Assessing quality of pre-service physics teachers’ written arguments

References

• von Aufschnaiter, C., S. Erduran, J. Osborne, and S. Simon. 2008. “Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Case Studies of How students’ Argumentation Relates to Their Scientific Knowledge.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (1): 101–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydeniz, M., A. Pabuccu, P. S. Cetin, and E. Kaya. 2012. “Argumentation and Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Properties and Behaviors of Gases.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10(6): 1303–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, P., and M. Linn. 2000. “Scientific Arguments as Learning ArtifaBTs: Designing for Learning on the Web in KIE.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (8): 797–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., and D. Hammer. 2012. “Framing for Scientific Argumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (1): 68–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L., and B. Reiser. 2009. “Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation.” Science Education 93 (1): 26–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argument in the Classroom.” Science Education 84 (3): 287–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A. 2008. “Quality Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria.” In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research, edited by S. Erduran and M. P. Jime′nez- Aleixandre, 159–175. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., and J. Osborne. 2002. “Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 38: 39–72.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A. 2006. “Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15(4): 451–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., D. Ardac, and B. Yakmaci-Guzel. 2006. “Learning to Teach Argumentation: Case Studies of Pre-Service Secondary Science Teachers.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2 (2): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., and M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (eds.). 2008. Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., S. Simon, and J. Osborne. 2004. “Tapping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse.” Science Education 88 (6): 915–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. 2008. “Disciplinary Authority and Accountability in Scientific Practice and Learning.” Science Education 92: 404–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. ed. 1996. Discourse, Learning, and Schooling. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., A. B. Rodriguez, and R. A. Duschl. 2000. ““Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: Argument in High School Genetics.” Science Education 84 (6): 757–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, E. 2013. “Argumentation in Classroom: Pre-Service teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium.” International Journal of Science Education. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.770935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, E., S. Erduran, and P. Cetin. 2013. “Pre-Service Science teachers’ Understanding and Evaluation of Arguments.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Juan, PR.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., S. Druker, and C. Chen. 1998. “Students’ Reasoning about Electricity: Combining Performance Assessments with Argumentation Analysis.” International Journal of Science Education 20: 849–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. 2012. “Relationship between Nature of Science Understandings and Argumentation Skills: a Role for Counterargument and Contextual Factors.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (4): 489–514. doi:10.1002/tea.21012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, A. M., and K. L. McNeill. 2011. “The Relationship between teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Beliefs of Scientific Argumentation on Classroom Practice.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. 2001. “Scientific Literacy for Citizenship: Tools for Dealing with the Science Dimension of Controversial Socioscientific Issues.” Science Education 85 (3): 291–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. 2006. “Patterns in students’ Argumentation Confronted with a Risk-Focused Socio-Scientific Issue.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (14): 1689–1716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1993. “Science as Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning Scientific Thinking.” Science Education 77(3): 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2010. “Teaching and Learning Science as Argument.” Science Education 94 (5): 810–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33: 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, C. V. 2010. “The Influence of Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction on Preservice Primary Teachers’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (9): 1137–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., and J. Krajcik. 2011. Claim, Evidence and Reasoning: Supporting Grade 5–8 Students in Constructing Scientific Explanations. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., and D. S. Pimentel. 2010. “Scientific Discourse in Three Urban Classrooms: the Role of the Teacher in Engaging High School Students in Argumentation.” Science Education 94 (2): 203–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council [NRC]. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, D. C. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. 1997. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., R. Driver, and J. Osborne. 1999. “The Place of Argumentation in the Pedagogy of School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 21: 553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogan-Bekiroglu, F., and M. Aydeniz. 2013. “Enhancing Pre-service Science Teachers’ Perceived Self-efficacy of Argumentation through Modeling and Mastery Experiences.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 9(3): 233–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogunniyi, M. B. 2006. “Using an Argumentation-Instrumental Reasoning Discourse to Facilitate teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2006. Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: a Framework for PISA 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2010. “Arguing to Learn in Science: the Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse.” Science 328: 463–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdem, Y., H. Ertepinar, J. Cakiroglu, and S. Erduran. 2011. “The Nature of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-Oriented Laboratory Context.” International Journal of Science Education 35(15). doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.611835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2009. “Situated Learning in Science Education: Socio-Scientific Issues as Contexts for Practice.” Studies in Science Education 45 (1): 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., F. W. Chambers, and D. L. Zeidler. 2004. “Student Conceptualizations of the Nature of Science in Response to a Socioscientific Issue.” International Journal of Science Education 26: 387–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and M. Blanchard. 2012. “Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (9): 1122–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and D. Clark. 2008. “Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions.” Science Education 92 (3): 447–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., and K. A. Millwood. 2008. “What Can Argumentation Tell Us about Epistemology?” In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research, edited by S. Erduran and M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre, 68–85. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., S. Erduran, and J. F. Osborne. 2006. “Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (2–3): 235–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topcu, M. S., T. D. Sadler, and O. Yilmaz-Tuzun. 2010. “Pre-Service Science teachers’ Informal Reasoning about Socioscientific Issues: the Influence of Issue Context.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (18): 2475–2495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topcu, M. S., O. Yilmaz-Tuzun, and T. D. Sadler. 2011. “Preservice Science Teachers’ Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues and the Factors Influencing Their Informal Reasoning.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 42: 51–74. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9221-0.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tumay, H., and F. Koseoglu. 2011. “Developing Pre-Service Chemistry teachers’ Understanding of Teaching through Argumentation.” Journal of Turkish Science Education 8 (3): 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of National Education. 2012. National High School Physics Curriculum Standards. Retrieved from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program2.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G. J., and V. M. Dawson. 2010. “The Impact of a Classroom Intervention on Grade 10 students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, and Conceptual Understanding of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47: 952–977. doi:10.1002/tea.20358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, K. A., and D. L. Zeidler. 2007. “Promoting Discourse about SSI through Scaffolded Inquiry.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (11): 1387–1410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F.-Y., O. R. Anderson, and O. R.. 2003. “Senior High School Students' Preference and Reasoning Modes about Nuclear Energy Use.” International Journal of Science Education 25: 221–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., T. D. Sadler, B. E. Callahan, and S. Applebaum. 2009. “Advancing Reflective Judgment through Socioscientific Issues.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (1): 74–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembal-Saul, C. 2009. “Learning to Teach Elementary School Science as Argument.” Science Education 93: 687–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembal-Saul, C., D. Munford, B. Crawford, P. Friedrichsen, and S. M. Land. 2002. “Scaffolding Preservice Science teachers’ Evidence-Based Arguments during an Investigation of Natural Selection.” Research in Science Education 32 (4): 437–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A.2008. “Science Teacher Education and Professional Development in Argumentation.” In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research, edited by S. Erduran and M. P. Jime′nez-Aleixandre, 245–268. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and F. Nemet. 2002. “Fostering Students’ Knowledge and Argumentation Skills through Dilemmas in Human Genetics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (1): 35–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar