Groundwater contamination risks from conservative point source pollutants in a future climate

References

• Allen, R., et al., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration, guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper No. 56. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Aller, L., et al., 1987. DRASTIC: a standardised system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. Ada, OK: US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/60012-87/035.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M.P., 1984. Movement of contaminants in groundwater: groundwater transport advection and dispersion. In: National Research Council, ed. Groundwater contamination. Studies in geophysics. Washington, DC: National Academy, 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Arheimer, B., et al., 2005. Climate change impact on water quality: model results from southern Sweden. AMBIO, 34, 559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belmans, C., Wesseling, J.G., and Feddes, R.A., 1983. Simulation model of the water balance of a cropped soil: SWATER. Journal of Hydrology, 63, 271–286. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(83)90045-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicki, T.J. and Guo, L., 1991. Tillage and simulated rainfall intensity effect on bromide movement in an argiudoll. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55, 794–799. doi:10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500030027x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boogaard, H., et al., 1998. WOFOST 7.1: user’s guide for the WOFOST 7.1 crop growth simulation model and WOFOST control center. Wageningen, The Netherlands: DLO Winand Staring Centre, Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Corwin, D.L., 1996. GIS applications of deterministic solute transport models for regional-scale assessment of non-point source pollutants in the vadose zone. In: D.L. Corwin and K. Loague, eds. Applications of GIS to the modeling of non-point source pollutants in the vadose zone. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, SSSA Special Publication No. 48, 69–100.
   Google Scholar
• Cote, C.M., et al., 2001. Measurement of water and solute movement in large undisturbed soil cores: analysis of Macknade and Bundaderg data. CSIRO Land and Water, Technical Report 07/2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dash, J.C., et al., 2015. Prediction of root zone water and nitrogen balance in an irrigated rice field using a simulation model. Paddy Water Environment, 13, 281–290. doi:10.1007/s10333-014-0439-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO, 2006. Guidelines for soil description. 4th ed. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2012. FAO - water, natural resources and environment department [Online]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/cropwat/en/ [Accessed 25 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Feddes, R.A., Kowalik, P.J., and Zaradny, H., 1978. Simulation of field water use and crop yield. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, C. and Riley, W.J., 2010. Combined effects of short term rainfall patterns and soil texture on soil nitrogen cycling - a modeling analysis. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 112, 141–154. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, C.J., et al., 2011. Climate, soil, and vegetation controls on the temporal variabilityof vadose zone transport. Water Resources Research, 47, W00J13. doi:10.1029/2010WR010194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, L.E., Wilby, R.L., and Leavesley, G.H., 2000. A comparison of delta change and downscaled GCM scenarios for three mountainous basins in the United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36, 387–397. doi:10.1111/jawr.2000.36.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazeleger, W., et al., 2010. EC-Earth. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91, 1357–1364. doi:10.1175/2010BAMS2877.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2013. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, N.J., 2007. A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality. European Journal of Soil Science, 58, 523–546. doi:10.1111/ejs.2007.58.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, A.L. and Davies, H.N., 2008. Calculating potential evaporation from climate model data: a source of uncertainty for hydrological climate change impacts. Journal of Hydrology, 358, 221–239. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellström, E., et al., 2016. Production and use of regional climate model projections – a Swedish perspective on building climate services. Climate Services, 2, 15–29. doi:10.1016/j.cliser.2016.06.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knapp, A.K., et al., 2008. Consequences of more extreme precipitation regimes for terrestrial ecosystems. Bioscience, 58, 811–821. doi:10.1641/B580908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koestel, J. and Jorda, H., 2014. What determines the strength of preferential transport in Undisturbed soil under steady-state flow. Geoderma, 217–218, 144–160. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kool, J.B. and Parker, J.C., 1987. Development and evaluation of closed-form expressions for hysteretic soil hydraulic properties. Water Resources Research, 23, 105–114. doi:10.1029/WR023i001p00105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraun, D., et al., 2015. VALUE: a framework to validate downscaling approaches for climate change studies. Earth’s Future, 3, 1–14. doi:10.1002/2014EF000259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, G.S., Hinz, C., and Sivapalan, M., 2010. Assessing the impact of regional rainfall variability on rapid pesticide leaching potential. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 113, 56–65. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, R.H., Nakicenovic, N., and O’Neill, B.C., 2008. Towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climate change, impacts, and response strategies. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. ISBN 978-92-9169-125-8.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., et al., 2009. Applying climate model precipitation scenarios for urban hydrological assessment: a case study in Kalmar City, Sweden. Atmospheric Research, 92, 364–375. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., et al., 2012. Downscaling of short-term precipitation from regional climate models for sustainable urban planning. Sustainability, 4, 866–887. doi:10.3390/su4050866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., et al., 2016. Hydrological climate change impact assessment at small and large scales: key messages from recent progress in Sweden. Climate, 4 (3), 39. doi:10.3390/cli4030039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, M. and Berndtsson, R., 1999. Water application frequency effects on steady state solute transport parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 225, 140–154. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00154-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, M. and Saifadeen, A., 2016. Effects of hysteresis, rainfall dynamics, and temporal resolution of rainfall input data in solute transport modelling in uncropped soil. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (5), 982–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J.T., 1972. A model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resources Research, 8 (5), 1204–1213. doi:10.1029/WR008i005p01204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaap, M., Leij, F., and van Genuchten, M., 2001. ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic properties with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Journal of Hydrology, 251, 163–176. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00466-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selim, T., Persson, M., and Olsson, J., 2017. Impact of spatial rainfall resolution on point source solute transport modelling. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62 (16), 2587–2596. doi:10.1080/02626667.2017.1403029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M.L. and Taniguchi, M., 1991. Movement of a non-reactive solute tracer during steady and intermittent leaching. Journal of Hydrology, 128, 323–334. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(91)90145-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šimůnek, J., et al., 2008. The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably saturated media, version 4.0: HYDRUS Software Series 3. University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA: Department of Environmental Science.
   Google Scholar
• Šimůnek, J., van Genuchten, M.T., and Šejna, M., 2016. Recent developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages. Vadose Zone Journal, 15 (7), 25. doi:10.2136/vzj2016.04.0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjökvist, E., et al., 2015. Klimatscenarier för Sverige. Bearbetning av RCP-scenarier för meteorologiska och hydrologiska effektstudier. SMHI, Norrköping, Sweden: Klimatologi nr, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, M., et al., 2012. Review of risk from potential emerging contaminants in UK groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 416, 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutanto, S.J., et al., 2012. Partitioning of evaporation into transpiration, soil evaporation and interception: a comparison between isotope measurements and a HYDRUS-1D model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 2605–2616. doi:10.5194/hess-16-2605-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafteh, A. and Sepaskhah, A.R., 2012. Application of HYDRUS-1D model for simulating water and nitrate leaching from continuous and alternate furrow irrigated rapeseed and maize fields. Agricultural Water Management, 113, 19–29. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomey, M.L., et al., 2012. Effect of precipitation variability on net primary production and soil respiration in a Chihuahuan desert grassland. Global Change Biology, 17, 1505–1515. doi:10.1111/gcb.2011.17.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiktak, A., et al., 2004. Assessment of the pesticide leaching risk at the pan-European level: the EuroPEARL approach. Journal of Hydrology, 289, 222–238. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.11.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Genuchten, M.T., 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils 1. Soil Science Socitey of America Journal, 44 (5), 892–898. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veijalainen, N., et al., 2010. National scale assessment of climate change impacts on flooding in Finland. Journal of Hydrology, 391, 333–350. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voldoire, A., et al., 2013. The CNRM-CM5.1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation. Climate Dynamics, 40, 2091–2121. doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1259-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2015. An assessment of irrigation practices: sprinkler irrigation of winter wheat in the North China plain. Agricultural Water Management, 159, 197–208. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, P., et al., 2012. Impacts of climate change on rainfall extremes and urban drainage systems. London, UK: IWA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, W., et al., 2010. Distribution-based scaling to improve usability of regional climate model projections for hydrological climate change impact studies. Hydrology Research, 41, 211–229. doi:10.2166/nh.2010.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., et al., 2012. Numerical modeling of wheat irrigation using coupled HYDRUS and WOFOST models. Soil & Water Management & Conservation, 76 (2), 648–662.
   Google Scholar