Electoral gifting and personal politics in Mongolia’s parliamentary election season

References

• Ansell, A. 2015. “Democracy as the Negation of Discourse: Liberalism, Clientelism, and Agency in Brazil.” American Ethnologist 42 (4): 688–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12164. doi: 10.1111/amet.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asia Foundation. 2009. Mongolia Voter Education Survey: A Research Report. Ulaanbaatar: The Asia Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2016. “The Slow and Deadly Dzud in Mongolia.” BBC Asia News. May 14, 2016. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35983912.
   Google Scholar
• Björkman, L. 2014. “‘You Can’t Buy a Vote’: Meanings of Money in a Mumbai Election.” American Ethnologist 41 (4): 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12101. doi: 10.1111/amet.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla, L. 2016a. “Internalizing External Debt.” Emerging Subjects Blog (blog). February 24, 2016. http://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/mongolian-economy/2016/02/24/internalizing-external-debt/.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla, L. 2016b. “Recap of ‘Mongolian-Made’ Capitalism Workshop.” Emerging Subjects Blog (blog). December 9, 2016. http://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/mongolian-economy/2016/12/09/recap-of-mongolian-made-capitalism-workshop/.
   Google Scholar
• Brun, D. A., and L. Diamond, eds. 2014. Clientelism, Social Policy, and the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M., and K. Verdery, eds. 2000. Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Buyandelger, M. 2016. “Electionization and Postsocialist Subjectivity: Women Running for Parliamentary Elections in Mongolia.” Presented at the Institute of East Asian Studies and the Berkeley Mongolia Initiative, University of California, Berkeley, September 27. http://events.berkeley.edu/index.php/calendar/sn/ieas.html?event_ID=100255&date=2016-09-27.
   Google Scholar
• Buyandelgeriyn, M. 2008. “Post-Post-Transition Theories: Walking on Multiple Paths.” Annual Review of Anthropology 37 (1): 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085214. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalaibuyan, B. 2015. “Doing Business in the New Economy: Stories of ‘Wealth Creators’ in Dalanzadgad.” Emerging Subjects Blog (blog). April 8, 2015. http://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/mongolian-economy/2015/04/08/doing-business-in-the-new-economy-stories-of-wealth-creators-in-dalanzadgad-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Dierkes, J. 2018. “Where Did the Conspiracy Conspiracy Come From?” Mongolia Focus (blog). January 21, 2018. http://blogs.ubc.ca/mongolia/2018/plethora-of-conspiracies/.
   Google Scholar
• Doojav, G., and A.-E. Bayarjargal. 2017. “Implications of Economic Growth, Poverty and Inequality in Mongolia Over the Period of 2008–2012.” The Northeast Asian Economic Review 5 (2): 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. [1990] 2002. “Foreword: No Free Gifts.” In M. Mauss (Ed.), The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, ix–xxiii. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. N., and L. Roniger. 1984. Patrons, Clients and Friends: Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Empson, R. 2011. Harnessing Fortune: Personhood, Memory and Place in Mongolia. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press/British Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Empson, R. 2016. “Political Atmospheres in the Lead-up to the Parliamentary Elections, 2016.” Emerging Subjects Blog (blog). August 17, 2016. https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/mongolian-economy/2016/08/17/political-atmospheres-in-the-lead-up-to-the-parliamentary-elections-2016/.
   Google Scholar
• Empson, R., and U. Ujeed. 2015. “Tsagaan Sar Gift Index – 2015.” Emerging Subjects Blog (blog). March 11, 2015. https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/mongolian-economy/2015/03/11/the-tsagaan-sar-gift-index-2015/.
   Google Scholar
• Godelier, M., and M. Strathern, eds. 1991. Big Men and Great Men: Personifications of Power in Melanesia. Reissue edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hann, C. M. (Ed.) 2003. Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• High, M. 2013. “Polluted Money, Polluted Wealth: Emerging Regimes of Value in the Mongolian Gold Rush.” American Ethnologist 40 (4): 676–688. doi: 10.1111/amet.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højer, L. 2018. “Apathy and Revolution: Temporal Sensibilities in Contemporary Mongolia.” In Recovering the Human Subject: Freedom, Creativity and Decision, edited by J. Laidlaw, B. Bodenhorn, and M. Holbraad, 74–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornby, L. 2016. “Mongolia Faces Livestock Crisis as Bitter Winter Bites.” Financial Times. February 29, 2016. https://www.ft.com/content/1f3e37ba-db66-11e5-98fd-06d75973fe09.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C. 2012. “Favors and ‘Normal Heroes’: The Case of Postsocialist Higher Education.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (2): 22–41. doi: 10.14318/hau2.2.003
   Google Scholar
• Ikon.mn. 2014. “Infographic: Connections between Parliament Members and Companies.” Ikon.mn. October 1, 2014. http://www.ikon.mn/p/6b0.
   Google Scholar
• Jargalsaikhan, D. 2011. “Election Law and Philosophers.” Jargal DeFacto. December 29, 2011. http://jargaldefacto.com/article/election-law-and-philosophers.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., and S. I. Wilkinson, eds. 2007. Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, S. 2004. “Personalist Politics, Clientelism and Citizenship: Local Elections in El Alto, Bolivia.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 23 (2): 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00106.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00106.x
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. [1990] 2002. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michelutti, L. 2008. The Vernacularisation of Democracy: Politics, Caste and Religion in India. New Delhi: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OSCE/ODIHR. 2016. Parliamentary Elections 29 June 2016. Warsaw, Poland: Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/mongolia/237621?download=true.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, J. 1986. “The Gift, the Indian Gift and the ‘Indian Gift’.” Man 21 (3): 453–473. doi: 10.2307/2803096
   Google Scholar
• Piliavsky, A., ed. 2014. Patronage as Politics in South Asia. Cambridge, UK; New York. /core/books/patronage-as-politics-in-south-asia/954BABA8F39940F58047416A8901AA21.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt-Rivers, J. 2012. “The Law of Hospitality.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (1): 501–517. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.1.022. doi: 10.14318/hau2.1.022
   Google Scholar
• Price, P., and D. Srinivas. 2014. “Patronage and Autonomy in India’s Deepening Democracy.” In Patronage as Poltics in South Asia, edited by Anastasia Piliavsky, 217–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radchenko, S., and M. Jargalsaikhan. 2017. “Mongolia in the 2016–17 Electoral Cycle: The Blessings of Patronage.” Asian Survey 57 (6): 1032–1057. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2017.57.6.1032. doi: 10.1525/as.2017.57.6.1032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shagdar, T. 2015. “Homeland Associations and the Production of Informal Power in Mongolia.” Emerging Subjects Blog (blog). May 11, 2015. https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/mongolian-economy/2015/11/05/homeland-associations-and-the-production-of-informal-power-in-mongolia/.
   Google Scholar
• Shakow, M. 2011. “The Peril and Promise of Noodles and Beer: Condemnation of Patronage and Hybrid Political Frameworks in “Post-Neoliberal” Cochabamba, Bolivia.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 34 (2): 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1555-2934.2011.01168.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1555-2934.2011.01168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuurkhai News. 2012. “B. Choijilsuren, Ch. Khurelbaatar Nar Say Sayar Ni Mungu Taraajee.” Shurkhai.mn. July 3, 2012. http://www.shuurhai.mn/?p=23604.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. 2002. “Other Domains of Democratic Theory: Space, Power, and the Politics of Democratization.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20 (3): 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1068/d255t. doi: 10.1068/d255t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneath, D. 2006. “Transacting and Enacting: Corruption, Obligation and the Use of Monies in Mongolia.” Ethnos 71 (1): 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840600603228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneath, D. 2010. “Political Mobilization and the Construction of Collective Identity in Mongolia.” Central Asian Survey 29 (3): 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2010.518009. doi: 10.1080/02634937.2010.518009
   Google Scholar
• Sneath, D. 2014. “Nationalising Civilisational Resources: Sacred Mountains and Cosmopolitical Ritual in Mongolia.” Asian Ethnicity 15 (4): 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2014.939330.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, J. 2007. Anthropology, Politics, and the State: Democracy and Violence in South Asia. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, S. C. 2009. “Political Clientelism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes, 604–627. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuya, N. 2012. What Is at Stake in Mongolia’s Election. Brookings Institution. June 26, 2012. https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/what-is-at-stake-in-mongolias-election/.
   Google Scholar