Validation of an instrument to measure students’ motivation and self-regulation towards technology learning

References

• Alexander, P. A., S. Graham, and K. R. Harris. 1998. “A Perspective on Strategy Research: Progress and Prospects.” Educational Psychology Review 10 (2): 129–154.10.1023/A:1022185502996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, C. 1992. “Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 84 (3): 261–271.10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, C., and J. Archer. 1988. “Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students’ Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes.” Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 260–267.10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., and Gijberls, D. 2013. “Reconstructing the Pupils Attitude towards Technology-survey.” Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 18 (1): 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. W. 1964. An Introduction to Motivation. New York: American Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2001. “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 52: 1–26.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2006. “Guide for Constructing Self-efficacy Scales.” In Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, edited by F. Pajares, and T. Urdan, 307–337. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Blalock, C. L., M. J. Lichtenstein, S. Owen, L. Pruski, C. Marshall, and M. Toepperwein. 2008. “In Pursuit of Validity: A Comprehensive Review of Science Attitude Instruments 1939–2005.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (7): 961–977.10.1080/09500690701344578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., and E. Cascallar. 2006. “How Far Have We Moved toward the Integration of Theory and Practice in Self-regulation?” Educational Psychology Review 18: 199–210.10.1007/s10648-006-9013-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., and L. Corno. 2005. “Self-regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention.” Applied Psychology 54 (2): 199–231.10.1111/apps.2005.54.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M. 2004. “Academic Motivation in Self-efficacy, Task Value, Achievement Goal Orientations, and Attributional Beliefs.” The Journal of Educational Research 97 (6): 287–298.10.3200/JOER.97.6.287-298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boser, R. A., J. D. Palmer, and M. K. Daugherty. 1998. “Students’ Attitudes toward Technology in Selected Technology Education Programs.” Journal of Technology Education 10 (1): 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, R. S. 1987. Strategic Teaching and Learning: Cognitive Instruction in the Content Areas. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. 1987. “On Motivating Students.” In Talks to Teachers, edited by D. C. Berliner, and B. V. Roshenshine, 201–245. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2000. “Achieving Technological Literacy: A National Imperative.” The Technology Teacher 60 (1): 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2000. Research Methods in Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.10.4324/9780203224342
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, T. G., and W. J. McKeachie. 2005. “The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.” Educational Psychologist 40 (2): 117–128.10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., D. T. Wegener, R. C. MacCallum, and E. J. Strahan. 1999. “Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research.” Psychological Methods 4 (3): 272.10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. Larcker. 1981. “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 1998. “Classroom Environment Instruments: Development, Validity and Applications.” Learning Environments Research 1 (1): 7–34.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and B. Weiner. 1996. “Theories and Principles of Motivation.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology, edited by D. C. Berliner, and R. Calfee, 63–84. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, M. 1998. “The Effect of Learning Environment Factors on students’ Motivation and Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 20 (6): 737–753.10.1080/0950069980200609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, P. M., C. DiStefano, and R. W. Motl. 2003. “Wording Effects in Self-esteem Scales: Methodological Artifact or Response Style?” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 10 (3): 435–455.10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Technology Education Association. 2006. Technological Literacy for All: A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. 1974. An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika 39: 31–36.10.1007/BF02291575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelloway, E. K. 1998. Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A researcher’s Guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Koballa, T. R. 1988. “Attitude and Related Concepts in Science Education.” Science Education 72 (2): 115–126.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J., A. M. Lane, and A. Kyprianou. 2004. “Self-efficacy, Self-esteem and Their Impact on Academic Performance.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 32: 247–256.10.2224/sbp.2004.32.3.247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, D. J., and H. Trujillo. 2011. “Motivational Beliefs and Learning Strategies in Organic Chemistry.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9 (6): 1351–1365.10.1007/s10763-010-9264-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1996. “Positive and Negative Global Self-esteem: A Substantively Meaningful Distinction or Artifactors?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (4): 810–819.10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 1998–2010. Mplus user’s Guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nota, L., S. Soresi, and B. J. Zimmerman. 2004. “Self-regulation and Academic Achievement and Resilience: A Longitudinal Study.” International Journal of Educational Research 41 (3): 198–215.10.1016/j.ijer.2005.07.001
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2006. Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079.10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 2008. “Motivational Role of Self-efficacy Beliefs in Self-regulated Learning.” In Motivation and Self-regulated Learning: Theory, Research and Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman. New York: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., S. L. Britner, and G. Valiante. 2000. “Relation between Achievement Goals and Self-beliefs of Middle School Students in Writing and Science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (4): 406–422.10.1006/ceps.1999.1027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., and G. Valiante. 2001. “Gender Differences in Writing Motivation and Achievement of Middle School Students: A Function of Gender Orientation?” Contemporary Educational Psychology 26 (3): 366–381.10.1006/ceps.2000.1069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 1995. “Understanding Self-regulated Learning.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1995 (63): 3–12.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0768
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., R. W. Marx, and R. A. Boyle. 1993. “Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change.” Review of Educational Research 63 (2): 167–199.10.3102/00346543063002167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raat, J., R. Coenen-van den Bergh, F. de Klerk Wolters, and M. de Vries. 1988. Basic Principles of School Technology; Report PATT-3 Conference. Eindhoven, NL: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
   Google Scholar
• Raat, J. H., and M. de Vries. 1985. What Do 13-Year Old Pupils Think about Technology? The Conception of and the Attitude towards Technology of 13-Year Old Girls and Boys. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 262 998. Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and F. Pajares. 2005. Competence Perceptions and Academic Functioning. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Talton, E. L., and R. D. Simpson. 1986. “Relationship of Attitudes toward Self, Family, and School with Attitude toward Science among Adolescents.” Science Education 70 (4): 365–374.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, H.-L., C.-C. Chin, and S.-H. Shieh. 2005. “The Development of a Questionnaire to Measure students’ Motivation towards Science Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (6): 639–654.10.1080/0950069042000323737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzuntiryaki, E., and Y. Çapa Aydın. 2009. “Development and Validation of Chemistry Self-efficacy Scaleinstrument for College Students.” Research in Science Education 39 (4): 539–551.10.1007/s11165-008-9093-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velayutham, S., J. Aldridge, and B. Fraser. 2011. “Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure students’ Motivation and Self-regulation in Science Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (15): 2159–2179.10.1080/09500693.2010.541529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velayutham, S., J. Aldridge, and B. Fraser. 2012. “Gender Differences in Student Motivation and Self-regulation in Science Learning: A Multi-group Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10 (6): 1347–1368.10.1007/s10763-012-9339-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volk, K. S., and W. M. Yip. 1999. “Gender and Technology in Hong Kong: A Study of pupils’ Attitudes toward Technology.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 9 (1): 57–71.10.1023/A:1008894006039
   Google Scholar
• Warr, P., and J. Downing. 2000. “Learning Strategies, Learning Anxiety and Knowledge Acquisition.” British Journal of Psychology 91: 331–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., J. S. Eccles, and P. R. Pintrich. 1996. “Development between the Ages of 11 and 25.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology, edited by D. C. Berliner, and R. C. Calfee, 148–185. New York: Simon & Schuster/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R., and A. Bandura. 1989. “Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-regulatory Mechanisms and Complex Decision Making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 407–415.10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 1989. “A Social Cognitive View of Self-regulated Academic Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 81 (3): 329.10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. “Self-efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 82–91.10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2002. “Becoming a Self-regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41 (2): 64–70.10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., and M. Martinez-Pons. 1990. “Student Differences in Self-regulated Learning: Relating Grade, Sex, and Giftedness to Self-efficacy and Strategy Use.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 51–59.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., and D. H. Schunk, eds. 2001. Self-regulation of Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. 2nd ed. Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., and D. H. Schunk, eds. 2011. Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar