6,567
Views
49
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Advancing socio-hydrology

Socio-hydrology with hydrosocial theory: two sides of the same coin?

& ORCID Icon
Pages 1443-1457 | Received 07 Sep 2019, Accepted 19 Mar 2020, Published online: 20 May 2020

References

  • Abebe, Y.A., et al., 2019. A coupled flood-agent-institution modelling (CLAIM) framework for urban flood risk management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 111, 483–492. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.015
  • Aert, J.C.J.H., et al., 2018. Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment. Nature Climate Change, 8 (3), 193–199. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1
  • Ajibade, I. and Adams, E.A., 2019. Planning principles and assessment of transformational adaptation: towards a refined ethical approach. Climate and Development, 11 (10), 850–862. doi:10.1080/17565529.2019.1580557
  • Bakarji, J., O’Malley, D., and Vesselinov, V.V., 2017. Agent-based socio-hydrological hybrid modeling for water resource management. Water Resource Management, 31, 3881–3898. doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1713-7
  • Bakker, K., 2000. Privatizing water, producing scarcity: the Yorkshire drought of 1995. Economic Geography, 76 (1), 4–25. doi:10.2307/144538
  • Bakker, K.J., 2003. A political ecology of water privatization. Studies in Political Economy, 70 (1), 35–58. doi:10.1080/07078552.2003.11827129
  • Bakker, K.J., 2014. The business of water: market environmentalism in the water sector. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 469–494. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-070312-132730
  • Banister, J.M., 2014. Are you wittfogel or against him? Geophilosophy, hydro-sociality, and the state. Geoforum, 57, 205–214. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.03.004
  • Barendrecht, M.H., et al., 2019. The value of empirical data for estimating the parameters of a sociohydrological flood risk model. Water Resources Research, 55, 1312–1336. doi:10.1029/2018WR024128
  • Bekchanov, M., et al., 2017. Systematic review of water-economy modeling applications. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 143 (8), 04017037. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000793
  • Boelens, R., 2008. Water rights arenas in the Andes: upscale networks to strengthen local water control. Water Alternatives, 1 (1), 48–65.
  • Boelens, R., 2014. Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: water, power and identity in the andean highlands. Geoforum, 57, 234–247. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.008
  • Boelens, R., et al., 2016. Hydrosocial territories: a political ecology perspective. Water International, 41 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898
  • Boelens, R., Shah, E., and Bruins, B., 2019. Contested knowledges: large dams and mega-hydraulic development. Water, 11, 416. doi:10.3390/w11030416
  • Borga, M., et al., 2019. Forensic analysis of flash flood response. WIRE’s Water, 6 (2), e1338.
  • Borgomeo, E., Hall, J.W., and Salehin, M., 2018. Avoiding the water-poverty trap: insights from a conceptual human–water dynamical model for coastal Bangladesh. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34 (6), 900–922. doi:10.1080/07900627.2017.1331842
  • Budds, J., 2009. Contested H2O: science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile. Geoforum, 40 (3), 418–430. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008
  • Budds, J. and McGranahan, G., 2003. Are the debates on water privatization missing the point? Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Environment and Urbanization, 15 (2), 87–114. doi:10.1630/095624703101286763
  • Callegary, J.B., et al., 2018. Findings and lessons learned from the assessment of the Mexico-United States transboundary San Pedro and Santa Cruz aquifers: the utility of social science in applied hydrologic research. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 20, 60–73.
  • Cantor, A., 2017. Material, political, and biopolitical dimensions of “waste” in California water law. Antipode, 49 (5), 1204–1222. doi:10.1111/anti.12314
  • Carey, M., et al., 2014. Toward hydro-social modeling: merging human variables and the social sciences with climate-glacier runoff models (Santa River, Peru). Journal of Hydrology, 518 (A), 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.006
  • Castilla-Rho, J.C., et al., 2019. Sustainable groundwater management: how long and what will it take? Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 58, 101972. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101972
  • Castro, J., 2007. Poverty and citizenship: sociological perspectives on water services and public–private participation. Geoforum, 38 (5), 756–771. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.12.006
  • Cavazos Cohn, T., et al., 2019. Spatio-temporality and tribal water quality governance in the United States. Water, 11 (1), 99. doi:10.3390/w11010099
  • Cisneros, J., et al., 2014. Freshwater resources. In: C.B. Field, et al., eds. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. New York: Cambridge University Press, 229–269.
  • Cook, C., 2016. Implementing drinking water security: the limits of source protection. Wiley Interdisciplinary reviews. Water, 3 (1), 5–12.
  • Cronon, W., 1991. Nature’s metropolis: chicago and the Great West. London: W.W. Norton and Co.
  • Damonte, G. and Boelens, R., 2019. Hydrosocial territories, agro-export and water scarcity: capitalist territorial transformations and water governance in Peru’s coastal valleys. Water International, 44 (2), 206–223. doi:10.1080/02508060.2018.1556869
  • Delanda, M., 2016. Assemblage Theory. Edinburg: University of Edinburg Press.
  • Di Baldassarre, G., et al., 2019. Sociohydrology: scientific challenges in addressing the sustainable development goals. Water Resources Research, 55 (8), 6327–6355. doi:10.1029/2018WR023901
  • Di Baldassarre, G., Brandimarte, L., and Beven, K., 2016. The seventh facet of uncertainty: wrong assumptions, unknowns and surprises in the dynamics of human–water systems. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (9), 1748–1758. doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1091460
  • Di Pelino, S., et al., 2019. A coupled-systems framework for reducing health risks associated with private drinking water wells. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 44 (3), 1–11. doi:10.1080/07011784.2019.1581663
  • Duarte Abadía, B., Boelens, R., and du Pré, L., 2019. Mobilizing water actors and bodies of knowledge. The multi-scalar movement against the Río Grande Dam in Málaga, Spain. Water, 11, 410. doi:10.3390/w11030410
  • Duarte-Abadia, B. and Boelens, R., 2016. Disputes over territorial boundaries and diverging valuation languages: the Santurban hydrosocial highlands territory in Colombia. Water International, 41 (1), 15–36. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1117271
  • Duarte-Abadía, B. and Boelens, R., 2019. Colonizing rural waters: the politics of hydro-territorial transformation in the guadalhorce valley, málaga, spain. Water International, 44 (2), 148–168. doi:10.1080/02508060.2019.1578080
  • Duran-Encalada, J.A., et al., 2016. Innovative applications of O.R. The impact of global climate change on water quantity and quality: A system dynamics approach to the US–Mexican transborder region. European Journal of Operational Research, 256, 567–581. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.016
  • Elshafei, Y., et al., 2015. A model of the socio‐hydrologic dynamics in a semiarid catchment: isolating feedbacks in the coupled human‐hydrology system. Water Resour. Res., 51, 6442–6471. doi:10.1002/2015WR017048
  • Ertsen, M.W., et al., 2015. A journey of a thousand miles begins with one small step - human agency, hydrological processes and time in socio-hydrology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18 (4), 1369–1382. doi:10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014
  • Evers, M., et al., 2017. The pluralistic water research concept: a new human-water system research approach. Water, 9 (12), 933. doi:10.3390/w9120933
  • Falkenmark, M., 1979. Main problems of water use and transfer of technology. GeoJournal, 3 (5), 435–443. doi:10.1007/BF00455982
  • Farjad, B., et al., 2017. An integrated modelling system to predict hydrological processes under climate and land-use/cover change scenarios. Water, 9, 767. doi:10.3390/w9100767
  • Farrelly, M.A. and Brown, R.R., 2014. Making the implicit, explicit: time for renegotiating the urban water supply hydrosocial contract? Urban Water Journal, 11, 392–404. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2013.793729
  • Feng, M.Y., et al., 2016. Modeling the nexus across water supply, power generation and environment systems using the system dynamics approach: Hehuang Region, China. Journal of Hydrology, 543, 344–359. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.011
  • Ferdous, M.R., et al., 2018. Socio-hydrological spaces in the Jamuna River floodplain in Bangladesh. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22 (10), 5159–5173. doi:10.5194/hess-22-5159-2018
  • Foster, J.B., 2000. Marx’s ecology. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  • Foucault, M., 2008. The birth of biopolitics lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. NYC: Palgrave.
  • Foucault, M., 2011. The government of the self and others: lectures at the Collège de France, 1982–1983. NYC: Palgrave.
  • Freeman, C. and Perez, C., 1988. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behavior. In: G. Dosi, et al., eds. Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter, 38–66.
  • Geels, F., 2005. Co-evolution of technology and society: the transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930)—a case study in multi-level perspective. Technology in Society, 27, 363–397. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.008
  • Gober, P., and Wheater, H.S., 2015. Debates—perspectives on socio-hydrology: modeling flood risk as a public policy problem. Water Resour. Res., 51, 4782– 4788. doi:10.1002/2015WR016945
  • Gunda, T., Turner, B.L., and Tidwell, V.C., 2018. The influential role of sociocultural feedbacks on community-managed irrigation system behaviors during times of water stress. Water Resources Research, 54 (4), 2697–2714. doi:10.1002/2017WR021223
  • Haraway, D., 1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
  • Harvey, D., 2006. Spaces of global capitalism: a theory of uneven geographical development. NYC: Verso.
  • Hommes, L. and Boelens, R., 2017. Urbanizing rural waters: rural-urban water transfers and the reconfiguration of hydrosocial territories in Lima. Political Geography, 57, 71–80. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.12.002
  • Hommes, L., Boelens, R., and Maat, H., 2016. Contested hydrosocial territories and disputed water governance: struggles and competing claims over the Ilisu Dam development in southeastern Turkey. Geoforum, 71, 9–20. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.015
  • Hoogendam, P., and Boelens, R., 2019. Dams and damages. Conflicting epistemological frameworks and interests concerning “Compensation” for the misicuni project’s socio-environmental impacts in Cochabamba, Bolivia. Water, 11, 408.
  • Hoogesteger, J. and Verzijl, A., 2015. Grassroots scalar politics: insights from peasant water struggles in the Ecuadorian and Peruvian Andes. Geoforum, 62, 13–23. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.013
  • Houston, D., et al., 2019. The influence of hazard maps and trust of flood controls on coastal flood spatial awareness and risk perception. Environment and Behavior, 51 (4), 347–375. doi:10.1177/0013916517748711
  • Jaeger, W.K., et al., 2017. Finding water scarcity amid abundance using human–natural system models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (45), 11884–11889. doi:10.1073/pnas.1706847114
  • Jeong, H. and Adamowski, J., 2016. A system dynamics based socio-hydrological model for agricultural wastewater reuse at the watershed scale. Agricultural Water Management, 171, 89–107. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.019
  • Kaika, M., 2005. City of flows. London: Routledge.
  • Kallis, G., 2010. Coevolution in water resource development: the vicious cycle of water supply and demand in Athens. Greece. Ecological Economics, 69, 796–809. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.025
  • Kam, J., Stowers, K., and Kim, S., 2019. Monitoring of drought awareness from google trends: a case study of the 2011–17 California drought. Weather, Climate, and Society, 11 (2), 419–429. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0085.1
  • Klassert, C., et al., 2015. Modeling residential water consumption in amman: the role of intermittency, storage, and pricing for piped and tanker water. Water, 7 (7), 3643–3670. doi:10.3390/w7073643
  • Lane, S.N., 2014. Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world. Hydrology and Earth Systems Science, 18, 927–952. doi:10.5194/hess-18-927-2014
  • Latour, B., 2004. The politics of nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Lerner, A., et al., 2018. Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity: the example of hydrological risk in mexico city. Cities, 83, 61–70. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.009
  • Linton, J., 2008. Is the hydrologic cycle sustainable? A historical–geographical critique of a modern concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98 (3), 630–649. doi:10.1080/00045600802046619
  • Linton, J. and Budds, J., 2014. The hydrosocial cycle: defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum, 57, 170–180. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008
  • Liu, D., et al., 2015. A conceptual socio-hydrological model of the co-evolution of humans and water: case study of the Tarim River basin, western China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19, 1035–1054. doi:10.5194/hess-19-1035-2015
  • Mark, B.G., et al., 2017. Glacier loss and hydro-social risks in the Peruvian Andes. Global and Planetary Change, 159, 61–76. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.003
  • Marx, K., 1999. Grundrisse: foundations of the critique of political ecology. Trans. Martin Nicolaus. NYC: Penguin.
  • Massuel, S., et al., 2018. Inspiring a broader socio‐hydrological negotiation approach with interdisciplinary field‐based experience. Water Resources Research, 54, 2510–2522. doi:10.1002/2017WR021691
  • Maxwell, C.M., Langarudi, S.P., and Fernald, A.G., 2019. Simulating a watershed-scale strategy to mitigate drought, flooding, and sediment transport in drylands. Systems, 7 (4), 53. doi:10.3390/systems7040053
  • McCarthy, J., 2002. First world political ecology: lessons from the wise use movement. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34 (7), 1281–1302. doi:10.1068/a3526
  • McKinnon, I., et al., 2017. Uneven urban metabolisms: toward an integrative (ex)urban political ecology of sustainability in and around the city. Urban Geography, 40 (3), 352–377. doi:10.1080/02723638.2017.1388733
  • McKinnon, I. and Hiner, C., 2016. Does the region still have relevance? (re)considering “regional” political ecology. Journal of Political Ecology, 23 (1), 115–203. doi:10.2458/v23i1.20182
  • McLean, J., 2017. Water cultures as assemblages: indigenous, neoliberal, colonial water cultures in northern Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 52, 81–89. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.015
  • Meehan, K., 2013. Disciplining de facto development: water theft and hydrosocial order in Tijuana. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31 (2), 319–336. doi:10.1068/d20610
  • Mehta, V.K., et al., 2015. Metabolic Urbanism and Environmental Justice: the Water Conundrum in Bangalore, India. Environmental Justice, 7 (5), 130–137. doi:10.1089/env.2014.0021
  • Meisner, M., 1963. The despotism of concepts: Wittfogel and Marx on China. The China Quarterly, 16, 99–111. doi:10.1017/S0305741000021536
  • Melsen, L.A., Vos, J., and Boelens, R., 2018. What is the role of the model in socio-hydrology? Discussion of “Prediction in a socio-hydrological world”. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (9), 1435–1443. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1499025
  • Mewes, B. and Schumann, A., 2019. The potential of combined machine learning and agent-based models in water resources management. Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung, 63 (6), 332–338.
  • Milly, P.C.D., et al., 2008. Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science, 319 (5863), 573–574. doi:10.1126/science.1151915
  • Molle, F., Foran, T., and Floch, P., 2009. Introduction: changing waterscapes in the Mekong Region – historical background and context. In: F. Molle, T. Foran, and M. Käkönen, eds. Contested waterscapes in the Mekong Region: hydropower, livelihoods, and governance. London: Earthscan, 1–22.
  • Mukherji, A., et al., 2019. Contributions of the cryosphere to mountain communities in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: a review. Regional Environmental Change, 19 (5), 1311–1326. doi:10.1007/s10113-019-01484-w
  • Müller, M.F. and Levy, M.C., 2019. Complementary vantage points: integrating hydrology and economics for sociohydrologic knowledge generation. Water Resources Research, 55 (4), 2549–2571. doi:10.1029/2019WR024786
  • Norman, E., Cook, C., and Cohen, A., eds, 2015. Negotiating water governance: why the politics of scale matters. New York: Routledge.
  • Nüsser, M., et al., 2019. Socio-hydrology of “artificial glaciers” in Ladakh, India: assessing adaptive strategies in a changing cryosphere. Regional Environmental Change, 19 (5), 1327–1337. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1372-0
  • Nüsser, M., Schmidt, S., and Dame, J., 2012. Irrigation and development in the upper indus basin: characteristics and recent changes of a socio-hydrological system in central ladakh, india. Mountain Research and Development, 32 (1), 51–61. doi:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00091.1
  • O’Connell, P.E. and O’Donnell, G., 2014. Towards modelling flood protection investment as a coupled human and natural system. Hydrology and Earth Systems Science, 18 (1), 155–171. doi:10.5194/hess-18-155-2014
  • Ogilvie, A., et al., 2019. Socio-hydrological drivers of agricultural water use in small reservoirs. Agricultural Water Management, 218, 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.001
  • Pande, S. and Savenije, H.H.G., 2016. A sociohydrological model for smallholder farmers in Maharashtra, India. Water Resources Research, 52 (3), 1923–1947. doi:10.1002/2015WR017841
  • Pande, S. and Sivapalan, M., 2017. Progress in socio-hydrology: a meta-analysis of challenges and opportunities. WIREs Water, 4, 4. doi:10.1002/wat2.1193
  • Peloso, M. and Harris, L.M., 2017. Pathways for participatory water governance in Ashaiman, Ghana: learning from institutional bricolage and hydrosocial perspectives. Society and Natural Resources, 30 (12), 1491–1506. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1364451
  • Re, V., 2015. Incorporating the social dimension into hydrogeochemical investigations for rural development: the Bir Al-Nas approach for socio-hydrogeology. Hydrogeology Journal, 23, 1293–1304. doi:10.1007/s10040-015-1284-8
  • Re, V., et al., 2017. Integrated socio-hydrogeological approach to tackle nitrate contamination in groundwater resources. The case of Grombalia Basin (Tunesia). Science of the Total Environment, 593–594, 664–676. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.151
  • Rogers, S., et al., 2016. Governmentality and the conduct of water: China’s South-North water transfer project. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41 (4), 429–441. doi:10.1111/tran.12141
  • Roobavannan, M., et al., 2017. Role of sectoral transformation in the evolution of water management norms in agricultural catchments: a sociohydrologic modeling analysis. Water Resources Research, 53 (10), 8344–8365. doi:10.1002/2017WR020671
  • Roth, D., et al., 2019. Climates of urbanization: local experiences of water security, conflict and cooperation in peri-urban South-Asia. Climate Policy, 19 (Sup1), S78–S93. doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1530967
  • Rusca, M. and Di Baldassarre, G., 2019. Interdisciplinary critical geographies of water: capturing the mutual shaping of society and hydrological flows. Water, 11 (10), 1973. doi:10.3390/w11101973
  • Sanchis-Ibor, C., Boelens, R., and Garcia-Molla, M., 2017. Collective irrigation reloaded. Re-collection and re-moralization of water management after privatization in Spain. Geoforum, 87, 38–47. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.002
  • Sarmiento, E., Landström, C., and Whatmore, S., 2019. Biopolitics, discipline, and hydro‐citizenship: drought management and water governance in england. Trans Inst Br Geogr., 44, 361–375. doi:10.1111/tran.12288
  • Sivakumar, B., 2012. Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes, 27 (4), 3788–3790. doi:10.1002/hyp.9511
  • Sivapalan, M., Saveniji, H.H.G., and Blöschl, G., 2012. Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes, 26 (8), 1270–1276. doi:10.1002/hyp.8426
  • Smith, N., 1984. Uneven development: nature, capital and the production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Srinivasan, V., 2015. Reimagining the past – use of counterfactual trajectories in socio-hydrological modelling: the case of Chennai, India. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19 (2), 785–801.
  • Srinivasan, V., et al., 2018. Moving socio-hydrologic modelling forward: unpacking hidden assumptions, values and model structure by engaging with stakeholders: reply to “What is the role of the model in socio-hydrology?”. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (9), 1444–1446. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1499026
  • Srivnivasan, V., 2015. Reimagining the past – use of counterfactual trajectories in socio-hydrological modelling: the case of Chennai, India. Hydrology and Earth Systems Science, 19 (2), 785–801. doi:10.5194/hess-19-785-2015
  • Stevenson, S.A., 2018. Decolonizing hydrosocial relations: the river as a site of ethical encounter in Alan Michelson’s TwoRow II. Decolonization—Indigeneity, Education and Society, 7 (1), 94–113.
  • Stoltenborg, D. and Boelens, R., 2016. Disputes over land and water rights in gold mining: the case of Cerro de San Pedro, Mexico. Water International, 41 (3), 447–467. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1143202
  • Strickert, G., Nazemi, A., and Bradford, L.E., 2015. A stochastic modeling framework for the invitational drought tournament. In: 21st international congress on modeling and simulation. Australia: Gold Coast. www.mssanz.org.au/modsim2015
  • Swyngedouw, E., 1997. Power, nature, and the city. the conquest of water and the political ecology of urbanization in Guayaquil, Ecuador: 1880–1990. Environment and Planning A, 29, 311–332. doi:10.1068/a290311
  • Swyngedouw, E., 1999. Modernity and hybridity: nature, Regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89 (3), 443–465. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00157
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2004. Social power and the urbanization of water: flows of power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2006. Metabolic urbanization: the making of cyborg cities. In: N. Heynen, M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw, eds. In the nature of cities. NYC: Routledge, 21–40.
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2007. The post-political city, BAVO urban politics now reflect series. Rotterdam: Netherland Architecture Institute-Publishers.
  • Swyngedouw, E. and Heynen, N.C., 2003. Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35 (5), 839–1042. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00364.x
  • Swyngedouw, E., Kaika, M., and Castro, E., 2002. Urban water: a political-ecology perspective. Built Environment, Special Issue on Water Management in Urban Areas, 28 (2), 124–137.
  • Tesfatsiona, L., et al., 2017. An agent-based platform for the study of watersheds as coupled natural and human systems. Preprint. Environmental Modelling and Software, 89, 40–60. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.021
  • Truelove, Y., 2019. Gray zones: the everyday practices and governance of water beyond the network. Annals of The American Association of Geographers, 109 (6), 1758–1774. doi:10.1080/24694452.2019.1581598
  • Turner, B.L., et al., 2016. Modeling acequia irrigation systems using system dynamics: model development, evaluation, and sensitivity analyses to investigate effects of socio-economic and biophysical feedbacks. Sustainability, 8 (10), 1019. doi:10.3390/su8101019
  • Turton, A. and Meissner, R., 2002. The hydrosocial contract and its manifestation in society: a South African case study. In: A.-R. Turton and R. Henwood, eds. Hydropolitics in the developing world: a Southern African perspective. Pretoria: AWIRU, 37–60.
  • Valladares, C. and Boelens, R., 2019. Mining for Mother Earth. Governmentalities, sacred waters an nature’s rights in Ecuador. Geoforum, 100. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.009
  • Van Loon, A.F., et al., 2016. Drought in a human-modified world: reframing drought definitions, understanding, and analysis approaches. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20 (9), 3631–3650. doi:10.5194/hess-20-3631-2016
  • Walker, W., Loucks, D.P., and Carr, G., 2015. Social responses to water management decisions. Environmental Processes, 2, 485–509. doi:10.1007/s40710-015-0083-5
  • Warner, J., 2000. Images of water security: a more integrated perspective. AWIRU Occasional Paper No. 3. African Water Issues Research Unit, Pretoria University.
  • Wens, M., et al., 2019. Integrating human behavior dynamics into drought risk assessment – A sociohydrologic, agent-based approach. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews – Water, 6 (4), e1345.
  • Wescoat, J.L., Jr., 2013. Reconstructing the duty of water: a study of emergent norms in socio-hydrology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17 (12), 4759–4768. doi:10.5194/hess-17-4759-2013
  • Wesselinck, A., Kooy, M., and Warner, J., 2017. Socio-hydrology and hydrosocial analysis: toward dialogues across disciplines. WIREs Water, 4 (2), e1196.
  • Wheater, H.S. and Gober, P., 2015. Water security and the science agenda. Water Resources Research, 51 (7), 5406–5424. doi:10.1002/2015WR016892
  • Wilson, N.J., 2014. Indigenous water governance: insights from the hydrosocial relations of the koyukon athabascan village of ruby, Alaska. Geoforum, 57, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.005
  • Wittfogel, K.A., 1957. Oriental despotism: a comparative study of total power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Workman, C.L., 2019. Ebbs and flows of authority: decentralization, development and the hydrosocial cycle in Lesotho. Water, 11 (2), 184. doi:10.3390/w11020184
  • Worster, D., 1985. Rivers of Empire: water, aridity, and the growth of the American West. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Xu, L., et al., 2018. Reframing socio-hydrological research to include a social science perspective. Journal of Hydrology, 563, 76–83. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.061
  • Yacoub, C., Vos, J., and Boelens, R., 2016. Hydro-social landscapes and mining in Cajamarca, Peru: environmental monitoring as political tools. Agua y Territorio, 7, 163–175. doi:10.17561/at.v0i7.2971

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.