The impact of the ‘Getting Practical: Improving Practical Work in Science’ continuing professional development programme on teachers’ ideas and practice in science practical work

References

• Abrahams, I., and R. Millar. 2008. “Does Practical Work Really Work? A Study of the Effectiveness of Practical Work as a Teaching and Learning Method in School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (14): 1945–1969.10.1080/09500690701749305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., and M. Reiss. 2012. “Practical Work: Its Effectiveness in Primary and Secondary Schools in England.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (8): 1035–1055.10.1002/tea.v49.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adey, P., N. Landau, G. Hewitt, and J. Hewitt. 2004. The Professional Development of Teachers: Practice and Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• The Association for Science Education (ASE). 2009. Getting Practical: Improving Practical Work in Science. Accessed April 14, 2014. http://www.gettingpractical.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Barak, M., and S. Pearlman-Avnion. 1999. “Who Will Teach an Integrated Program for Science and Technology in Israeli Junior High Schools? A Case Study.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (2): 239–253.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., M. Braund, and F. Lubben. 2010. The Impact of Targeted Continuing Professional Development (CCPD) on Teachers’ Professional Practice in Science: An Evaluation of the Classroom Impact of Courses Provided by the National Network of Science Learning Centres (Nnslcs). Accessed February 11, 2014. https://www.sciencelearningcentres.org.uk/impact-and-research/YorkImpactcasestudies.CPD
   Google Scholar
• Clackson, S. G., and D. K. Wright. 1992. “An Appraisal of Practical Work in Science Education.” School Science Review 74 (266): 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. 2007. “Learning to Teach Science as Inquiry in the Rough and Tumble of Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (4): 613–642.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and P. Youngs. 2002. “Defining ‘Highly Qualified Teachers’: What Does ‘Scientifically-based’ Research Actually Tell Us?” Educational Researcher 31 (9): 13–25.10.3102/0013189X031009013
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2013. Schools, Pupils and Their Characteristics: January 2013. Accessed April 14, 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/schools-pupils-and-their-characteristics-january-2013
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J., A. Buchan, E. Jenkins, P. Laws, and G. Welford. 1996. Investigations by Order: Policy, Curriculum and Science Teachers’ Work under the Education Reform Act. Nafferton: Studies in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., and R. E. Herriott. 1984. “Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Some Design and Implementation Issues.” In Ethnography in Educational Evaluation, edited by D. M. Fetterman, 63–88. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2002. “Professional Development and Teacher Change.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 8 (3): 381–391.10.1080/135406002100000512
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., and B. Showers. 2002. Designing Training and Peer Coaching: Our Needs for Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. 2005. “Models of Continuing Professional Development (CCPD): A Framework for Analysis.” Journal of In-Service Education 31 (2): 235–250.10.1080/13674580500200358
   Google Scholar
• Kind, P. M., V. Kind, A. Hofstein, and J. Wilson. 2011. “Peer Argumentation in the School Science Laboratory – Exploring Effects of Task Features.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (18): 2577–2558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudenko, I., M. Ratcliffe, A. Redmore, and C. Aldridge. 2011. “Impact of National Programme of Professional Development in Science Education.” Research in Science and Technology Education 29 (1): 25–47.10.1080/02635143.2011.543800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavonen, J., J. Jauhiainen, I. T. Koponen, and K. Kurki-Suonio. 2004. “Effect of a Long-term in-service Training Program on Teachers’ Beliefs about the Role of Experiments in Physics Education.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (3): 309–328.10.1080/095006903200007433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., K. Stiles, S. Mundry, N. Love, and P. Hewson. 2010. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lunetta, V. N., A. Hofstein, and M. P. Clough. 2007. “Learning and Teaching in the School Science Laboratory: An Analysis of Research, Theory, and Practice.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 393–441. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, D. P. 1999. “Measuring Instructional Practice: Can Policymakers Trust Survey Data?” Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21 (1): 29–45.10.3102/01623737021001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R. 2011. “Practical Work.” In Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research Has to Say, edited by J. Osborne and J. Dillon, 108–134. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., J.-F. Le Maréchal, and A. Tiberghien. 1999. “‘Mapping’ the Domain: Varieties of Practical Work.” In Practical Work in Science Education – Recent Research Studies, edited by J. Leach and A. Paulsen, 33–59. Roskilde/Dordrecht: Roskilde University Press/Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mushayikwa, E., and F. Lubben. 2009. “Self-directed Professional Development: Hope for Teachers Working in Deprived Environments?” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (3): 375–382.10.1016/j.tate.2008.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., B. J. Fishman, R. Yamaguchi, and L. P. Gallagher. 2007. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation.” American Educational Research Journal 44 (4): 921–958.10.3102/0002831207308221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M., C. Hurren, and M. Stephenson. 2012. Impact Report 2009–10. Accessed February 11, 2014. https://www.sciencelearningcentres.org.uk/impact-and-research/networkimpactreport0910.CPD
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, G., and J. Striley. 1996. “Making Meaning in Classrooms: Social Processes in Small Group Discourse and Scientific Knowledge Building.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33 (8): 839–858.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, P. M., J. A. Marsh, and N. E. Adelman. 1998. Evaluation of NSF’s Statewide Systemic Initiatives Program: The SSIs’ Impact on Classroom Practice. Menlo Park, CA: SRI.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. 1984. “Library Access, Library Use and User Education in Academic Sixth Forms: An Autobiographical Account.” In The Research Process in Educational Settings: Ten Case Studies, edited by R. G. Burgess, 211–234. Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiberghien, A. 2000. “Designing Teaching Situations in the Secondary School.” In Improving Science Education: The Contribution of Research, edited by R. Millar, J. Leach, and J. Osborne, 27–47. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TIMSS. 1997. Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Slough: NFER.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. 1980. “The Conduct of Educational Case Studies: Ethics, Theory and Procedures.” In Rethinking Educational Research, edited by W. B. Dockrell and D. Hamilton, 30–63. Sevenoaks: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar