‘Listening State?’: exploring citizens’ perceptions of Open Government in Tokayev’s Kazakhstan

References

• Akhmetzharov, S., and S. Orazgaliyev. 2021. “Labor Unions and Institutional Corruption: The Case of Kazakhstan.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 12 (2): 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665211041198.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Aufi, A. S., I. Al-Harthi, Y. AlHinai, Z. Al-Salti, and A. Al-Badi. 2017. “Citizens’ Perceptions of Government’s Participatory Use of Social Media.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 11 (2): 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2016-0056.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhabayev, S., and M. Azhigaliyev. 2019. “I forbid to engage in the Kok-Zhailau project – Tokayev” [Zapreshchayu zanimat’sya proyektom “Kok-Zhaylyau” – Tokayev]. TengriNews. October 29, 2019. Accessed July 21, 2023. https://tengrinews.kz/kazakhstan_news/zapreschayu-zanimatsya-proektom-kok-jaylyau-tokaev-382757/.
   Google Scholar
• Altayar, M. S. 2018. “Motivations for Open Data Adoption: An Institutional Theory Perspective.” Government Information Quarterly 35 (4): 633–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arafa, M., and C. Armstrong. 2016. ““Facebook to Mobilize, Twitter to Coordinate Protests, and YouTube to Tell the World”: New Media, Cyberactivism, and the Arab Spring.” Journal of Global Initiatives: Policy, Pedagogy, Perspective 10 (1). https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/jgi/vol10/iss1/6.
   Google Scholar
• Arshad, S., and S. Khurram. 2020. “Can Government’s Presence on Social Media Stimulate Citizens’ Online Political Participation? Investigating the Influence of Transparency, Trust, and Responsiveness.” Government Information Quarterly 37 (3): 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åström, J., M. Karlsson, J. Linde, and A. Pirannejad. 2012. “Understanding the Rise of E-Participation in Non-Democracies: Domestic and International Factors.” Government Information Quarterly 29 (2): 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barma, N. H., E. Ratner, and R. A. Spector. 2009. “Open Authoritarian Regimes: Surviving and Thriving in the Liberal International Order.” Democracy and Society 6 (2): 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI). 2023. Democracy Status Index. Transformation Index. Last accessed September 16, 2022. https://atlas.bti-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Cassani, A. 2017. “Social Services to Claim Legitimacy: Comparing Autocracies’ Performance.” Contemporary Politics 23 (3): 348–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1304321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers, J., I. M. Mbiti, and A. Zeitlin. 2021. “Can Public Rankings Improve School Performance? Evidence from a Nationwide Reform in Tanzania.” Journal of Human Resources 56 (3): 655–685. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.56.3.0119-9969R1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, N., E. Sharplin, and A. Burkhanov. 2023, June. “Challenges for Political Science Research Ethics in Autocracies: A Case Study of Central Asia.” Political Studies Review, 14789299231153074. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299231153074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, J. 2016. “The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method.” Sociological Methods & Research 45 (2): 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115570065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukalskis, A., and J. Gerschewski. 2018. “What Autocracies Say (and What Citizens Hear): Proposing Four Mechanisms of Autocratic Legitimation’.” In Justifying Dictatorship, edited by, Alexander Dukalskis and Johannes Gerschewski, 16–66. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. M., and A. Campos. 2013. “Open Government Initiatives: Challenges of Citizen Participation: Professional Practice.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 32 (1): 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, P., and X. Alfonso. 2009. “E-government and the Transformation Agenda.” Public Administration 87 (2): 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01749.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, J. 2018. “Legitimacy in Autocracies: Oxymoron or Essential Feature?” Perspectives on Politics 16 (3): 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717002183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, J. R., S. S. Dawes, and T. A. Pardo. 2018. “Digital Government and Public Management Research: Finding the Crossroads.” Public Management Review 20 (5): 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G., and T. Slough. 2022. “Government Responsiveness in Developing Countries.” Annual Review of Political Science 25 (1): 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-112501.
   Google Scholar
• Gunitsky, S. 2015. “Corrupting the Cyber-Commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (1): 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714003120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guriev, S., and D. Treisman. 2019. “Informational Autocrats.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (4): 100–127. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, T. M., S. Guerrero, G. Brian Burke, M. Cook, A. Cresswell, N. Helbig, J. Hrdinová, and T. Pardo. 2011. “Open Government and E-Government: Democratic Challenges from a Public Value Perspective”. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 245–53. College Park Maryland USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037597.
   Google Scholar
• Heydemann, S. 2007. “Upgrading Authoritarianism in the Arab World.” Brookings. November 30. https://www.brookings.edu/research/upgrading-authoritarianism-in-the-arab-world/.
   Google Scholar
• Idrisov, E. 2015. “Kazakhstan: 100 steps toward a new nation.” The Diplomat. Accessed December 25, 2022. https://thediplomat.com/2015/07/kazakhstan-100-steps-toward-a-new-nation.
   Google Scholar
• Ingrams, A. 2017. “The Transparency Performance Puzzle: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Policy Failure in Open Government Initiatives.” Information Polity 22 (1): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160014.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, R. 2023, May. “The Political Economy of Hipsters in Kazakhstan: Mobilization, Hybridity and Class.” Globalizations, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2216121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janenova, S. 2019. “The Boundaries of Research in an Authoritarian State.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18 (January): 160940691987646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919876469.
   Google Scholar
• Janenova, S., and P. S. Kim. 2016. “Innovating Public Service Delivery in Transitional Countries: The Case of One Stop Shops in Kazakhstan.” International Journal of Public Administration 39 (4): 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1064445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalathil, S., and T. C. Boas. 2003. “Wired for Modernization in China?” In Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule, edited by Shanthi Kalathil and Taylor Boas, 13–42. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Khamitov, Z., C. Knox, and G. Junusbekova. 2022. “Corruption, Public Procurement and Political Instability in Kazakhstan.” Central Asian Survey 0 (0): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2022.2072811.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, C. 2008. “Kazakhstan: Modernizing Government in the Context of Political Inertia.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 74 (3): 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852308095314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, C., and S. Janenova. 2018. “Public Councils in Kazakhstan: A Case of Emergent Participative Democracy?” Central Asian Survey 37 (2): 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2017.1410467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, C., and S. Janenova. 2019. “The E-Government Paradox in Post-Soviet Countries.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 32 (6): 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2018-0173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolosovskaya, K. 2022. “Tokayev: All guilty people will be punished regardless of their official positions and status in society” [Tokayev: Vse vinovnyye ponesut nakazaniye vne zavisimosti ot dolzhnostey i pozitsiy v obshchestve]. Informburo. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://informburo.kz/novosti/tokaev-vse-vinovnye-ponesut-nakazanie-vne-zavisimosti-ot-dolznostei-i-pozicii-v-obshhestve.
   Google Scholar
• Kudaibergenova, D. T., and M. Laruelle. 2022. “Making Sense of the January 2022 Protests in Kazakhstan: Failing Legitimacy, Culture of Protests, and Elite Readjustments.” Post-Soviet Affairs 38 (6): 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2077060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurmanov, B. 2022. “The Rise of Information Autocracies: Kazakhstan and its Constitutional Referendum. The Loop.” European Consortium for Political Science Research. https://theloop.ecpr.eu/the-rise-of-information-autocracies-kazakhstan-and-its-constitutional-referendum/.
   Google Scholar
• Kurmanov, B., and C. Knox. 2022. “Open Government and Citizen Empowerment in Authoritarian States.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 13 (2): 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665221104118.
   Google Scholar
• Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2015. On Access to Information. No. 401-V.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 2016. “Blogging Zhanaozen: Hegemonic Discourse and Authoritarian Resilience in Kazakhstan.” Central Asian Survey 35 (3): 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2016.1161902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, E., and Y.-Y. Zhou. 2022. “Self-Efficacy and Citizen Engagement in Development: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 9 (1): 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2020.47.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, J., and M. Karlsson. 2013. “The Dictator’s New Clothes: The Relationship Between E-Participation and Quality of Government in Non-Democratic Regimes.” International Journal of Public Administration 36 (4): 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.757619.
   Google Scholar
• Maerz, S. F. 2016. “The Electronic Face of Authoritarianism: E-Government as a Tool for Gaining Legitimacy in Competitive and Non-Competitive Regimes.” Government Information Quarterly 33 (4): 727–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manin, B., A. Przeworski, and S. C. Stokes. 1999. ““Introduction.” Introduction.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, edited by A. Przeworski, S. C. Stokes, and B. Manin, 1–26. Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175104.001.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J., D. Curtin, and M. Hillebrandt. 2012. “Open Government: Connecting Vision and Voice.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 78 (1): 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2019. Qualitative Data Analysis. 4th ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moore-Gilbert, K., and Z. Abdul-Nabi. 2021. “Authoritarian Downgrading, (Self)Censorship and New Media Activism After the Arab Spring.” New Media & Society 23 (5): 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818821367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 2012. Focus Groups and Social Interaction. The Sage handbook of Interview Research 2.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, K., S. Janenova, and C. Knox. 2019. “Open Government in Authoritarian Regimes.” International Review of Public Policy 1 (1): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.325.
   Google Scholar
• Omelicheva, M. Y. 2016. “Authoritarian Legitimation: Assessing Discourses of Legitimacy in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.” Central Asian Survey 35 (4): 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2016.1245181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onuch, O. 2015. “EuroMaidan Protests in Ukraine: Social Media Versus Social Networks.” Problems of Post-Communism 62 (4): 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2015.1037676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruijer, E., and A. Meijer. 2020. “Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment.” Public Performance & Management Review 43 (3): 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1568884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarov, I. 2020. “Institutional Dimensions of Open Government Data Implementation: Evidence from Transition Countries.” Public Performance & Management Review 43 (6): 1359–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1805336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiek, S. 2022. “The Politics of Stability in Kazakhstan: Depoliticising Participation Through Consultative Ideology?” Europe–Asia Studies 74 (2): 266–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2022.2034746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T., M. V. Twist, and I. Vanhommerig. 2013. “Innovations in Accountability.” Public Performance & Management Review 36 (3): 407–435. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell, S. 2020. “Vision, Voice, and Technology: Is There a Global “Open Government” Trend?” Administration & Society 52 (10): 1593–1620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720918316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvan, K. 2022. “Leadership Successions in Central Asia | FIIA.” 2022. FIIA – Finnish Institute of International Affairs. November 3. https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/leadership-successions-in-central-asia.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, R., and B. Straits. 2009. Approaches to Social Research. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slough, T. 2021. Squeaky Wheels and Inequality in Bureaucratic Service Provision. Work. Pap., New York Univ., New York, NY. http://taraslough.com/assets/pdf/colombia_audit.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Soest, C. von., and J. Grauvogel. 2017. “Identity, Procedures and Performance: How Authoritarian Regimes Legitimize Their Rule.” Contemporary Politics 23 (3): 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1304319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengrinews. 2020. “Approaches to the Implementation of the “Listening State” Concept were Presented in Nur-Sultan” [Podkhody k realizatsii «Slyshashchego gosudarstva» prezentovany v Nur-Sultane]. TengriNews. February 6, 2020. Accessed July 21, 2023. https://www.inform.kz/ru/podhody-k-realizacii-koncepcii-slyshaschego-gosudarstva-prezentovany-v-nur-sultane_a3611684.
   Google Scholar
• Tokayev, K. J. 2019. The Address to the Nation [Poslaniye Glavy gosudarstva Kasym-Zhomarta Tokayeva narodu Kazakhstana]. Accessed December 10, 2022. https://www.akorda.kz/ru/addresses/addresses_of_president/poslanie-glavy-gosudarstva-kasym-zhomarta-tokaeva-narodu-kazahstana.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2022. UN E-Participation and E-Government Index. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/87-Kazakhstan.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmann, E., M. Bohn, R. Sturm, and T. Demmelhuber. 2022. “Decentralisation as Authoritarian Upgrading? Evidence from Jordan and Morocco.” The Journal of North African Studies 27 (2): 362–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2020.1787837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., and S. Birkmeyer. 2015. “Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives.” International Journal of Public Administration 38 (5): 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.942735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., J. C. Weyerer, and M. Rösch. 2019. “Open Government and Citizen Participation: An Empirical Analysis of Citizen Expectancy Towards Open Government Data.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 85 (3): 566–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317719996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar