1,226
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A framework for practical work in science and scientific literacy through argumentation

&
Pages 271-291 | Published online: 20 Sep 2007

References

  • Coderre , S. , Mandin , H. , Harasym , P. H. and Fick , G. H. 2003 . Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success . Medical Education , 37 : 695 – 703 .
  • Colucci‐Gray , L. , Camino , E. , Barbiero , G. and Gray , D. 2006 . From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: an ecological framework for education . Science Education , 90 (2) : 227 – 252 .
  • Department of Education and Science & The Welsh Office . 1989 . Science in the national curriculum , London : HMSO .
  • Duschl , R. 2000 . “ Making the nature of science explicit ” . In Improving science: the contribution of research , Edited by: Millar , R. , Leach , J. and Osborne , J. Milton Keynes : Open University Press .
  • Erduran , S. , Simon , S. and Osborne , J. 2004 . TAPping into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse . Science Education , 88 : 915 – 933 .
  • Gott , R. and Duggan , S. 2002 . Problems with assessment of performance in practical science: which way now? . Cambridge Journal of Education , 32 : 183 – 201 .
  • Gott , R. and Duggan , S. 2003 . Understanding and using scientific evidence , London : Sage .
  • Gott , R. , Duggan , S. and Roberts , R. 2003 . Concepts of evidence Available online at: www.dur.ac.uk/richard.gott/Evidence/cofev.htm (accessed 30 August 2007)
  • House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee . 2002 . Science education from 14 to 19. Third report , London : House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee .
  • Kim , H. and Song , J. 2003 . Peer argumentation as an authentic feature of scientific enquiry in schools , Melbourne : ASERA .
  • Lang , M. , Drake , S. and Olson , J. 2006 . Discourse and the new didactics of scientific literacy . Journal of Curriculum Studies , 38 (2) : 177 – 188 .
  • Leslie , S. , Keiler , L. and Woolnough , B. 2002 . Practical work in school science: the dominance of assessment . School Science Review , 83 (304) : 83 – 88 .
  • Newton , P. , Driver , R. and Osborne , J. 1999 . The place of argumentation in pedagogy of school science . International Journal of Science Education , 21 : 553 – 576 .
  • Nuffield Foundation . 1966 . Nuffield chemistry: introduction and guide , Harlow : Penguin .
  • Osborne , J. and Collins , S. 2000 . Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum , London : King’s College .
  • QCA . 2005 . GCSE criteria for science , HMSO : London .
  • Roberts , R. and Gott , R. 2003 . Assessment of biology investigations . Journal of Biological Education , 37 (3) : 114 – 121 .
  • Royal Society (website) . ‘Nullius in verba’ Available online at: http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=6186 (accessed 30 August 2007)
  • Simon , S. , Sibel , E. and Osborne , J. 2006 . Learning to teach argumentation: research and development in the science classroom . International Journal of Science Education , 28 (2/3) : 235 – 260 .
  • Toulmin , S. E. 1958 . The uses of argument , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Tytler , R. , Duggan , S. and Gott , R. 2001a . Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education . International Journal of Science Education , 23 : 815 – 832 .
  • Tytler , R. , Duggan , S. and Gott , R. 2001b . Public participation in an environmental dispute: implications for science education . Public Understanding of Science , 10 : 343 – 364 .
  • Wellcome Trust . 2001 . Valuable lessons: Engaging with the social context of science in schools , London : The Wellcome Trust .
  • Zion , M. , Slezak , D. , Shapira , E. , Link , E. , Bashan , M. , Brumer , M. , Orian , T. , Nussinowitz , R. , Court , D. , Agrest , B. , Medolovici , R. and Valanides , N. 2004 . Dynamic, open inquiry in biology learning . Science Education , 88 (5) : 728 – 753 .
  • Zohar , A. and Nemet , F. 2002 . Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 39 : 36 – 62 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.