Using an adaptive expertise lens to understand the quality of teachers’ classroom implementation of computer-supported complex systems curricula in high school science

References

• Aldunate, R., and M. Nussbaum. 2013. “Teacher Adoption of Technology.” Computers in Human Behavior 29: 519–524.10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, S., and B. Koslowski. 2002. “Adaptive Expertise: Effects of Type of Experience and the Level of Theoretical Understanding It Generates.” Thinking and Reasoning 8 (4): 237–267.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., and M. Scardamalia. 1993. Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise. Illinois: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. 2001. “Learning about and Learning from Expert Teachers.” International Journal of Educational Research 35: 463–482.10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking. 1999. “How Experts Differ from Novices.” In How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, edited by J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, 19–38. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., L. Darling-Hammond, and P. LePage. 2005. “Introduction.” In Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do, edited by L. Darling-Hammond and J. Bransford, 1–39. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, T. 2011. “Theoretical Perspectives, Methodological Approaches, and Trends in the Study of Expertise.” In Expertise in Mathematics Instruction: An International Perspective, edited by Y. Li and G. Kaiser, 9–39. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Colella, V., E. Klopfer, and M. Resnick. 2001. Adventures in Modeling. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, and R. R. Hoffman. 2006. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816796
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, E. Sendurur, and P. Sendurur. 2012. “Teacher Beliefs and Technology Integration Practices: A Critical Relationship.” Computers and Education 59: 423–435.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, C. M., G. G. Duffy, B. S. Faircloth, Y. He, B. Levin, J. Rohr and C. Stein. 2010. “Beyond Knowledge: Exploring Why Some Teachers Are More Thoughtfully Adaptive than Others.” Journal of Teacher Education 61 (1–2): 161–171.10.1177/0022487109347874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M. 2002. The Pursuit of Excellence through Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, A. 1978. Thought and Choice and Chess. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K., L. Darling-Hammond, J. Bransford, D. Berliner, M. Cochran-Smith, M. McDonald, and K. Zeichner. 2005. “How Teachers Learn and Develop.” In Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do, edited by L. Darling-Hammond and J. Bransford, 358–389. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G. 1982. “Cognitive Consequences of Practice in Culture Specific Procedural Skills.” The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 4 (1): 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., and R. Azevedo. 2006. “Understanding Complex Systems: Some Core Challenges.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (1): 53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C., Y. Kafai, and Y. 2011. “Editor’s Note.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 20: 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., and H. May. 2012. “The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34: 435–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, F., and R. Murnane. 2004. Expert Thinking in the New Division of Labor: How Computers Are Creating the Next Job Market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., E. Wood, T. Willoughby, C. Ross, and J. Specht. 2008. “Identifying Discriminating Variables between Teachers Who Fully Integrate Computers and Teachers with Limited Integration.” Computers & Education 51: 1523–1537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2011. Successful K–12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. 2010. Preparing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators: Identifying and Developing Our Nation’s Human Capital. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Lessons from PISA for the United States, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., L. P. Gallagher, and S. Moorthy. 2011. “Preparing Teachers to Design Sequences of Instruction in Earth Systems Science: A Comparison of Three Professional Development Programs.” American Education Research Journal 48 (4): 996–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, M. E. 2001. “Technology Integration Practice as a Function of Pedagogical Expertise.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 33 (4): 413–430.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, H. 2012. NSTA’s Reader’s Guide to a Framework for K-12 Science Education. Expanded Edition. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• The National Academies. 2009. Keck Futures Initiative: Complex Systems: Task Group Summaries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M. 2009. “Distinctive Qualities of Expert Teachers.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 15 (4): 421–439.10.1080/13540600903057179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., and K. Reisman. 2006. “Thinking Like a Wolf, a Sheep or a Firefly: Learning Biology Through Constructing and Testing Computational Theories — An Embodied Modeling Approach.” Cognition and Instruction 24 (2): 171–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. 2008. “An Evolutionary Approach to Harnessing Complex Systems Thinking in the Science and Technology Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (1): 1–32.10.1080/09500690601101672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. A. 2011. “Using Social Network Graphs as Visualization Tools to Influence Peer Selection Decision-Making Strategies to Access Information about Complex Socioscientific Issues.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 20 (4): 549–588.10.1080/10508406.2011.563655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., E. Anderson, J. Koehler-Yom, J. Sheldon, I. Schoenfeld, D. Wendel, H. Scheintaub, E. Klopfer, M. Oztok, and C. Evans 2015. “Design Features for Computer-Supported Complex Systems Learning and Teaching in High School Science Classrooms.” To appear in the proceedings of the International Conference for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar