Engineering students’ experiences from physics group work in learning labs

References

• Bang, H. 2001. “Det længerevarende Gruppearbejde.” [The Longitudinal Group Work]. In At lære Fysik – Et Studium i Gymnasielevers læreprocesser i Fysik [Learning Physics – A Study of Secondary Students’ Learning Processes in Physics], edited by J. Dolin and V. Schilling. København: Uddannelsesstyrelsen p. 78–99.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, M., and A. T. Danielsson. 2013. “Characterising Learning Interactions: A Study of University Students Solving Physics Problems in Groups.” Research in Science Education 43 (3): 1177–1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., R. W. Marx, E. Soloway, and J. Krajcik. 1996. “Learning with Peers: From Small Group Cooperation to Collaborative Communities.” Educational Researcher 25 (8): 37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bungum, B., H. Hauge, and S. Rødseth. 2012. “Fysikkstudenten fra Studiestart til Mastergrad. Motivasjon, Verdier og Prioriteringer.” [The Physics Student from First Year to Master’s Degree. Motivation, Values and Preferences.] Uniped 35 (3): 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Enghag, M., P. Gustafsson, and G. Jonsson. 2007. “From Everyday Life Experiences to Physics Understanding Occurring in Small Group Work with Context Rich Problems during Introductory Physics Work at University.” Research in Science Education 37 (4): 449–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S. 2011. “The Role of Digital Artefacts on the Interactive Whiteboard in Supporting Classroom Dialogue.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27 (6): 463–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., G. Biesta, and D. James. 2008. “Understanding Learning Culturally: Overcoming the Dualism between Social and Individual Views of Learning.” Vocations and Learning 1 (1): 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingerman, Å., M. Berge, and S. Booth. 2009. “Physics Group Work in a Phenomenographic Perspective – Learning Dynamics as the Experience of Variation and Relevance.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (4): 349–358.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen, A., P. A. Tufte, and L. Christoffersen. 2004. Introduksjon til Samfunnsvitenskapelig Metode [Introduction to Methodology in Social Science]. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., and R. T. Johnson. 1989. Cooperation and Competition – Theory and Research. Edina: Interaction Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kershner, R., N. Mercer, P. Warwick, and J. Kleine Staarman. 2010. “Can the Interactive Whiteboard Support Young Children’s Collaborative Communication and Thinking in Classroom Science Activities?” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5 (4): 359–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellingsæter, M. S., and B. Bungum. n.d. “Students’ Use of the Interactive Whiteboard during Physics Group Work.” Paper submitted to European Journal of Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., P. Warwick, R. Kershner, and J. K. Staarman. 2010. “Can the Interactive Whiteboard Help to Provide ‘Dialogic Space’ for Children’s Collaborative Activity?” Language and Education 24 (5): 367–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, R. S., R. E. Scherr, D. Hammer, and J. Mikeska. 2008. “Recognizing Mechanistic Reasoning in Student Scientific Inquiry: A Framework for Discourse Analysis Developed from Philosophy of Science.” Science Education 92 (3): 499–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, R. E., and D. Hammer. 2009. “Student Behavior and Epistemological Framing: Examples from Collaborative Active-Learning Activities in Physics.” Cognition and Instruction 27 (2): 147–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., S. Higgins, K. Wall, and J. Miller. 2005. “Interactive Whiteboards: Boon or Bandwagon? A Critical Review of the Literature.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21 (2): 91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, L., M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan. 1999. “Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 69 (1): 21–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J. H., J. J. Mintzes, and J. D. Novak. 1994. “Research on Alternative Conceptions in Science.” In Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, edited by D. l Gabel, 177–210. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. 2007. Dialogic Education and Technology. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V. 2011. Fokusgrupper: Om Fokuserade Gruppintervjuer som Undersökningsmetod [Focus groups: On Focus Group Interviews as a Method of Investigation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar