New neural fuzzy-based machine learning ensemble for enhancing the prediction accuracy of flood susceptibility mapping

References

• Abedini, M., et al., 2019. A comparative study of support vector machine and logistic model tree classifiers for shallow landslide susceptibility modeling. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78 (18), 560. doi:10.1007/s12665-019-8562-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adhikari, P., et al., 2010. A digitized global flood inventory (1998–2008): compilation and preliminary results. Natural Hazards, 55 (2), 405–422. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9537-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadlou, M., et al., 2019. Flood susceptibility assessment using integration of adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) and BAT algorithms (BA). Geocarto International, 34 (11), 1252–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfieri, L., et al., 2018. Multi-model projections of river flood risk in Europe under global warming. Climate, 6 (1), 6. doi:10.3390/cli6010006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S.A., et al., 2020. GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multicriteria decision-making approach, naïve Bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: a case of Topľa basin, Slovakia. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106620. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameri, A.A., Pourghasemi, H.R., and Cerda, A., 2018. Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: a comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multicriteria decision making models. Science of the Total Environment, 613, 1385–1400. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avand, M., et al., 2020. A tree-based intelligence ensemble approach for spatial prediction of potential groundwater. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1–22. doi:10.1080/17538947.2020.1718785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azareh, A., et al., 2019. Incorporating multicriteria decision-making and fuzzy-value functions for flood susceptibility assessment. Geocarto International, 1–21. doi:10.1080/10106049.2019.1695958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Below, R. and Wallemacq, P., 2018. Natural disasters 2017. Brussels: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED).
   Google Scholar
• Bodoque, J.M., et al., 2019. Enhancing flash flood risk perception and awareness of mitigation actions through risk communication: a pre-post survey design. Journal of Hydrology, 568, 769–779. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, B.A., et al., 2013. Geological hazards: earthquakes-tsunamis-volcanoes-avalanches-landslides-floods. Springer Science & Business Media, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, G.W., 1995. HEC-RAS river analysis system. Hydraulic reference manual. Version 1.0. Davis, CA: Hydrologic Engineering Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bui, D.T., et al., 2016. Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on neural fuzzy inference model and metaheuristic optimization for flood susceptibilitgy modeling in a high-frequency tropical cyclone area using GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 317–330. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D.T., et al., 2018. Novel hybrid evolutionary algorithms for spatial prediction of floods. Scientific Reports, 8 (1), 15364. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33755-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D.T., et al., 2019a. A new intelligence approach based on GIS-based multivariate adaptive regression splines and metaheuristic optimization for predicting flash flood susceptible areas at high-frequency tropical typhoon area. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 314–326. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D.T., et al., 2019b. Flash flood susceptibility modeling using an optimized fuzzy rule based feature selection technique and tree based ensemble methods. Science of the Total Environment, 668, 1038–1054. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D.T., et al., 2020. A novel deep learning neural network approach for predicting flash flood susceptibility: a case study at a high frequency tropical storm area. Science of the Total Environment, 701, 134413. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celikyilmaz, A. and Turksen, I.B., 2009. Modeling uncertainty with fuzzy logic. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 240, 149–215.
   Google Scholar
• Chapi, K., et al., 2017. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 95, 229–245. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubin, B., et al., 2019. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 2087–2096. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsini, A., Cervi, F., and Ronchetti, F., 2009. Weight of evidence and artificial neural networks for potential groundwater spring mapping: an application to the Mt. Modino area (Northern Apennines, Italy). Geomorphology, 111 (1–2), 79–87. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, V. and Fernandes, W., 2017. Bayesian estimation of extreme flood quantiles using a rainfall-runoff model and a stochastic daily rainfall generator. Journal of Hydrology, 554, 137–154. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., 2014a. Assessing monthly average runoff depth in Sărățel river basin, Romania. Analele stiintifice ale Universitatii” Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Din Iasi-seria Geografie, 60 (1), 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Costache, R., 2014b. Estimating multiannual average runoff depth in the middle and upper sectors of Buzău River basin. Geographia Technica, 9 (2), 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Costache, R., et al., 2015. Flood vulnerability assessment in the low sector of Saratel catchment. Case study: Joseni village. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 10 (1), 161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., 2019a. Flash-flood potential index mapping using weights of evidence, decision trees models and their novel hybrid integration. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 33 (7), 1375–1402. doi:10.1007/s00477-019-01689-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., 2019b. Flash-flood potential assessment in the upper and middle sector of Prahova river catchment (Romania). A comparative approach between four hybrid models. Science of the Total Environment, 659, 1115–1134. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., 2019c. Flood susceptibility assessment by using bivariate statistics and machine learning models-A useful tool for flood risk management. Water Resources Management, 33 (9), 3239–3256. doi:10.1007/s11269-019-02301-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., et al., 2020a. Novel hybrid models between bivariate statistics, artificial neural networks and boosting algorithms for flood susceptibility assessment, Journal of Environmental Management, 265, 110485. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110485
   Google Scholar
• Costache, R., et al., 2020a. Using GIS, remote sensing, and machine learning to highlight the correlation between the land-use/land-cover changes and flash-flood potential. Remote Sensing, 12 (9), 1422. doi:10.3390/rs12091422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., et al., 2020b. Novel hybrid models between bivariate statistics, artificial neural networks and boosting algorithms for flood susceptibility assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 265, 110485. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., et al., 2020c. Flash-flood susceptibility assessment using multi-criteria decision making and machine learning supported by remote sensing and GIS techniques. Remote Sensing, 12 (1), 106. doi:10.3390/rs12010106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., et al., 2020d. Spatial predicting of flood potential areas using novel hybridizations of fuzzy decision-making, bivariate statistics, and machine learning. Journal of Hydrology, 585, 124808. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R. and Bui, D.T., 2019. Spatial prediction of flood potential using new ensembles of bivariate statistics and artificial intelligence: a case study at the Putna river catchment of Romania. Science of the Total Environment, 691, 1098–1118. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R. and Bui, D.T., 2020. Identification of areas prone to flash-flood phenomena using multiple-criteria decision-making, bivariate statistics, machine learning and their ensembles. Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136492. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., Fontanine, I., and Corodescu, E., 2014. Assessment of surface runoff depth changes in Sǎrǎţel River basin, Romania using GIS techniques. Open Geosciences, 6 (3), 363–372.
   Google Scholar
• Costache, R., Hong, H., and Pham, Q.B., 2020a. Comparative assessment of the flash-flood potential within small mountain catchments using bivariate statistics and their novel hybrid integration with machine learning models. Science of the Total Environment, 711, 134514. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., Hong, H., and Wang, Y., 2019. Identification of torrential valleys using GIS and a novel hybrid integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning and bivariate statistics. Catena, 183, 104179. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R., Ngo, P.T.T., and Tien Bui, D., 2020b. Novel ensembles of deep learning neural network and statistical learning for flash-flood susceptibility mapping. Water, 12 (6), 1549. doi:10.3390/w12061549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costache, R. and Zaharia, L., 2017. Flash-flood potential assessment and mapping by integrating the weights-of-evidence and frequency ratio statistical methods in GIS environment–case study: Bâsca Chiojdului River catchment (Romania). Journal of Earth System Science, 126 (4), 59. doi:10.1007/s12040-017-0828-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodangeh, E., et al., 2020. Integrated machine learning methods with resampling algorithms for flood susceptibility prediction. Science of the Total Environment, 705, 135983. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dottori, F., et al., 2018. Increased human and economic losses from river flooding with anthropogenic warming. Nature Climate Change, 8, 781–786. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0257-z
   Google Scholar
• Dumitriu, D., 2019. Relationships between sediment transport and various hydrological and hydraulic characteristics of flood events on Trotuș River (Romania).
   Google Scholar
• El Alfy, M., 2016. Assessing the impact of arid area urbanization on flash floods using GIS, remote sensing, and HEC-HMS rainfall–runoff modeling. Hydrology Research, 47 (6), 1142–1160. doi:10.2166/nh.2016.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkhrachy, I., 2015. Flash flood hazard mapping using satellite images and GIS tools: a case study of Najran City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18 (2), 261–278. doi:10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin, J.-P., et al., 2001. Distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data. I: description of model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 6 (2), 91–99. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:2(91)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha-Sapir, D., 2012. Disaster data: a balanced perspective. CredCrunch, 27, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Henstra, D., et al., 2019. Flood risk management and shared responsibility: exploring Canadian public attitudes and expectations. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 12 (1), e12346. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H., et al., 2018. Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution. Science of the Total Environment, 621, 1124–1141. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, F.S., et al., 2020. Flash-flood hazard assessment using ensembles and Bayesian-based machine learning models: application of the simulated annealing feature selection method. Science of the Total Environment, 711, 135161. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J.-S., 1993. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23 (3), 665–685. doi:10.1109/21.256541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak, M.S., et al., 2016. Floodplain mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcGIS: a case study of Kabul River. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 41 (4), 1375–1390. doi:10.1007/s13369-015-1915-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi, K., et al., 2018. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Science of the Total Environment, 627, 744–755. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi, K., et al., 2019. A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. Journal of Hydrology, 573, 311–323. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourgialas, N.N. and Karatzas, G.P., 2011. Flood management and a GIS modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas—a case study. Hydrological Sciences Journal–Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, 56 (2), 212–225. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.555836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucsicsa, G., et al., 2019. Future land use/cover changes in Romania: regional simulations based on CLUE-S model and CORINE land cover database. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 15 (1), 75–90. doi:10.1007/s11355-018-0362-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurnik, B., et al., 2017. Weather-and climate-related natural hazards in Europe. In: Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction in Europe. Kongens Nytorv 61050 Copenhagen K Denmark: EEA-European Environment Agency, 46–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lázaro, J.M., et al., 2016. Flood frequency analysis (FFA) in Spanish catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 538, 598–608. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., et al., 2017. Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8 (2), 1185–1203. doi:10.1080/19475705.2017.1308971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkov, I., et al., 2009. Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Science of the Total Environment, 407 (19), 5199–5205. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linzer, H.-G., et al., 1998. Kinematic evolution of the Romanian Carpathians. Tectonophysics, 297 (1–4), 133–156. doi:10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00166-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, M. and Avram, M., 2017. Analysis of the hydroclimatic risk parameters at the high level of the Tazlăul Sărat river in 2016 year. Present Environment and Sustainable Development, 11 (2), 97–108. doi:10.1515/pesd-2017-0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiti, S. and Tiwari, R., 2014. A comparative study of artificial neural networks, Bayesian neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in groundwater level prediction. Environmental Earth Sciences, 71 (7), 3147–3160. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2702-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masseroni, D., et al., 2017. A reliable rainfall–runoff model for flood forecasting: review and application to a semi-urbanized watershed at high flood risk in Italy. Hydrology Research, 48 (3), 726–740. doi:10.2166/nh.2016.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, H., Avand, M.T., and Janizadeh, S., 2019. Landslide susceptibility survey using modeling methods. In: Hamid Pourghasemi Candan Gokceoglu, eds. Spatial modeling in GIS and R for earth and environmental sciences. Elsevier, 259–275.
   Google Scholar
• Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., and Chau, K., 2018. Flood prediction using machine learning models: literature review. Water, 10 (11), 1536. doi:10.3390/w10111536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi, A., et al., 2016. Flood hazard mapping in Jamaica using principal component analysis and logistic regression. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75 (6), 465. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-5323-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo, P.-T., et al., 2018. A novel hybrid swarm optimized multilayer neural network for spatial prediction of flash floods in tropical areas using sentinel-1 SAR imagery and geospatial data. Sensors, 18 (11), 3704. doi:10.3390/s18113704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, P.T., et al., 2016. A high resolution coupled hydrologic–hydraulic model (HiResFlood-UCI) for flash flood modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 541, 401–420. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V.-N., et al., 2017. An integration of least squares support vector machines and firefly optimization algorithm for flood susceptible modeling using GIS. Presented at the International Conference on Geo-Spatial Technologies and Earth Resources, Hanoi, Vietnam: Springer, 52–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nhu, V.-H., et al., 2020. Gis-based gully erosion susceptibility mapping: a comparison of computational ensemble data mining models. Applied Sciences, 10 (6), 2039. doi:10.3390/app10062039
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H.-J. and Pradhan, B., 2011. Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Computers & Geosciences, 37 (9), 1264–1276. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelling, M., et al., 2004. Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development.. New York, NY, USA: United Nations Development Programme Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery One United Nations Plaza.
   Google Scholar
• Petrow, T. and Merz, B., 2009. Trends in flood magnitude, frequency and seasonality in Germany in the period 1951–2002. Journal of Hydrology, 371 (1–4), 129–141. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, B.T., et al., 2020. GIS based hybrid computational approaches for flash flood susceptibility assessment. Water, 12 (3), 683. doi:10.3390/w12030683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, Q.B., et al., 2019. Potential of hybrid data-intelligence algorithms for multi-station modelling of rainfall. Water Resources Management, 33 (15), 5067–5087. doi:10.1007/s11269-019-02408-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prăvălie, R. and Costache, R., 2013. The vulnerability of the territorial-administrative units to the hydrological phenomena of risk (flash-floods). Case study: the subcarpathian sector of Buzău catchment. Analele Universității Din Oradea–Seria Geografie, 23 (1), 91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Prăvălie, R. and Costache, R., 2014a. The potential of water erosion in Slănic River basin. Revista de Geomorfologie, 16, 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Prăvălie, R. and Costache, R., 2014b. The analysis of the susceptibility of the flash-floods’ genesis in the area of the hydrographical basin of Bāsca Chiojdului river/Analiza susceptibilitatii genezei viiturilor īn aria bazinului hidrografic al rāului Bāsca Chiojdului. Forum Geografic, 13 (1), 39–49. doi:10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2014.071.i
   Google Scholar
• Rahmati, O. and Pourghasemi, H.R., 2017. Identification of critical flood prone areas in data-scarce and ungauged regions: a comparison of three data mining models. Water Resources Management, 31 (5), 1473–1487. doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1589-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regmi, N.R., Giardino, J.R., and Vitek, J.D., 2010. Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology, 115 (1–2), 172–187. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority. Resource allocation. USA: RWS publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sarhadi, A., Soltani, S., and Modarres, R., 2012. Probabilistic flood inundation mapping of ungauged rivers: linking GIS techniques and frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 458, 68–86. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortliffe, E.H. and Buchanan, B.G., 1975. A model of inexact reasoning in medicine. Mathematical Biosciences, 23 (3–4), 351–379. doi:10.1016/0025-5564(75)90047-4
   Google Scholar
• Skaugen, T. and Onof, C., 2014. A rainfall‐runoff model parameterized from GIS and runoff data. Hydrological Processes, 28 (15), 4529–4542. doi:10.1002/hyp.9968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaugen, T., Peerebom, I.O., and Nilsson, A., 2015. Use of a parsimonious rainfall–run‐off model for predicting hydrological response in ungauged basins. Hydrological Processes, 29 (8), 1999–2013. doi:10.1002/hyp.10315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar, S., et al., 2020. Flood susceptibility modeling in Teesta River basin, Bangladesh using novel ensembles of bagging algorithms. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 1–24. doi:10.1007/s00477-020-01862-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanwattana, P., 2018. Systematizing community-based disaster risk management (CBDRM): case of urban flood-prone community in Thailand upstream area. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 798–812. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany, M.S., et al., 2014. Flood susceptibility mapping using integrated bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environmental Earth Sciences, 72 (10), 4001–4015. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3289-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany, M.S., et al., 2015. Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena, 125, 91–101. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany, M.S., Pradhan, B., and Jebur, M.N., 2014. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 512, 332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, J., et al., 2017. Flood inundation modelling: a review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 90, 201–216. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeh, S.V.R., et al., 2018. Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms. Science of the Total Environment, 615, 438–451. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui, D., et al., 2018. New hybrids of anfis with several optimization algorithms for flood susceptibility modeling. Water, 10 (9), 1210. doi:10.3390/w10091210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tincu, R., Lazar, G., and Lazar, I., 2018. Modified flash flood potential index in order to estimate areas with predisposition to water accumulation. Open Geosciences, 10 (1), 593–606. doi:10.1515/geo-2018-0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinke-de Kruijf, J., Kuks, S.M., and Augustijn, D.C., 2015. Governance in support of integrated flood risk management? The case of Romania. Environmental Development, 16, 104–118. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2019a. A hybrid GIS multi-criteria decision-making method for flood susceptibility mapping at Shangyou, China. Remote Sensing, 11 (1), 62. doi:10.3390/rs11010062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2019b. Flood susceptibility mapping in Dingnan County (China) using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with biogeography based optimization and imperialistic competitive algorithm. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 712–729. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wod, I., 1985. Weight of evidence: a brief survey. Bayesian Statistics, 2 (2), 249–270.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L., et al., 2013. Research on the triggering factors analysis and relevant countermeasures of FaTing mountain landslide induced by Wenchuan earthquake. In: Earthquake-Induced Landslides. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 355–365.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, L., et al., 2017. Frequency analysis of nonstationary annual maximum flood series using the time‐varying two‐component mixture distributions. Hydrological Processes, 31 (1), 69–89. doi:10.1002/hyp.10965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yariyan, P., et al., 2020a. Earthquake vulnerability mapping using different hybrid models. Symmetry, 12 (3), 405.
   Google Scholar
• Yariyan, P., et al., 2020b. Improvement of best first decision trees using bagging and dagging ensembles for flood-risk mapping. Water Resources Management, 34 (9), 3037–3053. doi:10.1007/s11269-020-02603-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaharia, L., et al., 2015. Assessment and mapping of flood potential in the Slănic catchment in Romania. Journal of Earth System Science, 124 (6), 1311–1324. doi:10.1007/s12040-015-0608-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaharia, L., et al., 2017. Mapping flood and flooding potential indices: a methodological approach to identifying areas susceptible to flood and flooding risk. Case study: the Prahova catchment (Romania). Frontiers of Earth Science, 11 (2), 229–247. doi:10.1007/s11707-017-0636-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, G., et al., 2019. Assessment of urban flood susceptibility using semi-supervised machine learning model. Science of the Total Environment, 659, 940–949. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., et al., 2012. Framework for economic pluvial flood risk assessment considering climate change effects and adaptation benefits. Journal of Hydrology, 414, 539–549. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo, R., et al., 2015. Evaluation of uncertainty in mineral prospectivity mapping due to missing evidence: a case study with skarn-type Fe deposits in Southwestern Fujian Province, China. Ore Geology Reviews, 71, 502–515. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar