References
- Abily, M., et al., 2016. Spatial Global Sensitivity Analysis of High Resolution classified topographic data use in 2D urban flood modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 77, 183–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.002.
- Adams, D.K. and Comrie, A.C., 1997. The North American Monsoon. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78 (10), 18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<2197:TNAM>2.0.CO;2.
- Akaike, H., 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19 (6), 716–723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.
- Assumpção, T.H., et al., 2018. Citizen observations contributing to flood modelling: opportunities and challenges. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22 (2), 1473–1489. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1473-2018.
- ASU, 2018. Metro Phoenix USGS LiDAR data. Available from: https://asu.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=0372792855514dd3bf9654c20bbe10e6.
- Balling, R. and Brazel, S., 1987. Diurnal variations in Arizona monsoon precipitation frequencies. Monthly Weather Review, 115, 342–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<0342:DVIAMP>2.0.CO;2.
- Bermúdez, M., et al., 2018. Development and comparison of two fast surrogate models for urban pluvial flood simulations. Water Resources Management, 32 (8), 2801–2815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1959-8.
- Blanc, J., et al., 2012. Enhanced efficiency of pluvial flood risk estimation in urban areas using spatial–temporal rainfall simulations. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 5 (2), 143–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01135.x.
- Chen, J., Hill, A.A., and Urbano, L.D., 2009. A GIS-based model for urban flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology, 373 (1–2), 184–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.021.
- Ciach, G.J. and Gebremichael, M., 2020. Empirical distribution of conditional errors in radar rainfall products. Geophysical Research Letters, 47 (22), e2020GL090237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090237.
- Ciach, G.J. and Krajewski, W.F., 2006. Analysis and modeling of spatial correlation structure in small-scale rainfall in Central Oklahoma. Advances in Water Resources, 29 (10), 1450–1463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.003.
- Ciach, G.J., Krajewski, W.F., and Villarini, G., 2007. Product-error-driven uncertainty model for probabilistic quantitative precipitation estimation with NEXRAD data. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8 (6), 1325–1347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM814.1.
- Cohen, B., 2006. Urbanization in developing countries: current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technology in Society, 28 (1–2), 63–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005.
- Cristiano, E., ten Veldhuis, M.-C., and van de Giesen, N., 2017. Spatial and temporal variability of rainfall and their effects on hydrological response in urban areas – a review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21 (7), 3859–3878. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3859-2017.
- Dai, Q., et al., 2018. Impact of gauge representative error on a radar rainfall uncertainty model. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 57 (12), 2769–2787. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0272.1.
- Deletic, A., et al., 2012. Assessing uncertainties in urban drainage models. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 42–44, 3–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.04.007.
- Doocy, S., et al., 2013. The human impact of floods: a historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Currents. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.f4deb457904936b07c09daa98ee8171a.
- Emanuel, K., 2005. Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature, 436 (7051), 686–688. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03906.
- Fang, H.-B., Fang, K.-T., and Kotz, S., 2002. The meta-elliptical distributions with given marginals. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 82 (1), 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmva.2001.2017.
- Fava, M.C., et al., 2019. Flood modelling using synthesised citizen science urban streamflow observations. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 12 (S2), e12498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12498.
- Finney, K., James, R., and Perera, N., 2012. Benchmarking SWMM5/PCSWMM 2D model performance. In: International Conference on Water Management Modeling. Kuah, Malaysia.
- Gao, S., et al., 2021. Evaluation of multiradar multisensor and stage IV quantitative precipitation estimates during Hurricane Harvey. Natural Hazards Review, 22 (1), 04020057. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000435.
- Germann, U., et al., 2009. REAL-Ensemble radar precipitation estimation for hydrology in a mountainous region. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 135 (639), 445–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.375.
- Grimley, L.E., Quintero, F., and Krajewski, W.F., 2020. Streamflow predictions in a small urban–rural watershed: the effects of radar rainfall resolution and urban rainfall–runoff dynamics. Atmosphere, 11 (8), 774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002<0621:EORIC>2.0.CO;2.
- Guan, X., et al., 2020. A metropolitan scale water management analysis of the food-energy-water nexus. Science of the Total Environment, 701, 134478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134478.
- Habib, E., Aduvala, A.V., and Meselhe, E.A., 2008. Analysis of radar-rainfall error characteristics and implications for streamflow simulation uncertainty. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (3), 568–587. doi:https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.3.568.
- Hossain, F., et al., 2015. Local-to-regional landscape drivers of extreme weather and climate: implications for water infrastructure resilience. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20 (7), 02515002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001210.
- Hostache, R., et al., 2018. Near-real-time assimilation of SAR-derived flood maps for improving flood forecasts. Water Resources Research, 54 (8), 5516–5535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022205.
- James, R., et al., 2013. SWMM5/PCSWMM integrated 1D-2D modeling. In: U. E. (retired); M. B. Jr. A.S. Donigian, AQUA TERRA Consultants; Richard Field, ed. Fifty years of watershed modeling—past, present and future. ECI Symposium Series. Available from: http://dc.engconfintl.org/watershed/12.
- James, W., Rossman, L.E., and James, W.R.C., 2010. User’s guide to SWMM5. 13th ed. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: CHI.
- Kirstetter, P.-E., et al., 2010. Toward an error model for radar quantitative precipitation estimation in the Cévennes–Vivarais region, France. Journal of Hydrology, 394 (1–2), 28–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.009.
- Koustas, R., 2000. Update on EPA’S urban watershed management branch modeling activities. Journal of Water Management Modeling. doi:https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R206-21.
- Leandro, J., Schumann, A., and Pfister, A., 2016. A step towards considering the spatial heterogeneity of urban key features in urban hydrology flood modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 535, 356–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.060.
- Li, J., et al., 2003. Summer weather simulation for the semiarid lower colorado river basin: case tests. Monthly Weather Review, 131, 21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0521:SWSFTS>2.0.CO;2.
- Lin, P., et al., 2018. Insights into hydrometeorological factors constraining flood prediction skill during the May and October 2015 Texas Hill Country flood events. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 19 (8), 1339–1361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0038.1.
- Lin, Y., 2020. GCIP/EOP surface: precipitation NCEP/EMC 4KM Gridded Data (GRIB) Stage IV Data. Version 1.0 (1.0, p. 229482 data files, 2 ancillary/documentation files, 11 GiB) [GNU Zip Compressed (.gz) Gridded Binary (GRIB) Format (application/x-gzip),GNU Zip (.gz) Format (application/x-gzip)]. UCAR/NCAR - Earth Observing Laboratory. doi:https://doi.org/10.5065/D6PG1QDD.
- Mascaro, G., 2017. Multiscale spatial and temporal statistical properties of rainfall in Central Arizona. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 18 (1), 227–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0167.1.
- Mascaro, G., 2018. On the distributions of annual and seasonal daily rainfall extremes in central Arizona and their spatial variability. Journal of Hydrology, 559, 266–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.011.
- Mascaro, G., 2020. Comparison of local, regional, and scaling models for rainfall intensity-duration-frequency analysis. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 59, 1519–1536. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0094.1.
- Mascaro, G., Deidda, R., and Hellies, M., 2013. On the nature of rainfall intermittency as revealed by different metrics and sampling approaches. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17 (1), 355–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-355-2013.
- MRLC, 2016. Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium | Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium. Available from: https://www.mrlc.gov/.
- Nelson, B.R., et al., 2016. Assessment and implications of NCEP stage IV quantitative precipitation estimates for product intercomparisons. Weather and Forecasting, 31 (2), 371–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00112.1.
- NOAA, 2016. National Water Model: improving NOAA’s water prediction services [ Water.noaa.gov]. Office of Water Prediction. Available from: https://water.noaa.gov/documents/wrn-national-water-model.pdf.
- NOAA, 2020. Flood related products. NOAA’s National Weather Service. Available from: https://www.weather.gov/safety/flood-products.
- NOAA, 2021. Storm data publication: IPS: National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). National Centers for Environmental Information. Available from: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/IPS/sd/sd.html.
- NRCS, 2019. Web soil survey—home. Available from: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm.
- NWS, 2021. Flood safety rules. NOAA’s National Weather Service. Available from: https://www.weather.gov/mlb/flashflood_rules.
- Prein, A.F., et al., 2017. Increased rainfall volume from future convective storms in the US. Nature Climate Change, 7 (12), 880–884. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0007-7.
- Rogers, J.W., Cohen, A.E., and Carlaw, L.B., 2017. Convection during the North American Monsoon across Central and Southern Arizona: applications to operational meteorology. Weather and Forecasting, 32 (2), 377–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0097.1.
- Rosenzweig, B.R., et al., 2018. Pluvial flood risk and opportunities for resilience. WIREs Water, 5 (6). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1302.
- Rossman, L.A., 2010. Stormwater management model user’s manual, version 5.0. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency. Available from: https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NRMRL&dirEntryId=114231.
- Saber, M., et al., 2020. Impacts of triple factors on flash flood vulnerability in Egypt: urban growth, extreme climate, and mismanagement. Geosciences, 10 (1), 24. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10010024.
- Salas, F.R., et al., 2018. Towards real-time continental scale streamflow simulation in continuous and discrete space. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 54 (1), 7–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12586.
- Seo, B.-C., et al., 2018. Comprehensive evaluation of the IFloodS radar rainfall products for hydrologic applications. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 19 (11), 1793–1813. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0080.1.
- Seo, D., et al., 2013. Evaluation of Operational National Weather Service Gridded Flash Flood Guidance over the Arkansas Red River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 49 (6), 1296–1307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12087.
- Serinaldi, F., 2008. Analysis of inter-gauge dependence by Kendall’s τK, upper tail dependence coefficient, and 2-copulas with application to rainfall fields. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 22 (6), 671–688. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0176-4.
- Sharif, R.B., Habib, E.H., and ElSaadani, M., 2020. Evaluation of Radar-Rainfall Products over Coastal Louisiana. Remote Sensing, 12 (9), 1477. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091477.
- Sheppard, P., et al., 2002. The climate of the US Southwest. Climate Research, 21, 219–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.3354/cr021219.
- Tang, L., et al., 2015. An improved procedure for the validation of satellite-based precipitation estimates. Atmospheric Research, 163, 61–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.12.016.
- Tauro, F., Piscopia, R., and Grimaldi, S., 2017. Streamflow observations from cameras: large-scale particle image velocimetry or particle tracking velocimetry? Water Resources Research, 53 (12), 10374–10394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020848.
- ten Veldhuis, J.A.E., 2011. How the choice of flood damage metrics influences urban flood risk assessment: urban flood risk assessment. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 4 (4), 281–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01112.x.
- Thakali, R., Kalra, A., and Ahmad, S., 2016. Understanding the effects of climate change on urban stormwater infrastructures in the Las Vegas Valley. Hydrology, 3 (4), 34. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3040034.
- The National Academies Press, 2019. Framing the challenge of urban flooding in the United States. The National Academies Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.17226/25381.
- Tian, Y., et al., 2013. Modeling errors in daily precipitation measurements: additive or multiplicative?: MODELING ERRORS IN PRECIPITATION DATA. Geophysical Research Letters, 40 (10), 2060–2065. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50320.
- Trenberth, K.E., et al., 2003. The changing character of precipitation. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 84 (9), 1205–1218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-9-1205.
- van Dijk, E., et al., 2014. Comparing modelling techniques for analysing urban pluvial flooding. Water Science and Technology, 69 (2), 305–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.699.
- Villarini, G., et al., 2014. Spatial and temporal modeling of radar rainfall uncertainties. Atmospheric Research, 135–136, 91–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.09.007.
- Villarini, G. and Krajewski, W.F., 2009. Empirically based modelling of radar-rainfall uncertainties for a C-band radar at different time-scales: RADAR-RAINFALL UNCERTAINTIES FOR A C-BAND RADAR. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 135 (643), 1424–1438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.454.
- Villarini, G. and Krajewski, W.F., 2010a. Review of the different sources of uncertainty in single polarization radar-based estimates of rainfall. Surveys in Geophysics, 31 (1), 107–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-009-9079-x.
- Villarini, G. and Krajewski, W.F., 2010b. Sensitivity studies of the models of radar-rainfall uncertainties. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 49 (2), 288–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2188.1.
- Yang, L., et al., 2017. Flash flooding in Arid/Semiarid Regions: dissecting the hydrometeorology and hydrology of the 19 August 2014 storm and flood hydroclimatology in Arizona. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 18 (12), 3103–3123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0089.1.
- Yang, L., et al., 2019. Flash flooding in arid/semiarid regions: climatological analyses of flood-producing storms in central Arizona during the North American monsoon. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 20 (7), 1449–1471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0016.1.
- Zhang, J., et al., 2011. National Mosaic and Multi-Sensor QPE (NMQ) system: Description, results, and future plans. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 92.10(2011), 1321–1338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS-D-11-00047.1.
- Zhang, J., et al., 2016. Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) quantitative precipitation estimation: initial operating capabilities. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97 (4), 621–638. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00174.1.
- Zhang, S. and Pan, B., 2014. An urban storm-inundation simulation method based on GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 517, 260–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.044.
- Zhang, W. et al., 2018. Urbanization exacerbated the rainfall and flooding caused by hurricane Harvey in Houston. Nature, 563(7731), 384–388.
- Zhang, Z., et al., 2012. SAC-SMA a priori parameter differences and their impact on distributed hydrologic model simulations. Journal of Hydrology, 420–421, 216–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.004.