Exploring pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical capacity for formative assessment through analyses of student answers

References

• Anderson, K. T., S. J. Zuicker, G. Taasoobshirazi, and D. T. Hickey. 2007. “Classroom Discourse as a Tool to Enhance Formative Assessment and Practice in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (14): 1721–1744.10.1080/09500690701217295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydeniz, M., A. Pabuccu, P. S. Cetin, and E. Kaya. 2012. “Argumentation and students' conceptual understanding of properties and behaviors of gases.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 10 (6): 1303–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydeniz, M., and S. A. Southerland. 2012. “A national survey of middle and high school science teachers? responses to standardized testing: Is science being devalued in schools?” Journal of Science Teacher Education 23 (3): 233–257.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. 2011. “Formative Assessment: A Critical Review.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18 (1): 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. A., and A. E. Trauth-Nare. 2009. “Preparing Teachers to Make the Formative Assessment Process Integral to Science Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 20 (5): 475–494.10.1007/s10972-009-9142-y
   Google Scholar
• Chieu, V. M., P. Herbst, and M. Weiss. 2011. “Effect of an Animated Classroom Story Embedded in Online Discussion on Helping Mathematics Teachers Learn to Notice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 20 (4): 589–624.10.1080/10508406.2011.528324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., and J. Osborne. 2010. “Supporting Argumentation through students’ questions: Case Studies in Science Classrooms.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (2): 230–284.10.1080/10508400903530036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. 1988. “The Tension between Theories of Learning and Instruction in Mathematics Education.” Educational Psychologist 23: 87–103.10.1207/s15326985ep2302_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo, S. 2000. “Seeing More than Right and Wrong Answers: Prospective Teachers’ Interpretations of Students’ Mathematical Work.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 3: 155–181.10.1023/A:1009999016764
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., and M. G. Sherin. 2002. “Learning to Notice: Scaffolding New Teachers’ Interpretations of Classroom Interactions.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 10 (4): 571–596.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., and M. G. Sherin. 2008. “Mathematics Teachers’ ‘Learning to Notice’ in the Context of a Video Club.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 244–276.10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. 2012. “Linking a Learning Progression for Natural Selection to Teachers’ Enactment of Formative Assessment.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (9): 1181–1210. doi:10.1002/tea.21054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M, and M. A. Ruiz-Primo (2005, January). Questioning Cycle: Making Students’ Thinking Explicit during Scientific Inquiry. Science Scope, 28 (4), 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., and M. A. Ruiz-Primo. 2008. “Making Students’ Thinking Explicit in Writing and Discussion: An Analysis of Formative Assessment Prompts.” Science Education 92 (5): 799–824. doi:10.1002/sce.20270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. 2007. Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hackenberg, A. 2005. “A model of mathematical learning and caring relations.” For the Learning of Mathematics 25 (1): 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., and E. van Zee (2006). Seeing the Science in Children’s Thinking: Case Studies of Student Inquiry in Physical Science. ( Book and DVD) Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, E., and M. T. McMahon. 2005. “Interpreting Middle School Students’ Proportional Reasoning Strategies: Observations from Pre-service Teachers.” School Science and Mathematics 105 (2): 88–105.10.1111/ssm.2005.105.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, V. R., L. L. C. Lamb, and R. A. Philipp. 2010. “Professional Noticing of Children’s Mathematical Thinking.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 41: 169–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, V. R., L. L. C. Lamb, R. A. Philipp, and B. P. Schappelle. 2011. “Deciding how to respond on the basis of children's understandings.” In Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes, edited by M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs and R. A. Philipp, 97–116. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, D. 2012. “Misconceptions about ‘Misconceptions’: Preservice Secondary Science Teachers’ Views on the Value and Role of Student Ideas.” Science Education 96: 927–959. doi:10.1002/sce.21022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D., D. Hammer, and J. Coffey. 2009. “Novice Teachers' Attention to Student Thinking.” Journal of Teacher Education 60: 142–154.10.1177/0022487108330245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustick, D. 2010. “The Priority of the Question: Focus Questions for Sustained Reasoning in Science.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 21 (5): 495–511.10.1007/s10972-010-9192-1
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 2002. Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing. London: Routledge-Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J., J. Venable, and D. Varier. 2013. “Studies of the Effect of Formative Assessment on Student Achievement: So Much More is Needed.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 18 (1–4): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 2001. "Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Committee on Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards." In edited by J. Myron Atkin, Paul Black, and Janet Coffey. Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 2007. "Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade." In edited by Richard A. Duschl, Heidi A. Schweingruber, and Andrew W. Shouse. Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 2011. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, V. 2006. “Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” conception of formative assessment.” Journal of Teacher Education 57: 247–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ, R., J. Coffey, D. Hammer, and P. Hutchison. 2009. “Making Classroom Assessment More Accountable to Scientific Reasoning: A Case for Attending to Mechanistic Thinking.” Science Education 93 (5): 875–891.10.1002/sce.v93:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/sti_outlook-2014-en.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., and S. Han. 2004. “Teacher Learning in the Context of a Video Club.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20: 163–183.10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J. 2013. “How Pre-service Teachers Interpret and Respond to Student Errors: Ratio and Proportion in Similar Rectangles.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 84 (1): 49–70.10.1007/s10649-013-9475-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J., and S. Crespo. 2009. “Prospective Teachers’ Reasoning about Students’ Non-traditional Strategies When Dividing Fractions.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 12 (4): 236–261.
   Google Scholar
• Talanquer, V., D. Tomanek, and H. Bolger (2014, April). Prospective Science Teachers’ Inferences about Student Understanding: Formative Assessment of Student Written Work. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Pittsburg, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Tomanek, D., V. Talanquer, and I. Novodvorsky. 2008. “What Do Science Teachers Consider When Selective Formative Assessment Tasks?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (10): 1113–1130.10.1002/tea.v45:10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland, I., R. Hudson, and J. Amador. 2014. “Pre-service Formative Assessment Interviews: The Development of Competent Questioning.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 12 (2): 329–352.10.1007/s10763-013-9402-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., C. Lee, C. Harrison, and P. J. Black. 2004. “Teachers Developing Assessment for Learning: Impact on Student Achievement.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 11 (1): 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., J. Thompson, and M. Braaten. 2011. “Ambitious Pedagogy by Novice Teachers? Who Benefits from Tool-supported Collaborative Inquiry into Practice and Why.” Teachers College Record 113 (7): 1311–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar