Application of Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) at different temporal scales to reduce the uncertainty level in modelled river flows

References

• Afzal, M., Gagnon, A.S., and Mansell, M.G., 2015. The impact of projected changes in climate variability on the reliability of surface water supply in Scotland. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 15, 736–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aston, A., 1979. Rainfall interception by eight small trees. Journal of Hydrology, 42 (3–4), 383–396. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(79)90057-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beskow, S., Rogerio Del Mello, C., and Norton, L.D., 2011. Development, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of LASH model. Scientia Agricola, 68 (3), 265–274. doi:10.1590/S0103-90162011000300001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K., 2006. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology, 320 (1–2), 18–36. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. and Binley, A., 1992. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes, 6 (3), 279–298. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. and Freer, J., 2001. Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. Journal of Hydrology, 249 (1–4), 11–29. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasone, R.-S., et al., 2008. Generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. Advances in Water Resources, 31 (4), 630–648. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., et al., 2013. Uncertainty intercomparison of different hydrological models in simulating extreme flows. Water Resources Management, 27 (5), 1393–1409. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0244-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, D.R., et al., 2010. Assessing the results of scenarios of climate and land use changes on the hydrology of an Italian catchment: modelling study. Hydrological Processes, 24 (19), 2693–2704. doi:10.1002/hyp.7765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freer, J., Beven, K., and Ambroise, B., 1996. Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach. Water Resources Research, 32 (7), 2161–2173. doi:10.1029/95WR03723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G., 2008. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. Water Research, 42 (8–9), 2061–2072. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gash, J.H., Lloyd, C., and Lachaud, G., 1995. Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. Journal of Hydrology, 170 (1–4), 79–86. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02697-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, W.H., 1911. Studies on soil physics, part I, the flow of air and water through soils. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, H.V., et al., 2009. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 377 (1–2), 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, L., et al., 2018. The effect of input data complexity on the uncertainty in simulated streamflow in humid, mountinous watershed. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22 (11), 5947–5965. doi:10.5194/hess-22-5947-2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., et al., 2016. Reconstruction of multi‐decadal groundwater level time‐series using a lumped conceptual model. Hydrological Processes, 30 (18), 3107–3125. doi:10.1002/hyp.10850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X., et al., 2010. Parameter and modelling uncertainty simulated by GLUE and a formal Bayesian method for a conceptual hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology, 383 (3–4), 147–155. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan, G., et al., 2019. Heterogeneous parallel computing accelerated generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method for fast hydrological model uncertainty analysis purpose. Engineering with Computers, 36, 75–96. doi:10.1007/s00366-018-0685-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoi, D.N. and Thom, V.T., 2015. Parameter uncertainty analysis for simulating streamflow in a river catchment of Vietnam. Global Ecology and Conservation, 4, 538–548. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, P., Boyle, D.P., and Bäse, F., 2005. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in Geosciences, 5, 89–97. doi:10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005
   Google Scholar
• Loucks, D.P. and Van Beek, E., 2017. Water resource systems planning and management: an introduction to methods, models, and applications. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro, A. and Ragab, R., 2010. Hydrological response of a Brazilian semi-arid catchment to different land use and climate change scenarios: a modelling study. Hydrological Processes, 24 (19), 2705–2723. doi:10.1002/hyp.7825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro, S. and Ragab, R., 2012. Impact of possible climate and land use changes in the semi-arid regions: a case study from North Eastern Brazil. Journal of Hydrology, 434–435, 55–68. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D. and Flavin, R., 1994. Sub-set of the UK 50 m by 50 m hydrological digital terrain model grids. Wallingford: NERC, Institute of Hydrology.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D., Flavin, R., and Moore, R., 1990a. A digital terrain model for hydrology. Wallingford, UK: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, CEH. Available from: https://www.ceh.ac.uk/services/integrated-hydrological-digital-terrain-model
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D., Flavin, R., and Moore, R., 1990b. A digital terrain model for hydrology. In: 4th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, 23–27 July 1990 Zürich. 250–262.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, D., et al., 2011. Final Report for LCM2007-the new UK land cover map. Countryside Survey Technical Report No 11/07. Wallingford, UK: UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology. Available from: https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/LCM2007%20Final%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
   Google Scholar
• Philip, J., 1957. The theory of infiltration: 1. The infiltration equation and its solution. Soil Science, 83 (5), 345–358. doi:10.1097/00010694-195705000-00002
   Google Scholar
• Ragab, R. and Bromley, J., 2010. IHMS—Integrated Hydrological Modelling System. Part 1. Hydrological processes and general structure. Hydrological Processes, 24 (19), 2663–2680. doi:10.1002/hyp.7681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragab, R., et al., 2010. IHMS—Integrated Hydrological Modelling System. Part 2. Application of linked unsaturated, DiCaSM and saturated zone, MODFLOW models on Kouris and Akrotiri catchments in Cyprus. Hydrological Processes, 24 (19), 2681–2692. doi:10.1002/hyp.7682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragab, R., Finch, J., and Harding, R., 1997. Estimation of groundwater recharge to chalk and sandstone aquifers using simple soil models. Journal of Hydrology, 190 (1–2), 19–41. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03067-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raupach, M., 1995. Vegetation-atmosphere interaction and surface conductance at leaf, canopy and regional scales. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 73 (3–4), 151–179. doi:10.1016/0168-1923(94)05071-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, E., et al., 2015. Climate hydrology and ecology research support system potential evapotranspiration dataset for Great Britain (1961–2015)[CHESS-PE]. Wallingford, UK: UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre (Dataset). doi:10.5285/8baf805d-39ce-4dac-b224-c926ada353b7
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., et al., 2014. Assessing the performance and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT and RBNN models for simulation of sediment yield in the Nagwa watershed, India. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59 (2), 351–364. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.872787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanguy, M., et al., 2016. Gridded estimates of daily and monthly areal rainfall for the United Kingdom (1890–2015)[CEH-GEAR]. Wallingford, UK: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre, 10. doi:10.5285/33604ea0-c238-4488-813d-0ad9ab7c51ca
   Google Scholar
• Tegegne, G., et al., 2019. Hydrological modelling uncertainty analysis for different flow quantiles: a case study in two hydro-geographically different watersheds. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64 (4), 473–489. doi:10.1080/02626667.2019.1587562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teweldebrhan, A.T., Burkhart, J.F., and Schuler, T.V., 2018. Parameter uncertainty analysis for an operational hydrological model using residual-based and limits of acceptability approaches. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22 (9), 5021–5039. doi:10.5194/hess-22-5021-2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola, F., et al., 2009. Daily streamflow prediction with uncertainty in ephemeral catchments using the GLUE methodology. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 34 (10–12), 701–706. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2009.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hoyningen-Huene, J., 1981. Die Interzeption des Niederschlags in landwirtschaftlichen Pflanzenbeständen. Arbeitsbericht Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau, DVWK.An. Hamburg und Berlin: Kommissionsvertrieb Verlag Paul Parey.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, H., et al., 2019. Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: a comparison between continuous and event-based modeling of streamflow based on the Hydrological Simulation Program–Fortran (HSPF) model. Water, 11 (1), 171. doi:10.3390/w11010171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, L. and O’Connor, K.M., 2008. An empirical method to improve the prediction limit of the GLUE methodology in rainfall-runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 349 (1–2), 115–124. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, L., et al., 2009. Indices for assessing the prediction bounds of hydrological models and application by generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation/Indices pour évaluer les bornes de prévision de modèles hydrologiques et mise en œuvre pour une estimation d’incertitude par vraisemblance généralisée. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54, 852–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, L., et al., 2018. Hydrological simulation and uncertainty analysis using the improved TOPMODEL in the arid Manas River basin, China. Scientific Reports, 8 (1), Article number: 452. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18982-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, P.-S. and Jeng, Y.-C., 1997. A study on grid based distributed rainfall runoff models. Water Resources Management, 11 (2), 83–99. doi:10.1023/A:1007908216885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar