Why and when it is useful to publish and share inconclusive results and failures: reply to “Reporting negative results to stimulate experimental hydrology”^*

Theresa BlumeHydrology Section, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, GermanyCorrespondence[email protected]

Ilja van MeerveldDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Markus WeilerChair of Hydrology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

References

Blume, T., van Meerveld, I., and Weiler, M., 2017. The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences–insights from a community survey. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62 (3), 334–337. doi:10.1080/02626667.2016.1230675
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Pfister, L. and Kirchner, J.W., 2017. Debates—Hypothesis testing in hydrology: theory and practice. Water Resources Research, 53 (3), 1792–1798. doi:10.1002/2016WR020116
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
van Emmerik, T., et al., 2018. Reporting negative results to stimulate experimental hydrology: discussion of “The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences – insights from a community survey”. Hydrological Sciences Journal, doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1493203
Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Why and when it is useful to publish and share inconclusive results and failures: reply to “Reporting negative results to stimulate experimental hydrology”^*

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Why and when it is useful to publish and share inconclusive results and failures: reply to “Reporting negative results to stimulate experimental hydrology”*

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date

Why and when it is useful to publish and share inconclusive results and failures: reply to “Reporting negative results to stimulate experimental hydrology”^*