Improved fuzzy weighted optimum curve-fitting method for estimating the parameters of a Pearson Type-III distribution

References

• Beven, K. and Binley, A., 1992. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes, 6 (3), 279–298. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., et al., 2010. Application of ant colony algorithm to parameter estimation of P-III type distribution curve. Water Resources and Power, 28 (4), 14–15+74.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, R., Wu, C.F.J., and Ruppert, D., 1988. The effect of estimating weights in weighted least squares. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83 (404), 1045–1054. doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S. and Mächler, M., 1997. Robust regression: a weighted least squares approach. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 26 (6), 1381–1394. doi:10.1080/03610929708831988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, K., 2007. A split-step particle swarm optimization algorithm in river stage forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 346 (3–4), 131–135. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. and Hou, Y., 1992. Research on parameter estimation method for P type-III distribution. Journal of HoHai University, 20 (3), 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., et al., 1963. Discussion of Pearson-III curve. Kriczki-Minca curve designing floods. Symposium Science, 2nd set. Beijing: Scientific Research Institute Water Conservancy Hydropower.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., et al., 2012. Pearson type III distribution parameters estimation based on simulated annealing. Yellow River, 34 (5), 14–15+19.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, C., Wu, X., and Chau, K., 2005. Multiple criteria rainfall-runoff model calibration using a parallel genetic algorithm in a cluster of computers. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50 (6), 1069–1087. doi:10.1623/hysj.2005.50.6.1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, K.C.A. and Watt, W.E., 1994. Practical use of the L-moments. In: K.W. Hipel, ed. Stochastic and statistical methods in hydrology and environmental engineering, Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic, 55–69.
   Google Scholar
• Cong, S., Tan, W., and Huang, S., 1980. Statistical testing research on the methods of parameter estimation in hydrological computation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 6 (3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cuevas, E., et al., 2013. A swarm optimization algorithm inspired in the behavior of the social-spider. Expert Systems with Applications, 40 (16), 6374–6384. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunnane, C., 1985. Factors affecting choice of distribution for flood series. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 30 (1), 25–36. doi:10.1080/02626668509490969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Y., Ding, J., and Wei, X., 1995. Fuzzy optimum curve fitting method in frequency analysis. Design of Hydroelectric Power Station, 11 (4), 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Fotovatikhah, F., et al., 2018. Survey of computational intelligence as basis to big flood management: challenges, research directions and future work. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12 (1), 411–437. doi:10.1080/19942060.2018.1448896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, J., 1990. Discussion on hydrologic frequency calculation by Weibull distribution. Yangtze River, (2), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J.A., Landwehr, J.M., and Matalas, N.C., 1979. Probability weighted moment: definition and relation to parameters of several distributions expressible in inverse form. Water Resources Research, 15 (5), 1049–1054. doi:10.1029/WR015i005p01049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., 1987. Fitting the Pearson type 3 distribution. Journal of Wuhan University of Hydraulic and Electric Engineering, 3, 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Haktanir, T., 1997. Self-determined probability-weight moments method and its application to various distributions. Journal of Hydrology, 194, 180–200. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03206-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haktanir, T. and Horlacher, H., 1993. Evaluation of various distributions for flood frequency analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 38 (1), 15–32. doi:10.1080/02626669309492637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosking, J.R.M. and Wallis, J.R., 1997. Regional frequency analysis – an approach based on L-Moment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 14–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, P., Li, X., and Wang, J., 2008. The comparison of several kinds of typical comprehensive evaluation methods. Chinese Journal of Hospital Statistics, 15 (4), 351–353.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, G., 1964. The principles and methods of hydrological statistics.  Beijing: China Industrial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, G., 2001. The discussion for the weight function method of probability distribution parameters. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 11 (11), 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, G. and Fei, Y., 1991. Determination of the revised coefficient B value in Г distribution. Journal of China Hydrology, 1991 (6), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, M. and Chowdhury, J., 1995. A comparison of four distributions used in flood frequency analysis in Bangladesh. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 40 (1), 55–66. doi:10.1080/02626669509491390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvanen, J. and Nuutinen, A., 2008. Characterizing the generalized lambda distribution by L-moments. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52 (4), 1971–1983. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2007.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., et al., 2003. Development of regional flood frequency relationships using L-moments for Middle Ganga Plains Subzone of India. Water Resources Management, 12 (17), 243–257. doi:10.1023/A:102477012.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, G., et al., 2015. The application of the TOPSIS-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method used in the method of optimizing the hydrologic frequency parameter estimation. Journal of Water Resources Research, 4, 200–207. doi:10.12677/JWRR.2015.42024
   Google Scholar
• Lei, G., et al., 2018. The analysis and improvement of the fuzzy weighted optimum curve-fitting method of Pearson-Type III distribution. Water Resources Management, 32 (14), 4511–4526. doi:10.1007/s11269-018-2055-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. and Song, S., 2009. Application of ant colony algorithm in parameter calculation of hydrological frequency curve. Yellow River, 31 (4), 38–40.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., 1984. Practicability of several frequency distribution lines for flood data in China. Journal of China Hydrology, 4 (1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. and Song, S., 2014. Application of higher probability weighted moments of P-III distribution to flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 33 (3), 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, Z., et al., 2014. A modified weighted function method for parameter estimation of Pearson Type Three distribution. Water Resources Research, 50 (4), 3216–3228. doi:10.1002/2013WR013653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Z., Ning, F., and Wang, Q., 2001. Application of weighted function method to hydrological frequency analysis. Journal of HoHai University, 29 (4), 95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., et al., 2009. Application of particle swarm optimization and fitness line method in hydrological frequency analysis. Journal of China Hydrology, 29 (2), 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Guo, S., and Hu, A., 2006. Deriving the B nomogram of L-moments method to estimate sampling errors of design floods. Journal of China Hydrology, 26 (6), 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• MWR (Ministry of Water Resources), 2006. Water resources and hydropower engineering specification design flood calculation. SL44-2006. Beijing, China: Waterpower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parida, B.P., Kachroo, R.K., and Shrestha, D.B., 1998. Regional flood frequency analysis of Mahi-Sabarmati Basin (Subzone 3-a) using index flood procedure with L-Moments. Water Resources Management, 12 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1007970800408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce, V.M., 1989. Engineering Hydrology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson, 214–216.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, L., Chen, S., and Pan, D., 1998. Weighted optimum curve fitting method for estimating the parameters of Pearson type-III distribution. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 29 (1), 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A.R. and Hamed, K.H., 2000. Flood frequency analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, C. and Villasenor, J., 2008. Trivariate generalized extreme value distribution in flood frequency analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (3), 550–567. doi:10.1623/hysj.53.3.550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarbu, C., 1995. A comparative study of regression concerning weighted least squares methods. Analytical Letters, 28 (11), 2077–2094. doi:10.1080/00032719508000026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M., Feng, P., and Zhang, Z., 2008a. Pearson type-III curve parameter estimation based on Genetic Algorithm. China Rural Water and Hydropower, (6), 52–54.
   Google Scholar
• Song, S., Kang, Y., and Jing, P., 2008b. Parameter optimum estimation for hydrological frequency curve. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Nat. Sci. Ed), 6 (4), 193–198.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X. and Ma, X., 2009. Hydrology engineering. Henan: Yellow River Water Conservancy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., et al., 2015. Application of historical flood-concerned mixed distribution with different tail types of PDFs. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 34 (4), 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Taormina, R., Chau, K.-W., and Sivakumar, B., 2015. Neural network river forecasting through baseflow separation and binary-coded swarm optimization. Journal of Hydrology, 529, 1788–1797. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, J.R., et al., 1974. Just a moment! Water Resources Research, 10 (2), 211–219. doi:10.1029/WR010i002p00211.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W., et al., 2013. Hydrology engineering. Beijing: China Waterpower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W., et al., 2015. The adaptive numerical integral Pearson-III curve parameters estimation based on SSO. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, S1, 122–133. doi:10.16058/j.issn,1005-0930.2015.s1.013
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W., et al., 2016. Hydrologic frequency analysis using SSO algorithm. Journal of China Hydrology, 36 (3), 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Lei, G., and Liu, K., 2017. Improvement and statistical performance of fuzzy weighted optimum curve-fitting method. Journal of China Hydrology, 37 (5), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., et al., 2009. Application of genetic algorithm in parameter estimation of P type III distribution curve. Yellow River, 31 (9), 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. and Chau, W., 2011. Rainfall–runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 399 (3–4), 394–409. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, G., 2015. Application of social spider optimization algorithm in parameter optimization of hydrological frequency curve. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 26 (6), 123–126,131. doi:10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2015.06.22.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, C., Yuan, H., and Guo, Y., 1997. A new estimation way of Pearson type-III distribution parameter of frequency curve-fuzzy maximum value method. Journal of China Hydrology, (1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, P. and Zheng, Z., 2000. A constrained and weighted fitting method for hydrologic frequency calculation. Journal of Wuhan University of Hydraulic and Electrical Engineering, 33 (1), 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, R. and Ding, J., 1988. Research on parameter estimation method for P- type III distribution. Journal of Chengdu University of Science and Technology, (2), 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, D. and Song, S., 2007. Curve fitting method of design flood frequency based on Particle Swarm Optimization. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 27 (6), 112–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Y., 1964. Problem of flood frequency analysis. Assembler of hydrological calculation experience.  Beijing: China Industrial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Y., et al., 1981. Statistical test research on parameter estimation method in hydrological frequency calculation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 4, 84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Y. and He, X., 2012. Maximum likelihood estimation of Pearson-III curve and its application. Yangtze River, 43 (21), 21–23.
   Google Scholar