Comparison of local and global approximators in multivariate chaotic forecasting of daily streamflow

References

• Abarbanel, H., 1996. Analysis of observed chaotic data. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Aqil, M., et al., 2007a. A comparative study of artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy in continuous modeling of the daily and hourly behaviour of runoff. Journal of Hydrology, 337 (1–2), 22–34. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aqil, M., et al., 2007b. Neural networks for real time catchment flow modeling and prediction. Water Resources Management, 21 (10), 1781–1796. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9127-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badrzadeh, H., Sarukkalige, R., and Jayawardena, A.W., 2013. Impact of multi-resolution analysis of artificial intelligence models inputs on multi-step ahead river flow forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 507, 75–85. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, P., et al., 2011. Artificial neural network model as a potential alternative for groundwater salinity forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 398 (3–4), 212–220. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behzad, M., et al., 2009. Generalization performance of support vector machines and neural networks in runoff modeling. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (4), 7624–7629. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, B. and Solomatine, D.P., 2005. Neural networks and M5 model trees in modelling water level–discharge relationship. Neurocomputing, 63, 381–396. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2004.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., et al., 1984. Classification and regression trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45 (1), 5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, M.I., et al., 2018. Synthetic design hydrographs for ungauged catchments: acomparison of regionalization methods. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 32 (7), 1993–2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L., 1997. Practical method for determining the minimum embedding dimension of a scalar time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 110 (1–2), 43–50. doi:10.1016/S0167-2789(97)00118-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L., Mees, A., and Judd, K., 1998. Dynamics from multivariate time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 121 (1–2), 75–88. doi:10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00151-1
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. and Kumar, P., 2002. Role of terrestrial hydrologic memory in modulating ENSO impacts in North America. Journal of Climate, 15 (24), 3569–3585. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2003)015<3569:ROTHMI>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., et al., 2014. Copula entropy coupled with artificial neural network for rainfall–runoff simulation. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28 (7), 1755–1767. doi:10.1007/s00477-013-0838-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., et al., 2013. Uncertainty intercomparison of different hydrological models in simulating extreme flows. Water Resources Management, 27 (5), 1393–1409. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0244-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y.-M., et al., 2017. Evaluating the contribution of multi-model combination to streamflow hindcasting by empirical and conceptual models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62 (9), 1456–1468. doi:10.1080/02626667.2017.1330543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y.-M., Chang, L.-C., and Chang, F.-J., 2004. Comparison of static-feedforward and dynamic-feedback neural networks for rainfall–runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 290 (3), 297–311. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, W. and Cleaver, J., 2008. Modern agriculture under stress—Lessons from the Murray-Darling. The Murray-Darling Basin Commission. MDBC Publicaton, 46 (8), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Daliakopoulos, I.N., Coulibaly, P., and Tsanis, I.K., 2005. Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 309 (1–4), 229–240. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daliakopoulos, I.N. and Tsanis, I.K., 2016. Comparison of an artificial neural network and a conceptual rainfall–runoff model in the simulation of ephemeral streamflow. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (15), 2763–2774. doi:10.1080/02626667.2016.1154151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dariane, A.B. and Azimi, S., 2018. Streamflow forecasting by combining neural networks and fuzzy models using advanced methods of input variable selection. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 20 (2), 520–532. doi:10.2166/hydro.2017.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, J. and Nanduri, U.V., 2018. Assessment and evaluation of potential climate change impact on monsoon flows using machine learning technique over Wainganga River basin, India. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (7), 1020–1046. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1469757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanya, C.T. and Nagesh Kumar, D., 2010. Nonlinear ensemble prediction of chaotic daily rainfall. Advances in Water Resources, 33 (3), 327–347. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibike, Y.B., et al., 2001. Model induction with support vector machines: introduction and applications. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15 (3), 208–216. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2001)15:3(208)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R.J., 1994. An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Ratón, MA: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Elshorbagy, A., Panu, U.S., and Simonovic, S.P., 2001. Analysis of cross-correlated chaotic streamflows. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 46 (5), 781–793. doi:10.1080/02626660109492870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeilzadeh, B., Sattari, M.T., and Samadianfard, S., 2017. Performance evaluation of ANNs and an M5 model tree in Sattarkhan Reservoir inflow prediction. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 23 (3), 283–292. doi:10.1080/09715010.2017.1308277
   Google Scholar
• Fan, Y., et al., 2015. A stepwise-cluster forecasting approach for monthly streamflows based on climate teleconnections. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29 (6), 1557–1569. doi:10.1007/s00477-015-1048-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, J.D. and Sidorowich, J.J., 1987. Predicting chaotic time series. Physical Review Letters, 59 (8), 845–848. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, A.M. and Swinney, H.L., 1986. Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Physical Review A, 33 (2), 1134–1140. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.33.1134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J.H., 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. The Annals of Statistics, 19 (1), 1–67. doi:10.1214/aos/1176347963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furquim, G., et al., 2016. Improving the accuracy of a flood forecasting model by means of machine learning and chaos theory. Neural Computing and Applications, 27 (5), 1129–1141. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-1930-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gizaw, M.S. and Gan, T.Y., 2016. Regional flood frequency analysis using support vector regression under historical and future climate. Journal of Hydrology, 538, 387–398. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, M.K., et al., 2014. Modeling of daily pan evaporation in sub tropical climates using ANN, LS-SVR, Fuzzy Logic, and ANFIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 41 (11), 5267–5276. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, M.K., 2014. Modeling of sediment yield prediction using M5 model tree algorithm and wavelet regression. Water Resources Management, 28 (7), 1991–2003. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0590-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, M.T. and Menhaj, M.B., 1994. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5 (6), 989–993. doi:10.1109/72.329697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, S.A. and Ansari, M.R.K., 2010. Nonlinear analysis of seasonality and stochasticity of the Indus River. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55 (2), 250–265. doi:10.1080/02626660903546167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z., et al., 2014. A comparative study of artificial neural network, adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and support vector machine for forecasting river flow in the semiarid mountain region. Journal of Hydrology, 509, 379–386. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipni, A., et al., 2013. Daily forecasting of dam water levels: comparing a support vector machine (SVM) model with adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Water Resources Management, 27 (10), 3803–3823. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0382-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honorato, A.G.D.S.M., Silva, G.B.L.D., and Guimarães Santos, C.A., 2018. Monthly streamflow forecasting using neuro-wavelet techniques and input analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (15–16), 2060–2075. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1552788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., et al., 2014. Monthly streamflow prediction using modified EMD-based support vector machine. Journal of Hydrology, 511, 764–775. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S.-C. and Hsieh, C.-H., 2012. Wavelet-based relevance vector regression model coupled with phase space reconstruction for exchange rate forecasting. Nternational Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 8, 1917–1930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M.N. and Sivakumar, B., 2002. Characterization and prediction of runoff dynamics: a nonlinear dynamical view. Advances in Water Resources, 25 (2), 179–190. doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X., et al., 2010. Parameter and modeling uncertainty simulated by GLUE and a formal Bayesian method for a conceptual hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology, 383 (3), 147–155. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jothiprakash, V. and Fathima, T.A., 2013. Chaotic analysis of daily rainfall series in Koyna reservoir catchment area, India. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 27 (6), 1371–1381. doi:10.1007/s00477-012-0673-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jothiprakash, V. and Kote, A.S., 2010. Effect of pruning and smoothing while using M5 model tree technique for reservoir inflow prediction. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16 (7), 563–574. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalteh, A.M., 2016. Improving forecasting accuracy of streamflow time series using least squares support vector machine coupled with data-preprocessing techniques. Water Resources Management, 30 (2), 747–766. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-1188-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamruzzaman, M., Beecham, S., and Metcalfe, A., 2011. Non‐stationarity in rainfall and temperature in the Murray Darling Basin. Hydrological Processes, 25 (10), 1659–1675. doi:10.1002/hyp.v25.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karunasinghe, D.S.K. and Liong, S.-Y., 2006. Chaotic time series prediction with a global model: artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 323 (1), 92–105. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasiviswanathan, K. and Sudheer, K., 2016. Comparison of methods used for quantifying prediction interval in artificial neural network hydrologic models. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2 (1), 1–11. doi:10.1007/s40808-016-0079-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasiviswanathan, K.S. and Sudheer, K.P., 2013. Quantification of the predictive uncertainty of artificial neural network based river flow forecast models. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 27 (1), 137–146. doi:10.1007/s00477-012-0600-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasiviswanathan, K.S., Sudheer, K.P., and He, J., 2018. Probabilistic and ensemble simulation approaches for input uncertainty quantification of artificial neural network hydrological models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (1), 101–113. doi:10.1080/02626667.2017.1393686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kędra, M., 2014. Deterministic chaotic dynamics of Raba River flow (Polish Carpathian Mountains). Journal of Hydrology, 509, 474–503. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennel, M.B., Brown, R., and Abarbanel, H.D.I., 1992. Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Physical Review A, 45 (6), 3403–3411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatibi, R., et al., 2012. Investigating chaos in river stage and discharge time series. Journal of Hydrology, 414–415, 108–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-W. and Pachepsky, Y.A., 2010. Reconstructing missing daily precipitation data using regression trees and artificial neural networks for SWAT streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 394 (3), 305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizza, M., et al., 2011. Modelling catchment inflows into Lake Victoria: uncertainties in rainfall–runoff modelling for the Nzoia River. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56 (7), 1210–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, D., et al., 2016. Daily suspended sediment simulation using machine learning approach. Catena, 138, 77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., et al., 2015. Reservoir inflow forecasting using ensemble models based on neural networks, wavelet analysis and bootstrap method. Water Resources Management, 29 (13), 4863–4883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laio, F., et al., 2003. A comparison of nonlinear flood forecasting methods. Water Resources Research, 39 (5), 1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.-Y., Cheng, C.-T., and Chau, K.-W., 2006. Using support vector machines for long-term discharge prediction. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (4), 599–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K., et al., 2016. Coupling the k-nearest neighbor procedure with the Kalman filter for real-time updating of the hydraulic model in flood forecasting. International Journal of Sediment Research, 31 (2), 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., et al., 1998. Phase-space analysis of daily streamflow: characterization and prediction. Advances in Water Resources, 21 (6), 463–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., et al., 2014. Evaluating a coupled discrete wavelet transform and support vector regression for daily and monthly streamflow forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 2822–2831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohani, A.K., Goel, N., and Bhatia, K., 2011. Comparative study of neural network, fuzzy logic and linear transfer function techniques in daily rainfall‐runoff modelling under different input domains. Hydrological Processes, 25 (2), 175–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londhe, S. and Charhate, S., 2010. Comparison of data-driven modelling techniques for river flow forecasting. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55 (7), 1163–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E.N., 1963. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20 (2), 130–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, H.R. and Dandy, G.C., 2000. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 15 (1), 101–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maity, R., Bhagwat, P.P., and Bhatnagar, A., 2010. Potential of support vector regression for prediction of monthly streamflow using endogenous property. Hydrological Processes, 24 (7), 917–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmahon, T.A. and Peel, M.C., 2019. Uncertainty in stage–discharge rating curves: application to Australian Hydrologic Reference Stations data. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64 (3), 255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, D., et al., 2009. Application and analysis of support vector machine based simulation for runoff and sediment yield. Biosystems Engineering, 103 (4), 527–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modaresi, F., Araghinejad, S., and Ebrahimi, K., 2018. A comparative assessment of artificial neural network, generalized regression neural network, least-square support vector regression, and K-nearest neighbor regression for monthly streamflow forecasting in linear and nonlinear conditions. Water Resources Management, 32 (1), 243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, C.H., et al., 2017. Regional changes in streamflow after a megathrust earthquake. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 458, 418–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A. and Ramachandran, P., 2018. Prediction of GWL with the help of GRACE TWS for unevenly spaced time series data in India: analysis of comparative performances of SVR, ANN and LRM. Journal of Hydrology, 558, 647–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packard, N.H., et al., 1980. Geometry from a time series. Physical Review Letters, 45 (9), 712–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, D.K. and Kumar, A., 2011. Evaluation of an over-used coastal aquifer (Orissa, India) using statistical approaches. Hydrological Sciences Journal–Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, 56 (3), 486–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partal, T. and Cigizoglu, H.K., 2009. Prediction of daily precipitation using wavelet—neural networks. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54 (2), 234–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porporato, A. and Ridolfi, L., 1997. Nonlinear analysis of river flow time sequences. Water Resources Research, 33 (6), 1353–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porporato, A. and Ridolfi, L., 2001. Multivariate nonlinear prediction of river flows. Journal of Hydrology, 248 (1), 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, J.R., ed., 1992. Learning with continuous classes. In: Proceedings of the Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Singapore: World Scientific, 343–348.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaie-Balf, M., et al., 2017. Wavelet coupled MARS and M5 model tree approaches for groundwater level forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 553, 356–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riad, S., et al., 2004. Rainfall-Runoff model using an artificial neural network approach. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40, 839–846.
   Google Scholar
• Schnier, S. and Cai, X., 2014. Prediction of regional streamflow frequency using model tree ensembles. Journal of Hydrology, 517, 298–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreider, S.Y., et al., 1997. A combined deterministic and self-adaptive stochastic algorithm for streamflow forecasting with application to catchments of the Upper Murray Basin, Australia. Environmental Modelling & Software, 12 (1), 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selle, B. and Hannah, M., 2010. A bootstrap approach to assess parameter uncertainty in simple catchment models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25 (8), 919–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabri, A. and Suhartono, 2012. Streamflow forecasting using least-squares support vector machines. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (7), 1275–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamshirband, S., et al., 2014. Support vector regression methodology for wind turbine reaction torque prediction with power-split hydrostatic continuous variable transmission. Energy, 67, 623–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, H., et al., 2014. Spatial distribution of monthly potential evaporation over mountainous regions: case of the Lhasa River basin, China. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59 (10), 1856–1871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortridge, J.E., Guikema, S.D., and Zaitchik, B.F., 2016. Machine learning methods for empirical streamflow simulation: a comparison of model accuracy, interpretability, and uncertainty in seasonal watersheds. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20 (7), 2611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siek, M. and Solomatine, D.P., 2010. Nonlinear chaotic model for predicting storm surges. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 17 (5), 405–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A., et al., 2014. Assessing the performance and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT and RBNN models for simulation of sediment yield in the Nagwa watershed, India. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59 (2), 351–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, K.P., et al., 2009. Artificial neural network modeling of the river water quality—a case study. Ecological Modelling, 220 (6), 888–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, B., 2001. Rainfall dynamics at different temporal scales: a chaotic perspective. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5 (4), 645–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, B., 2002. A phase-space reconstruction approach to prediction of suspended sediment concentration in rivers. Journal of Hydrology, 258 (1–4), 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, B., 2003. Forecasting monthly streamflow dynamics in the western United States: a nonlinear dynamical approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 18 (8–9), 721–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, B., et al., 2005. A multi-variable time series phase-space reconstruction approach to investigation of chaos in hydrological processes. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1 (1), 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, B., et al., 2006. Nonlinear analysis of rainfall dynamics in California’s Sacramento Valley. Hydrological Processes, 20, 1723–1736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, B., 2007. Nonlinear determinism in river flow: prediction as a possible indicator. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 32 (7), 969–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, B., Jayawardena, A.W., and Fernando, T.M.K.G., 2002. River flow forecasting: use of phase-space reconstruction and artificial neural networks approaches. Journal of Hydrology, 265 (1–4), 225–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, B., Woldemeskel, F.M., and Puente, C.E., 2014. Nonlinear analysis of rainfall variability in Australia. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28 (1), 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomatine, D.P. and Xue, Y., 2004. M5 model trees and neural networks: application to flood forecasting in the upper reach of the Huai River in China. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 9 (6), 491–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Štravs, L. and Brilly, M., 2007. Development of a low-flow forecasting model using the M5 machine learning method. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52 (3), 466–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl, C., et al., 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics, 9 (1), 307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., et al., 2014. Improving numerical forecast accuracy with ensemble Kalman filter and chaos theory: case study on Ciliwung river model. Journal of Hydrology, 512, 540–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takens, F., 1981. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: D.A. Rand and L.S. Jung, eds. Dynamical systems and turbulence, lecture notes in mathematics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 366–381.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, M.K. and Chatterjee, C., 2010. Uncertainty assessment and ensemble flood forecasting using bootstrap based artificial neural networks (BANNs). Journal of Hydrology, 382 (1), 20–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongal, H. and Berndtsson, R., 2014. Phase-space reconstruction and self-exciting threshold modeling approach to forecast lake water levels. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28 (4), 955–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongal, H. and Berndtsson, R., 2017. Impact of complexity on daily and multi-step forecasting of streamflow with chaotic, stochastic, and black-box models. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 31 (3), 661–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongal, H. and Booij, M.J., 2017. Quantification of parametric uncertainty of ANN models with GLUE method for different streamflow dynamics. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 31 (4), 993–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongal, H. and Booij, M.J., 2018. Simulation and forecasting of streamflows using machine learning models coupled with base flow separation. Journal of Hydrology, 564, 266–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongal, H. and Sivakumar, B., 2017. Cross-entropy clustering framework for catchment classification. Journal of Hydrology, 552, 433–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V. and Chervonenkis, A., 1964. A note on one class of perceptrons. Automation and Remote Control, 25 (1), 103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V.N., 1995. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K., 1985. A review of the ecological effects of river regulation in Australia. Hydrobiologia, 125 (1), 111–129.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W.-C., et al., 2009. A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. Journal of Hydrology, 374 (3–4), 294–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2014. Comparative study of monthly inflow prediction methods for the Three Gorges reservoir. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28 (3), 555–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worland, S.C., Farmer, W.H., and Kiang, J.E., 2018. Improving predictions of hydrological low-flow indices in ungaged basins using machine learning. Environmental Modelling & Software, 101, 169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.L. and Chau, K.W., 2010. Data-driven models for monthly streamflow time series prediction. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 23 (8), 1350–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M.-C., Lin, G.-F., and Lin, H.-Y., 2014. Improving the forecasts of extreme streamflow by support vector regression with the data extracted by self-organizing map. Hydrological Processes, 28 (2), 386–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. and Chen, J., 2013. Analyzing the water budget and hydrological characteristics and responses to land use in a monsoonal climate river basin in South China. Environmental Management, 51 (6), 1174–1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, T. and Valocchi, A.J., 2015. Data-driven methods to improve baseflow prediction of a regional groundwater model. Computers & Geosciences, 85, 124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X. and Liong, S.-Y., 2007. Forecasting of hydrologic time series with ridge regression in feature space. Journal of Hydrology, 332 (3–4), 290–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X.Y., Liong, S.Y., and Babovic, V., 2004. EC-SVM approach for real-time hydrologic forecasting. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 6 (3), 209–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. and Goh, A.T., 2016. Multivariate adaptive regression splines and neural network models for prediction of pile drivability. Geoscience Frontiers, 7 (1), 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., et al., 2009. Estimating uncertainty of streamflow simulation using Bayesian neural networks. Water Resources Research, 45 (2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ziehmann, C., Smith, L.A., and Kurths, J., 1999. The bootstrap and Lyapunov exponents in deterministic chaos. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 126 (1–2), 49–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar