Modelling of infiltration using artificial intelligence techniques in semi-arid Iran

References

• Achari, M.S., Dhakshinamurthy, M., and Arunachalam, G., 1999. Studies of the influence on paper mill effluents on the yield, availability and uptake of nutrients in rice. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 47 (2), 276–280.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sulaiman, M.A., 2015. Applying of an adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for prediction of unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity. Biosciences, Biotechnology Research Asia, 12 (3), 2261–2272. doi:10.13005/bbra/1899
   Google Scholar
• Anari, P.L., Darani, H.S., and Nafarzadegan, A.R., 2011. Application of ANN and ANFIS models for estimating total infiltration rate in an arid rangeland ecosystem. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 5 (3), 236. doi:10.3923/rjes.2011.236.247
   Google Scholar
• Angelaki, A., et al., 2018. Estimation of models for cumulative infiltration of soil using machine learning methods. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1–8. doi:10.1080/09715010.2018.1531274
   Google Scholar
• Angelaki, A., Sakellariou-Makrantonaki, M., and Tzimopoulos, C., 2013. Theoretical and experimental research of cumulative infiltration. Transport in Porous Media, 100 (2), 247–257. doi:10.1007/s11242-013-0214-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshad, M., Shoaib, A., and Beg, I., 2013. Fixed point of a pair of contractive dominated mappings on a closed ball in an ordered dislocated metric space. Fixed Point Theory and Applications, 2013 (1), 115. doi:10.1186/1687-1812-2013-115
   Google Scholar
• Azamathulla, H.M., Haghiabi, A.H., and Parsaie, A., 2016. Prediction of side weir discharge coefficient by support vector machine technique. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 16 (4), 1002–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaei, F., et al., 2018. Spatial analysis of infiltration in agricultural lands in arid areas of Iran. CATENA, 170, 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2018.05.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., 1999. Random forests. Berkeley, CA: University of Calfornia at Berkeley, Reoprt TR567.
   Google Scholar
• Corradini, C., Melone, F., and Smith, R.E., 1994. Modeling infiltration during complex rainfall sequences. Water Resources Research, 30 (10), 2777–2784. doi:10.1029/94WR00951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V., 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20 (3), 27297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, L., et al., 2011. Centennial scale warming over Japan: are the rural stations really rural? Atmospheric Science Letters, 12 (4), 362–367. doi:10.1002/asl.v12.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbisy, M.S., 2015. Support Vector Machine and regression analysis to predict the field hydraulic conductivity of sandy soil. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19 (7), 2307–2316. doi:10.1007/s12205-015-0210-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erzin, Y., et al., 2009. Artificial neural network (ANN) models for determining hydraulic conductivity of compacted fine-grained soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46 (8), 955–968. doi:10.1139/T09-035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, W.H. and Ampt, G.A., 1911. Studies on soil phyics. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 4 (1), 1–24. doi:10.1017/S0021859600001441
   Google Scholar
• Holtan, H.N., 1961. Concept for infiltration estimates in watershed engineering. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R.E., 1941. An approach toward a physical interpretation of infiltration-capacity 1. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 5 (C), 399–417. doi:10.2136/sssaj1941.036159950005000C0075x
   Google Scholar
• Kostiakov, A.N., 1932. On the dynamics of the coefficient of water percolation in soils and the necessity of studying it from the dynamic point of view for the purposes of amelioration. Transactions of the Sixth Committee of the International Society of Soil Science, 1, 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, M. and Sihag, P., 2019. Assessment of infiltration rate of soil using empirical and machine learning‐based models. Irrigation and Drainage, 68, 588–601. doi:10.1002/ird.2332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., Sihag, P., and Singh, V., 2019. Enhanced soft computing for ensemble approach to estimate the compressive strength of high strength concrete. Journal of Materials and Engineering Structures, JMES, 6 (1), 93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loague, K. and Gander, G.A., 1990. R‐5 revisited: 1. Spatial variability of infiltration on a small rangeland catchment. Water Resources Research, 26 (5), 957–971. doi:10.1029/WR026i005p00957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdipour, V., et al., 2018. Comparing different methods for statistical modeling of particulate matter in Tehran, Iran. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 11 (10), 1155–1165. doi:10.1007/s11869-018-0615-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, S., et al., 2019. Estimating the strength of stabilized dispersive soil with cement clinker and fly ash. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37 (4), 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10706-019-00808-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nain, S.S., Sihag, P., and Luthra, S., 2018. Performance evaluation of fuzzy-logic and BP-ANN methods for WEDM of aeronautics super alloy. MethodsX, 5, 890–908. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2018.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlange, J.Y., 1971a. Theory of water movement in soils: 1. One-dimensional absorption. Soil Science, 111 (2), 134–137. doi:10.1097/00010694-197102000-00010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlange, J.Y., 1971b. Theory of water movement in soils: 2. One-imensional infiltration. Soil Science, 111 (3), 170–174. doi:10.1097/00010694-197103000-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlange, J.Y., 1972a. Theory of water movement in soils. 6. Effect of water depth over soil. Soil Science, 133, 308–312. doi:10.1097/00010694-197205000-00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlange, J.Y., 1972b. Theory of water movement in soils. 8. One-dimensional infiltration with constant flux at the surface. Soil Science, 114, 1–4. doi:10.1097/00010694-197207000-00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlange, J.Y., 1975. A note of the Green & Ampt equation. Soil Science, 119, 466–467. doi:10.1097/00010694-197506000-00009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlange, J.Y., et al., 1982. The three parameter infiltration equation. Soil Science, 133, 337–341. doi:10.1097/00010694-198206000-00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlange, J.Y., Havercamp, R., and Touma, J., 1985. Infiltration under ponded conditions: 1. Optimal analytical solution and comparison with experimental observations. Soil Science, 139, 305–311. doi:10.1097/00010694-198504000-00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsaie, A., et al., 2017b. Predication of discharge coefficient of cylindrical weir-gate using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS). Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 11 (1), 111–122. doi:10.1007/s11709-016-0354-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsaie, A., Yonesi, H., and Najafian, S., 2017a. Prediction of flow discharge in compound open channels using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system method. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 54, 288–297. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, J.R., 1957a. Theory of infiltration: 1. The infiltration equation and its solution. Soil Science, 83, 435–448. doi:10.1097/00010694-195706000-00003
   Google Scholar
• Philip, J.R., 1957b. Theory of infiltration: 4. Sorptivity and algebraic infiltration equations. Soil Science, 84, 257–264. doi:10.1097/00010694-195709000-00010
   Google Scholar
• Rahmati, M., 2017. Reliable and accurate point-based prediction of cumulative infiltration using soil readily available characteristics: a comparison between GMDH, ANN, and MLR. Journal of Hydrology, 551, 81–91. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaap, M.G. and Leij, F.J., 1998. Using neural networks to predict soil water retention and soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil and Tillage Research, 47 (1–2), 37–42. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00070-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCS (Soil Conservation Service), 1972. National engineering handbook, section 4: hydrology. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture, 762.
   Google Scholar
• Sepahvand, A., et al., 2019. Assessment of the various soft computing techniques to predict sodium absorption ratio (SAR). ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1–12. doi:10.1080/09715010.2019.1595185
   Google Scholar
• Sihag, P., 2018. Prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using fuzzy logic and artificial neural network. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 4 (1), 189–198. doi:10.1007/s40808-018-0434-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihag, P., et al., 2018a. Modeling the infiltration process with soft computing techniques. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1–15. doi:10.1080/09715010.2018.1464408
   Google Scholar
• Sihag, P., et al., 2019a. Modeling unsaturated hydraulic conductivity by hybrid soft computing techniques. Soft Computing, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-03847-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihag, P., et al., 2019b. Model-based soil temperature estimation using climatic parameters: the case of Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 1–13. doi:10.1080/24749508.2019.1610841
   Google Scholar
• Sihag, P., Jain, P., and Kumar, M., 2018b. Modeling of impact of water quality on recharging rate of storm water filter system using various kernel function based regression. Modelling Earth Systems and Environment, 4 (1), 61–68. doi:10.1007/s40808-017-0410-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihag, P., Tiwari, N.K., and Ranjan, S., 2017a. Estimation and inter-comparison of infiltration models. Water Science, 31 (1), 34–43. doi:10.1016/j.wsj.2017.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Sihag, P., Tiwari, N.K., and Ranjan, S., 2017b. Modelling of infiltration of sandy soil using gaussian process regression. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 3 (3), 1091–1100. doi:10.1007/s40808-017-0357-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihag, P., Tiwari, N.K., and Ranjan, S., 2017c. Prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1–11. doi:10.1080/09715010.2017.1381861
   Google Scholar
• Sihag, P., Tiwari, N.K., and Ranjan, S., 2018c. Support vector regression-based modeling of cumulative infiltration of sandy soil. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1–7. doi:10.1080/09715010.2018.1439776
   Google Scholar
• Singh, B., et al., 2018a. Estimation of trapping efficiency of vortex tube silt ejector. International Journal of River Basin Management, 1–38. doi:10.1080/15715124.2018.1476367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, B., Sihag, P., and Deswal, S., 2019. Modelling of the impact of water quality on the infiltration rate of the soil. Applied Water Science, 9 (1), 15. doi:10.1007/s13201-019-0892-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, B., Sihag, P., and Singh, K., 2017. Modelling of impact of water quality on infiltration rate of soil by random forest regression. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 3 (3), 999–1004. doi:10.1007/s40808-017-0347-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, B., Sihag, P., and Singh, K., 2018b. Comparison of infiltration models in NIT Kurukshetra campus. Applied Water Science, 8 (2), 63. doi:10.1007/s13201-018-0708-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P. and Yu, F.X., 1990. Derivation of infiltration equation using systems approach. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 116 (6), 837–858. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1990)116:6(837)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smola, A.J. and Schölkopf, B., 2004. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing, 14 (3), 199–222. doi:10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sy, N.L., 2006. Modelling the infiltration process with a multi-layer perceptron artificial neural network. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (1), 3–20. doi:10.1623/hysj.51.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha, A., Gresillon, J.M., and Clothier, B.E., 1997. Modelling the link between hillslope water movement and streamflow: application to a small Mediterranean forest watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 203 (1–4), 11–20. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00081-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi, T. and Sugeno, M., 1985. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Transaction on System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-15, 116–132. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, N.K., et al., 2018. Prediction of trapping efficiency of vortex tube ejector. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1–9. doi:10.1080/09715010.2018.1441752
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, N.K., et al., 2019. Estimation of tunnel desilter sediment removal efficiency by ANFIS. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s40996-019-00261-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, N.K. and Sihag, P., 2018. Prediction of oxygen transfer at modified Parshall flumes using regression models. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1–12. doi:10.1080/09715010.2018.1473058
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, N.K., Sihag, P., and Ranjan, S., 2017. Modeling of infiltration of soil using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Journal of Engineering & Technology Education, 11 (1), 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V.N., 1995. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V.N., 1999. An overview of statistical learning theory. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10 (5), 988–999. doi:10.1109/72.788640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar