Learning to apply models of materials while explaining their properties

References

• Andersson, B. 1990. “Pupils’ Conceptions of Matter and Its Transformations (Age 12–16).” Studies in Science Education 18 (1): 53–85.10.1080/03057269008559981
   Google Scholar
• Coe, R. 2014a. “Effect Size Calculator”. Accessed May 7. http://www.cem.org/evidence-based-education/effect-size-calculator#graph.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, R. 2014b. “Effect Size Resource”. Accessed May 7. http://www.cem.org/evidence-based-education/effect-size-resources.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Domin, D. J. 1999. “A Content Analysis of General Chemistry Laboratory Manuals for Evidence of Higher-order Cognitive Tasks.” Journal of Chemical Education 76 (1): 109–111.10.1021/ed076p109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, D. 1999. “Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the Future.” Journal of Chemical Education 76 (4): 548–554.10.1021/ed076p548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. 1991. The Unschooled Mind. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., and D. F. Treagust. 2009. “Introduction: Macro, Submicro and Symbolic Representations and the Relationship between Them: Key Models in Chemical Education.” In Multiple Representations in Chemical Education, edited by John K. Gilbert and David F. Treagust, 1–8. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., and D. F. Treagust. 2002. “The Particulate Nature of Matter: Challenges in Understanding the Microscopic World.” In Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice, edited by John K. Gilbert, Onno De Jong, Rosaria Justi, David F. Treagust, and Jan .H. Van Driel, 189–212. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H. 1991. “Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things Are Seldom What They Seem.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 7: 75–83.10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
   Google Scholar
• Justi, R., J. K. Gilbert, and P. F. M. Ferreira. 2009. “The Application of a ‘Model of Modelling’ to Illustrate the Importance of Meta Visualization in Respect of the Three Types of Representation.” In Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Series: Model and Modeling in Chemical Education, Vol. 4, edited by John K. Gilbert and David F. Treagust, 285–307. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8
   Google Scholar
• Kivinen, O., and T. Piiroinen. 2006. “Toward Pragmatist Methodological Relationalism: From Philosophizing Sociology to Sociologizing Philosophy.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3): 303–329.10.1177/0048393106289794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavonen, J., A. Loukomies, V. Meisalo, A. Ampuja, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, and J. Jansson. 2006. “Materials around us: Metals, plastics and paper.” Helsinki: Economic Information Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtiniemi, K., and L. Turpeenoja. 2010. Mooli 1. Helsinki: Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L. 2014. Accessed May 7. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/29645/5/gupea_2077_29645_5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Margel, H., B.-S. Eylon, and Z. Scherz. 2008. “A Longitudinal Study of Junior High School Students’ Conceptions of the Structure of Materials.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (1): 132–152.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 1981. “Phenomenography – Describing Conceptions of the World around us.” Instructional Science 10: 177–200.10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and S. Booth. 1997. Learning and Awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and A. B. M. Tsui. 2004. Classroom Discourse and the Space of Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, M. R. 2011. “Macro–Meso–Micro Thinking with Structure-Property Relations for Chemistry Education – An Explorative Design-Based Study.” PhD diss., Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, M. R., A. M. W. Bulte, and A Pilot. 2009. “Structure-property Relations between Macro and Micro Representations: Relevant Meso-levels in Authentic Tasks.” In Models and Modeling in Science Education 4: Multiple Representations in Chemical Education, edited by John K. Gilbert, 195–213. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nakhleh, M. B., A. Samarapungavan, and Y. Saglam. 2005. “Middle School Students’ Beliefs about Matter.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (5): 581–612.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner, D. E. 2000. “Explaining Systems: Investigating Middle School Students’ Understanding of Emergent Phenomena.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (8): 784–806.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappoport, L. T., and G. Ashkenazi. 2008. “Connecting Levels of Representation: Emergent versus Submergent Perspective.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (12): 1585–1603.10.1080/09500690701447405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renström, L., B. Andersson, and F. Marton. 1990. “Students’ Conceptions of Matter.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (3): 555–569.10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1998. “Pragmatism”. In Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Craig, London: Routledge. Accessed from http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/N046SECT3.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2009. “Learning at the Symbolic Level.” In Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Series: Model and Modeling in Chemical Education, Vol. 4, edited by John K. Gilbert and David F. Treagust, 75–105. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. 1998. Practical Work in School Science: Which Way Now? London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203267059
   Google Scholar
• White, R. T. 1996. “The Link between the Laboratory and Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 18 (7): 761–774.10.1080/0950069960180703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., and R. Gunstone. 1992. Probing Understanding. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiser, M., and C. L. Smith. 2008. “Learning and Teaching about Matter in Grades K-8: When Should the Atomic-Molecular Theory Be Introduced?” In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, edited by Stella Vosniadou, 205–239. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar