Influence of alternative representations of land use and geology on distributed hydrological modelling results: Eddleston, Scotland

References

• Ahiablame, L., et al., 2017. Streamflow response to potential land use and climate changes in the James River watershed, Upper Midwest United States. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 14, 150–166. doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Alvarenga, L.A., et al., 2016. Assessment of land cover change on the hydrology of a Brazilian headwater watershed using the Distributed Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model. CATENA, 143, 7–17. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, J., Refsgaard, J.C., and Jensen, K.H., 2001. Distributed hydrological modelling of the Senegal river basin - model construction and validation. Journal of Hydrology, 247 (3–4), 200–214. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00384-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andréassian, V., et al., 2004. Impact of spatial aggregation of inputs and parameters on the efficiency of rainfall‐runoff models: a theoretical study using chimera watersheds. Water Resources Research, 40. doi:10.1029/2003WR002854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, N.L., et al., 2013. Soil characteristics and landcover relationships on soil hydraulic conductivity at a hillslope scale: a view towards local flood management. Journal of Hydrology, 497, 208–222. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auton, C.A., 2011. Eddleston water catchment, superficial geology, 1: 25 000. Edinburgh: British Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, V.A. and Moore, R.J., 2000. The sensitivity of catchment runoff models to rainfall data at different spatial scales. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 4 (4), 653–667. doi:10.5194/hess-4-653-2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K., 1993. Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Advances in Water Resources, 16, 41–51. doi:10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K., 2006. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology, 320 (1), 18–36. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingqing, L., et al., 2015. Analyses of landuse change impacts on catchment runoff using different time indicators based on SWAT model. Ecological Indicators, 58, 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, D. and Elfert, S., 2010. Application of WaSiM-ETH model to Northern German lowland catchments: model performance in relation to catchment characteristics and sensitivity to and use change. Advances in Geosciences, 27, 1–10. doi:10.5194/adgeo-27-1-201
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, D.P., et al., 2001. Toward improved streamflow forecasts: value of semidistributed modeling. Water Resources Reseacrh, 37 (11), 2749–2759. doi:10.1029/2000WR000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camargos, C., et al., 2018. Effects of input data content on the uncertainty of simulating water resources. Water, 10 (5), 621. doi:10.3390/w10050621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlier, C., et al., 2018. Geology controls streamflow dynamics. Journal of Hydrology, 566, 756–769. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DHI, 2014. MIKE SHE user manual volume 1: user guide. Copenhagen: Mike by DHI.
   Google Scholar
• Doummar, J., Sauter, M., and Geyer, T., 2012. Simulation of flow processes in a large scale karst system with an integrated catchment model (Mike She) – identification of relevant parameters influencing spring discharge. Journal of Hydrology, 426–427, 112–123. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA, 2012. CORINE land-cover 2012 vector data, version v.18.5.1 [ dataset]. Available from: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover [ Accessed 22 Dec 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Fatichi, S., et al., 2016. An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 537, 45–60. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, S.B. and Allen, D.M., 2015. Groundwater - surface water interactions in a mountain-to-coast watershed: effects of climate change and human stressors. Advances in Meteorology, 2015. Article ID 861805. doi:10.1155/2015/861805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeze, R.A. and Harlan, R.L., 1969. Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model. Journal of Hydrology, 9, 237–258. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(69)90020-1
   Google Scholar
• Gilvear, D.J., Spray, C.J., and Casas-Mulet, R., 2013. River rehabilitation for the delivery of multiple ecosystem services at the river network scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 26, 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heistermann, M. and Kneis, D., 2011. Benchmarking quantitative precipitation estimation by conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resources Research, 47 (6), 1–23. doi:10.1029/2010WR009153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, C.E. and Thompson, J.R., 2019. Hydrological modelling of climate change impacts on river flows in Siberia’s Lena River Basin and implications for the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Hydrology Research, 50 (6), 1577–1595. doi:10.2166/nh.2019.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R.A., 1996. Geological map series, Sheet number: 24E, Sheet title: peebles, 1: 50 000. Edinburgh: Geological Survey of Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, J.A., et al., 2009. Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modelling (LUCHEM) III: scenario analysis. Advances in Water Resources, 32, 159–170. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, S., et al., 2009. Assessing the impacts of land use changes on watershed hydrology using MIKE SHE. Environmental Geology, 57, 231. doi:10.1007/s00254-008-1303-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, F.U., et al., 2019. Trade-offs between parameter constraints and model realism: a case study. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), 10729. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46963-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JHI, 2014. James Hutton Instite, Soil Map (National Soil Map), 1:250,000,vector data [ dataset].
   Google Scholar
• Kalantari, Z., et al., 2014. Quantifying the hydrological impact of simulated changes in land use on peak discharge in a small catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 466–467, 741–754. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käser, D. and Hunkeler, D., 2016. Contribution of alluvial groundwater to the outflow of mountainous catchments. Water Resources Research, 52 (2), 680–697. doi:10.1002/2014WR016730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y.K. and Wang, C.Z., 2009. Impacts of urbanization on surface runoff of the Dardenne Creek Watershed, St. Charles County, Missouri. Physical Geography, 30 (6), 556–573. doi:10.2747/0272-3646.30.6.556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobligeois, F., et al., 2014. When does higher spatial resolution rainfall information improve streamflow simulation? An evaluation using 3620 flood events. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences Discussions, 18 (2), 575–594. doi:10.5194/hess-18-575-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, A.M., et al., 2012. Relating in situ hydraulic conductivity, particle size and relative density of superficial deposits in a heterogeneous catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 434–435, 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, D.R., 2002. Arc hydro: GIS for water resources, California: ESRI, 203.
   Google Scholar
• Marhaento, H., Booij, M.J., and Hoekstra, A.Y., 2018. Hydrological response to future land-use change and climate change in a tropical catchment. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63 (9), 1368–1385. doi:10.1080/02626667.2018.1511054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masih, I., et al., 2011. Assessing the impact of areal precipitation input on streamflow simulations using the SWAT model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA), 47 (1), 179–195. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medcalf, J. and Williams, H., 2010. Scottish borders council and tweed forum consortium Tweed aerial survey phase 2: aerial photography interpretation land cover classification and habitat mapping. Final Report. Available from: www.scotborders.gov.uk [ Accessed 3 October 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Moriasi, D.N., et al., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50 (3), 885–900. doi:10.13031/2013.23153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D.A. and Johnson, A.I., 1967. Summary of hydrologic and physical properties of rock and soil materials as analyzed by the hydrologic laboratory of the U.S. geological survey, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1839-D, 42.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Dochartaigh, B.E., et al., 2012. Eddleston water floodplain project: data report. Nottingham, 95.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Dochartaigh, B.E., et al., 2019. Geological structure as a control on floodplain groundwater dynamics. Hydrogeology Journal, 27, 703–716. doi:10.1007/s10040-018-1885-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3). doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 3 10 282-290
   Google Scholar
• OS, 2017, Ordnance survey, PROFILE Contours, NTF geospatial data, Scale 1:10000, Tiles: t13ne,nt14ne,nt14se,nt15ne,nt15se,nt23nw,nt23ne,nt24sw,nt24nw,nt24ne,nt24se,nt25sw,nt25nw,nt25ne,nt25se,Updated: November 2009, Ordnance Survey (GB) [ dataset]. EDINA Digimap Ordnance Survey Service. Availble from: http://edina.ac.uk/digimap [ Accessed 17 Apr 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Paule-Mercado, M.A., et al., 2017. Influence of land development on stormwater runoff from a mixed land use and land cover catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 599–600, 2142–2155. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, D., et al., 2014. Glacial geomorphology of the Tweedsmuir Hills, Central Southern Uplands, Scotland. Journal of Maps, 10 (3), 457–465. doi:10.1080/17445647.2014.886492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peskett, L., et al., 2020. The impact of across-slope forest strips on hillslope subsurface hydrological dynamics. Journal of Hydrology, 581, 124427. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, A. and Muñoz-Carpena, R., 2013. Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. Journal of Hydrology, 480, 33–45. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J.L., Ozbek, M.M., and Pinder, G.F., 2009. Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport simulation. Water Resources Research, 45. doi:10.1029/2007WR006799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruman, S., et al., 2020. Impact of missing precipitation values on hydrological model output: a case study from the Eddleston Water catchment, Scotland. Acta Geophys, 68, 565–576. doi:10.1007/s11600-020-00409-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo, G.B., Ray, C., and De Carlo, E.H., 2006. Calibration and validation of a physically distributed hydrological model, MIKE SHE, to predict streamflow at high frequency in a flashy mountainous Hawaii stream. Journal of Hydrology, 327 (1–2), 94–109. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheliga, B., et al., 2018. Groundwater dynamics at the hillslope-riparian interface in a year with extreme rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, 564, 509–528. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, C.R., et al., 2011. Modelling water-level options for ecosystem services and assessment of climate change: Loktak Lake, northeast India. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56 (8), 1518–1542. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.631012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terink, W., et al., 2018. Spatial resolutions in areal rainfall estimation and their impact on hydrological simulations of a lowland catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 563, 319–335. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J.R., et al., 2004. Application of the coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modelling system to a lowland wet grassland in southeast England. Journal of Hydrology, 293 (1–4), 151–179. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J.R., 2012. Modelling the impacts of climate change on upland catchments in southwest Scotland using MIKE SHE and the UKCP09 probabilistic projections. Hydrology Research, 43 (4), 507. doi:10.2166/nh.2012.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J.R., et al., 2013. Assessment of uncertainty in river flow projections for the Mekong River using multiple GCMs and hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 486, 1–30. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J.R., Green, A.J., and Kingston, D.G., 2014. Potential evapotranspiration-related uncertainty in climate change impacts on river flow: an assessment for the Mekong River basin. Journal of Hydrology, 510, 259–279. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweed Forum, 2016. The Eddleston water project report (online). C.J Spray, ed. Available from: www.tweedforum.org [ Accessed 3 October 2018].
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA, 2009. Guidance on the development, evaluation, and application of environmental models. Washington, DC: Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlenbrook, S. and Sieber, A., 2005. On the value of experimental data to reduce the prediction uncertainty of a process-oriented catchment model. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20 (1), 19–32. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannier, O., Anquetin, S., and Braud, I., 2016. Investigating the role of geology in the hydrological response of Mediterranean catchments prone to flash-floods: regional modelling study and process understanding. Journal of Hydrology, 541. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaze, J., et al., 2012. Towards best practice model application. Australia: eWater Cooperative Research Centre, 46.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez, R.F. and Feyen, J., 2003. Effect of potential evapotranspiration estimates on effective parameters and performance of the MIKE SHE-code applied to a medium-size catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 270 (4), 309–327. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00308-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez, R.F. and Hampel, H., 2014. Prediction limits of a catchment hydrological model using different estimates of ET. Journal of Hydrology, 513, 216–228. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W.E., et al., 2003. Defining uncertainty a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment, 4 (1), 5–17. doi:10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L., et al., 2017. Identifying separate impacts of climate and land use/cover change on hydrological processes in upper stream of Heihe River, Northwest China. Hydrological Processes, 31, 1100–1112. doi:10.1002/hyp.11098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, H., et al., 2015. Assessment of model predictions and parameter transferability by alternative land use data on watershed modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 527, 458–470. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yira, Y., et al., 2016. Modeling land use change impacts on water resources in a tropical West African catchment (Dano, Burkina Faso). Journal of Hydrology, 537, 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, C.H. and Li, Y., 2014. Long-term hydrological impacts of land use/land cover change from 1984 to 2010 in the Little River Watershed, Tennessee. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2 (2), 11–21.10.1016/S2095-6339(15)30002-2
   Google Scholar