Applying wavelet transformation and artificial neural networks to develop forecasting-based reservoir operating rule curves

References

• Ahmadi, M., Haddad, O.B., and Loáiciga, H.A., 2015. Adaptive reservoir operation rules under climatic change. Water Resources Management, 29 (4), 1247–1266. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0871-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi Najl, A., Haghighi, A., and Vali Samani, H.M., 2016. Simultaneous optimization of operating rules and rule curves for multireservoir systems using a self-adaptive simulation-GA model. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 142 (10), 04016041. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allawi, M.F., et al., 2019. Forecasting hydrological parameters for reservoir system utilizing artificial intelligent models and exploring their influence on operation performance. Knowledge-based Systems, 63 (18), 907–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amnatsan, S., Yoshikawa, S., and Kanae, S., 2018. Improved forecasting of extreme monthly reservoir inflow using an analogue-based forecasting method: a case study of the sirikit dam in Thailand. Water, 10 (11), 1614. doi:10.3390/w10111614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi, S.M., 2019. Investigating pareto front extreme policies using semi-distributed simulation model for Great Karun River Basin. Journal of Hydraulic Structures, 5 (1), 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Ashrafi, S.M., Ashrafi, S.F., and Moazami, S., 2017. Developing self-adaptive melody search algorithm for optimal operation of multi-reservoir systems. Journal of Hydraulic Structures, 3 (1), 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ashrafi, S.M. and Dariane, A.B., 2017. Coupled operating rules for optimal operation of multi-reservoir systems. Water Resources Management, 31 (14), 4505–4520. doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1762-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi, S.M. and Mahmoudi, M., 2019. Developing a semi-distributed decision support system for great Karun water resources system. Journal of Applied Research in Water and Wastewater, 6 (1), 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, N.R. and Whitlatch, E.E., Jr, 1980. Derivation of monthly reservoir release policies. Water Resources Research, 16 (6), 987–993. doi:10.1029/WR016i006p00987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolouri, Y., 2009. Effects of extracting multi-reservoir systemes operational rule curves for different reservoires in system efficiency Doctoral dissertation, M. Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resource. Soil and Water Department. Tehran University. Karaj, Iran. (In Farsi).
   Google Scholar
• Chai, T. and Draxler, R.R., 2014. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?–Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific Model Development, 7 (3), 1247–1250. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.T., et al., 2015. Heuristic methods for reservoir monthly inflow forecasting: A case study of Xinfengjiang reservoir in Pearl river, China. Water, 7 (8), 4477–4495. doi:10.3390/w7084477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiamsathit, C., Adeloye, A.J., and Bankaru-Swamy, S., 2016. Inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks for reservoir operation. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 373, 209–214. doi:10.5194/piahs-373-209-2016
   Google Scholar
• Dariane, A.B. and Momtahen, S., 2009. Optimization of multireservoir systems operation using modified direct search genetic algorithm. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 135 (3), 141–148. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:3(141)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deo, R.C., et al., 2017. Very short-term reactive forecasting of the solar ultraviolet index using an extreme learning machine integrated with the solar zenith angle. Environmental Research, 155, 141–166. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.01.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisel, L.M., 1972. Chance constrained reservoir model. Water Resources Research, 8 (2), 339–347. doi:10.1029/WR008i002p00339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eum, H.I., Arunachalam, V., and Simonovic, S.P., 2009. Integrated reservoir management system for adaptation to climate change impacts in the Upper Thames River basin. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ontario, Canada: The University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, M., et al., 2017. Identifying changing patterns of reservoir operating rules under various inflow alteration scenarios. Advances in Water Resources, 104, 23–36. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Z., et al., 2019. Operation rule derivation of hydropower reservoir by k-means clustering method and extreme learning machine based on particle swarm optimization. Journal of Hydrology, 576, 229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavahi, K., Mousavi, J., and Ponnambalam, K., 2019. Adaptive forecast-based real-time optimal reservoir operations: application to Lake Urmia. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 21 (5), 908–924. doi:10.2166/hydro.2019.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimaraes Santos, C.A. and Silva, G.B.L.D., 2014. Daily streamflow forecasting using a wavelet transform and artificial neural network hybrid models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59 (2), 312–324. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.800944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., et al., 2004. A reservoir flood forecasting and control system for China/Un système chinois de prévision et de contrôle de crue en barrage. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 49 (6). doi:10.1623/hysj.49.6.959.55728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J.H., 1973. Genetic algorithms and the optimal allocation of trials. SIAM Journal on Computing, 2 (2), 88–105. doi:10.1137/0202009
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y. and Lee, S., 2019. Comparative effectiveness of reservoir operation applying hedging rules based on available water and beginning storage to cope with droughts. Water Resource Management, 33 (5), 1897–1911. doi:10.1007/s11269-019-02220-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamruzzaman, M., Metcalfe, A.V., and Beecham, S., 2014. Wavelet-based rainfall–stream flow models for the southeast Murray darling basin. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19 (7), 1283–1293. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kistenmacher, M. and Georgakakos, A.P., 2015. Assessment of reservoir system variable forecasts. Water Resources Research, 51 (5), 3437–3458. doi:10.1002/2014WR016564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, P., Boyle, D.P., and Bäse, F., 2005. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in Geosciences, 5, 89–97. doi:10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005
   Google Scholar
• Legates, D.R. and McCabe, G.J., Jr, 1999. Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research, 35 (1), 233–241. doi:10.1029/1998WR900018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., et al., 2018. Hybrid two-stage stochastic methods using scenario-based forecasts for reservoir refill operations. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 144 (12), 04018080. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., et al., 2014. Identifying explicit formulation of operating rules for multi-reservoir systems using genetic programming. Water Resources Management, 28 (6), 1545–1565. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0563-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., et al., 2014. Parameter uncertainty analysis of reservoir operating rules based on implicit stochastic optimization. Journal of Hydrology, 514, 102–113. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., et al., 2011. Deriving optimal refill rules for multi-purpose reservoir operation. Water Resources Management, 25 (2), 431–448. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9707-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al., 2019. Deriving reservoir operation rule based on bayesian deep learning method considering multiple uncertainties. Journal of Hydrology, 579, 124207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks, D.P., 1970. Some comments on linear decision rules and chance constraints. Water Resources Research, 6 (2), 668–671. doi:10.1029/WR006i002p00668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallat, S.G., 1989. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 11 (7), 674–693. doi:10.1109/34.192463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, W.S. and Pitts, W., 1990. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 52 (1–2), 99–115. doi:10.1016/S0092-8240(05)80006-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moazami, S., et al., 2016. Hydrological assessment of daily satellite precipitation products over a basin in Iran. Journal of Hydraulic Structures, 2 (2), 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Nohara, D., et al., 2016. Real-time reservoir operation for flood management considering ensemble streamflow prediction and its uncertainty. In: Advances in hydroinformatics edited by P. Gourbesville, J. Cunge, and G. Caigneart. Singapore: Springer, 333–347.
   Google Scholar
• Pachauri, R.K., et al., 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland: Ipcc, 151.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, A., et al., 2019. The application of ensemble precipitation forecasts to reservoir operation. Water Science & Technology. Water Supply, 19 (2), 588–595. doi:10.2166/ws.2018.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phuong, T.M., Lin, Z., and Altman, R.B., 2005. Choosing SNPs using feature selection. In: 2005 IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference (CSB’05), August. Stanford, CA, USA: IEEE, 301–309.
   Google Scholar
• Polikar, R., 1999. The story of wavelets. In: Physics and modern topics in mechanical and electrical engineering. World Scientific and Engineering Society Press, 192–197.
   Google Scholar
• Rathinasamy, M., et al., 2014. Wavelet‐based multiscale performance analysis: an approach to assess and improve hydrological models. Water Resources Research, 50 (12), 9721–9737. doi:10.1002/2013WR014650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, C., Joeres, E., and Kirby, W., 1969. The linear decision rule in reservoir management and design: 1, development of the stochastic model. Water Resources Research, 5 (4), 767–777. doi:10.1029/WR005i004p00767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenberg, D., et al., 2015. Short-term reservoir optimization for flood mitigation under meteorological and hydrological forecast uncertainty. Water Resources Management, 29 (5), 1635–1651. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0899-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamseldin, A.Y., 1997. Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 199 (3–4), 272–294. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03330-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, J.S. and ReVelle, C., 1994. Water-supply operations during drought: continuous hedging rule. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 120 (5), 613–629. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:5(613)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solgi, A., Nourani, V., and Pourhaghi, A., 2014. Forecasting daily precipitation using hybrid model of wavelet-artificial neural network and comparison with adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (case study: verayneh station, Nahavand). Advances in Civil Engineering, 2014, 1–12. doi:10.1155/2014/279368
   Google Scholar
• Struzik, Z.R. and Siebes, A., 1999. The Haar Wavelet transform in the time series similarity paradigm. In: European Conference on Pricniples of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 15–18 September 1999, Czech Republic, 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S.W., Xu, W., and Voisin, N., 2020. Inferred inflow forecast horizons guiding reservoir release decisions across the United States. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 24, 1275–1291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W.C., et al., 2009. A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. Journal of Hydrology, 374 (3–4), 294–306. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2019. A Forecast-Based Operation (FBO) mode for reservoir flood control using forecast cumulative net rainfall. Water Resources Management, 33 (7), 2417–2437. doi:10.1007/s11269-019-02267-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X.L., et al., 2011. A new approach of obtaining reservoir operation rules: artificial immune recognition system. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (9), 11701–11707. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, P. and Ng, T.L., 2016. Fuzzy inference system for robust rule-based reservoir operation under nonstationary inflows. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 143 (4), 04016084. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T., et al., 2017. Developing reservoir monthly inflow forecasts using artificial intelligence and climate phenomenon information. Water Resources Research, 53 (4), 2786–2812. doi:10.1002/2017WR020482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, G.K., 1967. Finding reservoir operating rules. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 93 (6), 297–322.
   Google Scholar