4,297
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Opinion Paper

Guiding principles for hydrologists conducting interdisciplinary research and fieldwork with participants

, , , , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 214-225 | Received 31 Jan 2020, Accepted 06 Oct 2020, Published online: 10 Dec 2020

References

  • ALLEA, 2017. The European code of conduct for research integrity. Revised edition. [online]. Available from: https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf [Accessed 02 December 2020]
  • Ansell, N. and Blerk, L.V., 2005. Joining the conspiracy? Negotiating ethics and emotions in researching (around) AIDS in Southern Africa. Ethics, Place and Environment, 8, 61–82. doi:10.1080/13668790500115706
  • Baldwin, C., et al., 2012. How scientific knowledge informs community understanding of groundwater. Journal of Hydrology, 474, 74–83. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.006
  • Banks, S., et al., 2013. Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. Contemporary Social Science, 8 (3), 263–277. doi:10.1080/21582041.2013.769618
  • Barthel, R., Seidl, R., and Hernandez Montoya, A.R., 2017. Interdisciplinary collaboration between natural and social sciences – status and trends exemplified in groundwater research. PLoS ONE, 12 (1), e0170754. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170754
  • Bawayŋu, L., et al., 2018. Gapu Napurruŋ (our water) [Video file]. Available from GroundUp – Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University: http://groundup.cdu.edu.au/index.php/cross-cultural-management-of-freshwater-on-resource-constrained-islands-arc-linkage/ [Accessed 02 December 2020].
  • Beaumont, N., ed, 2020. Demystifying interdisciplinary working (in valuing nature), Valuing Nature Paper VNP25. Available from: https://valuing-nature.net/sites/default/files/documents/demystifying/VNP25-DemystifyingInterdisciplinaryWorking-A4-28pp-144dpi.pdf
  • Bergmann, M., et al., 2012. Methods for transdisciplinary research: a primer for practice. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag. ISBN 9783593396477.
  • Birt, L., et al., 2016. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26 (13), 1802–1811. doi:10.1177/1049732316654870
  • Blair, P. and Buytaert, W., 2016. Modelling socio-hydrological systems: a review of concepts, approaches and applications. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12, 8761–8851. doi:10.5194/hessd-12-8761-2015
  • Cadag, J.R.D. and Gaillard, J., 2012. Integrating knowledge and actions in disaster risk reduction: the contribution of participatory mapping. Area, 44 (1), 100–109. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01065.x
  • Cairns, M.R., Workman, C.L., and Tandon, I., 2017. Gender mainstreaming and water development projects: analyzing unexpected enviro-social impacts in Bolivia, India, and Lesotho. Gender, Place & Culture, 24 (3), 325–342. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2017.1314945
  • Christie, M., 2010. Milingimbi water: Djäka gapuw ŋamathaŋ - care properly for our water. Darwin: Uniprint.
  • Cooke, B., 2001. The social psychological limits of participation? In: B. Cooke and U. Kothari, eds. Participation: the New Tyranny? London: Zed Books, 102–121.
  • Coombes, B., Johnson, J.T., and Howitt, R., 2014. Indigenous geographies III: methodological innovation and the unsettling of participatory research. Progress in Human Geography, 38 (6), 845–854. doi:10.1177/0309132513514723
  • DeLyser, D. and Sui, D., 2014. Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm III: enduring methods, open geography, participatory research, and the fourth paradigm. Progress in Human Geography, 38 (2), 294–307. doi:10.1177/0309132513479291
  • Di Baldassarre, G., et al., 2019. Sociohydrology: scientific challenges in addressing the sustainable development goals. Water Resources Research, 55, 6327–6355. doi:10.1029/2018WR023901
  • Dowling, R., 2005. Power, subjectivity and ethics in qualitative research. In: I. Hay, ed. Qualitative research methods in human geography. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 19–29.
  • Dowling, R., 2009. Ethical issues in research. In: N. Castree, R. Kitchin, N. Thrift, M. Crang and M. Domosh, eds. International encyclopedia of human geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier BV, 595–600.
  • Durham Community Research Team, 2011. Available from: https://ahrc.ukri.org/documents/project-reports-and-reviews/connected-communities/community-based-participatory-research-ethical-challenges/ [Accessed 02 December 2020].
  • European Commission, 2013. Ethics for researchers [online]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/fp7/89888/ethics-for-researchers_en.pdf [Accessed 09 January 2020].
  • Evers, M., et al., 2017. The pluralistic water research concept: a new human-water system research approach. Water, 9, 933. doi:10.3390/w9120933
  • Fuchs, S. and Keiler, M., 2013. Space and time. Coupling dimensions in natural hazard risk management? In: D. Müller-Mahn, ed. The spatial dimension of risk. How geography shapes the emergence of riskscapes. Oxon, CA: Routledge, 189–201.
  • Ge, J., Resurreccion, B.P., and Elmhirst, E., 2011. Return migration and the reiteration of gender norms in water management politics: insights from a Chinese village. Geoforum, 42 (2), 133–142. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.12.001
  • Guillemin, M. and Gillam, L., 2004. Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (2), 261–280. doi:10.1177/1077800403262360
  • Hesse-Biber, S.N., 2007. Handbook of feminist research: theory and praxis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Höllermann, B., et al., 2020. Dynamics of human-water interactions in the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania - insights from farmers’ aspirations and (livelihood-) decisions in a highly uncertain environment. European Journal of Development Research, submitted.
  • IDEO.org, 2015. The field guide to human-centered design. 1st ed. Canada: IDEO. ISBN: 9780991406319.
  • Kothari, U., 2001. Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development. In: B. Cooke and U. Kothari, eds.. Participation: the New Tyranny? London: Zed Books, 139–152.
  • Krueger, T., et al., 2016. A transdisciplinary account of water research. WIREs Water, 3, 369–389. doi:10.1002/wat2.1132
  • Lebek, K., Twomey, M., and Krueger, T., 2020. Municipal failure, unequal access and conflicts over water – a hydro-social perspective on water insecurity of rural households in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Water Alternatives, submitted.
  • Linton, J., 2010. What is water? The history of a modern abstraction. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press. ISBN 978-0774817028.
  • Linton, J. and Budds, J., 2014. The hydrosocial cycle: defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum, 57, 170–180. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008
  • Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., and Wilkinson, K., 2013. Why social scientists should engage with natural scientists. Contemporary Social Science, 8 (3), 207–222. doi:10.1080/21582041.2013.769617
  • Martin, V.Y., 2019. Four common problems in environmental social research undertaken by natural scientists. BioScience, biz128. doi:10.1093/biosci/biz128
  • McMillan, H., et al., 2016. Panta Rhei 2013–2015: global perspectives on hydrology, society and change. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (7), 1–18. doi:10.1080/02626667.2016.1159308
  • Montanari, A., et al., 2013. “Panta Rhei—everything flows”: change in hydrology and society—the IAHS scientific decade 2013–2022. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58 (6), 1256–1275. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.809088
  • Nelson, N. and Wright, S., 1995. Power and participatory development: theory and practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
  • Norström, A.V., et al., 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
  • Palaganas, E.C., et al., 2017. Reflexivity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 22 (2), 426–438.
  • Phillipson, J., Lowe, P., and Bullock, J.M., 2009. Navigating the social sciences: interdisciplinarity and ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46 (2), 261–264. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01625.x
  • Rangecroft, S., et al., 2018. Hydrological modelling as a tool for interdisciplinary workshops on future drought. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 42 (2), 237–256. doi:10.1177/0309133318766802
  • Resurreccion, B.P., Real, M.J., and Pantana, P., 2004. Officialising strategies: participatory processes and gender in Thailand’s water resources sector. Development in Practice, 14 (4), 521–533. doi:10.1080/09614520410001686115
  • Roobavannan, M., et al., 2018. Norms and values in socio-hydrological models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22, 1337–1349. doi:10.5194/hess-22-1337-2018
  • Rose, G., 1997. Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21 (3), 305–320. doi:10.1191/030913297673302122
  • Rusca, M., 2018. Visualizing urban inequalities: the ethics of videography and documentary filmmaking in water research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 5 (4), 1292. doi:10.1002/wat2.1292
  • Rusca, M. and Di Baldassarre, G., 2019. Interdisciplinary critical geographies of water: capturing the mutual shaping of society and hydrological flows. Water, 11 (10), 1973. doi:10.3390/w11101973
  • Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H.H., and Bloschl, G., 2012. Socio-hydrology: a new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes, 26, 1270–1276. doi:10.1002/hyp.8426
  • Smith, K.E., 2006. Problematising power relations in ‘elite’ interviews. Geoforum, 37 (4), 643–653. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.11.002
  • Strang, V., 2009. Integrating the social and natural sciences in environmental research: a discussion paper. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11, 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10668-007-9095-2
  • Sultana, F., 2007. Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6 (3), 374–385.
  • Torrance, H., 2012. Triangulation, respondent validation, and democratic participation in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6 (2), 111–123. doi:10.1177/1558689812437185
  • TRUST, 2018. Global code of conduct for research in resource-poor settings [online]. Available from: www.globalcodeofconduct.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Global-Code-of-Conduct-Brochure.pdf [Accessed 09 January 2020].
  • UNDRR & CIMA, 2019a. Zambia disaster risk profile. Nairobi: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and CIMA Research Foundation.
  • UNDRR & CIMA, 2019b. United Republic of Tanzania disaster risk profile. Nairobi: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and CIMA Research Foundation.
  • UNDRR & CIMA, 2019c. Perfil De Risco De Desastres de Angola. Nairobi: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and CIMA Research Foundation.
  • Van Loon, A.F., et al., 2016. Drought in a human-modified world: reframing drought definitions, understanding, and analysis approaches. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20, 3631–3650. doi:10.5194/hess-20-3631-2016
  • Viseu, A., 2015. Integration of social science into research is crucial. Nature, 525, 291. doi:10.1038/525291a
  • Weichselgartner, J. and Kasperson, R.E., 2010. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 20 (2), 266–277. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.006
  • Wellcome Trust, 2014. Ensuring your research is ethical: a guide for extended project qualification students. EPQs ethics guide, October. Available from: https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtp057673_0.pdf [Accessed 01 July 2020].
  • Wesselink, A., Kooy, M., and Warner, J., 2017. Socio‐hydrology and hydrosocial analysis: toward dialogues across disciplines. WIREs Water, 4, e1196. doi:10.1002/wat2.1196
  • Whiteford, L.M., et al., 2016. Water, environment, and health: the political ecology of water. In: M. Singer, ed.. A companion to the anthropology of environmental health. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 217–235.
  • Wiles, R., 2012. What are qualitative research ethics? London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Williams, C.L. and Heikes, E.J., 1993. The importance of researcher’s gender in the in-depth interview: evidence from two case studies of male nurses. Gender & Society, 7 (2), 280–291. doi:10.1177/089124393007002008
  • Xu, L., et al., 2018. Reframing socio-hydrological research to include a social science perspective. Journal of Hydrology, 563, 76–83. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.061

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.