A pedagogical framework for developing innovative science teachers with ICT

References

• Abell, S. K. 2008. “Twenty Years Later: Does Pedagogical Content Knowledge Remain a Useful Idea?” International Journal of Science Education 30 (10): 1405–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D., J. Novak, and H. Hanesian. 1978. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. 2nd ed. , 27. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., and H. Hollingsworth. 2002. “Elaborating a Model of Teacher Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18: 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M. J., and M. E. Webb. 2004. ICT and Pedagogy: A Review of the Research Literature. Coventry and London: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency/Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Cradler, J., M. Freeman, R. Cradler, and M. McNabb. 2002. “Research Implications for Preparing Teachers to Use Technology.” Learning & Leading with Technology 30 (1): 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• van Driel, J. H., N. Verloop, and W. de Vos. 1998. “Developing Science teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35 (6): 673–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, D., C. Ringstaff, and J. Sandholtz. 1991. “Changes in Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Technology-Rich Classrooms.” Educational Leadership 48 (8): 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson, H., and L. T. Rogers. 2003. “Does ICT in Science Really Work in the Classroom? Part 2. the Importance of the Department and Its Organisation.” School Science Review 85 (310): 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. 2010. “Supporting the Development of Effective Science Teachers.” In Good Practice in Science Teaching – What Research Has to Say, edited by J. Osborne and J. Dillon, 283–287. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. 1994. “Gibson’s Affordances.” Psychological Review 101 (2): 340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2002. “Professional Development and Teacher Change.” Teachers and Teaching 8 (3): 381–391.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., K. Ruthven, and S. Brindley. 2005. “Teacher Perspectives on Integrating ICT into Subject Teaching: Commitment, Constraints, Caution and Change.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 37 (2): 155–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., J. Wishart, D. Whitelock, R. Deaney, R. Brawn, L. la Velle, A. McFarlane, K. Ruthven, and M. Winterbottom. 2007. “Pedagogical Approaches for Technology-Integrated Science Teaching.” Computers & Education 48 (2007): 137–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y., and R. Thomas. 2002. “The Impacts of a Web-Aided Instructional Simulation on Science Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (9): 955–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. 2004. “Technology Learning Principles for Preservice and in-Service Teacher Education.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 4 (3): 345–362.
   Google Scholar
• ICT for Innovative Science Teachers Project(2011). Leonardo da Vinci Programme 2009-1-PL1- LEO05- 05046. http://www.ictforist.oeiizk.waw.pl/
   Google Scholar
• ICT for IST Resource Guide (2011) http://ictforist.oeiizk.waw.pl/upload/Resource_Guide_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. 1996. Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kennewell, S. 2001. “Using Affordances and Constraints to Evaluate the Use of ICT in Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 10: 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kennewell, S. (2004). Researching the Influence of Interactive Presentation Tools on teachers’ Pedagogy. In Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association (BERA), September 2004, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Kind.2009. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education: Perspectives and Potential for Progress.” Studies in Science Education 45 (2): 169–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., and P. Mishra. 2005. “What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? the Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 32 (2): 131–152.
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. B. 2009. “Comparative Analysis of Policies for ICT in Education.” In International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, edited by J. Voogt and C. Knezek. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., and B. Eylon. 2011. Science Learning and Instruction – Taking Advantage of Technology for Knowledge Integration, 10–15. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., and C. Matsumoto. 1999. “Research on Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics and Science: The State of the Scene.” School Science and Mathematics 99(5): 258–271.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., P. Mulhall, and A. Berry. 2004. “In Search of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science: Developing Ways of Articulating and Documenting Professional Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (4): 370–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., P. Mulhall, and A. Berry. 2008. “Exploring Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Teacher Education.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (10): 1301–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveless, A. 2011. “Technology, Pedagogy and Education: Reflections on the Accomplishment of What Teachers Know, Do and Believe in a Digital Age.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 20 (3): 301–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarney, J. 2004. “Effective Models of Staff Development in ICT.” European Journal of Teacher Education 27 (1): 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• McCrory, (2008) The Topic-Specific Challenges of TPCK in Science. In Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators. New York: Routledge, 193–206
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. 2010. “Practical Work.” In Good Practice in Science Teaching – What Research Has to Say, edited by J. Osborne and J. Dillon, 108–134. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., and M. J. Koehler. 2006. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.” Teacher College Record 108 (6): 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morine-Dershimer, G., and T. Kent. 1999. “The Complex Nature and Sources of teachers’ Pedagogical Knowledge.” In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, edited by J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman, 19–32. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., and P. H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, H. 1938. Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, L. R. 1998. “Gathering Data: Does It Make Sense?” Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 7: 379–394.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, L., and L. Rogers. 2001. Teaching Science with ICT. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Papaevripidou, M., M. Lividjis and C.P. Constantinou(2011) Teachers as Learners and Designers of ICT-Driven Science Curriculum Materials: Findings from the “ICT for Innovative Science Teachers” Project. In Proceedings of ESERA 2011 Conference, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S.. 1999. Introduction in: Logo Philosophy and Implementation, Logo Computer Systems Inc. (www.lcsi.ca)
   Google Scholar
• Pedretti, E., J. Smith-Mayer, and J. Woodrow. 1999. “Teaming Technology Enhanced Instruction in the Science Classroom and Teacher Professional Development.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 7: 131–143.
   Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S. 2009. “Teachers’ Talk in Professional Development Activity That Supports Change in Their ICT Pedagogical Beliefs and Practices.” Teacher Development: An International Journal of teachers’ Professional Development 13 (1): 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, L. T., and H. Finlayson. 2003. “Does ICT in Science Really Work in the Classroom? Part 1. the Individual Teacher Experience.” School Science Review 84 (309): 105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, L. T., and H. Finlayson. 2004. “Developing Successful Pedagogy with Information and Communications Technology: How Are Science Teachers Meeting the Challenge?” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 13 (3): 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Schibeci, R., J. MacCallum, W. Cumming‐Potvin, C. Durrant, B. Kissane, and E. Miller. 2008. “Teachers’ Journeys towards Critical Use of ICT.” Learning, Media and Technology 33 (4): 313–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Education Review 57(1): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smetana, L. K., and R. L. Bell. 2011. “Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A Critical Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Science Education. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.605182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B. 2007. “Digital Resources versus Cognitive Tools: A Discussion of Learning Science with Technology.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 471. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, P., and C. J. König. 2006. “Integrating Motivational Theories.” Academy of Management Review 31 (4): 889–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffregen, T. A. 2003. Affordances as Properties of the Animal-Environment System. Ecological Psychology 15 (2), 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, C. R. 1998. “Science as Conversation: Come and See My Air Pump!.” In Practical Work in School Science – Which Way Now?, edited by J. J. Wellington. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, M. 2010. “Technology-Mediated Learning.” In Good Practice in Science Teaching – What Research Has to Say, edited by J. Osborne and J. Dillon, 181. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. J. 1998. Practical Work in School Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woolnough, B. E. 1991. Practical Science. Milton Keynes: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., K. Pugh, S. Sheldon, and J. L. Byers. 2002. “Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations.” Teachers College Record 104 (3): 482–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar