References
- Afan, H.A., et al., 2020. Input attributes optimization using the feasibility of genetic nature inspired algorithm: application of river flow forecasting. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 1–15. Nature Publishing Group. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61355-x
- Al-Sudani, Z.A., Salih, S.Q., and Yaseen, Z.M., 2019. Development of multivariate adaptive regression spline integrated with differential evolution model for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 573, 1–12. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.004
- Aljarah, I., Faris, H., and Mirjalili, S., 2018. Optimizing connection weights in neural networks using the whale optimization algorithm. Soft Computing, 22 (1), 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2442-1
- Anctil, F., et al., 2004. A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for stream flow forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 286(1–4), 155–167. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.006
- Arnold, J.G., et al., 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(1), 73–89. Wiley. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
- Assareh, E., et al., 2010. Application of PSO (particle swarm optimization) and GA (genetic algorithm) techniques on demand estimation of oil in Iran. Energy, 35(12), 5223–5229. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.043
- Ayele, G., et al., 2017. Streamflow and sediment yield prediction for watershed prioritization in the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia. Water, 9 (10), 782. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100782
- Bhagat, S.K., Tung, T.M., and Yaseen, Z.M., 2020. Development of artificial intelligence for modeling wastewater heavy metal removal: state of the art, application assessment and possible future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119473.
- Bicknell, B.R., et al., 1997. Hydrological simulation program–Fortran, user’s manual for version 11: U.S. environmental protection agency. Athens, GA: National Exposure Research Laboratory, 755. EPA/600/R-97/080.
- Buragohain, M. and Mahanta, C., 2008. A novel approach for ANFIS modelling based on full factorial design. Applied Soft Computing, 8 (1), 609–625. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2007.03.010.
- Chen, W., Panahi, M., and Pourghasemi, H.R., 2017. Performance evaluation of GIS-based new ensemble data mining techniques of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution (DE), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) for landslide spatial modelling. Catena, 157, 310–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.034
- Chen, X.Y., Chau, K.W., and Busari, A.O., 2015b. A comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for downstream river flow forecasting by a hybrid neural network model. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 46, 258–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.09.010
- Chen, X.Y., Chau, K.W., and Wang, W.C., 2015a. A novel hybrid neural network based on continuity equation and fuzzy pattern-recognition for downstream daily river discharge forecasting. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 17 (5), 733–744. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2015.095
- Choubin, B. and Malekian, A., 2017. Combined gamma and M-test-based ANN and ARIMA models for groundwater fluctuation forecasting in semiarid regions. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76 (15). Springer Nature. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6870-8
- Croke, B.F.W., et al., 2006. IHACRES Classic Plus: a redesign of the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(3), 426–427. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.003
- Dehghani, M., Seifi, A., and Riahi-Madvar, H., 2019. Novel forecasting models for immediate-short-term to long-term influent flow prediction by combining ANFIS and grey wolf optimization. Journal of Hydrology, 576, 698–725. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.065
- Devia, G.K., Ganasri, B.P., and Dwarakish, G.S., 2015. A review on hydrological models. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 1001–1007. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.126
- Dodangeh, E., et al., 2017. Usability of the BLRP model for hydrological applications in arid and semi-arid regions with limited precipitation data. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 3(2), 539–555. Springer Nature. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0312-1
- Dodangeh, E., et al., 2019. Data-based bivariate uncertainty assessment of extreme rainfall-runoff using copulas: comparison between annual maximum series (AMS) and peaks over threshold (POT). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191 (2). Springer Nature. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7202-0
- Elsafi, S.H., 2014. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) for flood forecasting at Dongola Station in the River Nile, Sudan. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 53(3), 655–662. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2014.06.010
- Evans, D. and Jones, A.J., 2002. A proof of the gamma test. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 458(2027), 2759–2799. The Royal Society. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2002.1010
- Ewees, A.A. and Elaziz, M.A., 2018. Improved adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system using gray wolf optimization: a case study in predicting biochar yield. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29(1), 924–940. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2017-0641
- Fakiola, M., et al., 2010. Classification and regression tree and spatial analyses reveal geographic heterogeneity in genome wide linkage study of Indian visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS ONE, 5 (12), e15807. Public Library of Science (PLoS). doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015807.
- Farfán, J.F., et al., 2020. A hybrid neural network-based technique to improve the flow forecasting of physical and data-driven models: methodology and case studies in Andean watersheds. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 27, 100652. Elsevier.
- Faris, H., et al., 2017. Grey wolf optimizer: a review of recent variants and applications. Neural Computing and Applications, 30(2), 413–435. Springer Nature. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3272-5
- Firat, M. and Güngör, M., 2007. River flow estimation using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 75 (3–4), 87–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2006.09.003
- Ghose, D.K., Panda, S.S., and Swain, P.C., 2013. Prediction and optimization of runoff via ANFIS and GA. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 52(2), 209–220. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2013.01.001
- Gupta, H.V., et al., 2009. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 377 (1–2), 80–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003
- Jaafari, A., et al., 2019. Meta optimization of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer and biogeography-based optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. CATENA, 175, 430–445. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.033
- Jacquin, A.P. and Shamseldin, A.Y., 2009. Review of the application of fuzzy inference systems in river flow forecasting. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 11 (3–4), 202–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2009.038
- Jang, J.S.R., 1993. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 23 (3), 665–685. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541
- Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R., 1995. Particle swarm optimization. Neural Networks, 1995. Proceedings., IEEE International Conference On, 4, 1942–1948. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
- Khosravi, K., et al. June 2018. Quantifying hourly suspended sediment load using data mining models: case study of a glacierized Andean catchment in Chile. Journal of Hydrology, 567, 165–179. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.015
- Končar, N., 1997. Optimisation methodologies for direct inverse neurocontrol. Doctoral dissertation, University of London.
- Kostić, S., et al., 2016. Modeling of river flow rate as a function of rainfall and temperature using response surface methodology based on historical time series. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 18 (4), 651–665. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2016.153
- Leuenberger, M., et al., 2018. Wildfire susceptibility mapping: deterministic vs. stochastic approaches. Environmental Modelling & Software, 101, 194–203. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.019
- Li, X., et al., 2018. Comparison of hybrid models for daily streamflow prediction in a forested basin. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 20 (1), 191–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2017.189
- Li, Z., et al., 2016. Impacts of future climate change on river discharge based on hydrological inference: a case study of the Grand River Watershed in Ontario, Canada. Science of the Total Environment, 548–549, 198–210. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.002
- Maroufpoor, S., et al. February 2019. Soil moisture simulation using hybrid artificial intelligent model: hybridization of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 544–556. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.045
- Memarzadeh, R., et al., 2020. A novel equation for longitudinal dispersion coefficient prediction based on the hybrid of SSMD and whale optimization algorithm. Science of the Total Environment, 716, 137007. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137007
- Meshram, S.G., et al., 2019. River flow prediction using hybrid PSOGSA algorithm based on feed-forward neural network. Soft Computing, 23 (20), 10429–10438. Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3598-7.
- Mirjalili, S. and Lewis, A., 2016. The whale optimization algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software, 95, 51–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008
- Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S.M., and Lewis, A., 2014. Grey Wolf Optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007
- Moghaddamnia, A., et al., 2009. Evaporation estimation using artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system techniques. Advances in Water Resources, 32 (1), 88–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.10.005
- Moriasi, D.N., et al., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50 (3), 885–900. doi:https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153
- Muro, C., et al., 2011. Wolf-pack (Canis lupus) hunting strategies emerge from simple rules in computational simulations. Behavioural Processes, 88(3), 192–197. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.09.006
- Napolitano, G., Serinaldi, F., and See, L., 2011. Impact of EMD decomposition and random initialisation of weights in ANN hindcasting of daily stream flow series: an empirical examination. Journal of Hydrology, 406(3–4), 199–214. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.015
- Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
- Pechlivanidis, I.G., et al., 2014. Use of an entropy-based metric in multiobjective calibration to improve model performance. Water Resources Research, 50 (10), 8066–8083. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014537
- Qi, C., et al., 2020. Particulate matter concentration from open-cut coal mines: a hybrid machine learning estimation. Environmental Pollution, 263, 114517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114517
- Rajaee, T., Ebrahimi, H., and Nourani, V., 2019. A review of the artificial intelligence methods in groundwater level modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 572, 336–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.037
- Rajurkar, M.P., Kothyari, U.C., and Chaube, U.C., 2004. Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 285 (1–4), 96–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.08.011
- Razavi Termeh, S.V., et al., 2018. Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms. Science of the Total Environment, 615, 438–451. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.262
- Rezaie-Balf, M., et al., 2019. Daily river flow forecasting using ensemble empirical mode decomposition based heuristic regression models: application on the perennial rivers in Iran and South Korea. Journal of Hydrology, 572, 470–485. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.046
- Rezaie-Balf, M., Zahmatkesh, Z., and Kim, S., 2017. Soft computing techniques for rainfall-runoff simulation: local non–parametric paradigm vs. model classification methods. Water Resources Management, 31(12), 3843–3865. Springer Nature. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1711-9
- Ritter, A. and Muñoz-Carpena, R., 2013. Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. Journal of Hydrology, 480, 33–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004
- Roushangar, K., Mehrabani, F.V., and Shiri, J., 2014. Modeling river total bed material load discharge using artificial intelligence approaches (based on conceptual inputs). Journal of Hydrology, 514, 114–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.065
- Samadianfard, S., et al., 2019. Support vector regression integrated with fruit fly optimization algorithm for river flow forecasting in lake urmia basin. Water (Switzerland), 11 (9). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091934
- Seifi, A. and Riahi, H., 2020. Estimating daily reference evapotranspiration using hybrid gamma test-least square support vector machine, gamma test-ann, and gamma test-anfis models in an arid area of Iran. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 11 (1), 217–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2018.003
- Solomatine, D.P. and Dulal, K.N., 2003. Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48(3), 399–412. Informa UK Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.3.399.45291
- Solomatine, D.P. and Xue, Y., 2004. M5 model trees and neural networks: application to flood forecasting in the upper reach of the Huai River in China. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 9 (6), 491–501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:6(491)
- Stefánsson, A., Končar, N., and Jones, A.J., 1997. A note on the gamma test. Neural Computing & Applications, 5 (3), 131–133. Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01413858.
- Tiwari, M.K., et al., 2013. Improving reliability of river flow forecasting using neural networks, wavelets and self-organising maps. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 15 (2), 486–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2012.130
- Tiyasha, Tung, T.M., and Yaseen, Z.M., 2020. A survey on river water quality modelling using artificial intelligence models: 2000–2020. Journal of Hydrology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124670
- Torabi, S.A., Mastouri, R., and Najarchi, M., 2020. Daily flow forecasting of perennial rivers in an arid watershed: a hybrid ensemble decomposition approach integrated with computational intelligence techniques. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua, 69 (6), 555–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2020.138
- Turan, M.E. and Yurdusev, M.A., 2009. River flow estimation from upstream flow records by artificial intelligence methods. Journal of Hydrology, 369(1–2), 71–77. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.004
- Watkins, W.A. and Schevill, W.E., 1979. Aerial observation of feeding behavior in four baleen whales: Eubalaena glacialis, Balaenoptera Borealis, Megaptera novaeangliae, and Balaenoptera physalus. Journal of Mammalogy, 60(1), 155–163. Oxford University Press (OUP). doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1379766
- Yang, Q., et al., 2019. Dynamic runoff simulation in a changing environment: a data stream approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 112, 157–165. Elsevier BV. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.007
- Yaseen, Z., et al., 2019. Implementation of univariate paradigm for streamflow simulation using hybrid data-driven model: case study in tropical region: implementation of univariate paradigm for streamflow simulation using hybrid data-driven model: case study in tropical region. IEEE Access, 7, 74471–74481.
- Yaseen, Z.M., et al., 2020. Hourly river flow forecasting: application of emotional neural network versus multiple machine learning paradigms. Water Resources Management, 34 (3), 1075–1091. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02484-w
- Zhang, D., et al., 2018. Modeling and simulating of reservoir operation using the artificial neural network, support vector regression, deep learning algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 565, 720–736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.050