References
- Bradford, M.J. and Heinonen, J.S., 2008. Low flows, instream flow needs and fish ecology in small streams. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 33 (2), 165–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj3302165
- Gao, B., et al., 2012. Changes in the eco-flow metrics of the Upper Yangtze River from 1961 to 2008. Journal of Hydrology, 448–449 (none). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.045
- Grill, G., et al., 2019. Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature, 569 (5), 215–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9
- Hua, Y. and Cui, B., 2018. Environmental flows and its satisfaction degree forecasting in the Yellow River. Ecological Indicators, 92, 207–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.017
- Huang, W., et al., 2018a. Periphyton and ecosystem metabolism as indicators of river ecosystem response to environmental flow restoration in a flow-reduced river. Ecological Indicators, 92, 394–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.025
- Huang, X.R., et al., 2018b. Cumulative impact of dam constructions on streamflow and sediment regime in lower reaches of the Jinsha River, China. Journal of Mountain Science, 15 (12), 2752–2765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-4924-3
- Huh, S.H., et al., 2005. Temporal analysis of the frequency and duration of low and high streamflow: years of record needed to characterize streamflow variability. Journal of Hydrology, 310 (1–4), 78–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.008
- Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data. 1982. Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency, Bulletin 17-B of the hydrology subcommittee. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey, 183.
- Kumar, A.U. and Jayakumar, K.V., 2020. Hydrological alterations due to anthropogenic activities in Krishna River Basin, India. Ecological Indicators, 108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105663
- Olden, J.D. and Poff, N.L., 2003. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Research and Application, 19 (2), 101–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.700
- Poff, L.R., et al., 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience, 47 (11), 769–784. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1313099
- Poff, L.R. and Matthews, J.H., 2013. Environmental flows in the Anthropocence: past progress and future prospects. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5 (6), 667–675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.006
- Poff, N.L. and Zimmerman, J.K.H., 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology, 55 (1), 194–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x
- Richter, B.D., et al., 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology, 10 (4), 1163–1174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041163.x
- Richter, B.D., et al., 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology, 37 (1), 231–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00153.x
- Riggs, H.C., 1972. Low-flow investigations, Techniques of water resource investigation of the US geological survey. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. (Book 4, Chapter B1).
- Shiau, J.T. and Wu, F.C., 2010. Assessment of hydrologic alterations caused by chi-chi diversion weir in chou-shui creek, Taiwan: opportunities for restoring natural flow conditions. River Research and Applications, 20 (4), 401–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.762
- Shrestha, R.R., Peters, D.L., and Schnorbus, M.A., 2014. Evaluating the ability of a hydrologic model to replicate hydro-ecologically relevant indicators. Hydrological Processes, 28 (14), 4294–4310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9997
- The Nature Conservancy, 2009. Indicators of hydrologic alteration, Version 7.1 User’s Manual, 8–9.
- Timpe, K. and Kaplan, D., 2017. The changing hydrology of a dammed Amazon. Science Advances, 3 (11), 13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700611
- Wang, H.X. and Yin, Z., 2019. Effects of hydrological regime variation in the upper Yangtze River on spawning of Coreius heterodon in the National Reserve. Yangtze River, 50 (12), 46–50+79. doi:https://doi.org/10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.12.009 (In Chinese)
- Wang, Y., et al., 2017. A framework to assess the cumulative impacts of dams on hydrological regime: a case study of the Yangtze river. Hydrological Processes, 31 (17), 3045–3055. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11239
- Yang, T., et al., 2008. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration caused by dam construction in the middle and lower yellow river, China. Hydrological Processes, 22 (18), 3829–3843. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6993
- Zhang, H., et al., 2020. Extinction of one of the world’s largest freshwater fishes: lessons for conserving the endangered Yangtze fauna. Science of the Total Environment, 710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136242.
- Zhang, W.H., et al., 2019. Multi-index data dimension reduction approach and its applicability in the calculation of indicators of hydrological alteration. Hydrology Research, 50 (1), 231–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2018.068
- Zhou, X.Y., et al., 2020. Development of a revised method for indicators of hydrologic alteration for analyzing the cumulative impacts of cascading reservoirs on flow regime. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24 (8), 4091–4107. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4091-2020