multiple scales. Environmental Research Letters, 10 (1), 15001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/015001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., et al., 2016. Remote sensing-derived water extent and level to constrain hydraulic flood forecasting models: opportunities and challenges. Surveys in Geophysics, 37 (5), 977–1034. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s1071two-016-9378-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J., Liang, X., and Leung, L.R., 2004. A new multiscale flow network generation scheme for land surface models. Geophysical Research Letters, 31 (23). doi:10.1029/2004GL021381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirabayashi, Y., et al., 2013. Global flood risk under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3 (9), 816–821. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/nclimate1911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horizon Systems Corporation, 2007. National Hydrography Dataset Plus: Documentation. Available from: http://www.horizon-systems.com/nhdplus/[Accessed January 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M.S., et al., 2007. A grid-based assessment of global water scarcity including virtual water trading. Water Resources Management, 21 (1), 19. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9038-y.
   Google Scholar
• Kilic, A., et al., 2016. METRIC-EEFLUX. Available from: http://eeflux-level1.appspot.com/ [Accessed January 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Lehner, B. and Grill, G., 2013. Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world’s large river systems. Hydrological Processes, 27 (15), 2171–2186. doi:10.1002/hyp.9740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., et al., 2013. A physically based runoff routing model for land surface and earth system models. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 14 (3), 808–828. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-1two-015.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., et al., 2015. Evaluating global streamflow simulations by a physically based routing model coupled with the community land model. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 16 (2), 948–971. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-14-0079.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, D., NolteHolube, R., and Raschke, E., 1996. A large-scale horizontal routing model to be coupled to land surface parametrization schemes. Tellus Series a-Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0870.1996.t01-3-00009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, D., et al., 1998. Regional scale hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2l model coupled to a routing model. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 43 (1), 131–141. doi: 10.1080/02626669809492107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masutomi, Y., et al. 2009. Development of highly accurate global polygonal drainage basin data. Hydrological Processes, 23 (4), 57two–584. doi:10.1002/hyp.7186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J.R., Russell, G.L., and Caliri, G., 1994. Continental-scale river flow in climate models. Journal of Climate, 7 (6), 914–928. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1994)007<0914:CSRFIC>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizukami, N., et al., 2016. mizuRoute version 1: a river network routing tool for a continental domain water resources applications. Geoscientific Model Development, 9, 2223–2238. doi:10.5194/gmd-9-2223-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naden, P., et al. 1999. River routing at the continental scale: use of globally-available data and an a priori method of parameter estimation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 3 (1), 109–123. doi:10.5194/hess-3-109-1999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASA Giovanni, 2018. Giovanni: The bridge between Data and Science. Available from: https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/. [Accessed January 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Nazemi, A. and Wheater, H.S., 2015a. On inclusion of water resource management in earth system models -part 1: problem definition and representation of water demand. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19 (1), 33–61. doi:10.5194/hess-19-33-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemi, A. and Wheater, H.S., 2015b. On inclusion of water resource management in earth system models part 2: representation of water supply and allocation and opportunities for improved modeling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19 (1), 63–90. doi:10.5194/hess-19-63-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo-Duc, T., Oki, T., and Kanae, S., 2007. A variable streamflow velocity method for global river routing model: model description and preliminary results. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 4 (6), 4389–4414. doi:10.5194/hessd-4-4389-2007
   Google Scholar
• Oki, T. and Sud, Y.C., 1998. Design of total runoff integrating pathways (TRIP)—A global river channel network. Earth Interactions, 2 (1), 1. doi:10.1175/1087-3562(1998)002<0001:DoTRIP>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Olivera, F., Famiglietti, J., and Asante, K., 2000. Global-scale flow routing using a source- to-sink algorithm. Water Resources Research, 36 (8), 2197–2207. doi:10.1029/2000WR900113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgaard, J., Rosbjerg, D., and Butts, M.B., 2006. Land-surface modelling in hydrological perspective? a review. Biogeosciences, 3 (2), 229–241. doi:10.5194/bg-3-229-2006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva, R.C.D., Collischonn, W., and Tucci, C.E.M., 2011. Large scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling using limited data and a GIS based approach. Journal of Hydrology, 406 (3), 170–181. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappenberger, F., et al., 2010. Global runoff routing with the hydrological component of the ECMWF NWP system. International Journal of Climatology, 30 (14), 2155–2174. doi:10.1002/joc.2028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekel, J.-F., et al., 2016. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540, 418–422. doi:10.1038/nature20584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccolroaz, S., et al., 2016. HYPERstream: a multi-scale framework for streamflow routing in large-scale hydrological model. Hydrol Earth Systems Sciences, 20, 2047–2061. doi:10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitman, A.J., 2003. The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 23 (5), 479–510. doi:10.1002/joc.893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokhrel, Y., et al. 2012. Incorporating anthropogenic water regulation modules into a land surface model. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13 (1), 255–269. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-11-013.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabalais, N.N., et al. 2009. Global change and eutrophication of coastal waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal Du Conseil, 66 (7), 1528–1537. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsp047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood, A. and Smakhtin, V., 2015. Global hydrological models: a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60 (4), 549–565. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.950580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallis, H.T., et al., 2013. InVEST 2.5. 3 user’s guide. The natural capital project. Stanford. Available from: http://data.naturalcapitalproject.org/invest-releases/documentation/2–5–3/. [Accessed March 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, H.A., 1981. Improved methods for national water assessment. Report WR15249270. Washington, DC: US Water Resource Council.
   Google Scholar
• Verzano, K., et al. 2012. Modeling variable river flow velocity on continental scale: current situation and climate change impacts in Europe. Journal of Hydrology, 424–425, 238–251. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, A., et al., 2012. Continental scale modelling of in‐stream river water quality: a report on methodology, test runs, and scenario application. Hydrological Processes, 26 (16), 2370–2384. doi:10.1002/hyp.9445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R.M., et al., 2007. Relations among storage, yield, and instream flow. Water Resources Research, 43 (5), 1–12. doi:10.1029/2006WR005226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R.M. and Sankarasubramanian, A., 2003. Validation of a watershed model without calibration. Water Resources Research, 39, 10. doi:10.1029/2002WR001940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P.J., et al., 2015. Usefulness and limitations of global flood risk models. Nature Climate Change, 5 (8), 712–715. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/nclimate2742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Z., Liang, X., and Yang, S., 2012. A new multiscale routing framework and its evaluation for land surface modeling applications. Water Resources Research, 48 (8). doi:10.1029/2011WR011337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., et al., 2011. Automated upscaling of river networks for macroscale hydrological modeling.”. Water Resources Research, 47, 3. doi:10.1029/2009WR008871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., et al. 2014. Real‐time global flood estimation using satellite‐based precipitation and a coupled land surface and routing model. Water Resources Research, 50 (3), 2693–2717. doi:10.1002/2013WR014710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., et al., 2012. A new global river network database for macroscale hydrologic modeling. Water Resources Research, 48, 9. doi:10.1029/2012WR012313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. and Chen, J., 2013. Investigating the effects of point source and nonpoint source pollution on the water quality of the east river (Dongjiang) in South China. Ecological Indicators, 32, 294–304. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WWAP (World Water Assessment Programme of the United Nations), 2017. The United Nations world water development report 2017. Wastewater: the untapped resource. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, C.-Y., 1999. From GCMs to river flow: a review of downscaling methods and hydrologic modelling approaches. Progress in Physical Geography, 23 (2), 229–249. doi:10.1191/030913399667424608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki, D., et al., 2011. A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model. Water Resources Research, 47 (4), 1–21. doi:10.1029/2010WR009726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki, D., et al., 2012. Analysis of the water level dynamics simulated by a global river model: a case study in the Amazon River. Water Resources Research, 48 (9), 1–15. doi:10.1029/2012WR011869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, A., et al., 2013. Improving kinematic wave routing scheme in community land model. Hydrology Research 44 (January 2016): 886, 44, 886. doi:10.2166/nh.2012.145
   Google Scholar
• Yearsley, J., 2012. A grid-based approach for simulating stream temperature. Water Resources Research, 48 (3), 1–15. doi:10.1029/2011WR011515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar