Developing an instrument for assessing students’ concepts of the nature of technology

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Ardies, J., S. de Maeyer, and D. Gijberls. 2013. “Reconstructing the Pupils Attitude towards Technology Survey.” Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 18 (1): 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. 2009. The Nature of Technology: What It is and How It Evolves. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. 2001. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. 1992. “Student Perceptions of Technology and Implications for an Empowering Curriculum.” Research in Science Education 22 (1): 72–80.10.1007/BF02356881
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2010. “Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 70 (1): 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Card, N. A. 2011. Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, S., and S. Bayrakçeken. 2006. “The Effect of a “Science, Technology and Society” Course on Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science.” Research in Science & Technological Education 24 (2): 255–273.
   Google Scholar
• Collier-Reed, B. I. 2008. Pupils’ Experiences of Technology: Exploring Dimensions of Technological Literacy. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller e.K.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C., R. Hadjilouca, and N. Papadouris. 2009. “Students’ Epistemological Awareness concerning the Distinction between Science and Technology.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (2): 143–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. 2003. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiGironimo, N. 2011. “What is Technology? Investigating Student Conceptions about the Nature of Technology.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (10): 1337–1352.10.1080/09500693.2010.495400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M. 2005. “A Systems Approach for Developing Technological Literacy.” Journal of Technology Education 17 (1): 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. 1992. “The Application of Science to Technology.” Research in Science Education 22: 140–148.10.1007/BF02356889
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. 1997. “The Roots of Technology and Science: A Philosophical and Historical View.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7: 13–20.10.1023/A:1008892400827
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. 1999. “The Representation of Science-Technology Relationships in Canadian Physics Textbooks.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (3): 329–347.10.1080/095006999290732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Pérez, D., A. Vilches, I. Fernández, A. Cachapuz, J. Praia, P. Valdés, and J. Salinas. 2005. “Technology as ‘Applied Science’: A Serious Misconception That Reinforces Distorted and Impoverished Views of Science.” Science & Education 14 (3–5): 309–320.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A. K., and N. P. Heath. 1996. “High School Students’ Views about Technology.” Research in Science & Technological Education 14 (2): 153–162.
   Google Scholar
• International Technology Education Association. 1996. Technology for All Americans: A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Technology Education Association. 2000. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Technology Education Association. 2003. Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Students Assessment, Professional Development, and Program Standards. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Technology Education Association. 2005. Impacts of Technology: A Standards-Based High School Model Course Guide. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Technology Education Association. 2006. Technological Literacy for All: A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. 1974. “An Index of Factorial Simplicity.” Psychometrika 39: 31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, J. W., and J. L. Wilcox. 2013. “Engaging Students with the Nature of Science and the Nature of Technology by Modeling the Work of Scientists.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 86 (3): 109–115.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33: 159–174.10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., and D. L. Zeidler. 1987. “Science Teacher’s Conceptions of the Nature of Science: Do They Really Influence Teacher Behavior?” Science Education 71 (5): 721–734.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, P.-Y., and P.-J. Kao. 2014. “Validation of an Instrument to Measure Students’ Motivation and Self-Regulation towards Technology Learning.” Research in Science & Technological Education 32 (2): 79–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and S. Booth. 1997. Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. R. 2011. “Technology Literacy: The Extension of Cognition.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 21 (2): 185–193.10.1007/s10798-010-9113-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2011. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, G., and A. T. Young, eds. 2002. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More about Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raat, J. H., and M. de Vries. 1987. “Technology in Education: Research and Development in the Project “Physics and Technology.” International Journal of Science Education 9 (2): 159–168.10.1080/0950069870090205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M. A. 2007. “Perceptions of Technological Literacy among Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Leaders.” Journal of Technology Education 19 (1): 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Waight, N., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2012. “Nature of Technology: Implications for Design, Development, and Enactment of Technological Tools in School Science Classrooms.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (18): 2875–2905.10.1080/09500693.2012.698763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. T., J. R. Cole, and D. Denton. 2002. “Improving Technological Literacy: The first Step is Understanding What is Meant by ‘Technology’.” Issues in Science and Technology 18 (4): 73–79.
   Google Scholar