Enhancing streamflow forecasting using the augmenting ensemble procedure coupled machine learning models: case study of Aswan High Dam

References

• Abudu, S., et al., 2010. Comparison of performance of statistical models in forecasting monthly streamflow of Kizil River, China. Water Science and Engineering, 3 (3), 269–281.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, B. and Solomatine, D.P., 2005. Neural networks and M5 model trees in modelling water level–discharge relationship. Neurocomputing, 63, 381–396. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2004.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can, I., Tosunoğlu, F., and Kahya, E., 2012. Daily streamflow modelling using ARMA and ANN models. Water Environment Journal, 26, 567–576. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00337
   Google Scholar
• Chu, H., Wei, J., and Qiu, J., 2018. Monthly streamflow forecasting using EEMD-Lasso-DBN method based on multi-scale predictors selection. Water, 10 (10), 1486. doi:10.3390/w10101486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, N.J., et al., 2009. Numerical modeling of river flow for ecohydraulic applications: some experiences with velocity characterization in field and simulated data. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136 (12), 1033–1041. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, P., West, S.G., and Aiken, L.S., 2014. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobriyal, P., et al., 2017. A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management. Applied Water Science, 7 (6), 2617–2628. doi:10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., 1991. Regression diagnostics: an introduction. In: D. S. Foster, ed. Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 07–079.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J.H., 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. The Annals of Statistics, 19, 1–67. doi:10.1214/aos/1176347963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J.H. and Roosen, C.B., 1995. An introduction to multivariate adaptive regression splines. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4 (3), 197–217. doi:10.1177/096228029500400303
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• George, E.I., 2000. The variable selection problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95 (452), 1304–1308. doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10474336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giupponi, C., et al., 2015. Integrated risk assessment of water-related disasters. In: J. F. Shroder, P. Paron and G. Di Baldassarre, eds. Hydro-meteorological hazards, risks and disasters. Netherlands: Elsevier, 163–200.
   Google Scholar
• Graupe, D., 2013. Principles of artificial neural networks. Vol. 7, Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J., 2009. The elements of statistical learning. Springer series in statistics. New York, NY: Springer. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7.
   Google Scholar
• Honorato, A.G.D.S.M., Silva, G.B.L.D., and Guimarães Santos, C.A., 2018. Monthly streamflow forecasting using neuro-wavelet techniques and input analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (15–16), 2060–2075. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1552788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, G.B., et al., 2016. A hybrid approach to monthly streamflow forecasting: integrating hydrological model outputs into a Bayesian artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 623–640. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst, H.E., Black, R.P., and Simaika, Y.M., 1966. The major Nile projects. In: Cairo University, ed. The Nile Basin. Vol. X. Cairo, Egypt: Government Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kisi, O., 2007. Streamflow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12 (5), 532–539. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:5(532)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O., 2009a. Wavelet regression model as an alternative to neural networks for monthly streamflow forecasting. Hydrological Processes, 23 (25), 3583–3597. doi:10.1002/hyp.7461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O., 2009b. Neural networks and wavelet conjunction model for intermittent streamflow forecasting. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14 (8), 773–782. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisi, O., 2015. Streamflow forecasting and estimation using least square support vector regression and adaptive neuro-fuzzy embedded fuzzy c-means clustering. Water Resources Management, 29 (14), 5109–5127. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-1107-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M. and Sakata, S., 1990. Mallows’ Cp criterion and unbiasedness of model selection. Journal of Econometrics, 45 (3), 385–395. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90006-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallows, C.L., 1973. Some comments on Cp. Technometrics, 15 (4), 661–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milborrow, S., 2018. Notes on the earth package. [online] http://www.milbo.org/doc/earth-notes.pdf [Accessed 8 August 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, K., Eslami, H.R., and Kahawita, R., 2006. Parameter estimation of an ARMA model for river flow forecasting using goal programming. Journal of Hydrology, 331 (1–2), 293–299. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriasi, D.N., et al., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50, 885–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• Nwaogazie, I.L., 1987. Comparative analysis of some explicit-implicit streamflow models. Advances in Water Resources, 10 (2), 69–77. doi:10.1016/0309-1708(87)90011-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, J.R., 1992, November. Learning with continuous classes. In: 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial IntelligenceIncorporating behaviour into animal movement modeling: a constrained agent based model for estimating visit probabilities in space-time prisms Hobart, Australia, vol. 92, 343–348.
   Google Scholar
• Regonda, S.K., Rajagopalan, B., and Clark, M., 2006. A new method to produce categorical streamflow forecasts. Water Resources Research, 42 (9), W09501. doi:10.1029/2006WR004984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaie-Balf, M. and Kisi, O., 2018. New formulation for forecasting streamflow: evolutionary polynomial regression vs. extreme learning machine. Hydrology Research, 49 (3), 939–953. doi:10.2166/nh.2017.283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaie-balf, M., et al., 2017. Wavelet coupled MARS and M5 model tree approaches for groundwater level forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 553, 356–373. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, E.A., Wood, A.W., and Steinemann, A.C., 2011. Statistical applications of physically based hydrologic models to seasonal streamflow forecasts. Water Resources Research, 47, W00H14. doi:10.1029/2010WR010101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabri, A. and Suhartono, 2012. Streamflow forecasting using least-squares support vector machines. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (7), 1275–1293. doi:10.1080/02626667.2012.714468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiri, J. and Kisi, O., 2010. Short-term and long-term streamflow forecasting using a wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model. Journal of Hydrology, 394 (3–4), 486–493. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomatine, D.P. and Xue, Y., 2004. M5 model trees and neural networks: application to flood forecasting in the upper reach of the Huai River in China. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 9 (6), 491–501. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:6(491)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebi, A., et al., 2017. Estimation of suspended sediment load using regression trees and model trees approaches (Case study: hyderabad drainage basin in Iran). ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 23 (2), 212–219. doi:10.1080/09715010.2016.1264894
   Google Scholar
• Torres, M.E., et al., 2011, May. A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. In Acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), 2011 IEEE international Conference, Prague, Czech Republic. IEEE, 4144–4147.
   Google Scholar
• Vafakhah, M., 2012. Application of artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system models to short-term streamflow forecasting. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 39 (4), 402–414. doi:10.1139/l2012-011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieux, B.E., Cui, Z., and Gaur, A., 2004. Evaluation of a physics-based distributed hydrologic model for flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 298 (1–4), 155–177. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. and Witten, I.H., 1996. Induction of model trees for predicting continuous classes. Waikato, New Zealand: The University of Waikato, Computer Science Working Paper 96/23.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z.Y., Qiu, J., and Li, F.F., 2018. Hybrid Models Combining EMD/EEMD and ARIMA for Long-Term Streamflow Forecasting. Water, 10 (7), 853. doi:10.3390/w10070853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, C.J., 1981. On the validation of models. Physical Geography, 2 (2), 184–194. doi:10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, C.J., Robeson, S.M., and Matsuura, K., 2012. A refined index of model performance. International Journal of Climatology, 32 (13), 2088–2094. doi:10.1002/joc.v32.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, H.C., 1984. Images and ideals of managerial work: a critical examination of conceptual and empirical accounts. Journal of Management Studies, 21 (3), 349–368. doi:10.1111/joms.1984.21.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W., Dandy, G.C., and Maier, H.R., 2014. Protocol for developing ANN models and its application to the assessment of the quality of the ANN model development process in drinking water quality modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 54, 108–127. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z. and Huang, N.E., 2009. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 1 (01), 1–41. doi:10.1142/S1793536909000047
   Google Scholar
• Yaseen, Z.M., et al., 2015. Artificial intelligence based models for stream-flow forecasting: 2000–2015. Journal of Hydrology, 530, 829–844. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. and Goh, A.T., 2016. Multivariate adaptive regression splines and neural network models for prediction of pile drivability. Geoscience Frontiers, 7 (1), 45–52. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Zhang, Q., and Singh, V.P., 2018. Univariate streamflow forecasting using commonly used data-driven models: literature review and case study. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (7), 1091–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar