Teaching habitat and animal classification to fourth graders using an engineering-design model

References

• Atran, S., D. Medin, E. Lynch, V. Vapnarsky, E. Ucan Ek, and P. Sousa. 2001. “Folkbiology Doesn’t Come from Folkpsychology: Evidence from Yukatek Maya in Cross-cultural Perspective.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 1: 3–42.10.1163/156853701300063561
   Google Scholar
• Marulcu, I. 2010. Investigating the Impact of a LEGO (TM)-Based, Engineering-oriented Curriculum Compared to an Inquiry-based Curriculum on Fifth Graders' Content Learning of Simple Machines. ProQuest LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Marulcu, I., and M. Barnett. 2013. “Fifth Graders’ Learning About Simple Machines Through Engineering Design-based Instruction Using LEGO™ Materials.” Research in Science Education 43 (5): 1825–1850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marulcu, I., K. B. Wendell, K. G. Connolly, C. G. Wright, L. Jarvin, C. Rogers, & M. Barnett. 2008. Simple Machines: Design a People Mover. Unpublished science curriculum unit. URL: http://legoengineering.com/curriculumsubmenuteachingresources-142.html
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. 2005. “Engaging Inner City Students in Learning Through Designing Remote Operated Vehicles.” Journal of Science Education & Technology 14 (1): 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., Marulcu, I., K. B. Wendell, K. G. Connolly, C. G. Wright, L. Jarvin, and C. Rogers. 2008. Design an Animal Model: Animal Studies. Unpublished science curriculum unit. http://legoengineering.com/curriculumsubmenuteachingresources-142.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B. F. 1981. “When is an Animal Not an Animal?” Journal of Biological Education 15 (3): 213–218.10.1080/00219266.1981.9654381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., A. Collins, and P. Duguid. 1989. “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning.” Educational Researcher 18 (1): 32–42.10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. H., and C. H. Ku. 1998. “Aboriginal Children’s Alternative Conceptions of Animals and Animal Classification.” Proceedings of the National Science Council Part D: Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 8 (2): 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P. F., S. J. Huang, and K. H. Wang. 1994. “A Study of Preservice Teachers’ Alternative Concepts of Fanimal Classification.” Journal of Science Education 5: 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. M., & K. Hester. 2007. Engineering is Elementary: An Engineering and Technology Curriculum for Children. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., E. Iversen, and C. Kalyandurg. 2004. Engineering in the K-12 Classroom: An Analysis of Current Practices & Guidelines for the Future. Washington, DC; 195.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R. 2009. “Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education (Bibliography).” Accessed July 3, 2009, from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
   Google Scholar
• Ellefson, M. R., R. A. Brinker, V. J. Vernacchio, and C. D. Schunn. 2008. “Design-based Learning for Biology.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 36 (4): 292–298.10.1002/(ISSN)1539-3429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortus, D., R. C. Dershimer, J. S. Krajcik, R. W. Marx, and R. Mamlok-Naaman. 2004. “Design-based Science and Student Learning.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (10): 1081–1110.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & M. Mallery. 2003. Using SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Gil‐White, F. J. 2001. “Are Ethnic Groups Biological ‘‘species’’ to the Human Brain?” Current Anthropology 42: 515–553.10.1086/ca.2001.42.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greaves, E., M. Stanisstreet, E. Boyes, and T. Williams. 1993. “Children’s Ideas about Animal Conservation.” School Science Review 75 (271): 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. 1989. A Perspective on Thinking. American Psychologist 44 (2): 134.10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., and J. L. Moore. 1993. “Situativity and Symbols: Response to Vera and Simon.” Cognitive Science 17 (1): 49–59.10.1207/s15516709cog1701_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigg, W. S., M. A. Lauko, and D. M. Brockway. 2006. The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2005. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, N., L. Rothschild, and D. Ernst. 2000. “Essentialist Beliefs about Social Categories.” British Journal of Social Psychology 39: 113–127.10.1348/014466600164363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, A., Å. Mäkitalo, and R. Säljö. 2009. “Conceptions of Knowledge in Re-search on students’ Understanding of the Greenhouse Effect: Methodological Positions and Their Consequences for Representations of Knowing.” Science Education 93: 978–995.10.1002/sce.v93:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come.” Educational Researcher 33 (7): 14–26.10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Katehi, L., G. Pearson, and M. A. Feder. 2009. Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kattmann, U. 2001. “Aquatics, Flyers, Creepers and Terrestrials - Students’ Conceptions of Animal Classification.” Journal of Biological Education 35 (3): 141–147.10.1080/00219266.2001.9655763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. 2004. “Are Children “Intuitive Theists”? Reasoning about Purpose and Design in Nature.” Psychological Science 15 (5): 295–301.10.1111/psci.2004.15.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. 2002. “Facilitating the Learning of Design Practices: Lessons Learned from an Inquiry into Science Education.” Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 39 (3): 9–40. Accessed April 1, 2009, from Education Research Complete database.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. L. 2006. “Case-based Reasoning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by K. L. Sawyer, 225–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. L., P. J. Camp, D. Crismond, B. Fasse, J. Gray, J. Holbrook, et al. 2003. “Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design (Tm) into Practice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (4): 495–547.10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. L., J. T. Gray, and B. B. Fasse. 2003. “Promoting Transfer through Case-Based Reasoning: Rituals and Practices in Learning by DesignTM Classrooms.” Cognitive Science Quarterly 3 (2): 119–170.
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, C. P., C. M. Cunningham, and A. Lindgren-Streicher 2006. “Elementary Teachers’ Understandings of Engineering and Technology.” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, R., D. Kaye, and H. Mason. 1995. “Pupil Perceptions of Local Habitats.” School Science Review 76 (277): 57–60.
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. 2009. Spring 2009 MCAS Tests: Summary of State Results. Author: Malden. MA.
   Google Scholar
• Natadze, R. G. 1963. “The Mastery of Scientific Concepts in School.” In Educational Psychology in the USSR, edited by B. Simon and J. Simon, 192–197. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council [NRC]. 2004. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council [NRC]. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. 2012. Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved on, 30, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N. 1986. Knowledge as Design. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and D. H. Schunk. 2002. Motivation in Education. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. 1996. “Art and Artifact of Children’s Designing: A Situated Cognition Perspective.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 5 (2): 129–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savvaidou-Kambouropoulou, M., and M. Skoumios. 2011. “Assessing Pupils’ Perceptions of Schoolyard Habitats with the Use of Photoshop Drawings.” International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society 7 (4): 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., M. Rhodes, and S. Gelman. 2009. “Boys Will Be Boys; Cows Will Be Cows: Children’s Essentialist Reasoning about Gender Categories and Animal Species.” Child Development 80 (2): 461–481. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01272.x.10.1111/cdev.2009.80.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowbridge, J. E., and J. J. Mintzes. 1985. “Students’ Alternative Conceptions of Animals and Animal Classification.” School Science and Mathematics 85: 304–316.10.1111/ssm.1985.85.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Trowbridge, J. E., and J. J. Mintzes. 1988. “Alternative Conceptions in Animal Classification: A Cross-Age Study.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 25 (7): 547–571.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunnicliffe, S. D., and M. J. Reiss. 1999a. “Students’ Understanding about Animal Skeletons.” International Journal of Science Education 21: 1187–1200.10.1080/095006999290147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunnicliffe, S. D., and M. J. Reiss. 1999b. “Building a Model of the Environment: How Do Children See Animals?” Journal of Biological Education 33: 142–148.10.1080/00219266.1999.9655654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunnicliffe, S. D., and M. J. Reiss. 2000. “What Sense Do Children Make of Three-dimensional, Life-Sized “Representations” of Animals?” School Science and Mathematics 100 (3): 128–138.10.1111/ssm.2000.100.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, K. B. 2011. “Science through Engineering in Elementary School: Comparing Three Enactments of an Engineering-Design-based Curriculum on the Science of Sound.” ProQuest LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, K. B., and H. S. Lee. 2010. “Elementary Students’ Learning of Materials Science Practices Through Instruction Based on Engineering Design Tasks.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 19 (6): 580–601.10.1007/s10956-010-9225-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendell, K. B., K. G. Connolly, C. G. Wright, L. Jarvin, C. Rogers, and M. Barnett. 2008. Design a Musical Instrument: The Science of Sound. Unpublished science curriculum unit. Accessed from: http://legoengineering.com/curriculumsubmenuteachingresources-142.html.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C., M. Stanisstreet, K. Spall, E. Boyes, and D. Dickson. 2003. “Why Aren’t Secondary Students Interested in Physics?” Physics Education 38 (4): 324–329.10.1088/0031-9120/38/4/306
   Google Scholar
• Woolnough, B. E. 1994. “Why Students Choose Physics, or Reject It? [Electronic Version].” Physics Education 29: 368–374.10.1088/0031-9120/29/6/006
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. G., K. B. Wendell, K. G. Connolly, L. Jarvin, C. Rogers, and M. Barnett. 2008. Design a Model House: The Properties of Materials. Unpublished science curriculum unit. Accessed from http://legoengineering.com/curriculumsubmenuteachingresources-142.html.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, C. F., T. W. Yao, and Y. C. Chiu. 2004. “Alternative Conceptions in Animal Classification Focusing on Ampibians and Reptiles: A Cross-Age Study.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2 (2): 159–174.10.1007/s10763-004-1951-z
   Google Scholar